-
Booth, A.: How consistent is MEDLINE indexing? (1990)
0.01
0.007242508 = product of:
0.028970033 = sum of:
0.028970033 = product of:
0.07242508 = sum of:
0.03703476 = weight(_text_:28 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03703476 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.035390325 = weight(_text_:22 in 3510) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035390325 = score(doc=3510,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3510, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3510)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- A known-item search for abstracts to previously retrieved references revealed that 2 documents from the same annual volume had been indexed twice. Working from the premise that the whole volume may have been double-indexed, a search strategy was devised that limited the journal code to the year in question. 57 references were retrieved, comprising 28 pairs of duplicates plus a citation for the whole volume. Author, title, source and descriptors were requested off-line and the citations were paired with their duplicates. The 4 categories of descriptors-major descriptors, minor descriptors, subheadings and check-tags-were compared for depth and consistency of indexing and lessons that might be learnt from the study are discussed.
- Source
- Health libraries review. 7(1990) no.1, S.22-26
-
Iivonen, M.; Kivimäki, K.: Common entities and missing properties : similarities and differences in the indexing of concepts (1998)
0.01
0.0062353997 = product of:
0.024941599 = sum of:
0.024941599 = product of:
0.062354 = sum of:
0.031744078 = weight(_text_:28 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031744078 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
0.03060992 = weight(_text_:29 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03060992 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
24. 2.1999 21:29:51
-
Hudon, M.: Conceptual compatibility in controlled language tools used to index and access the content of moving image collections (2004)
0.01
0.0062353997 = product of:
0.024941599 = sum of:
0.024941599 = product of:
0.062354 = sum of:
0.031744078 = weight(_text_:28 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031744078 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.03060992 = weight(_text_:29 in 2655) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03060992 = score(doc=2655,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2655, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2655)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
29. 8.2004 16:17:19
-
Shoham, S.; Kedar, R.: ¬The subject cataloging of monographs with the use of keywords (2001)
0.00
0.0041569336 = product of:
0.016627735 = sum of:
0.016627735 = product of:
0.041569334 = sum of:
0.02116272 = weight(_text_:28 in 5442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02116272 = score(doc=5442,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 5442, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5442)
0.020406613 = weight(_text_:29 in 5442) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020406613 = score(doc=5442,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 5442, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5442)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 28. 7.2006 20:15:08
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 33(2001) no.2, S.29-54
-
Prasher, R.G.: Evaluation of indexing system (1989)
0.00
0.002116272 = product of:
0.008465088 = sum of:
0.008465088 = product of:
0.04232544 = sum of:
0.04232544 = weight(_text_:28 in 4998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04232544 = score(doc=4998,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 4998, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4998)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Herald of library science. 28(1989) no.3, S.157-65
-
Ladewig, C.; Rieger, M.: Ähnlichkeitsmessung mit und ohne aspektische Indexierung (1998)
0.00
0.0020406614 = product of:
0.008162646 = sum of:
0.008162646 = product of:
0.040813226 = sum of:
0.040813226 = weight(_text_:29 in 2526) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040813226 = score(doc=2526,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2526, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2526)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 4. 1.1999 19:31:29
-
Veenema, F.: To index or not to index (1996)
0.00
0.0020223043 = product of:
0.008089217 = sum of:
0.008089217 = product of:
0.040446084 = sum of:
0.040446084 = weight(_text_:22 in 7247) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040446084 = score(doc=7247,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7247, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7247)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Canadian journal of information and library science. 21(1996) no.2, S.1-22
-
Neshat, N.; Horri, A.: ¬A study of subject indexing consistency between the National Library of Iran and Humanities Libraries in the area of Iranian studies (2006)
0.00
0.0017695163 = product of:
0.007078065 = sum of:
0.007078065 = product of:
0.035390325 = sum of:
0.035390325 = weight(_text_:22 in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035390325 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 4. 1.2007 10:22:26
-
Kedar, R.; Shoham, S.: ¬The subject cataloging of monographs with the use of a thesaurus (2003)
0.00
0.0015872039 = product of:
0.0063488157 = sum of:
0.0063488157 = product of:
0.031744078 = sum of:
0.031744078 = weight(_text_:28 in 2700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031744078 = score(doc=2700,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2700, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2700)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
-
Losee, R.: ¬A performance model of the length and number of subject headings and index phrases (2004)
0.00
0.0015872039 = product of:
0.0063488157 = sum of:
0.0063488157 = product of:
0.031744078 = sum of:
0.031744078 = weight(_text_:28 in 3725) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031744078 = score(doc=3725,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13367462 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 3725, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3725)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
-
Taniguchi, S.: Recording evidence in bibliographic records and descriptive metadata (2005)
0.00
0.0015167282 = product of:
0.006066913 = sum of:
0.006066913 = product of:
0.030334564 = sum of:
0.030334564 = weight(_text_:22 in 3565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030334564 = score(doc=3565,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3565, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3565)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 18. 6.2005 13:16:22
-
Leininger, K.: Interindexer consistency in PsychINFO (2000)
0.00
0.0015167282 = product of:
0.006066913 = sum of:
0.006066913 = product of:
0.030334564 = sum of:
0.030334564 = weight(_text_:22 in 2552) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030334564 = score(doc=2552,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2552, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2552)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Huffman, G.D.; Vital, D.A.; Bivins, R.G.: Generating indices with lexical association methods : term uniqueness (1990)
0.00
0.0012754134 = product of:
0.0051016537 = sum of:
0.0051016537 = product of:
0.025508268 = sum of:
0.025508268 = weight(_text_:29 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025508268 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 23.11.1995 11:29:46
-
Ansari, M.: Matching between assigned descriptors and title keywords in medical theses (2005)
0.00
0.0012754134 = product of:
0.0051016537 = sum of:
0.0051016537 = product of:
0.025508268 = sum of:
0.025508268 = weight(_text_:29 in 4739) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025508268 = score(doc=4739,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4739, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4739)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 3.12.2005 19:38:29
-
Lee, D.H.; Schleyer, T.: Social tagging is no substitute for controlled indexing : a comparison of Medical Subject Headings and CiteULike tags assigned to 231,388 papers (2012)
0.00
0.0012754134 = product of:
0.0051016537 = sum of:
0.0051016537 = product of:
0.025508268 = sum of:
0.025508268 = weight(_text_:29 in 383) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025508268 = score(doc=383,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13126493 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 383, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=383)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 26. 8.2012 14:29:37
-
Subrahmanyam, B.: Library of Congress Classification numbers : issues of consistency and their implications for union catalogs (2006)
0.00
0.0012639402 = product of:
0.005055761 = sum of:
0.005055761 = product of:
0.025278805 = sum of:
0.025278805 = weight(_text_:22 in 5784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025278805 = score(doc=5784,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5784, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5784)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
White, H.; Willis, C.; Greenberg, J.: HIVEing : the effect of a semantic web technology on inter-indexer consistency (2014)
0.00
0.0012639402 = product of:
0.005055761 = sum of:
0.005055761 = product of:
0.025278805 = sum of:
0.025278805 = weight(_text_:22 in 1781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025278805 = score(doc=1781,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13067318 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03731569 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1781, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1781)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the effect of the Helping Interdisciplinary Vocabulary Engineering (HIVE) system on the inter-indexer consistency of information professionals when assigning keywords to a scientific abstract. This study examined first, the inter-indexer consistency of potential HIVE users; second, the impact HIVE had on consistency; and third, challenges associated with using HIVE. Design/methodology/approach - A within-subjects quasi-experimental research design was used for this study. Data were collected using a task-scenario based questionnaire. Analysis was performed on consistency results using Hooper's and Rolling's inter-indexer consistency measures. A series of t-tests was used to judge the significance between consistency measure results. Findings - Results suggest that HIVE improves inter-indexing consistency. Working with HIVE increased consistency rates by 22 percent (Rolling's) and 25 percent (Hooper's) when selecting relevant terms from all vocabularies. A statistically significant difference exists between the assignment of free-text keywords and machine-aided keywords. Issues with homographs, disambiguation, vocabulary choice, and document structure were all identified as potential challenges. Research limitations/implications - Research limitations for this study can be found in the small number of vocabularies used for the study. Future research will include implementing HIVE into the Dryad Repository and studying its application in a repository system. Originality/value - This paper showcases several features used in HIVE system. By using traditional consistency measures to evaluate a semantic web technology, this paper emphasizes the link between traditional indexing and next generation machine-aided indexing (MAI) tools.
