-
Leydesdorff, L.; Shin, J.C.: How to evaluate universities in terms of their relative citation impacts : fractional counting of citations and the normalization of differences among disciplines (2011)
0.01
0.014134051 = product of:
0.084804304 = sum of:
0.084804304 = weight(_text_:ranking in 4466) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084804304 = score(doc=4466,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.4183332 = fieldWeight in 4466, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4466)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Fractional counting of citations can improve on ranking of multidisciplinary research units (such as universities) by normalizing the differences among fields of science in terms of differences in citation behavior. Furthermore, normalization in terms of citing papers abolishes the unsolved questions in scientometrics about the delineation of fields of science in terms of journals and normalization when comparing among different (sets of) journals. Using publication and citation data of seven Korean research universities, we demonstrate the advantages and the differences in the rankings, explain the possible statistics, and suggest ways to visualize the differences in (citing) audiences in terms of a network.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Moya-Anegón, F. de; Nooy, W. de: Aggregated journal-journal citation relations in scopus and web of science matched and compared in terms of networks, maps, and interactive overlays (2016)
0.01
0.010095751 = product of:
0.0605745 = sum of:
0.0605745 = weight(_text_:ranking in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0605745 = score(doc=3090,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.29880944 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- We compare the network of aggregated journal-journal citation relations provided by the Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2012 of the Science Citation Index (SCI) and Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) with similar data based on Scopus 2012. First, global and overlay maps were developed for the 2 sets separately. Using fuzzy-string matching and ISSN numbers, we were able to match 10,524 journal names between the 2 sets: 96.4% of the 10,936 journals contained in JCR, or 51.2% of the 20,554 journals covered by Scopus. Network analysis was pursued on the set of journals shared between the 2 databases and the 2 sets of unique journals. Citations among the shared journals are more comprehensively covered in JCR than in Scopus, so the network in JCR is denser and more connected than in Scopus. The ranking of shared journals in terms of indegree (i.e., numbers of citing journals) or total citations is similar in both databases overall (Spearman rank correlation ??>?0.97), but some individual journals rank very differently. Journals that are unique to Scopus seem to be less important-they are citing shared journals rather than being cited by them-but the humanities are covered better in Scopus than in JCR.
-
Bauer, J.; Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: Highly cited papers in Library and Information Science (LIS) : authors, institutions, and network structures (2016)
0.01
0.010095751 = product of:
0.0605745 = sum of:
0.0605745 = weight(_text_:ranking in 3231) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0605745 = score(doc=3231,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.29880944 = fieldWeight in 3231, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3231)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- As a follow-up to the highly cited authors list published by Thomson Reuters in June 2014, we analyzed the top 1% most frequently cited papers published between 2002 and 2012 included in the Web of Science (WoS) subject category "Information Science & Library Science." In all, 798 authors contributed to 305 top 1% publications; these authors were employed at 275 institutions. The authors at Harvard University contributed the largest number of papers, when the addresses are whole-number counted. However, Leiden University leads the ranking if fractional counting is used. Twenty-three of the 798 authors were also listed as most highly cited authors by Thomson Reuters in June 2014 (http://highlycited.com/). Twelve of these 23 authors were involved in publishing 4 or more of the 305 papers under study. Analysis of coauthorship relations among the 798 highly cited scientists shows that coauthorships are based on common interests in a specific topic. Three topics were important between 2002 and 2012: (a) collection and exploitation of information in clinical practices; (b) use of the Internet in public communication and commerce; and (c) scientometrics.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Johnson, M.W.; Ivanova, I.: Toward a calculus of redundancy : signification, codification, and anticipation in cultural evolution (2018)
0.01
0.005667552 = product of:
0.03400531 = sum of:
0.03400531 = product of:
0.051007964 = sum of:
0.025619213 = weight(_text_:29 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025619213 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
0.025388751 = weight(_text_:22 in 4463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025388751 = score(doc=4463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4463)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 9.2018 11:22:09
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.; Wagner, C.S.: ¬The relative influences of government funding and international collaboration on citation impact (2019)
0.00
0.0016925833 = product of:
0.0101555 = sum of:
0.0101555 = product of:
0.030466499 = sum of:
0.030466499 = weight(_text_:22 in 4681) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030466499 = score(doc=4681,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4681, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4681)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 8. 1.2019 18:22:45
-
Chen, C.; Leydesdorff, L.: Patterns of connections and movements in dual-map overlays : a new method of publication portfolio analysis (2014)
0.00
0.0014232898 = product of:
0.008539738 = sum of:
0.008539738 = product of:
0.025619213 = sum of:
0.025619213 = weight(_text_:29 in 1200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025619213 = score(doc=1200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1200)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 1.2014 16:38:28
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Ivanova, I.A.: Mutual redundancies in interhuman communication systems : steps toward a calculus of processing meaning (2014)
0.00
0.0014232898 = product of:
0.008539738 = sum of:
0.008539738 = product of:
0.025619213 = sum of:
0.025619213 = weight(_text_:29 in 1211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025619213 = score(doc=1211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1211)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 1.2014 16:44:54
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.00
0.0014104862 = product of:
0.008462917 = sum of:
0.008462917 = product of:
0.025388751 = sum of:
0.025388751 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025388751 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
-
Hellsten, I.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction of interdisciplinarity : the development of the knowledge base and programmatic focus of the journal Climatic Change, 1977-2013 (2016)
0.00
0.0014104862 = product of:
0.008462917 = sum of:
0.008462917 = product of:
0.025388751 = sum of:
0.025388751 = weight(_text_:22 in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025388751 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 24. 8.2016 17:53:22
