Search (4497 results, page 1 of 225)

  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.35
    0.34722906 = product of:
      0.6944581 = sum of:
        0.09920831 = product of:
          0.29762492 = sum of:
            0.29762492 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.29762492 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.29762492 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29762492 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.29762492 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29762492 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.32
    0.32317764 = product of:
      0.48476642 = sum of:
        0.03968332 = product of:
          0.11904996 = sum of:
            0.11904996 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11904996 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16836207 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16836207 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.16836207 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16836207 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.108358964 = weight(_text_:ranking in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.108358964 = score(doc=5820,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.5345266 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Abstract
    The successes of information retrieval (IR) in recent decades were built upon bag-of-words representations. Effective as it is, bag-of-words is only a shallow text understanding; there is a limited amount of information for document ranking in the word space. This dissertation goes beyond words and builds knowledge based text representations, which embed the external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases, and provide richer and structured evidence for more advanced information retrieval systems. This thesis research first builds query representations with entities associated with the query. Entities' descriptions are used by query expansion techniques that enrich the query with explanation terms. Then we present a general framework that represents a query with entities that appear in the query, are retrieved by the query, or frequently show up in the top retrieved documents. A latent space model is developed to jointly learn the connections from query to entities and the ranking of documents, modeling the external evidence from knowledge bases and internal ranking features cooperatively. To further improve the quality of relevant entities, a defining factor of our query representations, we introduce learning to rank to entity search and retrieve better entities from knowledge bases. In the document representation part, this thesis research also moves one step forward with a bag-of-entities model, in which documents are represented by their automatic entity annotations, and the ranking is performed in the entity space.
    This proposal includes plans to improve the quality of relevant entities with a co-learning framework that learns from both entity labels and document labels. We also plan to develop a hybrid ranking system that combines word based and entity based representations together with their uncertainties considered. At last, we plan to enrich the text representations with connections between entities. We propose several ways to infer entity graph representations for texts, and to rank documents using their structure representations. This dissertation overcomes the limitation of word based representations with external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases. We believe this thesis research is a solid start towards the new generation of intelligent, semantic, and structured information retrieval.
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
  3. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.28
    0.28461504 = product of:
      0.42692253 = sum of:
        0.05952498 = product of:
          0.17857493 = sum of:
            0.17857493 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17857493 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.17857493 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17857493 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.17857493 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17857493 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.010247685 = product of:
          0.030743055 = sum of:
            0.030743055 = weight(_text_:29 in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030743055 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2009 21:15:48
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  4. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.28
    0.2845536 = product of:
      0.42683035 = sum of:
        0.05952498 = product of:
          0.17857493 = sum of:
            0.17857493 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17857493 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.17857493 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17857493 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.17857493 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17857493 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.0101555 = product of:
          0.030466499 = sum of:
            0.030466499 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030466499 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(4/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  5. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.28
    0.2823056 = product of:
      0.5646112 = sum of:
        0.05952498 = product of:
          0.17857493 = sum of:
            0.17857493 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17857493 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.2525431 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2525431 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.2525431 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2525431 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  6. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.28
    0.27778324 = product of:
      0.5555665 = sum of:
        0.07936664 = product of:
          0.23809992 = sum of:
            0.23809992 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.23809992 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.23809992 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23809992 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.23809992 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.23809992 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  7. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.24
    0.24306035 = product of:
      0.4861207 = sum of:
        0.06944582 = product of:
          0.20833744 = sum of:
            0.20833744 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20833744 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.20833744 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20833744 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.20833744 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20833744 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  8. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.21
    0.20833743 = product of:
      0.41667485 = sum of:
        0.05952498 = product of:
          0.17857493 = sum of:
            0.17857493 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17857493 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.17857493 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17857493 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.17857493 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17857493 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  9. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.21
    0.20833743 = product of:
      0.41667485 = sum of:
        0.05952498 = product of:
          0.17857493 = sum of:
            0.17857493 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17857493 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.17857493 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17857493 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.17857493 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17857493 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  10. Huo, W.: Automatic multi-word term extraction and its application to Web-page summarization (2012) 0.18
    0.18365268 = product of:
      0.36730537 = sum of:
        0.17857493 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17857493 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.17857493 = weight(_text_:2f in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17857493 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.0101555 = product of:
          0.030466499 = sum of:
            0.030466499 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030466499 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    A Thesis presented to The University of Guelph In partial fulfilment of requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science. Vgl. Unter: http://www.inf.ufrgs.br%2F~ceramisch%2Fdownload_files%2Fpublications%2F2009%2Fp01.pdf.
    Date
    10. 1.2013 19:22:47
  11. Farazi, M.: Faceted lightweight ontologies : a formalization and some experiments (2010) 0.17
    0.17361453 = product of:
      0.34722906 = sum of:
        0.049604155 = product of:
          0.14881246 = sum of:
            0.14881246 = weight(_text_:3a in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14881246 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14881246 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14881246 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
        0.14881246 = weight(_text_:2f in 4997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14881246 = score(doc=4997,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4997, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4997)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    PhD Dissertation at International Doctorate School in Information and Communication Technology. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fcore.ac.uk%2Fdownload%2Fpdf%2F150083013.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2n-qisNagpyT0lli_6QbAQ.
  12. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.17
    0.17361453 = product of:
      0.34722906 = sum of:
        0.049604155 = product of:
          0.14881246 = sum of:
            0.14881246 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14881246 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14881246 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14881246 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.14881246 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14881246 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  13. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.14
    0.13889162 = product of:
      0.27778324 = sum of:
        0.03968332 = product of:
          0.11904996 = sum of:
            0.11904996 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11904996 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.11904996 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11904996 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.11904996 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11904996 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3177388 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
  14. Dobrota, M.; Dobrota, M.: ARWU ranking uncertainty and sensitivity : what if the award factor was Excluded? (2016) 0.08
    0.080006525 = product of:
      0.24001957 = sum of:
        0.22986408 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22986408 = score(doc=2652,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            1.1339021 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
        0.0101555 = product of:
          0.030466499 = sum of:
            0.030466499 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030466499 = score(doc=2652,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) uses six university performance indicators, including "Alumni" and "Awards"-the number of alumni and staff winning Nobel Prizes and Fields Medals. These two indicators raised doubts about the reliability of this ranking method because they are difficult to cope with. Recently, a newsletter was published featuring a reduced ARWU ranking list, leaving out Nobel Prize and Fields Medal indicators: the Alternative Ranking (Excluding Award Factor). We used uncertainty and sensitivity analyses to examine and compare the stability and confidence of the official ARWU ranking and the Alternative Ranking. The results indicate that if the ARWU ranking is reduced to the 4-indicator Alternative Ranking, it shows greater certainty and stability in ranking universities.
    Date
    22. 1.2016 14:40:53
  15. Kaszkiel, M.; Zobel, J.: Effective ranking with arbitrary passages (2001) 0.07
    0.071948126 = product of:
      0.21584436 = sum of:
        0.20559667 = weight(_text_:ranking in 5764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20559667 = score(doc=5764,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            1.0141928 = fieldWeight in 5764, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5764)
        0.010247685 = product of:
          0.030743055 = sum of:
            0.030743055 = weight(_text_:29 in 5764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030743055 = score(doc=5764,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5764, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5764)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Text retrieval systems store a great variety of documents, from abstracts, newspaper articles, and Web pages to journal articles, books, court transcripts, and legislation. Collections of diverse types of documents expose shortcomings in current approaches to ranking. Use of short fragments of documents, called passages, instead of whole documents can overcome these shortcomings: passage ranking provides convenient units of text to return to the user, can avoid the difficulties of comparing documents of different length, and enables identification of short blocks of relevant material among otherwise irrelevant text. In this article, we compare several kinds of passage in an extensive series of experiments. We introduce a new type of passage, overlapping fragments of either fixed or variable length. We show that ranking with these arbitrary passages gives substantial improvements in retrieval effectiveness over traditional document ranking schemes, particularly for queries on collections of long documents. Ranking with arbitrary passages shows consistent improvements compared to ranking with whole documents, and to ranking with previous passage types that depend on document structure or topic shifts in documents
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:00:39
  16. Back, J.: ¬An evaluation of relevancy ranking techniques used by Internet search engines (2000) 0.06
    0.06443493 = product of:
      0.19330478 = sum of:
        0.16960861 = weight(_text_:ranking in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16960861 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.8366664 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
        0.023696167 = product of:
          0.0710885 = sum of:
            0.0710885 = weight(_text_:22 in 3445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0710885 = score(doc=3445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3445)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    25. 8.2005 17:42:22
  17. Vechtomova, O.; Karamuftuoglu, M.: Lexical cohesion and term proximity in document ranking (2008) 0.06
    0.060510855 = product of:
      0.18153256 = sum of:
        0.16786899 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16786899 = score(doc=2101,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.828085 = fieldWeight in 2101, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2101)
        0.013663581 = product of:
          0.04099074 = sum of:
            0.04099074 = weight(_text_:29 in 2101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04099074 = score(doc=2101,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2101, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2101)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    We demonstrate effective new methods of document ranking based on lexical cohesive relationships between query terms. The proposed methods rely solely on the lexical relationships between original query terms, and do not involve query expansion or relevance feedback. Two types of lexical cohesive relationship information between query terms are used in document ranking: short-distance collocation relationship between query terms, and long-distance relationship, determined by the collocation of query terms with other words. The methods are evaluated on TREC corpora, and show improvements over baseline systems.
    Date
    1. 8.2008 12:29:05
  18. Berry, M.W.; Browne, M.: Understanding search engines : mathematical modeling and text retrieval (2005) 0.06
    0.05814619 = product of:
      0.17443857 = sum of:
        0.105906345 = weight(_text_:suchmaschine in 7) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105906345 = score(doc=7,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.21191008 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.4997702 = fieldWeight in 7, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7)
        0.06853223 = weight(_text_:ranking in 7) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06853223 = score(doc=7,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.33806428 = fieldWeight in 7, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Introduction Document File Preparation - Manual Indexing - Information Extraction - Vector Space Modeling - Matrix Decompositions - Query Representations - Ranking and Relevance Feedback - Searching by Link Structure - User Interface - Book Format Document File Preparation Document Purification and Analysis - Text Formatting - Validation - Manual Indexing - Automatic Indexing - Item Normalization - Inverted File Structures - Document File - Dictionary List - Inversion List - Other File Structures Vector Space Models Construction - Term-by-Document Matrices - Simple Query Matching - Design Issues - Term Weighting - Sparse Matrix Storage - Low-Rank Approximations Matrix Decompositions QR Factorization - Singular Value Decomposition - Low-Rank Approximations - Query Matching - Software - Semidiscrete Decomposition - Updating Techniques Query Management Query Binding - Types of Queries - Boolean Queries - Natural Language Queries - Thesaurus Queries - Fuzzy Queries - Term Searches - Probabilistic Queries Ranking and Relevance Feedback Performance Evaluation - Precision - Recall - Average Precision - Genetic Algorithms - Relevance Feedback Searching by Link Structure HITS Method - HITS Implementation - HITS Summary - PageRank Method - PageRank Adjustments - PageRank Implementation - PageRank Summary User Interface Considerations General Guidelines - Search Engine Interfaces - Form Fill-in - Display Considerations - Progress Indication - No Penalties for Error - Results - Test and Retest - Final Considerations Further Reading
    RSWK
    Suchmaschine / Information Retrieval
    Suchmaschine / Information Retrieval / Mathematisches Modell (HEBIS)
    Subject
    Suchmaschine / Information Retrieval
    Suchmaschine / Information Retrieval / Mathematisches Modell (HEBIS)
  19. Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991) 0.05
    0.05044257 = product of:
      0.1513277 = sum of:
        0.0969192 = weight(_text_:ranking in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0969192 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.47809508 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
        0.05440849 = product of:
          0.081612736 = sum of:
            0.04099074 = weight(_text_:29 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04099074 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
            0.040622 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040622 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.1, S.29-41
  20. Wong, W.Y.P.; Lee, D.L.: Implementation of partial document ranking using inverted files (1993) 0.05
    0.050242677 = product of:
      0.15072803 = sum of:
        0.13706446 = weight(_text_:ranking in 6539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13706446 = score(doc=6539,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.67612857 = fieldWeight in 6539, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6539)
        0.013663581 = product of:
          0.04099074 = sum of:
            0.04099074 = weight(_text_:29 in 6539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04099074 = score(doc=6539,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 6539, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6539)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the implementations of document ranking based on inverted files. Studies three heuristic methods for implementing the term frequency X inverse document frequency weighting strategy. The basic idea of the heuristic methods is to process the query terms in an order so that as many top documents as possible can be identified without processing all of the query terms. The heuristics were evaluated and compared. The results show improved performance. Two methods for estimating the retrieval accuracy were studied. All experiments were based on four test collection made available with the SMART system
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.5, S.647-669

Types

  • a 3951
  • m 327
  • s 176
  • el 162
  • b 34
  • r 21
  • i 19
  • x 12
  • p 6
  • n 3
  • ? 1
  • d 1
  • h 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications