Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Referieren"
  1. Wan, X.; Yang, J.; Xiao, J.: Incorporating cross-document relationships between sentences for single document summarizations (2006) 0.04
    0.037651278 = product of:
      0.112953834 = sum of:
        0.102798335 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102798335 = score(doc=2421,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.5070964 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
        0.0101555 = product of:
          0.030466499 = sum of:
            0.030466499 = weight(_text_:22 in 2421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030466499 = score(doc=2421,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2421, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2421)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Graph-based ranking algorithms have recently been proposed for single document summarizations and such algorithms evaluate the importance of a sentence by making use of the relationships between sentences in the document in a recursive way. In this paper, we investigate using other related or relevant documents to improve summarization of one single document based on the graph-based ranking algorithm. In addition to the within-document relationships between sentences in the specified document, the cross-document relationships between sentences in different documents are also taken into account in the proposed approach. We evaluate the performance of the proposed approach on DUC 2002 data with the ROUGE metric and results demonstrate that the cross-document relationships between sentences in different but related documents can significantly improve the performance of single document summarization.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006
  2. Kuhlen, R.: Volltextanalyse zum Zwecke des Abstracting (1983) 0.00
    0.0039852113 = product of:
      0.023911266 = sum of:
        0.023911266 = product of:
          0.071733795 = sum of:
            0.071733795 = weight(_text_:29 in 447) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071733795 = score(doc=447,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 447, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=447)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  3. Gerdel, W.: Anforderungen an Referier Regeln aus Benutzersicht (1983) 0.00
    0.0039852113 = product of:
      0.023911266 = sum of:
        0.023911266 = product of:
          0.071733795 = sum of:
            0.071733795 = weight(_text_:29 in 448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071733795 = score(doc=448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=448)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  4. Eimermacher, M.: Textverstehen im Projekt KIT : kognitive Verfahren zur Informationsextraktion und Zusammenfassung aus Texten (1983) 0.00
    0.0039852113 = product of:
      0.023911266 = sum of:
        0.023911266 = product of:
          0.071733795 = sum of:
            0.071733795 = weight(_text_:29 in 449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071733795 = score(doc=449,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 449, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=449)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  5. Hahn, U.; Reimer, U.: Informationslinguistische Konzepte der Volltextverarbeitung in TOPIC (1983) 0.00
    0.0039852113 = product of:
      0.023911266 = sum of:
        0.023911266 = product of:
          0.071733795 = sum of:
            0.071733795 = weight(_text_:29 in 450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071733795 = score(doc=450,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 450, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=450)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  6. Koltay, T.: ¬A hypertext tutorial on abstracting for library science students (1995) 0.00
    0.0028209724 = product of:
      0.016925834 = sum of:
        0.016925834 = product of:
          0.050777502 = sum of:
            0.050777502 = weight(_text_:22 in 3061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050777502 = score(doc=3061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3061)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:22:06
  7. Hartley, J.: Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals? (1997) 0.00
    0.0022772634 = product of:
      0.013663581 = sum of:
        0.013663581 = product of:
          0.04099074 = sum of:
            0.04099074 = weight(_text_:29 in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04099074 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    25. 2.1997 10:29:16
  8. Palais, E.S.: Abstracting for reference librarians (1988) 0.00
    0.0022567778 = product of:
      0.013540667 = sum of:
        0.013540667 = product of:
          0.040622 = sum of:
            0.040622 = weight(_text_:22 in 2832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040622 = score(doc=2832,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2832, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2832)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Reference librarian. 1988, no.22, S.297-308
  9. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.00
    0.0016925833 = product of:
      0.0101555 = sum of:
        0.0101555 = product of:
          0.030466499 = sum of:
            0.030466499 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030466499 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37
  10. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.00
    0.0016925833 = product of:
      0.0101555 = sum of:
        0.0101555 = product of:
          0.030466499 = sum of:
            0.030466499 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030466499 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
  11. Alonso, M.I.; Fernández, L.M.M.: Perspectives of studies on document abstracting : towards an integrated view of models and theoretical approaches (2010) 0.00
    0.0014232898 = product of:
      0.008539738 = sum of:
        0.008539738 = product of:
          0.025619213 = sum of:
            0.025619213 = weight(_text_:29 in 3959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025619213 = score(doc=3959,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3959, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3959)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2010 13:11:19
  12. Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.00
    0.0014104862 = product of:
      0.008462917 = sum of:
        0.008462917 = product of:
          0.025388751 = sum of:
            0.025388751 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025388751 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356