Search (31 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012) 0.03
    0.03137607 = product of:
      0.09412821 = sum of:
        0.085665286 = weight(_text_:ranking in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085665286 = score(doc=515,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.42258036 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
        0.008462917 = product of:
          0.025388751 = sum of:
            0.025388751 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025388751 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    A new collaborative approach in information organization and sharing has recently arisen, known as collaborative tagging or social indexing. A key element of collaborative tagging is the concept of collective intelligence (CI), which is a shared intelligence among all participants. This research investigates the phenomenon of social tagging in the context of CI with the aim to serve as a stepping-stone towards the mining of truly valuable social tags for web resources. This study focuses on assessing and evaluating the degree of CI embedded in social tagging over time in terms of two-parameter values, number of participants, and top frequency ranking window. Five different metrics were adopted and utilized for assessing the similarity between ranking lists: overlapList, overlapRank, Footrule, Fagin's measure, and the Inverse Rank measure. The result of this study demonstrates that a substantial degree of CI is most likely to be achieved when somewhere between the first 200 and 400 people have participated in tagging, and that a target degree of CI can be projected by controlling the two factors along with the selection of a similarity metric. The study also tests some experimental conditions for detecting social tags with high CI degree. The results of this study can be applicable to the study of filtering social tags based on CI; filtered social tags may be utilized for the metadata creation of tagged resources and possibly for the retrieval of tagged resources.
    Date
    25.12.2012 15:22:37
  2. Web-2.0-Dienste als Ergänzung zu algorithmischen Suchmaschinen (2008) 0.02
    0.018721774 = product of:
      0.11233064 = sum of:
        0.11233064 = weight(_text_:suchmaschine in 4323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11233064 = score(doc=4323,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21191008 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.53008634 = fieldWeight in 4323, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4323)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    RSWK
    World Wide Web 2.0 / Suchmaschine
    Subject
    World Wide Web 2.0 / Suchmaschine
  3. Naderi, H.; Rumpler, B.: PERCIRS: a system to combine personalized and collaborative information retrieval (2010) 0.02
    0.018430464 = product of:
      0.055291392 = sum of:
        0.0484596 = weight(_text_:ranking in 3960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0484596 = score(doc=3960,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.23904754 = fieldWeight in 3960, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3960)
        0.0068317903 = product of:
          0.02049537 = sum of:
            0.02049537 = weight(_text_:29 in 3960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02049537 = score(doc=3960,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 3960, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3960)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to discuss and test the claim that utilization of the personalization techniques can be valuable to improve the efficiency of collaborative information retrieval (CIR) systems. Design/methodology/approach - A new personalized CIR system, called PERCIRS, is presented based on the user profile similarity calculation (UPSC) formulas. To this aim, the paper proposes several UPSC formulas as well as two techniques to evaluate them. As the proposed CIR system is personalized, it could not be evaluated by Cranfield, like evaluation techniques (e.g. TREC). Hence, this paper proposes a new user-centric mechanism, which enables PERCIRS to be evaluated. This mechanism is generic and can be used to evaluate any other personalized IR system. Findings - The results show that among the proposed UPSC formulas in this paper, the (query-document)-graph based formula is the most effective. After integrating this formula into PERCIRS and comparing it with nine other IR systems, it is concluded that the results of the system are better than the other IR systems. In addition, the paper shows that the complexity of the system is less that the complexity of the other CIR systems. Research limitations/implications - This system asks the users to explicitly rank the returned documents, while explicit ranking is still not widespread enough. However it believes that the users should actively participate in the IR process in order to aptly satisfy their needs to information. Originality/value - The value of this paper lies in combining collaborative and personalized IR, as well as introducing a mechanism which enables the personalized IR system to be evaluated. The proposed evaluation mechanism is very valuable for developers of personalized IR systems. The paper also introduces some significant user profile similarity calculation formulas, and two techniques to evaluate them. These formulas can also be used to find the user's community in the social networks.
    Date
    29. 8.2010 12:59:10
  4. Wang, J.; Clements, M.; Yang, J.; Vries, A.P. de; Reinders, M.J.T.: Personalization of tagging systems (2010) 0.02
    0.017133057 = product of:
      0.102798335 = sum of:
        0.102798335 = weight(_text_:ranking in 4229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102798335 = score(doc=4229,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.5070964 = fieldWeight in 4229, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4229)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Social media systems have encouraged end user participation in the Internet, for the purpose of storing and distributing Internet content, sharing opinions and maintaining relationships. Collaborative tagging allows users to annotate the resulting user-generated content, and enables effective retrieval of otherwise uncategorised data. However, compared to professional web content production, collaborative tagging systems face the challenge that end-users assign tags in an uncontrolled manner, resulting in unsystematic and inconsistent metadata. This paper introduces a framework for the personalization of social media systems. We pinpoint three tasks that would benefit from personalization: collaborative tagging, collaborative browsing and collaborative search. We propose a ranking model for each task that integrates the individual user's tagging history in the recommendation of tags and content, to align its suggestions to the individual user preferences. We demonstrate on two real data sets that for all three tasks, the personalized ranking should take into account both the user's own preference and the opinion of others.
  5. Hsu, M.-H.; Chen, H.-H.: Efficient and effective prediction of social tags to enhance Web search (2011) 0.01
    0.014277548 = product of:
      0.085665286 = sum of:
        0.085665286 = weight(_text_:ranking in 4625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085665286 = score(doc=4625,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.42258036 = fieldWeight in 4625, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4625)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    As the web has grown into an integral part of daily life, social annotation has become a popular manner for web users to manage resources. This method of management has many potential applications, but it is limited in applicability by the cold-start problem, especially for new resources on the web. In this article, we study automatic tag prediction for web pages comprehensively and utilize the predicted tags to improve search performance. First, we explore the stabilizing phenomenon of tag usage in a social bookmarking system. Then, we propose a two-stage tag prediction approach, which is efficient and is effective in making use of early annotations from users. In the first stage, content-based ranking, candidate tags are selected and ranked to generate an initial tag list. In the second stage, random-walk re-ranking, we adopt a random-walk model that utilizes tag co-occurrence information to re-rank the initial list. The experimental results show that our algorithm effectively proposes appropriate tags for target web pages. In addition, we present a framework to incorporate tag prediction in a general web search. The experimental results of the web search validate the hypothesis that the proposed framework significantly enhances the typical retrieval model.
  6. Sun, A.; Bhowmick, S.S.; Nguyen, K.T.N.; Bai, G.: Tag-based social image retrieval : an empirical evaluation (2011) 0.01
    0.014277548 = product of:
      0.085665286 = sum of:
        0.085665286 = weight(_text_:ranking in 4938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085665286 = score(doc=4938,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.42258036 = fieldWeight in 4938, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4938)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Tags associated with social images are valuable information source for superior image search and retrieval experiences. Although various heuristics are valuable to boost tag-based search for images, there is a lack of general framework to study the impact of these heuristics. Specifically, the task of ranking images matching a given tag query based on their associated tags in descending order of relevance has not been well studied. In this article, we take the first step to propose a generic, flexible, and extensible framework for this task and exploit it for a systematic and comprehensive empirical evaluation of various methods for ranking images. To this end, we identified five orthogonal dimensions to quantify the matching score between a tagged image and a tag query. These five dimensions are: (i) tag relatedness to measure the degree of effectiveness of a tag describing the tagged image; (ii) tag discrimination to quantify the degree of discrimination of a tag with respect to the entire tagged image collection; (iii) tag length normalization analogous to document length normalization in web search; (iv) tag-query matching model for the matching score computation between an image tag and a query tag; and (v) query model for tag query rewriting. For each dimension, we identify a few implementations and evaluate their impact on NUS-WIDE dataset, the largest human-annotated dataset consisting of more than 269K tagged images from Flickr. We evaluated 81 single-tag queries and 443 multi-tag queries over 288 search methods and systematically compare their performances using standard metrics including Precision at top-K, Mean Average Precision (MAP), Recall, and Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG).
  7. Li, D.; Ding, Y.; Sugimoto, C.; He, B.; Tang, J.; Yan, E.; Lin, N.; Qin, Z.; Dong, T.: Modeling topic and community structure in social tagging : the TTR-LDA-Community model (2011) 0.01
    0.010095751 = product of:
      0.0605745 = sum of:
        0.0605745 = weight(_text_:ranking in 4759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0605745 = score(doc=4759,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03747799 = queryNorm
            0.29880944 = fieldWeight in 4759, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4759)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The presence of social networks in complex systems has made networks and community structure a focal point of study in many domains. Previous studies have focused on the structural emergence and growth of communities and on the topics displayed within the network. However, few scholars have closely examined the relationship between the thematic and structural properties of networks. Therefore, this article proposes the Tagger Tag Resource-Latent Dirichlet Allocation-Community model (TTR-LDA-Community model), which combines the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model with the Girvan-Newman community detection algorithm through an inference mechanism. Using social tagging data from Delicious, this article demonstrates the clustering of active taggers into communities, the topic distributions within communities, and the ranking of taggers, tags, and resources within these communities. The data analysis evaluates patterns in community structure and topical affiliations diachronically. The article evaluates the effectiveness of community detection and the inference mechanism embedded in the model and finds that the TTR-LDA-Community model outperforms other traditional models in tag prediction. This has implications for scholars in domains interested in community detection, profiling, and recommender systems.
  8. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.01
    0.009068082 = product of:
      0.05440849 = sum of:
        0.05440849 = product of:
          0.081612736 = sum of:
            0.04099074 = weight(_text_:29 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04099074 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
            0.040622 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040622 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2009 9:55:29
    Pages
    S.15-22
  9. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.01
    0.008215973 = product of:
      0.049295835 = sum of:
        0.049295835 = product of:
          0.07394375 = sum of:
            0.04347725 = weight(_text_:29 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04347725 = score(doc=164,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
            0.030466499 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030466499 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2012 13:58:08
    29. 5.2012 14:15:36
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  10. Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008) 0.01
    0.005667552 = product of:
      0.03400531 = sum of:
        0.03400531 = product of:
          0.051007964 = sum of:
            0.025619213 = weight(_text_:29 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025619213 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
            0.025388751 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025388751 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    20. 2.2009 10:29:07
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  11. Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011) 0.00
    0.0022772634 = product of:
      0.013663581 = sum of:
        0.013663581 = product of:
          0.04099074 = sum of:
            0.04099074 = weight(_text_:29 in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04099074 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Pages
    S.29-53
  12. Evedove Tartarotti, R. Dal'; Lopes Fujita, M.: ¬The perspective of social indexing in online bibliographic catalogs : between the individual and the collaborative (2016) 0.00
    0.0022772634 = product of:
      0.013663581 = sum of:
        0.013663581 = product of:
          0.04099074 = sum of:
            0.04099074 = weight(_text_:29 in 4917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04099074 = score(doc=4917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4917)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  13. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.00
    0.0019947288 = product of:
      0.011968372 = sum of:
        0.011968372 = product of:
          0.035905115 = sum of:
            0.035905115 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035905115 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  14. Marchitelli, A.; Piazzini, T.: OPAC, SOPAC e social networking : cataloghi di biblioteca 2.0? (2008) 0.00
    0.0019926056 = product of:
      0.011955633 = sum of:
        0.011955633 = product of:
          0.035866898 = sum of:
            0.035866898 = weight(_text_:29 in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035866898 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
  15. Oudenaar, H.; Bullard, J.: NOT A BOOK : goodreads and the risks of social cataloging with insufficient direction (2024) 0.00
    0.0019926056 = product of:
      0.011955633 = sum of:
        0.011955633 = product of:
          0.035866898 = sum of:
            0.035866898 = weight(_text_:29 in 1156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035866898 = score(doc=1156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1156)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    22.11.2023 18:29:56
  16. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.00
    0.0019746807 = product of:
      0.011848084 = sum of:
        0.011848084 = product of:
          0.03554425 = sum of:
            0.03554425 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03554425 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
  17. Furner, J.: User tagging of library resources : toward a framework for system evaluation (2007) 0.00
    0.0017079476 = product of:
      0.010247685 = sum of:
        0.010247685 = product of:
          0.030743055 = sum of:
            0.030743055 = weight(_text_:29 in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030743055 = score(doc=703,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:29:31
  18. Corrado, E.; Moulaison, H.L.: Social tagging and communities of practice : two case studies (2008) 0.00
    0.0017079476 = product of:
      0.010247685 = sum of:
        0.010247685 = product of:
          0.030743055 = sum of:
            0.030743055 = weight(_text_:29 in 2271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030743055 = score(doc=2271,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2271, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2271)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    27.12.2008 11:20:29
  19. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.00
    0.0016925833 = product of:
      0.0101555 = sum of:
        0.0101555 = product of:
          0.030466499 = sum of:
            0.030466499 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030466499 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
  20. Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009) 0.00
    0.0016925833 = product of:
      0.0101555 = sum of:
        0.0101555 = product of:
          0.030466499 = sum of:
            0.030466499 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030466499 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03747799 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Languages

  • e 25
  • d 5
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 28
  • b 2
  • el 2
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…