-
Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991)
0.05
0.05044257 = product of:
0.1513277 = sum of:
0.0969192 = weight(_text_:ranking in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0969192 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.47809508 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.05440849 = product of:
0.081612736 = sum of:
0.04099074 = weight(_text_:29 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04099074 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.040622 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040622 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
- Source
- Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.1, S.29-41
-
Wong, W.Y.P.; Lee, D.L.: Implementation of partial document ranking using inverted files (1993)
0.05
0.050242677 = product of:
0.15072803 = sum of:
0.13706446 = weight(_text_:ranking in 6539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13706446 = score(doc=6539,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.67612857 = fieldWeight in 6539, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6539)
0.013663581 = product of:
0.04099074 = sum of:
0.04099074 = weight(_text_:29 in 6539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04099074 = score(doc=6539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 6539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6539)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Examines the implementations of document ranking based on inverted files. Studies three heuristic methods for implementing the term frequency X inverse document frequency weighting strategy. The basic idea of the heuristic methods is to process the query terms in an order so that as many top documents as possible can be identified without processing all of the query terms. The heuristics were evaluated and compared. The results show improved performance. Two methods for estimating the retrieval accuracy were studied. All experiments were based on four test collection made available with the SMART system
- Source
- Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.5, S.647-669
-
Smith, M.P.; Pollitt, A.S.: ¬The potential for incorporating document ranking in the MenUSE front-end search internemdiary system (1996)
0.05
0.047970545 = product of:
0.14391163 = sum of:
0.13544871 = weight(_text_:ranking in 6980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13544871 = score(doc=6980,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.66815823 = fieldWeight in 6980, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6980)
0.008462917 = product of:
0.025388751 = sum of:
0.025388751 = weight(_text_:22 in 6980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025388751 = score(doc=6980,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 6980, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6980)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Reviews research which aims to improve the ways in which documents are presented to the user within the MenUSE (Menu based User Search Engine) search intermediary system. MenUSE is an advanced intermediary system for end user searching of bibliographic databases originating in CANSEARCH, a prototype intermediary system that used an expert systems approach to generate searches in cancer therapy related information retrieval from MEDLINE. In particular it investigates ways in which the order of presentation of documents can be made more effective. Discusses alternative schemes for document reordering, the main emphasis being on the provision of relevance ranking where the most relevant documents are presented to the user first. Examines the feasibility of incorporating such ranking techniques into MenUSE and compares 3 algorithms which simulate collection frequency ranking on a remote bibliographic database host using Boolean searching. Concludes that the CIRT algorithm offers the best performance. Proposes a design for an enhancement to the MenUSE system which will be the subject of user testing to verify the effectiveness of ranking in MenUSE
- Source
- Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
-
Efthimiadis, E.N.: User choices : a new yardstick for the evaluation of ranking algorithms for interactive query expansion (1995)
0.05
0.047970545 = product of:
0.14391163 = sum of:
0.13544871 = weight(_text_:ranking in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13544871 = score(doc=5697,freq=10.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.66815823 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
0.008462917 = product of:
0.025388751 = sum of:
0.025388751 = weight(_text_:22 in 5697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025388751 = score(doc=5697,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5697, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5697)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The performance of 8 ranking algorithms was evaluated with respect to their effectiveness in ranking terms for query expansion. The evaluation was conducted within an investigation of interactive query expansion and relevance feedback in a real operational environment. Focuses on the identification of algorithms that most effectively take cognizance of user preferences. user choices (i.e. the terms selected by the searchers for the query expansion search) provided the yardstick for the evaluation of the 8 ranking algorithms. This methodology introduces a user oriented approach in evaluating ranking algorithms for query expansion in contrast to the standard, system oriented approaches. Similarities in the performance of the 8 algorithms and the ways these algorithms rank terms were the main focus of this evaluation. The findings demonstrate that the r-lohi, wpq, enim, and porter algorithms have similar performance in bringing good terms to the top of a ranked list of terms for query expansion. However, further evaluation of the algorithms in different (e.g. full text) environments is needed before these results can be generalized beyond the context of the present study
- Date
- 22. 2.1996 13:14:10
-
Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Customizable multi-engine search tool with clustering (1997)
0.04
0.044137247 = product of:
0.13241173 = sum of:
0.084804304 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084804304 = score(doc=2670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.4183332 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
0.047607433 = product of:
0.07141115 = sum of:
0.035866898 = weight(_text_:29 in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035866898 = score(doc=2670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
0.03554425 = weight(_text_:22 in 2670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03554425 = score(doc=2670,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2670, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2670)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Proposes a new idea of searching under the multi-engine search architecture to overcome the problems associated with relevance ranking. These include clustering of the search results and extraction of co-occurence keywords, which, with the user's feedback, better refines the query in the searching process. The system also provides the construction of the concept space to gradually customize the search tool to fit the usage for the user at the same time
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Source
- Computer networks and ISDN systems. 29(1997) no.8, S.1217-1224
-
Keller, R.M.: ¬A bookmarking service for organizing and sharing URLs (1997)
0.04
0.04063629 = product of:
0.121908866 = sum of:
0.0726894 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0726894 = score(doc=2721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.35857132 = fieldWeight in 2721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2721)
0.049219467 = product of:
0.0738292 = sum of:
0.030743055 = weight(_text_:29 in 2721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030743055 = score(doc=2721,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2721, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2721)
0.04308614 = weight(_text_:22 in 2721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04308614 = score(doc=2721,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2721, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2721)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Presents WebTagger, an implemented prototype of a personal book marking service that provides both individuals and groups with a customisable means of organizing and accessing Web-based information resources. The service enables users to supply feedback on the utility of these resources relative to their informatio needs, and provides dynamically updated ranking of resources based on incremental user feedback. Individuals may access the service from anywhere on the Internet and require no special software. The service simplifies the process of sharing URLs within groups, in comparison with manual methods involving email. The underlying bookmark organization scheme is more natural and flexible than current hierarchical schemes supported by the major Web browsers and enables rapid access to stored bookmarks
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
17. 1.1999 14:22:14
- Source
- Computer networks and ISDN systems. 29(1997) no.8, S.1103-1114
-
Carrière, S.J.; Kazman, R.: Webquery : searching and visualising the Web through connectivity (1997)
0.04
0.037831925 = product of:
0.11349577 = sum of:
0.0726894 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0726894 = score(doc=2674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.35857132 = fieldWeight in 2674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2674)
0.040806368 = product of:
0.061209552 = sum of:
0.030743055 = weight(_text_:29 in 2674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030743055 = score(doc=2674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2674)
0.030466499 = weight(_text_:22 in 2674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030466499 = score(doc=2674,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2674, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2674)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The WebQuery system offers a powerful new method for searching the Web based on connectivity and content. Examines links among the nodes returned in a keyword-based query. Rankes the nodes, giving the highest rank to the most highly connected nodes. By doing so, finds hot spots on the Web that contain information germane to a user's query. WebQuery not only ranks and filters the results of a Web query; it also extends the result set beyond what the search engine retrieves, by finding interesting sites that are highly connected to those sites returned by the original query. Even with WebQuery filering and ranking query results, the result set can be enormous. Explores techniques for visualizing the returned information and discusses the criteria for using each of the technique
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
- Source
- Computer networks and ISDN systems. 29(1997) no.8, S.1257-1267
-
Ata, B.M.A.: SISDOM: a multilingual document retrieval system (1995)
0.04
0.036860928 = product of:
0.110582784 = sum of:
0.0969192 = weight(_text_:ranking in 895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0969192 = score(doc=895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.47809508 = fieldWeight in 895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=895)
0.013663581 = product of:
0.04099074 = sum of:
0.04099074 = weight(_text_:29 in 895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04099074 = score(doc=895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- The Malay language is widely used in Malaysia, Indonesia and brunei. The growth in the number of documents written in Malay justifies the need for a document retrieval system for that language. Describes the implementation of a bilingual Malay and English full text document retrieval systems: SIStem capaian DOkumen Multilingua (SISDOM), by the Kebangsaan University Malaysia. The system incorporates many facilities for users, including the choice of search techniques, browsing of retrieved documents, and ranking of documents
- Date
- 31. 7.1996 9:29:12
-
LEXIS-NEXIS expands services (1998)
0.04
0.036860928 = product of:
0.110582784 = sum of:
0.0969192 = weight(_text_:ranking in 15) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0969192 = score(doc=15,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.47809508 = fieldWeight in 15, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=15)
0.013663581 = product of:
0.04099074 = sum of:
0.04099074 = weight(_text_:29 in 15) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04099074 = score(doc=15,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 15, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=15)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- LEXIS-NEXIS has annouced: enhancement of InfoTailor a customized daily briefing service which now scans 2.500 sources daily, allows instant profile changes and performs relevance ranking; the release of LEXIS-NEXIS Xchange, providing a single Web location for obtaining legal and general news, access practice-specific information and search the LEXIS-NEXIS collection; and, the signing of an agreement with the National Association for Law Placement, Inc. to make LEXIS-NEXIS services the exclusive online source for the 'National Directory of Legal Employers'
- Date
- 29. 7.1998 14:37:27
-
Berry, M.W.; Browne, M.: Understanding search engines : mathematical modeling and text retrieval (1999)
0.03
0.032427065 = product of:
0.19456238 = sum of:
0.19456238 = weight(_text_:suchmaschine in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19456238 = score(doc=5777,freq=12.0), product of:
0.21191008 = queryWeight, product of:
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.9181365 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.6542544 = idf(docFreq=420, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- RSWK
- Suchmaschine / Information Retrieval
World Wide Web / Suchmaschine / Mathematisches Modell (BVB)
Suchmaschine / Information Retrieval / Mathematisches Modell (HEBIS)
- Subject
- Suchmaschine / Information Retrieval
World Wide Web / Suchmaschine / Mathematisches Modell (BVB)
Suchmaschine / Information Retrieval / Mathematisches Modell (HEBIS)
-
Lee, J.H.; Kim, M.H.: Ranking documents in thesaurus-based Boolean retrieval systems (1994)
0.03
0.032306403 = product of:
0.1938384 = sum of:
0.1938384 = weight(_text_:ranking in 6732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1938384 = score(doc=6732,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.95619017 = fieldWeight in 6732, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6732)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Investigates document ranking methods in thesaurus-based Boolean retrieval systems and proposes a new thesaurus-based ranking algorithm, the Extended Relevance (E-Relevance) algorithm. The E-Relevance algorithm integrates the extended Boolean model and the thesaurus-based relevance algorithm. Since the E-Relevance algorithm has all the desirable properties of previous thesauri-based ranking algorithms. It also ranks documents effectively by uisng terms dependence information from the thesaurus. Through performance comparison shows that the proposed algorithm achieved higher retrieval effectiveness than the others proposed earlier
-
Harman, D.: Ranking algorithms (1992)
0.03
0.032306403 = product of:
0.1938384 = sum of:
0.1938384 = weight(_text_:ranking in 3511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1938384 = score(doc=3511,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.95619017 = fieldWeight in 3511, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3511)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Presents both a summary of past research done in the development of ranking algorithms and detailed instructions on implementing a ranking type of retrieval system. This type of retrieval system takes as input a natural language query without Boolean syntax and produces a list of records that 'answer' the query, with the records ranked in order of likely relevance. Ranking retrieval systems are particularly appropriate for end-users
-
Huffman, G.D.: Semi-automatic determination of citation relevancy : user evaluation (1990)
0.03
0.032217465 = product of:
0.09665239 = sum of:
0.084804304 = weight(_text_:ranking in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084804304 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.4183332 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
0.011848084 = product of:
0.03554425 = sum of:
0.03554425 = weight(_text_:22 in 4158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03554425 = score(doc=4158,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4158, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4158)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Online bibiographic, database searches typically produce hundreds of retrieved citations with only about 20-40% relevant to the search topic and/or problem statement. Significant amounts of time are required to categorize and select the relevant citations. A software system-SORT-AIDS/SABRE-has been developes which ranks the citations in terms of relevance. This paper presents the results of a comprehensive user evaluation of the relevance ranking procedures. Test results show that the software generated distributions approach the ideal distribution-all relevant citations at the beginning of the collection-in 22% of the cases, are 23% better than the random distribution-relevant citations distributed uniformly throughout the dcollection-on average and are poorer than the random distribution in 4% of the cae.
-
Haiqi, Z.: ¬The literature of Qigong : publication patterns and subject headings (1997)
0.03
0.032217465 = product of:
0.09665239 = sum of:
0.084804304 = weight(_text_:ranking in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084804304 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.4183332 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.011848084 = product of:
0.03554425 = sum of:
0.03554425 = weight(_text_:22 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03554425 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a bibliometric study of the literature of Qigong: a relaxation technique used to teach patients to control their heart rate, blood pressure, temperature and other involuntary functions through controlles breathing. All articles indexed in the MEDLINE CD-ROM database, between 1965 and 1995 were identified using 'breathing exercises' MeSH term. The articles were analyzed for geographical and language distribution and a ranking exercise enabled a core list of periodicals to be identified. In addition, the study shed light on the changing frequency of the MeSH terms and evaluated the research areas by measuring the information from these respective MeSH headings
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.38-44
-
Chang, C.-H.; Hsu, C.-C.: Integrating query expansion and conceptual relevance feedback for personalized Web information retrieval (1998)
0.03
0.032217465 = product of:
0.09665239 = sum of:
0.084804304 = weight(_text_:ranking in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084804304 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.4183332 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.011848084 = product of:
0.03554425 = sum of:
0.03554425 = weight(_text_:22 in 1319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03554425 = score(doc=1319,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1319, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1319)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Keyword based querying has been an immediate and efficient way to specify and retrieve related information that the user inquired. However, conventional document ranking based on an automatic assessment of document relevance to the query may not be the best approach when little information is given. Proposes an idea to integrate 2 existing techniques, query expansion and relevance feedback to achieve a concept-based information search for the Web
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Hsieh-Yee, I.: ¬The retrieval power of selected search engines : how well do they address general reference questions and subject questions? (1998)
0.03
0.032217465 = product of:
0.09665239 = sum of:
0.084804304 = weight(_text_:ranking in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084804304 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.4183332 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
0.011848084 = product of:
0.03554425 = sum of:
0.03554425 = weight(_text_:22 in 2186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03554425 = score(doc=2186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2186)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Evaluates the performance of 8 major Internet search engines in answering 21 real reference questions and 5 made up subject questions. Reports on the retrieval and relevancy ranking abilities of the search engines. Concludes that the search engines did not produce good results for the reference questions unlike for the subject questions. The best engines are identified by type of questions, with Infoseek best for the subject questions, and OpenText best for refrence questions
- Date
- 25.12.1998 19:22:51
-
Lawrence, S.; Giles, C.L.: Inquirus, the NECI meta search engine (1998)
0.03
0.032217465 = product of:
0.09665239 = sum of:
0.084804304 = weight(_text_:ranking in 3604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.084804304 = score(doc=3604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.4183332 = fieldWeight in 3604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3604)
0.011848084 = product of:
0.03554425 = sum of:
0.03554425 = weight(_text_:22 in 3604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03554425 = score(doc=3604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13124153 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3604)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Presents Inquirus, a WWW meta search engine which works by downloading and analysing the individual documents. It makes improvements over existing search engines in a number of areas: more useful document summaries incorporating query term context, identification of both pages which no longer exist and pages which no longer contain the query terms, advanced detection of duplicate pages, improved document ranking using proximity information, dramatically improved precision for certain queries by using specific expressive forms, and quick jump links and highlighting when viewing the full document
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:08:06
-
Huffman, G.D.; Vital, D.A.; Bivins, R.G.: Generating indices with lexical association methods : term uniqueness (1990)
0.03
0.031401675 = product of:
0.09420502 = sum of:
0.085665286 = weight(_text_:ranking in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085665286 = score(doc=4152,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.42258036 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.008539738 = product of:
0.025619213 = sum of:
0.025619213 = weight(_text_:29 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025619213 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13183585 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- A software system has been developed which orders citations retrieved from an online database in terms of relevancy. The system resulted from an effort generated by NASA's Technology Utilization Program to create new advanced software tools to largely automate the process of determining relevancy of database citations retrieved to support large technology transfer studies. The ranking is based on the generation of an enriched vocabulary using lexical association methods, a user assessment of the vocabulary and a combination of the user assessment and the lexical metric. One of the key elements in relevancy ranking is the enriched vocabulary -the terms mst be both unique and descriptive. This paper examines term uniqueness. Six lexical association methods were employed to generate characteristic word indices. A limited subset of the terms - the highest 20,40,60 and 7,5% of the uniquess words - we compared and uniquess factors developed. Computational times were also measured. It was found that methods based on occurrences and signal produced virtually the same terms. The limited subset of terms producedby the exact and centroid discrimination value were also nearly identical. Unique terms sets were produced by teh occurrence, variance and discrimination value (centroid), An end-user evaluation showed that the generated terms were largely distinct and had values of word precision which were consistent with values of the search precision.
- Date
- 23.11.1995 11:29:46
-
Page, L.; Brin, S.; Motwani, R.; Winograd, T.: ¬The PageRank citation ranking : Bringing order to the Web (1999)
0.03
0.028268103 = product of:
0.16960861 = sum of:
0.16960861 = weight(_text_:ranking in 496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16960861 = score(doc=496,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.8366664 = fieldWeight in 496, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=496)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
-
Heine, M.M.: Bradford ranking conventions and their application to a growing literature (1998)
0.03
0.028268103 = product of:
0.16960861 = sum of:
0.16960861 = weight(_text_:ranking in 1069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16960861 = score(doc=1069,freq=8.0), product of:
0.20271951 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.03747799 = queryNorm
0.8366664 = fieldWeight in 1069, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.4090285 = idf(docFreq=537, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1069)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Bradford distributions describe the relationship between 'journal productivities' and 'journal rankings by productivity'. However, different ranking conventions exist, implying some ambiguity as to what the Bradford distribution 'is'. A need accordingly arises for a standard ranking convention to assist comparisons between empirical data, and also comparisons between empirical data and theoretical models. Five ranking conventions are described including the one used originally by Bradford, along with suggested distinctions between 'Bradford data set', 'Bradford distribution', 'Bradford graph', 'Bradford model', and 'Bradford's law'. Constructions such as the Lotka distribution, Groos droop (generalised to accomodate growth as well as fall-off in the Bradford log-graph), Brookes hooks, and the slope and intercept of the Bradford log graph are clarified on this basis
