Search (326 results, page 1 of 17)

0.19486147 = product of:
  0.38972294 = sum of:
    0.05567471 = product of:
      0.16702412 = sum of:
        0.16702412 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16702412 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2971864 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.16702412 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16702412 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2971864 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03505379 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
    0.16702412 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16702412 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2971864 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03505379 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)

Content

Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.

0.18098816 = product of:
  0.27148223 = sum of:
    0.037116475 = product of:
      0.11134942 = sum of:
        0.11134942 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11134942 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2971864 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.11134942 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11134942 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2971864 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03505379 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
    0.011666888 = product of:
      0.023333777 = sum of:
        0.023333777 = weight(_text_:web in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023333777 = score(doc=701,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.11134942 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11134942 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2971864 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03505379 = queryNorm
        0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
  0.6666667 = coord(4/6)

Abstract

By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.

Content

Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.

Theme

Semantic Web

0.1760301 = product of:
  0.3520602 = sum of:
    0.037116475 = product of:
      0.11134942 = sum of:
        0.11134942 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11134942 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2971864 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.15747185 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15747185 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2971864 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03505379 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
    0.15747185 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15747185 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.2971864 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03505379 = queryNorm
        0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)

Content

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.

0.025096897 = product of:
  0.07529069 = sum of:
    0.037123807 = product of:
      0.07424761 = sum of:
        0.07424761 = weight(_text_:web in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07424761 = score(doc=4649,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.64902663 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.03816688 = product of:
      0.05725032 = sum of:
        0.028754493 = weight(_text_:29 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028754493 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
        0.028495826 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028495826 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

More and more cultural heritage institutions publish their collections, vocabularies and metadata on the Web. The resulting Web of linked cultural data opens up exciting new possibilities for searching and browsing through these cultural heritage collections. We report on ongoing work in which we investigate the estimation of relevance in this Web of Culture. We study existing measures of semantic distance and how they apply to two use cases. The use cases relate to the structured, multilingual and multimodal nature of the Culture Web. We distinguish between measures using the Web, such as Google distance and PMI, and measures using the Linked Data Web, i.e. the semantic structure of metadata vocabularies. We perform a small study in which we compare these semantic distance measures to human judgements of relevance. Although it is too early to draw any definitive conclusions, the study provides new insights into the applicability of semantic distance measures to the Web of Culture, and clear starting points for further research.

Date

29. 7.2011 14:44:56
26.12.2011 13:40:22

Theme

Semantic Web

0.021604024 = product of:
  0.06481207 = sum of:
    0.060818393 = sum of:
      0.017861202 = weight(_text_:web in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017861202 = score(doc=4393,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03505379 = queryNorm
          0.15613155 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
      0.04295719 = weight(_text_:seite in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04295719 = score(doc=4393,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.19633847 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03505379 = queryNorm
          0.21879151 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
            0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
    0.00399368 = product of:
      0.011981039 = sum of:
        0.011981039 = weight(_text_:29 in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011981039 = score(doc=4393,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.097163305 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Content

Vgl. auch Mitgliederbrief Ernst-Schröder-Zentrum, Nr.41: "Die aktuelle Entwicklung insbesondere der Internettechnologien führte in den letzten Jahren zu einem Wieder-Erwachen des Interesses von Forschern und Anwendern an (technischen) Ontologien. Typische Visionen in diesem Zusammenhang sind das ,Semantic Web' und das ,Internet der Dinge' (Web 3.0). Technische Ontologien sind formale, zeichenvermittelte symbolische Repräsentationen von lebensweltlichen Zusammenhängen, die notwendigerweise zu einem großen Teil von ihrem Kontextbezug gelöst werden und über die ursprünglichen lebensweltlichen Zusammenhänge hinaus computerverarbeitbar verfügbar werden. Häufig werden dafür XML-basierte Beschreibungssprachen eingesetzt wie z.B. der OWL-Standard. Trotz des großen Interesses sind jedoch umfangreiche und erfolgreiche Beispiele von in größerem Umfang praktisch eingesetzten (technischen) Ontologien eher die Ausnahme. Die zentrale Fragestellung unseres Beitrags ist daher, ob es eventuell grundlegendere (möglicherweise auch außertechnische) Hürden gibt auf dem Weg zu einer Verwirklichung der oft visionären Vorstellungen, wie z.B. zukünftig E-Commerce und E-Business und ,Wissensmanagement' durch technische Ontologien unterstützt werden könnten: Oder ist alles vielleicht ,nur' eine Frage der Zeit, bis wir durch ausreichend leistungsfähige Technologien für solche technischen Ontologien die Versprechungen des ,Internet der Dinge' verwirklichen können?
Als theoretischen Ausgangspunkt wählen wir in unserem Beitrag eine medienphilosophische Perspektive, die von der Fragestellung ausgeht, inwieweit menschliches Wissen, das von Subjekten explizit oder implizit gewusst wird und Sinn und Bedeutungsbezüge hat, bereits dadurch prinzipiell verändert und möglicherweise um Wesentliches reduziert wird, wenn es in technischen Ontologien - notwendigerweise symbolhaft - repräsentiert wird. Zunächst wird dazu in unserem Beitrag historisch die jahrhundertelange Tradition insbesondere der abendländischen Kulturen seit dem Mittelalter nachgezeichnet, derzufolge zunehmend die epistemische Seite von ,Wissen' in den Vordergrund gestellt wurde, die sich besonders gut symbolisch, d.h. zeichenvermittelt darstellen lässt. Demgegenüber sind wissenschaftshistorisch andere Aspekte menschlichen Wissens wie z.B. die soziale Einbettung symbolvermittelten Wissens und Anteile ,impliziten Wissens' zunehmend in den Hintergrund getreten. Auch Fragen nach Sinn und Bedeutung bzw. reflektionsorientiertem Orientierungswissen sind teilweise davon betroffen.
Zweifelsohne hat die wissenschaftshistorisch begründete Bevorzugung epistemischen Wissens in Verbindung mit der symbolischen Repräsentation (z.B. in Büchern und zunehmend auch in digitaler, computerverarbeitbarer Form) wesentlich zur Herausbildung unseres aktuellen materiellen Wohlstands und technologischen Fortschritts in den Industrieländern beigetragen. Vielleicht hat jedoch gerade dieser Siegeszug der epistemischen, symbolhaft repräsentierten Seite menschlichen Wissens auch dazu beigetragen, dass die eher verdeckten Beiträge der begleitenden sozialen Prozesse und impliziten Anteile menschlichen Wissens erst in den allerletzten Jahren wieder zunehmend Aufmerksamkeit erhalten. Nur vor dieser wissenschaftshistorischen Kulisse kann schließlich auch erklärt werden, dass in vielen Organisationen das Schlagwort vom ,Wissens-management' oft verkürzend so verstanden wurde, von (technischen) Wissensrepräsentationssystemen zu erhoffen, dass sie als Technologie bereits unmittelbar zum gegenseitigen Wissensaustausch und Wissenstransfer für die Menschen beitragen würden, was in der Praxis dann jedoch oft nicht so wie erhofft eingetreten ist.
In der Finanzwirtschaft mit ihren automatisierten Handelssystemen (auf Basis technischer Ontologien) wird beispielsweise inzwischen bei außergewöhnlichen Kursbewegungen der Börse der automatische Handel unterbrochen, so dass dann auf pragmatisch-natürlichsprachliche Weise nach den Gründen für die Ausschläge gesucht werden kann. Aus Sicht der technischen Ontologien wäre eine solche Unterbrechung des Computerhandels (zur Beruhigung der Märkte) nicht zwingend erforderlich, aber sie ist sehr sinnvoll aus einer außerhalb der technischen Ontologie stehenden Perspektive, die alleine nach Sinn und Bedeutung stabiler Kursverläufe zu fragen imstande ist. Der hier sich abzeichnende ,pragmatic turn' beim Einsatz technischer Ontologien ist auch in vielfältiger Weise in Trends wie z.B. Folksonomies, Sozialen Netzwerken und Open-SourceEntwicklergruppen zu erkennen. Diese Gemeinschaften zeichnen sich dadurch aus, dass sie zwar (technische) Ontologien einsetzen, diese jedoch in intensive soziale Austauschprozesse einbinden, in denen die formalen Wissensrepräsentationen mit situativer Bedeutung und Sinn versehen und angereichert werden. Dieser Trend zu ,weicheren' Formen der Nutzung von (technischen) Ontologien scheint nach aktuellem Wissensstand auf jeden Fall in der Praxis erfolgversprechender als die anfänglichen Hoffnungen des Semantic Web oder vollständiger (technischer) Ontologien - ganz abgesehen vom laufenden Pflegeaufwand 'vollständiger' technischer Ontologien.

Source

http://www.cba.neu.edu/uploadedFiles/Site_Sections/OLKC_2010/Program_Overview/Parallel_Sessions/180_Wyssusek_Abstract_Ontologies%20in%20Knowledge%20Management%281%29.pdf

0.018414553 = product of:
  0.055243656 = sum of:
    0.0472563 = product of:
      0.0945126 = sum of:
        0.0945126 = weight(_text_:web in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0945126 = score(doc=4706,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.8261705 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.00798736 = product of:
      0.023962079 = sum of:
        0.023962079 = weight(_text_:29 in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023962079 = score(doc=4706,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

The two-volume set LNCS 6496 and 6497 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, held in Shanghai, China, during November 7-11, 2010. Part I contains 51 papers out of 578 submissions to the research track. Part II contains 18 papers out of 66 submissions to the semantic Web in-use track, 6 papers out of 26 submissions to the doctoral consortium track, and also 4 invited talks. Each submitted paper were carefully reviewed. The International Semantic Web Conferences (ISWC) constitute the major international venue where the latest research results and technical innovations on all aspects of the Semantic Web are presented. ISWC brings together researchers, practitioners, and users from the areas of artificial intelligence, databases, social networks, distributed computing, Web engineering, information systems, natural language processing, soft computing, and human computer interaction to discuss the major challenges and proposed solutions, the success stories and failures, as well the visions that can advance research and drive innovation in the Semantic Web.

Date

29. 7.2011 14:44:56

RSWK

Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>

Subject

Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>

Theme

Semantic Web

0.016519586 = product of:
  0.049558755 = sum of:
    0.03689394 = product of:
      0.07378788 = sum of:
        0.07378788 = weight(_text_:web in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07378788 = score(doc=4685,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.6450079 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.012664813 = product of:
      0.037994437 = sum of:
        0.037994437 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037994437 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This document contains and presents test cases for the Web Ontology Language (OWL) approved by the Web Ontology Working Group. Many of the test cases illustrate the correct usage of the Web Ontology Language (OWL), and the formal meaning of its constructs. Other test cases illustrate the resolution of issues considered by the Working Group. Conformance for OWL documents and OWL document checkers is specified.

Date

14. 8.2011 13:33:22

Theme

Semantic Web

0.01623892 = product of:
  0.04871676 = sum of:
    0.039131932 = product of:
      0.078263864 = sum of:
        0.078263864 = weight(_text_:web in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.078263864 = score(doc=439,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.6841342 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.009584831 = product of:
      0.028754493 = sum of:
        0.028754493 = weight(_text_:29 in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028754493 = score(doc=439,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the Second European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2005, heldin Heraklion, Crete, Greece in May/June 2005. The 48 revised full papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 148 submissions. The papers are organized in topical sections on semantic Web services, languages, ontologies, reasoning and querying, search and information retrieval, user and communities, natural language for the semantic Web, annotation tools, and semantic Web applications.

RSWK

Semantic Web / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>

Subject

Semantic Web / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>

Theme

Semantic Web

0.0154816955 = product of:
  0.046445087 = sum of:
    0.035363376 = product of:
      0.07072675 = sum of:
        0.07072675 = weight(_text_:web in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07072675 = score(doc=4330,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.01108171 = product of:
      0.03324513 = sum of:
        0.03324513 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03324513 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

One vision of the Semantic Web is that it will be much like the Web we know today, except that documents will be enriched by annotations in machine understandable markup. These annotations will provide metadata about the documents as well as machine interpretable statements capturing some of the meaning of document content. We discuss how the information retrieval paradigm might be recast in such an environment. We suggest that retrieval can be tightly bound to inference. Doing so makes today's Web search engines useful to Semantic Web inference engines, and causes improvements in either retrieval or inference to lead directly to improvements in the other.

Date

12. 2.2011 17:35:22

Theme

Semantic Web

0.014861832 = product of:
  0.044585496 = sum of:
    0.035000663 = product of:
      0.07000133 = sum of:
        0.07000133 = weight(_text_:web in 4332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07000133 = score(doc=4332,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.6119082 = fieldWeight in 4332, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4332)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.009584831 = product of:
      0.028754493 = sum of:
        0.028754493 = weight(_text_:29 in 4332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028754493 = score(doc=4332,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4332, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4332)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Das Semantic Web bezeichnet ein erweitertes World Wide Web (WWW), das die Bedeutung von präsentierten Inhalten in neuen standardisierten Sprachen wie RDF Schema und OWL modelliert. Diese Arbeit befasst sich mit dem Aspekt des Information Retrieval, d.h. es wird untersucht, in wie weit Methoden der Informationssuche sich auf modelliertes Wissen übertragen lassen. Die kennzeichnenden Merkmale von IR-Systemen wie vage Anfragen sowie die Unterstützung unsicheren Wissens werden im Kontext des Semantic Web behandelt. Im Fokus steht die Suche nach Fakten innerhalb einer Wissensdomäne, die entweder explizit modelliert sind oder implizit durch die Anwendung von Inferenz abgeleitet werden können. Aufbauend auf der an der Universität Duisburg-Essen entwickelten Retrievalmaschine PIRE wird die Anwendung unsicherer Inferenz mit probabilistischer Prädikatenlogik (pDatalog) implementiert.

Date

12. 2.2011 17:29:27

Footnote

Zugl.: Dortmund, Univ., Dipl.-Arb., 2006 u.d.T.: Hüsken, Peter: Information-Retrieval im Semantic-Web.

RSWK

Information Retrieval / Semantic Web

Subject

Information Retrieval / Semantic Web

Theme

Semantic Web

0.014731642 = product of:
  0.044194926 = sum of:
    0.03780504 = product of:
      0.07561008 = sum of:
        0.07561008 = weight(_text_:web in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07561008 = score(doc=4707,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.6609364 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0063898875 = product of:
      0.019169662 = sum of:
        0.019169662 = weight(_text_:29 in 4707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019169662 = score(doc=4707,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 4707, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4707)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

The two-volume set LNCS 6496 and 6497 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, held in Shanghai, China, during November 7-11, 2010. Part I contains 51 papers out of 578 submissions to the research track. Part II contains 18 papers out of 66 submissions to the semantic Web in-use track, 6 papers out of 26 submissions to the doctoral consortium track, and also 4 invited talks. Each submitted paper were carefully reviewed. The International Semantic Web Conferences (ISWC) constitute the major international venue where the latest research results and technical innovations on all aspects of the Semantic Web are presented. ISWC brings together researchers, practitioners, and users from the areas of artificial intelligence, databases, social networks, distributed computing, Web engineering, information systems, natural language processing, soft computing, and human computer interaction to discuss the major challenges and proposed solutions, the success stories and failures, as well the visions that can advance research and drive innovation in the Semantic Web.

Date

29. 7.2011 14:44:56

RSWK

Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>

Subject

Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>

Theme

Semantic Web

0.014079578 = product of:
  0.042238735 = sum of:
    0.032740124 = product of:
      0.06548025 = sum of:
        0.06548025 = weight(_text_:web in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06548025 = score(doc=987,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.57238775 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.009498609 = product of:
      0.028495826 = sum of:
        0.028495826 = weight(_text_:22 in 987) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028495826 = score(doc=987,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 987, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=987)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This book covers the basics of semantic web technologies and indexing languages, and describes their contribution to improve languages as a tool for subject queries and knowledge exploration. The book is relevant to information scientists, knowledge workers and indexers. It provides a suitable combination of theoretical foundations and practical applications.

Date

23. 7.2017 13:49:22

LCSH

Semantic Web
World Wide Web / Subject access

RSWK

Semantic Web

Subject

Semantic Web
World Wide Web / Subject access
Semantic Web

0.013747579 = product of:
  0.041242737 = sum of:
    0.028577924 = product of:
      0.057155848 = sum of:
        0.057155848 = weight(_text_:web in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057155848 = score(doc=3376,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.49962097 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.012664813 = product of:
      0.037994437 = sum of:
        0.037994437 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037994437 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This chapter presents ontologies and their role in the creation of the Semantic Web. Ontologies hold special interest, because they are very closely related to the way we understand the world. They provide common understanding, the very first step to successful communication. In following sections, we will present ontologies, how they are created and used. We will describe available tools for specifying and working with ontologies.

Date

31. 7.2010 16:58:22

Theme

Semantic Web

0.013298765 = product of:
  0.039896294 = sum of:
    0.030311465 = product of:
      0.06062293 = sum of:
        0.06062293 = weight(_text_:web in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06062293 = score(doc=4640,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.5299281 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.009584831 = product of:
      0.028754493 = sum of:
        0.028754493 = weight(_text_:29 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028754493 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Ontologies will play a central role in the development of the Semantic Web. It is unrealistic to assume that such ontologies will be developed from scratch. Rather, we assume that existing resources such as thesauri and lexical data bases will be reused in the development of ontologies for the Semantic Web. In this paper we describe a method for converting existing source material to a representation that is compatible with Semantic Web languages such as RDF(S) and OWL. The method is illustrated with three case studies: converting Wordnet, AAT and MeSH to RDF(S) and OWL.

Date

29. 7.2011 14:44:56

Source

Proceedings of the First European Semantic Web Symposium (ESWS2004), Eds.: C. Bussler, J. Davies, D. Fensel and R. Studer. 2004. S.299-311

Theme

Semantic Web

0.012062661 = product of:
  0.036187984 = sum of:
    0.025005683 = product of:
      0.050011367 = sum of:
        0.050011367 = weight(_text_:web in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050011367 = score(doc=4471,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.011182303 = product of:
      0.033546906 = sum of:
        0.033546906 = weight(_text_:29 in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033546906 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This document describes best practice recipes for publishing vocabularies or ontologies on the Web (in RDF Schema or OWL). The features of each recipe are described in detail, so that vocabulary designers may choose the recipe best suited to their needs. Each recipe introduces general principles and an example configuration for use with an Apache HTTP server (which may be adapted to other environments). The recipes are all designed to be consistent with the architecture of the Web as currently specified, although the associated example configurations have been kept intentionally simple.

Date

14. 8.2011 14:29:06

Theme

Semantic Web

0.011415939 = product of:
  0.034247816 = sum of:
    0.024749206 = product of:
      0.049498413 = sum of:
        0.049498413 = weight(_text_:web in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049498413 = score(doc=2418,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.009498609 = product of:
      0.028495826 = sum of:
        0.028495826 = weight(_text_:22 in 2418) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028495826 = score(doc=2418,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1227524 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2418, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2418)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Integrated digital access to multiple collections is a prominent issue for many Cultural Heritage institutions. The metadata describing diverse collections must be interoperable, which requires aligning the controlled vocabularies that are used to annotate objects from these collections. In this paper, we present an experiment where we match the vocabularies of two collections by applying the Knowledge Representation techniques established in recent Semantic Web research. We discuss the steps that are required for such matching, namely formalising the initial resources using Semantic Web languages, and running ontology mapping tools on the resulting representations. In addition, we present a prototype that enables the user to browse the two collections using the obtained alignment while still providing her with the original vocabulary structures.

Source

Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 10th European conference, proceedings / ECDL 2006, Alicante, Spain, September 17 - 22, 2006

Theme

Semantic Web

0.010351777 = product of:
  0.031055331 = sum of:
    0.017500332 = product of:
      0.035000663 = sum of:
        0.035000663 = weight(_text_:web in 2738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035000663 = score(doc=2738,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 2738, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2738)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.013555 = product of:
      0.040664997 = sum of:
        0.040664997 = weight(_text_:29 in 2738) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040664997 = score(doc=2738,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 2738, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2738)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of automatic methods for building domain knowledge structures (domain models) from text collections. Applications of domain models have a long history within knowledge engineering and artificial intelligence. In the last couple of decades they have surfaced noticeably as a useful tool within natural language processing, information retrieval and semantic web technology. Inspired by the ubiquitous propagation of domain model structures that are emerging in several research disciplines, we give an overview of the current research landscape and some techniques and approaches. We will also discuss trade-offs between different approaches and point to some recent trends.

Content

Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Soft Approaches to IA on the Web". Vgl.: doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2011.07.002.

Date

29. 1.2016 18:29:51

0.010348691 = product of:
  0.031046072 = sum of:
    0.023058712 = product of:
      0.046117425 = sum of:
        0.046117425 = weight(_text_:web in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046117425 = score(doc=3084,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.40312994 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.00798736 = product of:
      0.023962079 = sum of:
        0.023962079 = weight(_text_:29 in 3084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023962079 = score(doc=3084,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3084, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3084)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Ontologies have moved beyond the domains of library science, philosophy, and knowledge representation. They are now the concerns of marketing departments, CEOs, and mainstream business. Research analyst companies such as Forrester Research report on the critical roles of ontologies in support of browsing and search for e-commerce and in support of interoperability for facilitation of knowledge management and configuration. One now sees ontologies used as central controlled vocabularies that are integrated into catalogues, databases, web publications, knowledge management applications, etc. Large ontologies are essential components in many online applications including search (such as Yahoo and Lycos), e-commerce (such as Amazon and eBay), configuration (such as Dell and PC-Order), etc. One also sees ontologies that have long life spans, sometimes in multiple projects (such as UMLS, SIC codes, etc.). Such diverse usage generates many implications for ontology environments. In this paper, we will discuss ontologies and requirements in their current instantiations on the web today. We will describe some desirable properties of ontologies. We will also discuss how both simple and complex ontologies are being and may be used to support varied applications. We will conclude with a discussion of emerging trends in ontologies and their environments and briefly mention our evolving ontology evolution environment.

Date

29. 3.1996 18:16:49

Source

Spinning the Semantic Web: bringing the World Wide Web to its full potential. Eds.: D. Fensel u.a

Theme

Semantic Web

0.010339425 = product of:
  0.031018274 = sum of:
    0.021433443 = product of:
      0.042866886 = sum of:
        0.042866886 = weight(_text_:web in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042866886 = score(doc=4642,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11439841 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.009584831 = product of:
      0.028754493 = sum of:
        0.028754493 = weight(_text_:29 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028754493 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12330827 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Thesauri can be useful resources for indexing and retrieval on the Semantic Web, but often they are not published in RDF/OWL. To convert thesauri to RDF for use in Semantic Web applications and to ensure the quality and utility of the conversion a structured method is required. Moreover, if different thesauri are to be interoperable without complicated mappings, a standard schema for thesauri is required. This paper presents a method for conversion of thesauri to the SKOS RDF/OWL schema, which is a proposal for such a standard under development by W3Cs Semantic Web Best Practices Working Group. We apply the method to three thesauri: IPSV, GTAA and MeSH. With these case studies we evaluate our method and the applicability of SKOS for representing thesauri.

Date

29. 7.2011 14:44:56

0.010023345 = product of:
  0.06014007 = sum of:
    0.06014007 = product of:
      0.12028014 = sum of:
        0.12028014 = weight(_text_:seite in 3143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12028014 = score(doc=3143,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19633847 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03505379 = queryNorm
            0.61261624 = fieldWeight in 3143, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3143)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Topic Maps auf der einen Seite und das Programm Concepto auf der anderen Seite werden beschrieben. Mt Topic Maps können Wortnetze und einfache Satzstrukturen dargestellt werden. Concepto dient zur Erfassung, Bearbeitung und Visualisierung von Wortschatz und Strukturen. Es unterstützt ein Wortmodell, bei dem die verschiedenen Lesarten eines Wortes erfasst und einfachen, formalsprachlichen Begriffen zugewiesen werden können. Die Funktionen beider Systeme werden verglichen. Es wird dargestellt, was an Topic Maps und an Concepto ergänzt werden müsste, wenn beide Systeme einen kompatiblen, wechselseitigen Datenaustausch zulassen sollen. Diese Erweiterungen würden die Anwendbarkeit der Systeme noch interessanter machen.