-
Li, L.; He, D.; Zhang, C.; Geng, L.; Zhang, K.: Characterizing peer-judged answer quality on academic Q&A sites : a cross-disciplinary case study on ResearchGate (2018)
0.01
0.011095377 = product of:
0.05547688 = sum of:
0.05547688 = sum of:
0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02667959 = score(doc=4637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 4637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02879729 = score(doc=4637,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4637, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4637)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 70(2018) no.3, S.269-287
-
Oard, D.W.; He, D.; Wang, J.: User-assisted query translation for interactive cross-language information retrieval (2008)
0.00
0.003201551 = product of:
0.016007755 = sum of:
0.016007755 = product of:
0.03201551 = sum of:
0.03201551 = weight(_text_:management in 2030) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03201551 = score(doc=2030,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2030, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2030)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.1, S.181-211
-
Chi, Y.; He, D.; Jeng, W.: Laypeople's source selection in online health information-seeking process (2020)
0.00
0.002879729 = product of:
0.014398645 = sum of:
0.014398645 = product of:
0.02879729 = sum of:
0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 34) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02879729 = score(doc=34,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 34, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=34)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 12.11.2020 13:22:09
-
He, D.; Brusilovsky, P.; Ahn, J.; Grady, J.; Farzan, R.; Peng, Y.; Yang, Y.; Rogati, M.: ¬An evaluation of adaptive filtering in the context of realistic task-based information exploration (2008)
0.00
0.002667959 = product of:
0.013339795 = sum of:
0.013339795 = product of:
0.02667959 = sum of:
0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02667959 = score(doc=2048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 44(2008) no.2, S.511-533
-
He, D.; Wu, D.: Enhancing query translation with relevance feedback in translingual information retrieval : a study of the medication process (2011)
0.00
0.002667959 = product of:
0.013339795 = sum of:
0.013339795 = product of:
0.02667959 = sum of:
0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 4244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02667959 = score(doc=4244,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4244, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4244)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 47(2011) no.1, S.1-17
-
Jeng, W.; DesAutels, S.; He, D.; Li, L.: Information exchange on an academic social networking site : a multidiscipline comparison on researchgate Q&A (2017)
0.00
0.002667959 = product of:
0.013339795 = sum of:
0.013339795 = product of:
0.02667959 = sum of:
0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 3431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02667959 = score(doc=3431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.042509552 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 3431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- The increasing popularity of academic social networking sites (ASNSs) requires studies on the usage of ASNSs among scholars and evaluations of the effectiveness of these ASNSs. However, it is unclear whether current ASNSs have fulfilled their design goal, as scholars' actual online interactions on these platforms remain unexplored. To fill the gap, this article presents a study based on data collected from ResearchGate. Adopting a mixed-method design by conducting qualitative content analysis and statistical analysis on 1,128 posts collected from ResearchGate Q&A, we examine how scholars exchange information and resources, and how their practices vary across three distinct disciplines: library and information services, history of art, and astrophysics. Our results show that the effect of a questioner's intention (i.e., seeking information or discussion) is greater than disciplinary factors in some circumstances. Across the three disciplines, responses to questions provide various resources, including experts' contact details, citations, links to Wikipedia, images, and so on. We further discuss several implications of the understanding of scholarly information exchange and the design of better academic social networking interfaces, which should stimulate scholarly interactions by minimizing confusion, improving the clarity of questions, and promoting scholarly content management.
