Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Tennis, J.T."
  1. Tennis, J.T.: Ethos and ideology of knowledge organization : toward precepts for an engaged knowledge organization (2013) 0.00
    0.004607566 = product of:
      0.02303783 = sum of:
        0.02303783 = product of:
          0.04607566 = sum of:
            0.04607566 = weight(_text_:22 in 637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04607566 = score(doc=637,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 637, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=637)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 11:54:49
  2. Tennis, J.T.: Facets and fugit tempus : considering time's effect on faceted classification schemes (2012) 0.00
    0.004607566 = product of:
      0.02303783 = sum of:
        0.02303783 = product of:
          0.04607566 = sum of:
            0.04607566 = weight(_text_:22 in 826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04607566 = score(doc=826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    2. 6.2013 18:33:22
  3. Tennis, J.T.: Scheme versioning in the Semantic Web (2006) 0.00
    0.0042687347 = product of:
      0.021343673 = sum of:
        0.021343673 = product of:
          0.042687345 = sum of:
            0.042687345 = weight(_text_:management in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042687345 = score(doc=4939,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.29792285 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a conceptual framework and methodology for managing scheme versioning for the Semantic Web. The first part of the paper introduces the concept of vocabulary encoding schemes, distinguished from metadata schemas, and discusses the characteristics of changes in schemes. The paper then presents a proposal to use a value record-similar to a term record in thesaurus management techniques-to manage scheme versioning challenges for the Semantic Web. The conclusion identifies future research directions.
  4. Tennis, J.T.: Load Bearing or Levittown? : the edifice metaphor in conceptualizing the ethos of classification work (2014) 0.00
    0.0040316205 = product of:
      0.0201581 = sum of:
        0.0201581 = product of:
          0.0403162 = sum of:
            0.0403162 = weight(_text_:22 in 1426) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0403162 = score(doc=1426,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1426, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1426)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
  5. Tennis, J.T.: Measured time : imposing a temporal metric to classificatory structures 0.00
    0.0037351425 = product of:
      0.018675713 = sum of:
        0.018675713 = product of:
          0.037351426 = sum of:
            0.037351426 = weight(_text_:management in 3529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037351426 = score(doc=3529,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 3529, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3529)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes three units of time helpful for understanding and evaluating classificatory structures: long time (versions and states of classification schemes), short time (the act of indexing as repeated ritual or form), and micro-time (where stages of the interpretation process of indexing are separated out and inventoried). Concludes with a short discussion of how time and the impermanence of classification also conjures up an artistic conceptualization of indexing, and briefly uses that to question the seemingly dominant understanding of classification practice as outcome of scientific management and assembly line thought.
  6. Tennis, J.T.; Sutton, S.A.: Extending the Simple Knowledge Organization System for concept management in vocabulary development applications (2008) 0.00
    0.003201551 = product of:
      0.016007755 = sum of:
        0.016007755 = product of:
          0.03201551 = sum of:
            0.03201551 = weight(_text_:management in 1337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03201551 = score(doc=1337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 1337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  7. Tennis, J.T.: Function, purpose, predication, and context of information organization frameworks (2006) 0.00
    0.003201551 = product of:
      0.016007755 = sum of:
        0.016007755 = product of:
          0.03201551 = sum of:
            0.03201551 = weight(_text_:management in 2520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03201551 = score(doc=2520,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2520, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2520)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper outlines the purposes, predications, functions, and contexts of information organization frameworks; including: bibliographic control, information retrieval, resource discovery, resource description, open access scholarly indexing, personal information management protocols, and social tagging in order to compare and contrast those purposes, predications, functions, and contexts. Information organization frameworks, for the purpose of this paper, consist of information organization systems (classification schemes, taxonomies, ontologies, bibliographic descriptions, etc.), methods of conceiving of and creating the systems, and the work processes involved in maintaining these systems. The paper first outlines the theoretical literature of these information organization frameworks. In conclusion, this paper establishes the first part of an evaluation rubric for a function, predication, purpose, and context analysis.