Search (6 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × author_ss:"Anderson, J.D."
  1. Anderson, J.D.: Indexing and classification : file organization and display for information retrieval (1989) 0.03
    0.034438718 = product of:
      0.17219359 = sum of:
        0.17219359 = weight(_text_:inc in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17219359 = score(doc=873,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2573945 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042509552 = queryNorm
            0.6689871 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Imprint
    Medford, NJ : Learned Informations Inc.
  2. Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: ¬The nature of indexing: how humans and machines analyze messages and texts for retrieval : Part I: Research and the nature of human indexing (2001) 0.01
    0.006403102 = product of:
      0.03201551 = sum of:
        0.03201551 = product of:
          0.06403102 = sum of:
            0.06403102 = weight(_text_:management in 3136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06403102 = score(doc=3136,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 3136, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3136)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.2, S.231-254
  3. Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: ¬The nature of indexing: how humans and machines analyze messages and texts for retrieval : Part II: Machine indexing, and the allocation of human versus machine effort (2001) 0.01
    0.005335918 = product of:
      0.02667959 = sum of:
        0.02667959 = product of:
          0.05335918 = sum of:
            0.05335918 = weight(_text_:management in 368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05335918 = score(doc=368,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.37240356 = fieldWeight in 368, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=368)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 37(2001) no.2, S.255-277
  4. Anderson, J.D.: Indexing standards : Are they possible? What good are they? Why bother? (1993) 0.00
    0.0037351425 = product of:
      0.018675713 = sum of:
        0.018675713 = product of:
          0.037351426 = sum of:
            0.037351426 = weight(_text_:management in 8087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037351426 = score(doc=8087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 8087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8087)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the nature of standards as tools to promote compatibility and improve practice, the role of research versus expert opinion in the creation of standards, the changing scope of standards for indexes in the face of the changing indexing environment, with the increasing use of automatic indexing, electronic displays, and electronic searching of non-displayed indexes. Describes the current draft of the NISO American Standard Guidelines for indexes in information retrieval (Z39.4) in terms of 3 fundamental requirements: syntax, vocabulary management and comprehensive planning and design. Concludes with comments about the nebulous concept of good and accurate indexing and whether and how standards can be used advantageously
  5. Anderson, J.D.: Standards for indexing : revising the American National Standard guidelines Z39.4 (1994) 0.00
    0.0037351425 = product of:
      0.018675713 = sum of:
        0.018675713 = product of:
          0.037351426 = sum of:
            0.037351426 = weight(_text_:management in 8266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037351426 = score(doc=8266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 8266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8266)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article discusses the nature of standards as tools to promote compatibiliy and improve practice, the role of research versus expert opinion in the creation of standards, the changing scope of standards for indexes in the face of the changing indexing environment, with the increasing use of automatic indexing, electronic displays, and electronic searching of non-displayed indexes. it describes the current draft of the NISO American Standards Guidelines for Indexes in Information Retrieval (Z39.4) in terms of three fundamental requirements: syntax, vocabulary management, and comprehensive planning and design. The article concludes with comments about the nebulous concept of good and accurate indexing and whether and how standards can be used advantageously
  6. Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) (2009) 0.00
    0.0034556747 = product of:
      0.017278373 = sum of:
        0.017278373 = product of:
          0.034556746 = sum of:
            0.034556746 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034556746 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:13