Search (142 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Jul, E.: Cataloging Internet resources : an assessment and prospectus (1998) 0.02
    0.024107104 = product of:
      0.12053552 = sum of:
        0.12053552 = weight(_text_:inc in 2541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12053552 = score(doc=2541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2573945 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042509552 = queryNorm
            0.46829098 = fieldWeight in 2541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0549803 = idf(docFreq=281, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2541)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Part of an issue devoted to 'Experimentation and collaboration: creating series for a new millenium', part 1, Proceedings of the North American Serials Interest Group, Inc.'s 12th annual conference, 29 May - 1 June 1997, University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan. Contribution to Issues Session 1, at which members from several CONSER institutions discussed their experiences with the CONSER program's interim guidelines for cataloguing remote access versions of print serials
  2. Kurth, M.; Ruddy, D.; Rupp, N.: Repurposing MARC metadata : using digital project experience to develop a metadata management design (2004) 0.02
    0.021229122 = product of:
      0.106145605 = sum of:
        0.106145605 = sum of:
          0.07158886 = weight(_text_:management in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07158886 = score(doc=4748,freq=10.0), product of:
              0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.49963182 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                  10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
          0.034556746 = weight(_text_:22 in 4748) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034556746 = score(doc=4748,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4748, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4748)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata and information technology staff in libraries that are building digital collections typically extract and manipulate MARC metadata sets to provide access to digital content via non-MARC schemes. Metadata processing in these libraries involves defining the relationships between metadata schemes, moving metadata between schemes, and coordinating the intellectual activity and physical resources required to create and manipulate metadata. Actively managing the non-MARC metadata resources used to build digital collections is something most of these libraries have only begun to do. This article proposes strategies for managing MARC metadata repurposing efforts as the first step in a coordinated approach to library metadata management. Guided by lessons learned from Cornell University library mapping and transformation activities, the authors apply the literature of data resource management to library metadata management and propose a model for managing MARC metadata repurposing processes through the implementation of a metadata management design.
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.144-152
  3. Hooland, S. van; Bontemps, Y.; Kaufman, S.: Answering the call for more accountability : applying data profiling to museum metadata (2008) 0.01
    0.013314451 = product of:
      0.06657226 = sum of:
        0.06657226 = sum of:
          0.03201551 = weight(_text_:management in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03201551 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
          0.034556746 = weight(_text_:22 in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034556746 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Although the issue of metadata quality is recognized as an important topic within the metadata research community, the cultural heritage sector has been slow to develop methodologies, guidelines and tools for addressing this topic in practice. This paper concentrates on metadata quality specifically within the museum sector and describes the potential of data-profiling techniques for metadata quality evaluation. A case study illustrates the application of a generalpurpose data-profiling tool on a large collection of metadata records from an ethnographic collection. After an analysis of the results of the case-study the paper reviews further steps in our research and presents the implementation of a metadata quality tool within an open-source collection management software.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  4. Godby, C.J.; Smith, D.; Childress, E.: Encoding application profiles in a computational model of the crosswalk (2008) 0.01
    0.011095377 = product of:
      0.05547688 = sum of:
        0.05547688 = sum of:
          0.02667959 = weight(_text_:management in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02667959 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
          0.02879729 = weight(_text_:22 in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02879729 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    OCLC's Crosswalk Web Service (Godby, Smith and Childress, 2008) formalizes the notion of crosswalk, as defined in Gill,et al. (n.d.), by hiding technical details and permitting the semantic equivalences to emerge as the centerpiece. One outcome is that metadata experts, who are typically not programmers, can enter the translation logic into a spreadsheet that can be automatically converted into executable code. In this paper, we describe the implementation of the Dublin Core Terms application profile in the management of crosswalks involving MARC. A crosswalk that encodes an application profile extends the typical format with two columns: one that annotates the namespace to which an element belongs, and one that annotates a 'broader-narrower' relation between a pair of elements, such as Dublin Core coverage and Dublin Core Terms spatial. This information is sufficient to produce scripts written in OCLC's Semantic Equivalence Expression Language (or Seel), which are called from the Crosswalk Web Service to generate production-grade translations. With its focus on elements that can be mixed, matched, added, and redefined, the application profile (Heery and Patel, 2000) is a natural fit with the translation model of the Crosswalk Web Service, which attempts to achieve interoperability by mapping one pair of elements at a time.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  5. Stubley, P.: Cataloguing standards and metadata for e-commerce (1999) 0.01
    0.01056458 = product of:
      0.052822895 = sum of:
        0.052822895 = product of:
          0.10564579 = sum of:
            0.10564579 = weight(_text_:management in 1915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10564579 = score(doc=1915,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.73732144 = fieldWeight in 1915, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1915)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information management report. 1999, Dec., S.16-18
    Theme
    Information Resources Management
  6. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.01
    0.009774125 = product of:
      0.048870623 = sum of:
        0.048870623 = product of:
          0.097741246 = sum of:
            0.097741246 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.097741246 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  7. Andresen, L.: Metadata in Denmark (2000) 0.01
    0.009215132 = product of:
      0.04607566 = sum of:
        0.04607566 = product of:
          0.09215132 = sum of:
            0.09215132 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09215132 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    16. 7.2000 20:58:22
  8. Philips, J.T.: Metadata - information about electronic records (1995) 0.01
    0.008537469 = product of:
      0.042687345 = sum of:
        0.042687345 = product of:
          0.08537469 = sum of:
            0.08537469 = weight(_text_:management in 4556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08537469 = score(doc=4556,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.5958457 = fieldWeight in 4556, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4556)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Metadata is a term to describe the information required to documents the characteristics of information contained within databases. Describes the elements that make up metadata. A number of software tools exist to help apply document management principles to electronic records but they have, so far, been inadequately applied. Describes 2 initiative currently under way to develop software to automate many records management functions. Understanding document management principles as applied to electronic records are vital to records managers
    Source
    Records management quarterly. 29(1995) no.4, S.53-55
  9. Moen, W.E.: ¬The metadata approach to accessing government information (2001) 0.01
    0.008063241 = product of:
      0.0403162 = sum of:
        0.0403162 = product of:
          0.0806324 = sum of:
            0.0806324 = weight(_text_:22 in 4407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0806324 = score(doc=4407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    28. 3.2002 9:22:34
  10. Chivers, A.; Feather, J.: ¬The management of digital data : a metadata approach (1998) 0.01
    0.007546128 = product of:
      0.037730638 = sum of:
        0.037730638 = product of:
          0.075461276 = sum of:
            0.075461276 = weight(_text_:management in 2363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.075461276 = score(doc=2363,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.5266582 = fieldWeight in 2363, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2363)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on a research study, conducted at the Department of Information and Library Studies, Loughborough University, to investigate the potential of metadata for universal data management and explore the attitudes of UK information professionals to these issues
  11. Caplan, P.; Guenther, R.: Metadata for Internet resources : the Dublin Core Metadata Elements Set and its mapping to USMARC (1996) 0.01
    0.0065160827 = product of:
      0.032580413 = sum of:
        0.032580413 = product of:
          0.065160826 = sum of:
            0.065160826 = weight(_text_:22 in 2408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065160826 = score(doc=2408,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2408, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2408)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    13. 1.2007 18:31:22
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.43-58
  12. Tennant, R.: ¬A bibliographic metadata infrastructure for the twenty-first century (2004) 0.01
    0.0065160827 = product of:
      0.032580413 = sum of:
        0.032580413 = product of:
          0.065160826 = sum of:
            0.065160826 = weight(_text_:22 in 2845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065160826 = score(doc=2845,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.4377287 = fieldWeight in 2845, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2845)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:22:38
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.175-181
  13. Büttner, G.: Integration audiovisueller Aufzeichnungen in das Records Management einer Organisation : ein konzeptionelles Metadatenmodell (2017) 0.01
    0.006469458 = product of:
      0.032347288 = sum of:
        0.032347288 = product of:
          0.064694576 = sum of:
            0.064694576 = weight(_text_:management in 4202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064694576 = score(doc=4202,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 4202, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4202)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Dieser Artikel stellt ein konzeptionelles Metadatenmodell vor, das auf Records verschiedener Medientypen anwendbar ist. Organisationen, die im Zuge ihrer Tätigkeit regelmäßig sowohl textbasierte als auch audiovisuelle Records erstellen, haben beide Medien im Sinne des Records Management zu verwalten. Dazu sind Metadaten, einschließlich der des zentralen Ordnungssystems für Records, ein Hauptwerkzeug. Inspiriert durch medienübergreifende, auf gemeinsamen Zugriff ausgerichtete Metadatenmodelle, wird ein neues Modell vorgeschlagen. Es kombiniert die hierarchische Abstraktion der existierenden Modelle mit den Prinzipien des Records Management. Das Modell kann Organisationen dabei helfen, Entscheidungen über Metadaten für ihre Records zu treffen.
  14. Chen, C.C.; Chen, H.H.; Chen, K.H.: ¬The design of the XML/Metadata management system (2000) 0.01
    0.006403102 = product of:
      0.03201551 = sum of:
        0.03201551 = product of:
          0.06403102 = sum of:
            0.06403102 = weight(_text_:management in 4633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06403102 = score(doc=4633,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.44688427 = fieldWeight in 4633, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4633)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
  15. Hoffmann, L.: Metadaten von Internetressourcen und ihre Integrierung in Bibliothekskataloge (1998) 0.01
    0.005759458 = product of:
      0.02879729 = sum of:
        0.02879729 = product of:
          0.05759458 = sum of:
            0.05759458 = weight(_text_:22 in 1032) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05759458 = score(doc=1032,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1032, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1032)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 5.1998 18:45:36
  16. Essen, F. von: Metadaten - neue Perspektiven für die Erschließung von Netzpublikationen in Bibliotheken : Erster META-LIB-Workshop in Göttingen (1998) 0.01
    0.005759458 = product of:
      0.02879729 = sum of:
        0.02879729 = product of:
          0.05759458 = sum of:
            0.05759458 = weight(_text_:22 in 2275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05759458 = score(doc=2275,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2275, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2275)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Bericht über den Workshop, der am 22. u. 23.6.98 in der SUB Göttingen stattfand
  17. Kopácsi, S. et al.: Development of a classification server to support metadata harmonization in a long term preservation system (2016) 0.01
    0.005759458 = product of:
      0.02879729 = sum of:
        0.02879729 = product of:
          0.05759458 = sum of:
            0.05759458 = weight(_text_:22 in 3280) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05759458 = score(doc=3280,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3280, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3280)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  18. Hajra, A. et al.: Enriching scientific publications from LOD repositories through word embeddings approach (2016) 0.01
    0.005759458 = product of:
      0.02879729 = sum of:
        0.02879729 = product of:
          0.05759458 = sum of:
            0.05759458 = weight(_text_:22 in 3281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05759458 = score(doc=3281,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3281, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3281)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  19. Mora-Mcginity, M. et al.: MusicWeb: music discovery with open linked semantic metadata (2016) 0.01
    0.005759458 = product of:
      0.02879729 = sum of:
        0.02879729 = product of:
          0.05759458 = sum of:
            0.05759458 = weight(_text_:22 in 3282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05759458 = score(doc=3282,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042509552 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3282, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3282)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
  20. Gömpel, R.; Altenhöner, R.; Kunz, M.; Oehlschläger, S.; Werner, C.: Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in Buenos Aires : Aus den Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control, der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC sowie der Information Technology Section (2004) 0.01
    0.0053222342 = product of:
      0.026611172 = sum of:
        0.026611172 = sum of:
          0.015092256 = weight(_text_:management in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.015092256 = score(doc=2874,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.14328322 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.10533164 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
          0.011518915 = weight(_text_:22 in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.011518915 = score(doc=2874,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14886121 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042509552 = queryNorm
              0.07738023 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    "Libraries: Tools for Education and Development" war das Motto der 70. IFLA-Generalkonferenz, dem Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, der vom 22.-27. August 2004 in Buenos Aires, Argentinien, und damit erstmals in Lateinamerika stattfand. Rund 3.000 Teilnehmerinnen und Teilnehmer, davon ein Drittel aus spanischsprachigen Ländern, allein 600 aus Argentinien, besuchten die von der IFLA und dem nationalen Organisationskomitee gut organisierte Tagung mit mehr als 200 Sitzungen und Veranstaltungen. Aus Deutschland waren laut Teilnehmerverzeichnis leider nur 45 Kolleginnen und Kollegen angereist, womit ihre Zahl wieder auf das Niveau von Boston gesunken ist. Erfreulicherweise gab es nunmehr bereits im dritten Jahr eine deutschsprachige Ausgabe des IFLA-Express. Auch in diesem Jahr soll hier über die Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control berichtet werden. Die Arbeit der Division mit ihren Sektionen Bibliography, Cataloguing, Classification and Indexing sowie der neuen Sektion Knowledge Management bildet einen der Schwerpunkte der IFLA-Arbeit, die dabei erzielten konkreten Ergebnisse und Empfehlungen haben maßgeblichen Einfluss auf die tägliche Arbeit der Bibliothekarinnen und Bibliothekare. Erstmals wird auch ausführlich über die Arbeit der Core Activities ICABS und UNIMARC und der Information Technology Section berichtet.
    Content
    Knowledge Management Section (Sektion Wissensmanagement) Ziel der neuen Sektion ist es, die Entwicklung und Implementierung des Wissensmanagements in Bibliotheken und Informationszentren zu fördern. Die Sektion will dafür eine internationale Plattform für die professionelle Kommunikation bieten und damit das Thema bekannter und allgemein verständlicher machen. Auf diese Weise soll seine Bedeutung auch für Bibliotheken und die mit ihm arbeitenden Einrichtungen herausgestellt werden. IFLA-CDNL Alliance for Bibliographic Standards (ICABS) Ein Jahr nach ihrer Gründung in Berlin hat die IFLA Core Activity "IFLA-CDNL Alliance for Bibliographic Standards (ICABS)" in Buenos Aires zum ersten Mal das Spektrum ihrer Arbeitsfelder einem großen Fachpublikum vorgestellt. Die IFLA Core Activity UNIMARC, einer der Partner der Allianz, hatte am Donnerstagvormittag zu einer Veranstaltung unter dem Titel "The holdings record as a bibliographic control tool" geladen. Am Nachmittag des selben Tages fand unter dem Titel "The new IFLA-CDNL Alliance for Bibliographic Standards - umbrella for multifaceted activities: strategies and practical ways to improve international coordination" die umfassende ICABS-Veranstaltung statt, die von der Generaldirektorin Der Deutschen Bibliothek, Dr. Elisabeth Niggemann, moderiert wurde. Nachdem die Vorsitzende des Advisory Board in ihrem Vortrag auf die Entstehungsgeschichte der Allianz eingegangen war, gab sie einen kurzen Oberblick über die Organisation und die Arbeit von ICABS als Dach der vielfältigen Aktivitäten im Bereich bibliographischer Standards. Vertreter aller in ICABS zusammengeschlossener Bibliotheken stellten im Anschluss daran ihre Arbeitsbereiche und -ergebnisse vor.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 126
  • d 13
  • chi 1
  • f 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types