Search (56 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationstheorie: Elemente / Struktur"
  1. Burkart, M.: Dokumentationssprachen (1990) 0.01 
    0.011159222 = product of:
  0.08927377 = sum of:
    0.08927377 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 4301) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08927377 = score(doc=4301,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.6193392 = fieldWeight in 4301, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4301)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit. 3. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a. Bd.1
  2. Szostak, R.: ¬A grammatical approach to subject classification in museums (2017) 0.01 
    0.010620554 = product of:
  0.08496443 = sum of:
    0.08496443 = weight(_text_:museum in 4136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08496443 = score(doc=4136,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.46147016 = fieldWeight in 4136, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4136)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Special Issue: Knowledge Organization within the Museum Domain.
  3. Soergel, D.E.: Klassifikationssysteme und Thesauri : Eine Anleitung zur Herstellung von Klassifikationssystemen und Thesauri im Bereich der Dokumentation (1969) 0.01 
    0.010521015 = product of:
  0.08416812 = sum of:
    0.08416812 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 2020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08416812 = score(doc=2020,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.58391863 = fieldWeight in 2020, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2020)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Content
    Überblick über Aufgaben und Aufbau eines Thesaurus. Aufwand für Herstellung von Thesauri. Begriffe und Begriffsbenennungen. Klassifikationssystem und Thesaurus und ihre Funktionen in einem Dokumentationssystem. Thesaurus-Struktur. Thesaurus-Format. Arbeitsablauf der Thesaurus-Herstellung. Regeln für Begriffsbenennungen, Rechtschreibung u.ä. Weiterentwicklung von Thesauri. Thesauri als Grundlage für kooperative Dokumentation.
  4. Blake, J.: Some issues in the classification of zoology (2011) 0.01 
    0.0075861104 = product of:
  0.060688883 = sum of:
    0.060688883 = weight(_text_:museum in 4845) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060688883 = score(doc=4845,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.32962155 = fieldWeight in 4845, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4845)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Content
    This paper is based on a thesis of the same title, completed as part of an MA in Library and Information Studies at University College London in 2009, and available at http://62.32.98.6/elibsql2uk_Z10300UK_Documents/Catalogued_PDFs/ Some_issues_in_the_classification_of_zoology.PDF. Thanks are due to Vanda Broughton, who supervised the MA thesis; and to Diane Tough of the Natural History Museum, London and Ann Sylph of the Zoological Society of London, who both provided valuable insights into the classification of zoological literature.
  5. Kleineberg, M.: Klassifikation (2023) 0.01 
    0.006509546 = product of:
  0.05207637 = sum of:
    0.05207637 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05207637 = score(doc=783,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.36128122 = fieldWeight in 783, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=783)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag nimmt eine informationswissenschaftliche Perspektive ein und betrachtet das Phänomen der Klassifikation als Methode und System der Wissensorganisation. Ein Klassifikationssystem wird dabei als Wissensorganisationssystem (engl. knowledge organization system) verstanden, das vor allem im Bereich der Information und Dokumentation zum Einsatz kommt, um dokumentarische Bezugseinheiten (DBE) mit einem kontrollierten Vokabular zu beschreiben (s. Kapitel B 1 Einführung Wissensorganisation). Als eine solche Dokumentationssprache zeichnet sich ein Klassifikationssystem typischerweise durch seine systematische Ordnung aus und dient der inhaltlichen Groberschließung, eignet sich aber auch als Aufstellungssystematik und Hilfsmittel bei der Recherche wie etwa als systematischer Sucheinstieg oder thematischer Filter für Treffermengen. Beim Information Retrieval liegt die Stärke der klassifikatorischen Erschließung durch das hohe Abstraktionsniveau in Überblicks- und Vollständigkeitsrecherchen.
  6. Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997) 0.01 
    0.005599554 = product of:
  0.044796433 = sum of:
    0.044796433 = product of:
      0.06719465 = sum of:
        0.033749122 = weight(_text_:29 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033749122 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
        0.033445526 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033445526 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
  7. Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017) 0.00 
    0.00489961 = product of:
  0.03919688 = sum of:
    0.03919688 = product of:
      0.058795318 = sum of:
        0.02953048 = weight(_text_:29 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02953048 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
        0.029264836 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029264836 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Pages
    S.22-36
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  8. Facets: a fruitful notion in many domains : special issue on facet analysis (2008) 0.00 
    0.0037930552 = product of:
  0.030344442 = sum of:
    0.030344442 = weight(_text_:museum in 3262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030344442 = score(doc=3262,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.16481078 = fieldWeight in 3262, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3262)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Footnote
    Several of the papers are clearly written as primers and neatly address the second agenda item: attracting others to the study and use of facet analysis. The most valuable papers are written in clear, approachable language. Vickery's paper (p. 145-160) is a clarion call for faceted classification and facet analysis. The heart of the paper is a primer for central concepts and techniques. Vickery explains the value of using faceted classification in document retrieval. Also provided are potential solutions to thorny interface and display issues with facets. Vickery looks to complementary themes in knowledge organization, such as thesauri and ontologies as potential areas for extending the facet concept. Broughton (p. 193-210) describes a rigorous approach to the application of facet analysis in the creation of a compatible thesaurus from the schedules of the 2nd edition of the Bliss Classification (BC2). This discussion of exemplary faceted thesauri, recent standards work, and difficulties encountered in the project will provide valuable guidance for future research in this area. Slavic (p. 257-271) provides a challenge to make faceted classification come 'alive' through promoting the use of machine-readable formats for use and exchange in applications such as Topic Maps and SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization Systems), and as supported by the standard BS8723 (2005) Structured Vocabulary for Information Retrieval. She also urges designers of faceted classifications to get involved in standards work. Cheti and Paradisi (p. 223-241) outline a basic approach to converting an existing subject indexing tool, the Nuovo Soggetario, into a faceted thesaurus through the use of facet analysis. This discussion, well grounded in the canonical literature, may well serve as a primer for future efforts. Also useful for those who wish to construct faceted thesauri is the article by Tudhope and Binding (p. 211-222). This contains an outline of basic elements to be found in exemplar faceted thesauri, and a discussion of project FACET (Faceted Access to Cultural heritage Terminology) with algorithmically-based semantic query expansion in a dataset composed of items from the National Museum of Science and Industry indexed with AAT (Art and Architecture Thesaurus). This paper looks to the future hybridization of ontologies and facets through standards developments such as SKOS because of the "lightweight semantics" inherent in facets.
  9. Green, R.: Relational aspects of subject authority control : the contributions of classificatory structure (2015) 0.00 
    0.0034997216 = product of:
  0.027997773 = sum of:
    0.027997773 = product of:
      0.041996658 = sum of:
        0.0210932 = weight(_text_:29 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0210932 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
        0.020903455 = weight(_text_:22 in 2282) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020903455 = score(doc=2282,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2282, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2282)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    8.11.2015 21:27:22
    Source
    Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
  10. Fairthorne, R.A.: Temporal structure in bibliographic classification (1985) 0.00 
    0.0027898054 = product of:
  0.022318443 = sum of:
    0.022318443 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022318443 = score(doc=3651,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.1548348 = fieldWeight in 3651, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=3651)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Footnote
    Original in: Ottawa Conference on the Conceptual Basis of the Classification of Knowledge, Ottawa, 1971. Ed.: Jerzy A Wojceichowski. Pullach: Verlag Dokumentation 1974. S.404-412.
  11. Foskett, A.C.: ¬The future of facetted classification (2000) 0.00 
    0.0024608735 = product of:
  0.019686988 = sum of:
    0.019686988 = product of:
      0.05906096 = sum of:
        0.05906096 = weight(_text_:29 in 3162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05906096 = score(doc=3162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3162)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    27. 1.2002 19:30:29
  12. Maniez, J.: ¬Des classifications aux thesaurus : du bon usage des facettes (1999) 0.00 
    0.0020903456 = product of:
  0.016722765 = sum of:
    0.016722765 = product of:
      0.05016829 = sum of:
        0.05016829 = weight(_text_:22 in 6404) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05016829 = score(doc=6404,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6404, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6404)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  13. Maniez, J.: ¬Du bon usage des facettes : des classifications aux thésaurus (1999) 0.00 
    0.0020903456 = product of:
  0.016722765 = sum of:
    0.016722765 = product of:
      0.05016829 = sum of:
        0.05016829 = weight(_text_:22 in 3773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05016829 = score(doc=3773,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3773, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3773)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  14. Foskett, D.J.: Systems theory and its relevance to documentary classification (2017) 0.00 
    0.0020903456 = product of:
  0.016722765 = sum of:
    0.016722765 = product of:
      0.05016829 = sum of:
        0.05016829 = weight(_text_:22 in 3176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05016829 = score(doc=3176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3176)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    6. 5.2017 18:46:22
  15. Loehrlein, A.J.; Lemieux, V.L.; Bennett, M.: ¬The classification of financial products (2014) 0.00 
    0.0014915147 = product of:
  0.011932118 = sum of:
    0.011932118 = product of:
      0.03579635 = sum of:
        0.03579635 = weight(_text_:29 in 1196) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03579635 = score(doc=1196,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 1196, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1196)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    29. 1.2014 16:29:52
  16. Cheti, A.: ¬Le categorie nell'indicizzazione (1990) 0.00 
    0.0014062135 = product of:
  0.011249708 = sum of:
    0.011249708 = product of:
      0.033749122 = sum of:
        0.033749122 = weight(_text_:29 in 3527) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033749122 = score(doc=3527,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3527, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3527)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Biblioteche oggi. 8(1990) no.1, S.29-49
  17. Grimaldi, T.: ¬L'indicizzazione dal punto di vista cognitivo (II) (1996) 0.00 
    0.0014062135 = product of:
  0.011249708 = sum of:
    0.011249708 = product of:
      0.033749122 = sum of:
        0.033749122 = weight(_text_:29 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033749122 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    14. 7.1996 13:29:45
  18. Poli, R.: Framing information (2003) 0.00 
    0.0014062135 = product of:
  0.011249708 = sum of:
    0.011249708 = product of:
      0.033749122 = sum of:
        0.033749122 = weight(_text_:29 in 2711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033749122 = score(doc=2711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2711)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    11. 9.2004 15:29:04
  19. Maple, A.: Faceted access : a review of the literature (1995) 0.00 
    0.0014062135 = product of:
  0.011249708 = sum of:
    0.011249708 = product of:
      0.033749122 = sum of:
        0.033749122 = weight(_text_:29 in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033749122 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    20. 8.2006 12:29:16
  20. Tennis, J.T.: Structure of classification theory : on foundational and the higher layers of classification theory (2016) 0.00 
    0.0014062135 = product of:
  0.011249708 = sum of:
    0.011249708 = product of:
      0.033749122 = sum of:
        0.033749122 = weight(_text_:29 in 4889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033749122 = score(doc=4889,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4889, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4889)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 45
  • d 4
  • f 3
  • i 3
  • chi 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 51
  • m 3
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications