Search (185 results, page 1 of 10)

  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  1. Hooland, S. van; Verborgh, R.: Linked data for Lilibraries, archives and museums : how to clean, link, and publish your metadata (2014) 0.05 
    0.0456239 = product of:
  0.1824956 = sum of:
    0.10856358 = weight(_text_:museum in 5153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10856358 = score(doc=5153,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.58964497 = fieldWeight in 5153, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5153)
    0.07393202 = weight(_text_:informationsmanagement in 5153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07393202 = score(doc=5153,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19105253 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.38697222 = fieldWeight in 5153, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5153)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    This highly practical handbook teaches you how to unlock the value of your existing metadata through cleaning, reconciliation, enrichment and linking and how to streamline the process of new metadata creation. Libraries, archives and museums are facing up to the challenge of providing access to fast growing collections whilst managing cuts to budgets. Key to this is the creation, linking and publishing of good quality metadata as Linked Data that will allow their collections to be discovered, accessed and disseminated in a sustainable manner. This highly practical handbook teaches you how to unlock the value of your existing metadata through cleaning, reconciliation, enrichment and linking and how to streamline the process of new metadata creation. Metadata experts Seth van Hooland and Ruben Verborgh introduce the key concepts of metadata standards and Linked Data and how they can be practically applied to existing metadata, giving readers the tools and understanding to achieve maximum results with limited resources. Readers will learn how to critically assess and use (semi-)automated methods of managing metadata through hands-on exercises within the book and on the accompanying website. Each chapter is built around a case study from institutions around the world, demonstrating how freely available tools are being successfully used in different metadata contexts. This handbook delivers the necessary conceptual and practical understanding to empower practitioners to make the right decisions when making their organisations resources accessible on the Web. Key topics include, the value of metadata; metadata creation - architecture, data models and standards; metadata cleaning; metadata reconciliation; metadata enrichment through Linked Data and named-entity recognition; importing and exporting metadata; ensuring a sustainable publishing model. This will be an invaluable guide for metadata practitioners and researchers within all cultural heritage contexts, from library cataloguers and archivists to museum curatorial staff. It will also be of interest to students and academics within information science and digital humanities fields. IT managers with responsibility for information systems, as well as strategy heads and budget holders, at cultural heritage organisations, will find this a valuable decision-making aid.
    BK
    06.35 Informationsmanagement
    Classification
    06.35 Informationsmanagement
    RSWK
    Bibliothek / Archiv / Museum / Metadaten / Linked Data
    Linked Data / Bibliothek / Archiv / Museum
    Subject
    Bibliothek / Archiv / Museum / Metadaten / Linked Data
    Linked Data / Bibliothek / Archiv / Museum
  2. Murphy, A.; Enser, P.: Accessing the visual heritage : metadata construction at the Science & Society Picture Library (1998) 0.04 
    0.04494309 = product of:
  0.17977236 = sum of:
    0.16992886 = weight(_text_:museum in 5180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.16992886 = score(doc=5180,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.9229403 = fieldWeight in 5180, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5180)
    0.009843494 = product of:
      0.02953048 = sum of:
        0.02953048 = weight(_text_:29 in 5180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02953048 = score(doc=5180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5180)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    The Science & Society Picture Library (SSPL) has been established to market the images of 3 of Britain's museums: the Science Museum in London, the National Railway Museum in York, and the National Museum of Photography, Film and Television in Bradford - collectively called the National Museum of Science and Industry). The images are drawn from many different collections within these museums and, as a result, SSPL represents one of the widest varieties of photographs, paintings, prints, posters and objects in the world. Discusses issues surrounding the SSPL's current task of developing an integrated cataloguing and indexing strategy by which metadata construction can proceed, and which will provide potential users with effective and standardized subject access to the many components of its holding
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:29:00
  3. Smiraglia, R.P.: Content metadata : an analysis of Etruscan artifacts in a museum of archeology (2005) 0.03 
    0.03364419 = product of:
  0.13457675 = sum of:
    0.12613948 = weight(_text_:museum in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12613948 = score(doc=176,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.68510556 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
    0.008437281 = product of:
      0.02531184 = sum of:
        0.02531184 = weight(_text_:29 in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02531184 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Metadata schemes target resources as information-packages, without attention to the distinction between content and carrier. Most schema are derived without empirical understanding of the concepts that need to be represented, the ways in which terms representing the central concepts might best be derived, and how metadata descriptions will be used for retrieval. Research is required to resolve this dilemma, and much research will be required if the plethora of schemes that already exist are to be made efficacious for resource description and retrieval. Here I report the results of a preliminary study, which was designed to see whether the bibliographic concept of "the work" could be of any relevance among artifacts held by a museum. I extend the "works metaphor" from the bibliographic to the artifactual domain, by altering the terms of the definition slightly, thus: 1) instantiation is understood as content genealogy. Case studies of Etruscan artifacts from the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology are used to demonstrate the inherence of the work in non-documentary artifacts.
    Date
    29. 9.2008 19:14:41
  4. Heidorn, P.B.; Wei, Q.: Automatic metadata extraction from museum specimen labels (2008) 0.03 
    0.028021013 = product of:
  0.11208405 = sum of:
    0.10511623 = weight(_text_:museum in 2624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10511623 = score(doc=2624,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.5709213 = fieldWeight in 2624, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2624)
    0.0069678184 = product of:
      0.020903455 = sum of:
        0.020903455 = weight(_text_:22 in 2624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020903455 = score(doc=2624,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2624, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2624)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    This paper describes the information properties of museum specimen labels and machine learning tools to automatically extract Darwin Core (DwC) and other metadata from these labels processed through Optical Character Recognition (OCR). The DwC is a metadata profile describing the core set of access points for search and retrieval of natural history collections and observation databases. Using the HERBIS Learning System (HLS) we extract 74 independent elements from these labels. The automated text extraction tools are provided as a web service so that users can reference digital images of specimens and receive back an extended Darwin Core XML representation of the content of the label. This automated extraction task is made more difficult by the high variability of museum label formats, OCR errors and the open class nature of some elements. In this paper we introduce our overall system architecture, and variability robust solutions including, the application of Hidden Markov and Naïve Bayes machine learning models, data cleaning, use of field element identifiers, and specialist learning models. The techniques developed here could be adapted to any metadata extraction situation with noisy text and weakly ordered elements.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  5. Hooland, S. van; Bontemps, Y.; Kaufman, S.: Answering the call for more accountability : applying data profiling to museum metadata (2008) 0.03 
    0.027838457 = product of:
  0.11135383 = sum of:
    0.102992445 = weight(_text_:museum in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.102992445 = score(doc=2644,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.5593863 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
    0.008361382 = product of:
      0.025084145 = sum of:
        0.025084145 = weight(_text_:22 in 2644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025084145 = score(doc=2644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2644)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Although the issue of metadata quality is recognized as an important topic within the metadata research community, the cultural heritage sector has been slow to develop methodologies, guidelines and tools for addressing this topic in practice. This paper concentrates on metadata quality specifically within the museum sector and describes the potential of data-profiling techniques for metadata quality evaluation. A case study illustrates the application of a generalpurpose data-profiling tool on a large collection of metadata records from an ethnographic collection. After an analysis of the results of the case-study the paper reviews further steps in our research and presents the implementation of a metadata quality tool within an open-source collection management software.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  6. Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany (2008) 0.02 
    0.0162391 = product of:
  0.0649564 = sum of:
    0.060078926 = weight(_text_:museum in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060078926 = score(doc=2668,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.32630867 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
    0.0048774728 = product of:
      0.014632418 = sum of:
        0.014632418 = weight(_text_:22 in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014632418 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Content
    Carol Jean Godby, Devon Smith, Eric Childress: Encoding Application Profiles in a Computational Model of the Crosswalk. - Maria Elisabete Catarino, Ana Alice Baptista: Relating Folksonomies with Dublin Core. - Ed Summers, Antoine Isaac, Clay Redding, Dan Krech: LCSH, SKOS and Linked Data. - Xia Lin, Jiexun Li, Xiaohua Zhou: Theme Creation for Digital Collections. - Boris Lauser, Gudrun Johannsen, Caterina Caracciolo, Willem Robert van Hage, Johannes Keizer, Philipp Mayr: Comparing Human and Automatic Thesaurus Mapping Approaches in the Agricultural Domain. - P. Bryan Heidorn, Qin Wei: Automatic Metadata Extraction From Museum Specimen Labels. - Stuart Allen Sutton, Diny Golder: Achievement Standards Network (ASN): An Application Profile for Mapping K-12 Educational Resources to Achievement Standards. - Allen H. Renear, Karen M. Wickett, Richard J. Urban, David Dubin, Sarah L. Shreeves: Collection/Item Metadata Relationships. - Seth van Hooland, Yves Bontemps, Seth Kaufman: Answering the Call for more Accountability: Applying Data Profiling to Museum Metadata. - Thomas Margaritopoulos, Merkourios Margaritopoulos, Ioannis Mavridis, Athanasios Manitsaris: A Conceptual Framework for Metadata Quality Assessment. - Miao Chen, Xiaozhong Liu, Jian Qin: Semantic Relation Extraction from Socially-Generated Tags: A Methodology for Metadata Generation. - Hak Lae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G. Breslin, Stefan Decker, Hong Gee Kim: The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies. - Martin Malmsten: Making a Library Catalogue Part of the Semantic Web. - Philipp Mayr, Vivien Petras: Building a Terminology Network for Search: The KoMoHe Project. - Michael Panzer: Cool URIs for the DDC: Towards Web-scale Accessibility of a Large Classification System. - Barbara Levergood, Stefan Farrenkopf, Elisabeth Frasnelli: The Specification of the Language of the Field and Interoperability: Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries (CACAO)
  7. Schneider, S.: Recherche und Literaturbestellung leicht gemacht! : MedPilot - Virtuelle Fachbibliothek Medizin (2003) 0.02 
    0.015479966 = product of:
  0.061919864 = sum of:
    0.05207637 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 1914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05207637 = score(doc=1914,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.36128122 = fieldWeight in 1914, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1914)
    0.009843494 = product of:
      0.02953048 = sum of:
        0.02953048 = weight(_text_:29 in 1914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02953048 = score(doc=1914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1914)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    MedPilot (www.medpilot.de) ist ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt der Deutschen Zentralbibliothek für Medizin (ZBMed) und des Deutschen Instituts für Medizinische Dokumentation und Information (DIMDI). Im Rahmen der Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken wird MedPilot von der Deutschen Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) gefördert. MedPilot basiert auf der Software SISIS-Elektra, welche im Rahmen des Projektes weiterentwickelt wurde. Projektstart im August 2001, Testbetrieb seit Juli 2002, offizielle Eröffnung im Februar 2003
    Source
    Bibliotheken und Informationseinrichtungen - Aufgaben, Strukturen, Ziele: 29. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB / Sektion 5 im DBV in Zusammenarbeit mit der BDB, BIB, DBV, DGI und VDB, zugleich DBV-Jahrestagung, 8.-11.4.2003 in Stuttgart. Red.: Margit Bauer
  8. Gartner, R.: Metadata in the digital library : building an integrated strategy with XML (2021) 0.01 
    0.0149169145 = product of:
  0.059667658 = sum of:
    0.055449016 = weight(_text_:informationsmanagement in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055449016 = score(doc=732,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19105253 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.29022917 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
    0.0042186403 = product of:
      0.01265592 = sum of:
        0.01265592 = weight(_text_:29 in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01265592 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.11659596 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    BK
    06.35 Informationsmanagement
    Classification
    06.35 Informationsmanagement
    Date
    29. 9.2022 17:57:57
  9. Haynes, D.: Metadata for information management and retrieval : understanding metadata and its use (2018) 0.01 
    0.013862254 = product of:
  0.11089803 = sum of:
    0.11089803 = weight(_text_:informationsmanagement in 4096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11089803 = score(doc=4096,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19105253 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.58045834 = fieldWeight in 4096, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4096)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    RSWK
    Informationsmanagement / Information Retrieval / Metadatenmodell
    Subject
    Informationsmanagement / Information Retrieval / Metadatenmodell
  10. Sewing, S.: Bestandserhaltung und Archivierung : Koordinierung auf der Basis eines gemeinsamen Metadatenformates in den deutschen und österreichischen Bibliotheksverbünden (2021) 0.01 
    0.013249567 = product of:
  0.052998267 = sum of:
    0.044636887 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044636887 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.3096696 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
    0.008361382 = product of:
      0.025084145 = sum of:
        0.025084145 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025084145 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    In den Handlungsempfehlungen der Koordinierungsstelle für die Erhaltung des schriftlichen Kulturguts (KEK) von 2015 (KEK-Handlungsempfehlungen) wird ein nationaler Standard bei der Dokumentation von Bestandserhaltung gefordert: "In den Bibliothekskatalogen sollten künftig für den verbundübergreifenden Abgleich Bestandserhaltungsmaßnahmen für die Bestände ab 1851 [.] in standardisierter Form dokumentiert und recherchierbar gemacht werden. Dies bedarf einer gemeinsamen Festlegung mit den Bibliotheksverbünden [.]." In den KEK-Handlungsempfehlungen werden auf der Basis einer im Jahr 2015 erfolgten Erhebung für Monografien fast neun Millionen Bände aus dem Zeitabschnitt 1851-1990 als Pflichtexemplare an Bundes- und Ländereinrichtungen angegeben, die akut vom Papierzerfall bedroht und als erste Stufe einer Gesamtstrategie zu entsäuern sind. Ein Ziel der KEK ist es, standardisierte und zertifizierte Verfahren zur Massenentsäuerung zu fördern. Im Metadatenformat sind zunächst fünf Verfahren der Massenentsäuerung in Form von kontrolliertem Vokabular dokumentiert: DEZ, Mg3/MBG, METE, MgO, MMMC[2]. Mit diesen Angaben, die gezielt selektiert werden können, ist mittel- und langfristig die Anwendung einzelner Verfahren der Massenentsäuerung abrufbar und statistisch auswertbar.
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  11. Zeng, M.L.: Metadata elements for object description and representaion : a case report from a digitized historical fashion collection project (1999) 0.01 
    0.012874056 = product of:
  0.102992445 = sum of:
    0.102992445 = weight(_text_:museum in 4055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.102992445 = score(doc=4055,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.5593863 = fieldWeight in 4055, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4055)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    This project's goal is to develop a catalog for a digitized collection of historical fashion objects held at the Kent State University Museum and to analyze and evaluate how well existing metadata formats can be applied to a fashion collection. The project considered the known and anticipated uses of the collection and the identification of the metadata elements that would be needed to support these uses. From a set of 90 museum accession records, 42 fashion objects were selected for cataloging. 2 metadata treatments were created for these 42 items using (a) AACR in use with USMARC formats, (b) the Dublic Core set of elements designed for minimal level cataloging, and (c) the Visual Resources Association (VRA) Core Categories for Visual Resources created for developing local databases and cataloging records for visual resource collections. Comparison and analysis of the formats resulted in the adoption of a modified VRA metadata format to catalog the entire digitized historical fashion collection
  12. Chen, Y.N.; Chen, S.J.: ¬A metadata practice of the OFLA FRBR model : a case study for the National Palace Museum in Taipai (2004) 0.01 
    0.012874056 = product of:
  0.102992445 = sum of:
    0.102992445 = weight(_text_:museum in 3384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.102992445 = score(doc=3384,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.5593863 = fieldWeight in 3384, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3384)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    In 1998, the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model which is composed of four entities (work, expression, manifestation and item) and their associative relationships (primary, responsibility and subject), was proposed by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). The FRBR model can be deployed as a logical framework for proceeding metadata analysis and developing metadata format. This paper presents a case study of the National Palace Museum (NPM) in Taipei to examine the feasibility of the FRBR model. Based on the examination of case study at the NPM, the FRBR model is proven to be a useful and fundamental framework for metadata analysis and implementation. Findings show that the FRBR model is helpful in identifying proper metadata elements organization and their distribution over the FRBR entities. The model is more suitable for media-centric and association-rich contents. However, in order to refine the FRBR model as a common framework for metadata, it would also require supportive mechanisms for management responsibility relationships for the workflow consideration and refine the distinction between work and expression entity.
  13. Baca, M.; O'Keefe, E.: Sharing standards and expertise in the early 21st century : Moving toward a collaborative, "cross-community" model for metadata creation (2008) 0.01 
    0.012874056 = product of:
  0.102992445 = sum of:
    0.102992445 = weight(_text_:museum in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.102992445 = score(doc=2321,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.5593863 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    This paper provides a brief overview of the evolving descriptive metadata landscape, one phenomenon of which can be characterized as "cross-community" metadata as manifested in records that are the result of a combination of carefully considered data value and data content standards. he online catalog of the Morgan Library & Museum provides a real-life illustration of how diverse data content standards and vocabulary tools can be integrated within the classic data structure/technical interchange format of MARC21 to better describe unique, museum-type objects, and to provide better end-user access and understanding. The Morgan experience also shows the value of developing a collaborative model for metadata creation that combines the subject expertise of curators and scholars with the cataloging expertise and knowledge of standards possessed by librarians.
  14. Wendler, R.: Branching out : cataloging skills and functions in the digital age (1999) 0.01 
    0.012137776 = product of:
  0.09710221 = sum of:
    0.09710221 = weight(_text_:museum in 6100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09710221 = score(doc=6100,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.5273945 = fieldWeight in 6100, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6100)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Librarians create metadata including cataloging to manage and provide access to collections. Two recent technological developments, the explosion in electronic publishing and the conversion of metadata previously unavailable online into machine-readable form, are providing challenges to cataloging. Disparate types of resources, such as images and museum objects, archives, and library collections in print and electronic form, must be brought together in a coherent information environment. While catalogers exclusively cannot do these tasks, they and their skills are essential to bring order out of the chaos of the many different access systems
  15. Chen, Y.-n.; Chen, S.-j.: ¬A metadata practice of the IFLA FRBR model : a case study for the National Palace Museum in Taipei (2004) 0.01 
    0.01072838 = product of:
  0.08582704 = sum of:
    0.08582704 = weight(_text_:museum in 4436) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08582704 = score(doc=4436,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.46615526 = fieldWeight in 4436, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4436)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    In 1998, the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) model which is composed of four entities (work, expression, manifestation and item) and their associative relationships (primary, responsibility and subject), was proposed by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA). The FRBR model can be deployed as a logical framework for proceeding metadata analysis and developing metadata format. This paper presents a case study of the National Palace Museum (NPM) in Taipei to examine the feasibility of the FRBR model. Based on the examination of case study at the NPM, the FRBR model is proven to be a useful and fundamental framework for metadata analysis and implementation. Findings show that the FRBR model is helpful in identifying proper metadata elements organization and their distribution over the FRBR entities. The model is more suitable for media-centric and association-rich contents. However, in order to refine the FRBR model as a common framework for metadata, it would also require supportive mechanisms for management responsibility relationships for the workflow consideration and refine the distinction between work and expression entity.
  16. Ya-Ning, C.; Hao-Ren, K.: FRBRoo-based approach to heterogeneous metadata integration (2013) 0.01 
    0.01072838 = product of:
  0.08582704 = sum of:
    0.08582704 = weight(_text_:museum in 1765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08582704 = score(doc=1765,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.46615526 = fieldWeight in 1765, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1765)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper seeks to adopt FRBRoo as an ontological approach to integrate heterogeneous metadata, and transform human-understandable format into machine-understandable format for semantic query. Design/methodology/approach - Two cases of use with museum artefacts and literary works were exploited to illustrate how FRBRoo can be used to re-contextualize the semantics of elements and the semantic relationships embedded in those elements. The shared ontology was then RDFized and examples were explored to examine the feasibility of the proposed approach. Findings - FRBRoo can play a role as inter lingua aligning museum and library metadata to achieve heterogeneous metadata integration and semantic query without changing either of the original approaches to fit the other. Research limitations/implications - Exploration of more diverse use cases is required to further align the different approaches of museums and libraries using FRBRoo and make revisions. Practical implications - Solid evidence is provided for the use of FRBRoo in heterogeneous metadata integration and semantic query. Originality/value - This is the first study to elaborate how FRBRoo can play a role as a shared ontology to integrate the heterogeneous metadata generated by museums and libraries. This paper also shows how the proposed approach is distinct from the Dublin Core format crosswalk in re-contextualizing semantic meanings and their relationships, and further provides four new sub-types for mapping description language.
  17. Bearman, D.: Capturing records' metadata : unresolved questions and proposals for research (1997) 0.01 
    0.010620554 = product of:
  0.08496443 = sum of:
    0.08496443 = weight(_text_:museum in 1714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08496443 = score(doc=1714,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.46147016 = fieldWeight in 1714, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1714)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Archives and museum informatics. 11(1997) nos.3/4, S.271-276
  18. Smiraglia, R.P.: Empiricism as the basis for metadata categorisation : expanding the case for instantiation with archival documents (2006) 0.01 
    0.010620554 = product of:
  0.08496443 = sum of:
    0.08496443 = weight(_text_:museum in 261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08496443 = score(doc=261,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.46147016 = fieldWeight in 261, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=261)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Metadata schemas tend to be rationally ordered instruments for the categorization of data about information objects. Instantiation has been demonstrated to be a universal phenomenon. Empirical analysis, both positivist and qualitative, has contributed to typologies of the properties of instantiation. This yields a naïve knowledge organization schema of instantiation. Bibliographic, museum, and archival analyses are compared to demonstrate the value of empirical derivation of categories. In this instance categories, once derived, are demonstrated to represent properties yielding typologies. The empirical generation of categories for knowledge organization is demonstrated.
  19. Rusch-Feja, D.D.: Metadaten zur Erschließung digitaler Ressourcen und PURL (1997) 0.01 
    0.009299352 = product of:
  0.074394815 = sum of:
    0.074394815 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 1881) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.074394815 = score(doc=1881,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.516116 = fieldWeight in 1881, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1881)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Weiter auf dem Weg zur Virtuellen Bibliothek! Praxis, Projekte, Perspektiven. 2. INETBIB-Tagung der Universitätsbibliothek Dortmund und der Fachhochschule Potsdam, Fachbereich Archiv-Bibliothek - Dokumentation vom 10.-11.3.1997. 2., erw. Aufl. Hrsg. von B. Tröger u. H.-C. Hobohm
  20. Hoffmann, L.: Probleme bei der Anpassung des Metadatenformats von IBIS ab Dublic Core und die Auswirkungen auf die Verbunddatenbank (1997) 0.01 
    0.009299352 = product of:
  0.074394815 = sum of:
    0.074394815 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 1882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.074394815 = score(doc=1882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03085695 = queryNorm
        0.516116 = fieldWeight in 1882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1882)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Weiter auf dem Weg zur Virtuellen Bibliothek! Praxis, Projekte, Perspektiven. 2. INETBIB-Tagung der Universitätsbibliothek Dortmund und der Fachhochschule Potsdam, Fachbereich Archiv-Bibliothek - Dokumentation vom 10.-11.3.1997. 2., erw. Aufl. Hrsg. von B. Tröger u. H.-C. Hobohm

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 157
  • d 24
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 164
  • el 12
  • m 11
  • s 10
  • b 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications