Search (347 results, page 1 of 18)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.39
    0.3920721 = product of:
      0.7841442 = sum of:
        0.049009018 = product of:
          0.24504508 = sum of:
            0.24504508 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.24504508 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26160556 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03085695 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.24504508 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24504508 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26160556 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.24504508 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24504508 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26160556 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
        0.24504508 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24504508 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26160556 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  2. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.31
    0.3136577 = product of:
      0.6273154 = sum of:
        0.039207216 = product of:
          0.19603607 = sum of:
            0.19603607 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19603607 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26160556 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03085695 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.19603607 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19603607 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26160556 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.19603607 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19603607 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26160556 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.19603607 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19603607 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26160556 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  3. Shala, E.: ¬Die Autonomie des Menschen und der Maschine : gegenwärtige Definitionen von Autonomie zwischen philosophischem Hintergrund und technologischer Umsetzbarkeit (2014) 0.20
    0.19603606 = product of:
      0.3920721 = sum of:
        0.024504509 = product of:
          0.12252254 = sum of:
            0.12252254 = weight(_text_:3a in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12252254 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26160556 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03085695 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.12252254 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12252254 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26160556 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.12252254 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12252254 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26160556 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
        0.12252254 = weight(_text_:2f in 4388) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12252254 = score(doc=4388,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26160556 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 4388, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4388)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. unter: https://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwizweHljdbcAhVS16QKHXcFD9QQFjABegQICRAB&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F271200105_Die_Autonomie_des_Menschen_und_der_Maschine_-_gegenwartige_Definitionen_von_Autonomie_zwischen_philosophischem_Hintergrund_und_technologischer_Umsetzbarkeit_Redigierte_Version_der_Magisterarbeit_Karls&usg=AOvVaw06orrdJmFF2xbCCp_hL26q.
  4. Hartmann, F.: Paul Otlets Hypermedium : Dokumentation als Gegenidee zur Bibliothek (2015) 0.02
    0.023829158 = product of:
      0.09531663 = sum of:
        0.08416812 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08416812 = score(doc=1432,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.58391863 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
        0.011148509 = product of:
          0.033445526 = sum of:
            0.033445526 = weight(_text_:22 in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033445526 = score(doc=1432,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03085695 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Schon zur Wende ins 20. Jahrhundert zweifelte der belgische Privatgelehrte Paul Otlet an der Zukunft des Buches und der Bibliothek. Statt dessen begann er damit, eine Dokumentation und Neuorganisation des Weltwissens anzulegen, und mittels eines Karteikartensystems (Répertoire Bibliographique Universel) zu vernetzen. Dieses Projekt eines flexiblen, abfrageorientierten Wissensbestandes in einem 'Hypermedium' (Otlet) besetzte jene technologische Leerstelle, die inzwischen eine die bibliothekarische Epoche aufsprengende neue Wissenskultur der digitalen Medialität produziert hat.
    Date
    22. 8.2016 15:58:46
  5. Trant, J.; Bearman, D.: Social terminology enhancement through vernacular engagement : exploring collaborative annotation to encourage interaction with museum collections (2005) 0.02
    0.020128226 = product of:
      0.1610258 = sum of:
        0.1610258 = weight(_text_:museum in 1185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1610258 = score(doc=1185,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.8745848 = fieldWeight in 1185, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1185)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    From their earliest encounters with the Web, museums have seen an opportunity to move beyond uni-directional communication into an environment that engages their users and reflects a multiplicity of perspectives. Shedding the "Unassailable Voice" (Walsh 1997) in favor of many "Points of View" (Sledge 1995) has challenged traditional museum approaches to the creation and delivery of content. Novel approaches are required in order to develop and sustain user engagement (Durbin 2004). New models of exhibit creation that democratize the curatorial functions of object selection and interpretation offer one way of opening up the museum (Coldicutt and Streten 2005). Another is to use the museum as a forum and focus for community story-telling (Howard, Pratty et al. 2005). Unfortunately, museum collections remain relatively inaccessible even when 'made available' through searchable on-line databases. Museum documentation seldom satisfies the on-line access needs of the broad public, both because it is written using professional terminology and because it may not address what is important to - or remembered by - the museum visitor. For example, an exhibition now on-line at The Metropolitan Museum of Art acknowledges "Coco" Chanel only in the brief, textual introduction (The Metropolitan Museum of Art 2005a). All of the images of her delightful fashion designs are attributed to "Gabrielle Chanel" (The Metropolitan Museum of Art 2005a). Interfaces that organize collections along axes of time or place - such of that of the Timeline of Art History (The Metropolitan Museum of Art 2005e) - often fail to match users' world-views, despite the care that went into their structuring or their significant pedagogical utility. Critically, as professionals working with art museums we realize that when cataloguers and curators describe works of art, they usually do not include the "subject" of the image itself. Simply put, we rarely answer the question "What is it a picture of?" Unfortunately, visitors will often remember a work based on its visual characteristics, only to find that Web-based searches for any of the things they recall do not produce results.
  6. Wiesenmüller, H.: ¬Der RDA-Umstieg in Deutschland : Herausforderungen für das Metadatenmanagement (2015) 0.01
    0.013862254 = product of:
      0.11089803 = sum of:
        0.11089803 = weight(_text_:informationsmanagement in 2149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11089803 = score(doc=2149,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19105253 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.58045834 = fieldWeight in 2149, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2149)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Content
    Beim vorliegenden Beitrag handelt es sich um die erweiterte und aktualisierte Fassung eines Vortrags, der am 5. Dezember 2014 auf dem Symposium "Forschung für die Praxis - Perspektiven für Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement" an der Hochschule der Medien in Stuttgart gehalten wurde. Vortragsfolien unter https://www.hdm-stuttgart.de/ bi/symposium/skripte/Wiesenmueller_RDA-Umstieg_Forum1_14-12-05.pdf (10.05.2015). Vgl. auch den Veranstaltungsbericht: Vonhof, Cornelia; Stang, Richard; Wiesenmüller, Heidrun: Forschung für die Praxis - Perspektiven für Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement. In: o-bib 2 (2015), H. 1, S. 68-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2015H1S6. Vgl.: http://dx.doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2015H2.
  7. Sewing, S.: Bestandserhaltung und Archivierung : Koordinierung auf der Basis eines gemeinsamen Metadatenformates in den deutschen und österreichischen Bibliotheksverbünden (2021) 0.01
    0.013249567 = product of:
      0.052998267 = sum of:
        0.044636887 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044636887 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.3096696 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
        0.008361382 = product of:
          0.025084145 = sum of:
            0.025084145 = weight(_text_:22 in 266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025084145 = score(doc=266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.108055785 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03085695 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=266)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    In den Handlungsempfehlungen der Koordinierungsstelle für die Erhaltung des schriftlichen Kulturguts (KEK) von 2015 (KEK-Handlungsempfehlungen) wird ein nationaler Standard bei der Dokumentation von Bestandserhaltung gefordert: "In den Bibliothekskatalogen sollten künftig für den verbundübergreifenden Abgleich Bestandserhaltungsmaßnahmen für die Bestände ab 1851 [.] in standardisierter Form dokumentiert und recherchierbar gemacht werden. Dies bedarf einer gemeinsamen Festlegung mit den Bibliotheksverbünden [.]." In den KEK-Handlungsempfehlungen werden auf der Basis einer im Jahr 2015 erfolgten Erhebung für Monografien fast neun Millionen Bände aus dem Zeitabschnitt 1851-1990 als Pflichtexemplare an Bundes- und Ländereinrichtungen angegeben, die akut vom Papierzerfall bedroht und als erste Stufe einer Gesamtstrategie zu entsäuern sind. Ein Ziel der KEK ist es, standardisierte und zertifizierte Verfahren zur Massenentsäuerung zu fördern. Im Metadatenformat sind zunächst fünf Verfahren der Massenentsäuerung in Form von kontrolliertem Vokabular dokumentiert: DEZ, Mg3/MBG, METE, MgO, MMMC[2]. Mit diesen Angaben, die gezielt selektiert werden können, ist mittel- und langfristig die Anwendung einzelner Verfahren der Massenentsäuerung abrufbar und statistisch auswertbar.
    Date
    22. 5.2021 12:43:05
  8. Peters, G.: Verschlagwortung und automatische Verfahren in der G+J Dokumentation (2003) 0.01
    0.0131512685 = product of:
      0.10521015 = sum of:
        0.10521015 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 2377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10521015 = score(doc=2377,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.7298983 = fieldWeight in 2377, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2377)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Wie man die Erarbeitung des Produkts Sacherschließung wirtschaftlicher gestalten kann, war Gegenstand des Referenten Günter Peters von der Gruner + Jahr-Dokumentation, Hamburg. Günter Peters berichtete unter anderem über das System DocCat, dem er eine erhebliche Kompetenz attestierte.
  9. Stelzenmüller, C.: Mashups in Bibliotheken : Untersuchung der Verbreitung von Mashups auf Webseiten wissenschaftlicher Bibliotheken und Erstellung eines praktischen Beispiels (2008) 0.01
    0.013069458 = product of:
      0.10455567 = sum of:
        0.10455567 = weight(_text_:informationsmanagement in 3069) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10455567 = score(doc=3069,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19105253 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.54726136 = fieldWeight in 3069, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3069)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Footnote
    Bachelor-Arbeit im Studiengang Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement an der Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart.
  10. Nitzschner, H.: Konzeption und Entwicklung eines Online-Tutorials zur Verbesserung der Informationskompetenz von Studierenden der Elektrotechnik/Informationstechnik (2004) 0.01
    0.012874056 = product of:
      0.102992445 = sum of:
        0.102992445 = weight(_text_:museum in 728) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102992445 = score(doc=728,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.5593863 = fieldWeight in 728, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=728)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Content
    Diplomarbeit an der Hochschule für Technik, Wirtschaft und Kultur Leipzig (FH) Fachbereich Buch und Museum Studiengang Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft
    Imprint
    Leipzig : Hochschule für Technik, Wirtschaft und Kultur / Fachbereich Buch und Museum
  11. Baca, M.; O'Keefe, E.: Sharing standards and expertise in the early 21st century : Moving toward a collaborative, "cross-community" model for metadata creation (2008) 0.01
    0.012874056 = product of:
      0.102992445 = sum of:
        0.102992445 = weight(_text_:museum in 2321) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.102992445 = score(doc=2321,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.5593863 = fieldWeight in 2321, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2321)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    This paper provides a brief overview of the evolving descriptive metadata landscape, one phenomenon of which can be characterized as "cross-community" metadata as manifested in records that are the result of a combination of carefully considered data value and data content standards. he online catalog of the Morgan Library & Museum provides a real-life illustration of how diverse data content standards and vocabulary tools can be integrated within the classic data structure/technical interchange format of MARC21 to better describe unique, museum-type objects, and to provide better end-user access and understanding. The Morgan experience also shows the value of developing a collaborative model for metadata creation that combines the subject expertise of curators and scholars with the cataloging expertise and knowledge of standards possessed by librarians.
  12. Mittelbach, J.: Modernes Datenmanagement : Linked Open Data und die offene Bibliothek (2015) 0.01
    0.011435776 = product of:
      0.09148621 = sum of:
        0.09148621 = weight(_text_:informationsmanagement in 2468) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09148621 = score(doc=2468,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19105253 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.4788537 = fieldWeight in 2468, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.1915555 = idf(docFreq=245, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2468)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliotheken stehen im Spannungsfeld zwischen sich verändernden Erwartungen der potentiellen Benutzer/innen, technologischem Wandel, Sparzwängen und steigenden Kosten für Inhalte und Infrastrukturen. Um fortzubestehen müssen sie sich neu erfinden. Eine Möglichkeit ist es, das Paradigma Offenheit auszufüllen, wonach u.a. die eigenen Kernprodukte entsprechend geltenden Webstandards für jeden frei zugänglich zur Verfügung gestellt werden. Um dies zu erreichen, müssen neue Infrastrukturen aufgebaut und neue Bündnisse eingegangen werden. Der Beitrag geht auf einen Vortrag auf dem Symposium Bibliotheks- und Informationsmanagement der Hochschule der Medien Stuttgart im Dezember 2014 zurück.
  13. DeVorsey, K.L.; Elson, C.; Gregorev, N.P.; Hansen, J.: ¬The development of a local thesaurus to improve access to the anthropological collections of the American Museum of Natural History (2006) 0.01
    0.010511624 = product of:
      0.08409299 = sum of:
        0.08409299 = weight(_text_:museum in 1174) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08409299 = score(doc=1174,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.45673704 = fieldWeight in 1174, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1174)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    The anthropology collection of the Division of Anthropology at the American Museum of Natural History (AMNH) has been systematically acquired over the past 136 years by many of the founders of the discipline, including Franz Boaz and Margaret Mead. Currently it is represented by over 500,000 catalog entries that were created at the same time artifacts were processed and accessioned. Information about each artifact was recorded by hand in bound ledger books. While the introduction of a computerized collections database at the AMNH has dramatically improved access to cataloging information, the absence of controlled vocabularies to describe anthropological collections, the cultures that created them, and their places of origin has hindered the ability of both staff and scholars to conduct research. This absence can be traced to the traditional museum idea that each object is "unique", compared to books, which are assumed to be identical within an edition and can therefore be described with standard bibliographic entries. This article describes a project begun in the spring of 2004 that set out to address these problems through the creation of a searchable, hierarchical thesaurus of terms linked to the individual object records located on the division's website at <http://anthro.amnh.org/>. The ultimate goal was not to replace the existing database search mechanisms, but instead to provide an additional access point that allows users to virtually browse through the collections. This eliminates the need for researchers to be familiar with the inconsistent and sometimes archaic terminology originally used to describe the artifacts, and we expect that the thesaurus will enable new avenues of research to be pursued by a much wider audience than previously possible.
  14. Hermann, S.; Hahn, U.; Gärtner, M.; Fritze, F.: Nachträglich ist nicht gleich nachnutzbar : Ansätze für integrierte Prozessdokumentation im Forschungsalltag (2018) 0.01
    0.010396992 = product of:
      0.083175935 = sum of:
        0.083175935 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 4484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083175935 = score(doc=4484,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.5770353 = fieldWeight in 4484, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4484)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Um Forschungsdaten auffindbar zu machen, müssen diese mit ausreichend Metadaten beschrieben werden. Damit die durch die Metadaten beschriebenen Forschungsdaten für andere Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftler reproduzierbar sind, ist es notwendig, den Kontext ihrer Entstehung mit abzubilden. Gerade die Dokumentation dieses Entstehungsprozesses wird aber oft durch mangelnde Zeit im Forschungsalltag vernachlässigt. Auch fehlt es hier noch an niederschwelliger Unterstützung im Arbeitsprozess. Einige Methoden sind gerade dabei sich zu etablieren oder befinden sich in der Entwicklung. Im Folgenden werden Softwareanwendungen, die die Dokumentation erleichtern sollen, vorgestellt und mit der aktuell im Projekt RePlay-DH entwickelten Lösung verglichen. Der Ansatz der Virtuellen Forschungsumgebung setzt auf die Zusammenarbeit über eine gemeinsame Plattform. Das Elektronische Laborbuch unterstützt die Dokumentation im Labor. Das Workflow-Management definiert, im Gegensatz zum Workflow-Tracking, einen Workflow vor der Ausführung der einzelnen Arbeitsschritte. Dabei steht die prozessbegleitende Dokumentation im Mittelpunkt. Der Lösungsansatz, der im Projekt RePlay-DH verfolgt wird, besteht in der unterstützenden Dokumentation des Forschungsprozesses mit Metadaten durch ein vereinfachtes Workflow-Tracking. Die Integration in bestehende Arbeitsabläufe von Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftlern und die einfache Bedienbarkeit stehen dabei im Vordergrund.
  15. Dobratz, S.; Neuroth, H.: nestor: Network of Expertise in long-term STOrage of digital Resources : a digital preservation initiative for Germany (2004) 0.01
    0.010157992 = product of:
      0.04063197 = sum of:
        0.036413327 = weight(_text_:museum in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036413327 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18411686 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.19777292 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.9667873 = idf(docFreq=307, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
        0.0042186403 = product of:
          0.01265592 = sum of:
            0.01265592 = weight(_text_:29 in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01265592 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1085451 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03085695 = queryNorm
                0.11659596 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Sponsored by the German Ministry of Education and Research with funding of 800.000 EURO, the German Network of Expertise in long-term storage of digital resources (nestor) began in June 2003 as a cooperative effort of 6 partners representing different players within the field of long-term preservation. The partners include: * The German National Library (Die Deutsche Bibliothek) as the lead institution for the project * The State and University Library of Lower Saxony Göttingen (Staats- und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen) * The Computer and Media Service and the University Library of Humboldt-University Berlin (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) * The Bavarian State Library in Munich (Bayerische Staatsbibliothek) * The Institute for Museum Information in Berlin (Institut für Museumskunde) * General Directorate of the Bavarian State Archives (GDAB) As in other countries, long-term preservation of digital resources has become an important issue in Germany in recent years. Nevertheless, coming to agreement with institutions throughout the country to cooperate on tasks for a long-term preservation effort has taken a great deal of effort. Although there had been considerable attention paid to the preservation of physical media like CD-ROMS, technologies available for the long-term preservation of digital publications like e-books, digital dissertations, websites, etc., are still lacking. Considering the importance of the task within the federal structure of Germany, with the responsibility of each federal state for its science and culture activities, it is obvious that the approach to a successful solution of these issues in Germany must be a cooperative approach. Since 2000, there have been discussions about strategies and techniques for long-term archiving of digital information, particularly within the distributed structure of Germany's library and archival institutions. A key part of all the previous activities was focusing on using existing standards and analyzing the context in which those standards would be applied. One such activity, the Digital Library Forum Planning Project, was done on behalf of the German Ministry of Education and Research in 2002, where the vision of a digital library in 2010 that can meet the changing and increasing needs of users was developed and described in detail, including the infrastructure required and how the digital library would work technically, what it would contain and how it would be organized. The outcome was a strategic plan for certain selected specialist areas, where, amongst other topics, a future call for action for long-term preservation was defined, described and explained against the background of practical experience.
    As follow up, in 2002 the nestor long-term archiving working group provided an initial spark towards planning and organising coordinated activities concerning the long-term preservation and long-term availability of digital documents in Germany. This resulted in a workshop, held 29 - 30 October 2002, where major tasks were discussed. Influenced by the demands and progress of the nestor network, the participants reached agreement to start work on application-oriented projects and to address the following topics: * Overlapping problems o Collection and preservation of digital objects (selection criteria, preservation policy) o Definition of criteria for trusted repositories o Creation of models of cooperation, etc. * Digital objects production process o Analysis of potential conflicts between production and long-term preservation o Documentation of existing document models and recommendations for standards models to be used for long-term preservation o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. * Transfer of digital objects o Object data and metadata o Transfer protocols and interoperability o Handling of different document types, e.g. dynamic publications, etc. * Long-term preservation of digital objects o Design and prototype implementation of depot systems for digital objects (OAIS was chosen to be the best functional model.) o Authenticity o Functional requirements on user interfaces of an depot system o Identification systems for digital objects, etc. At the end of the workshop, participants decided to establish a permanent distributed infrastructure for long-term preservation and long-term accessibility of digital resources in Germany comparable, e.g., to the Digital Preservation Coalition in the UK. The initial phase, nestor, is now being set up by the above-mentioned 3-year funding project.
  16. Internet Tools : Netzwerk-Tools & -Utilities für PC und UNIX (1996) 0.01
    0.009299352 = product of:
      0.074394815 = sum of:
        0.074394815 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 5095) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074394815 = score(doc=5095,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.516116 = fieldWeight in 5095, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5095)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Content
    Enthält: Crynwr Packet Treiber für DOS; CMU & MIT SNMP für UNIX; Management- und Sicherheits-Tools für UNIX; Netzwerk-Dämone: ftpd, gated, routed, named & bind für UNIX; LAN Packet Monitoring & Route Tracing für UNIX; Mail-Utilities; SLIP- & PPP-Implementierungen für UNIX und DOS; Dokumentation zu Windows-Sockets
  17. Wätjen, H.-J.: Automatisches Sammeln, Klassifizieren und Indexieren von wissenschaftlich relevanten Informationsressourcen im deutschen World Wide Web : das DFG-Projekt GERHARD (1998) 0.01
    0.009299352 = product of:
      0.074394815 = sum of:
        0.074394815 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074394815 = score(doc=3066,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.516116 = fieldWeight in 3066, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3066)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Footnote
    Vortrag auf der 20. Online-Tagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation, 5.-7.5.1998. Session 3: WWW-Suchmaschinen
  18. Stein, R.; Saro, C.: Online-Plattform für kontrolliertes Vokabular (2006) 0.01
    0.009299352 = product of:
      0.074394815 = sum of:
        0.074394815 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074394815 = score(doc=3443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.516116 = fieldWeight in 3443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3443)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Content
    Präsentation des Web-basierten Konzepts zur verteilten Vokabularverwaltung innerhalb der AG Regelwerke AG Datenaustausch / Fachgruppe Dokumentation DMB
  19. Marloth, H.: Thesen über die Beziehungen zwischen Informationspolitik, Informationswissenschaft und Informationspraxis : Saarbrücker Thesen (1996) 0.01
    0.009299352 = product of:
      0.074394815 = sum of:
        0.074394815 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.074394815 = score(doc=3275,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.516116 = fieldWeight in 3275, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3275)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Content
    Vortrag vor der Bundesfachschaftstagung Information und Dokumentation auf dem Jahrestreffen am 7. Juni 1996 in Saarbrücken. Mit einem historischen Abriss der Entwicklung der Informationswissenschaft in Deutschland.
  20. Frodl, C.; Gros, A.; Rühle, S.: Übersetzung des Singapore Framework für Dublin-Core-Anwendungsprofile (2009) 0.01
    0.009205889 = product of:
      0.07364711 = sum of:
        0.07364711 = weight(_text_:dokumentation in 3229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07364711 = score(doc=3229,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14414358 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03085695 = queryNorm
            0.5109288 = fieldWeight in 3229, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.671349 = idf(docFreq=1124, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3229)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Das Singapore Framework für Dublin-Core-Anwendungsprofile nennt die Rahmenbedingungen um Metadatenanwendungen möglichst interoperabel zu gestalten und so zu dokumentieren, dass sie nachnutzbar sind. Es definiert die Komponenten, die erforderlich und hilfreich sind, um ein Anwendungsprofil zu dokumentieren und es beschreibt, wie sich diese dokumentarischen Standards gegenüber Standard-Domain-Modellen und den Semantic-Web-Standards verhalten. Das Singapore Framework ist die Grundlage für die Beurteilung von Anwendungsprofilen in Hinblick auf Vollständigkeit der Dokumentation und auf Übereinstimmung mit den Prinzipien der Web-Architektur. Dieses Dokument bietet eine kurze Übersicht über das Singapore Framework. Weitere Dokumente, die als Anleitung für die Erstellung der erforderlichen Dokumentation dienen, sind in Planung.

Years

Languages

  • d 181
  • e 159
  • el 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 163
  • i 21
  • m 6
  • x 5
  • r 4
  • b 3
  • p 3
  • s 3
  • n 1
  • More… Less…