Search (26708 results, page 1 of 1336)

  1. Szanto, T.: Bewusstsein, Intentionalität und mentale Repräsentation : Husserl und die analytische Philosophie des Geistes (2012) 0.76
    0.75823706 = product of:
      1.0615319 = sum of:
        0.2116418 = product of:
          0.4232836 = sum of:
            0.4232836 = weight(_text_:edmund in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.4232836 = score(doc=4406,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.31580627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                1.3403268 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.6879861 = sum of:
          0.3807504 = weight(_text_:1859 in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.3807504 = score(doc=4406,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.29951957 = queryWeight, product of:
                9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03188311 = queryNorm
              1.2712038 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
          0.3072357 = weight(_text_:1938 in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.3072357 = score(doc=4406,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.26905486 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03188311 = queryNorm
              1.1419072 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
        0.10729453 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10729453 = score(doc=4406,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.17596108 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.60976285 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
        0.006091011 = weight(_text_:of in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006091011 = score(doc=4406,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049857445 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.12216854 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
        0.048518553 = product of:
          0.09703711 = sum of:
            0.09703711 = weight(_text_:mind in 4406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09703711 = score(doc=4406,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.19900054 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.48762235 = fieldWeight in 4406, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4406)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.71428573 = coord(5/7)
    
    LCSH
    Husserl, Edmund / 1859 / 1938 ; Phenomenology ; Mental representation ; Intentionality (Philosophy)
    RSWK
    Husserl, Edmund, 1859-1938 / Philosophy of Mind
    Husserl, Edmund, 1859-1938 / Phänomenologie / Hochschulschrift
    Subject
    Husserl, Edmund, 1859-1938 / Philosophy of Mind
    Husserl, Edmund, 1859-1938 / Phänomenologie / Hochschulschrift
    Husserl, Edmund / 1859 / 1938 ; Phenomenology ; Mental representation ; Intentionality (Philosophy)
  2. Wetz, F.J.: Edmund Husserl (1995) 0.15
    0.14760773 = product of:
      0.516627 = sum of:
        0.17958403 = product of:
          0.35916805 = sum of:
            0.35916805 = weight(_text_:edmund in 2156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.35916805 = score(doc=2156,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.31580627 = queryWeight, product of:
                  9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                1.137305 = fieldWeight in 2156, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  9.905128 = idf(docFreq=5, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2156)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.337043 = sum of:
          0.18652885 = weight(_text_:1859 in 2156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.18652885 = score(doc=2156,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.29951957 = queryWeight, product of:
                9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03188311 = queryNorm
              0.6227601 = fieldWeight in 2156, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                9.394302 = idf(docFreq=9, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2156)
          0.15051416 = weight(_text_:1938 in 2156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.15051416 = score(doc=2156,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.26905486 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03188311 = queryNorm
              0.5594181 = fieldWeight in 2156, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2156)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Edmund Husserl (1859-1938) hat ein philosophisches Werk hinterlassen, das zwar nicht im engeren Sinne schulbildend geworden ist, aber auf viele zeitgenössische Denker von Heidegger bis Sartre großen Einfluß ausgeübt hat. Husserl ist ein schwieriger Autor. Obwohl auch heute noch wie selbstverständlich über seine schwierige Phänomenologie geschrieben wird, vermißt man eine klare Antwort auf die einfache Frage: Weshalb quälte sich Husserl überhaupt mit den Problemen, an deren Lösung seine Philosophie sich lebenslang versuchte? Die Antwort darauf gibt die gut lesbare Einführung von Franz Josef Wetz, indem sie sich einer Quelle bedient, die erst 1993 zugänglich wurde, nämlich des Husserlschen Briefwechsels. Aus den Briefen Husserls wird deutlich, daß unter dem hochabstrakten Gedankengebäude des publizierten Werkes eine Tiefenschicht existiert, die sich aus abgründigen Ängsten und Zweifeln speiste. Husserls rationale Philosophie, die nach letzten Begründungen suchte, ist die Antwort eines von Lebensnot geplagten »Sinnsuchers« auf eine Welt, die er in Naturalismus, Relativismus und "Gottlosigkeit" versinken sah.
    Biographed
    Husserl, Edmund
  3. Xiong, C.: Knowledge based text representations for information retrieval (2016) 0.13
    0.12846299 = product of:
      0.22481021 = sum of:
        0.025319416 = product of:
          0.101277664 = sum of:
            0.101277664 = weight(_text_:3a in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.101277664 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.14322825 = weight(_text_:2f in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14322825 = score(doc=5820,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.5298757 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.04291781 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04291781 = score(doc=5820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17596108 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.24390514 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
        0.013344738 = weight(_text_:of in 5820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013344738 = score(doc=5820,freq=30.0), product of:
            0.049857445 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.26765788 = fieldWeight in 5820, product of:
              5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                30.0 = termFreq=30.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5820)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    The successes of information retrieval (IR) in recent decades were built upon bag-of-words representations. Effective as it is, bag-of-words is only a shallow text understanding; there is a limited amount of information for document ranking in the word space. This dissertation goes beyond words and builds knowledge based text representations, which embed the external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases, and provide richer and structured evidence for more advanced information retrieval systems. This thesis research first builds query representations with entities associated with the query. Entities' descriptions are used by query expansion techniques that enrich the query with explanation terms. Then we present a general framework that represents a query with entities that appear in the query, are retrieved by the query, or frequently show up in the top retrieved documents. A latent space model is developed to jointly learn the connections from query to entities and the ranking of documents, modeling the external evidence from knowledge bases and internal ranking features cooperatively. To further improve the quality of relevant entities, a defining factor of our query representations, we introduce learning to rank to entity search and retrieve better entities from knowledge bases. In the document representation part, this thesis research also moves one step forward with a bag-of-entities model, in which documents are represented by their automatic entity annotations, and the ranking is performed in the entity space.
    This proposal includes plans to improve the quality of relevant entities with a co-learning framework that learns from both entity labels and document labels. We also plan to develop a hybrid ranking system that combines word based and entity based representations together with their uncertainties considered. At last, we plan to enrich the text representations with connections between entities. We propose several ways to infer entity graph representations for texts, and to rank documents using their structure representations. This dissertation overcomes the limitation of word based representations with external and carefully curated information from knowledge bases. We believe this thesis research is a solid start towards the new generation of intelligent, semantic, and structured information retrieval.
    Content
    Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Language and Information Technologies. Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cs.cmu.edu%2F~cx%2Fpapers%2Fknowledge_based_text_representation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0SaTSvhWLTh__Uz_HtOtl3.
    Imprint
    Pittsburgh, PA : Carnegie Mellon University, School of Computer Science, Language Technologies Institute
  4. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.12
    0.12252095 = product of:
      0.21441166 = sum of:
        0.037979122 = product of:
          0.15191649 = sum of:
            0.15191649 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15191649 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.15191649 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15191649 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.0115568815 = weight(_text_:of in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0115568815 = score(doc=562,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.049857445 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.23179851 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.012959163 = product of:
          0.025918325 = sum of:
            0.025918325 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025918325 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.111649215 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    Document representations for text classification are typically based on the classical Bag-Of-Words paradigm. This approach comes with deficiencies that motivate the integration of features on a higher semantic level than single words. In this paper we propose an enhancement of the classical document representation through concepts extracted from background knowledge. Boosting is used for actual classification. Experimental evaluations on two well known text corpora support our approach through consistent improvement of the results.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
    Source
    Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM 2004), 1-4 November 2004, Brighton, UK
  5. Arbour, D.; Miller, K.: ¬A long running quest for Power (1998) 0.12
    0.121830225 = product of:
      0.21320288 = sum of:
        0.100342765 = product of:
          0.20068553 = sum of:
            0.20068553 = weight(_text_:1938 in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20068553 = score(doc=1652,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.26905486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.74589074 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.08583562 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08583562 = score(doc=1652,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17596108 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.48781028 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
        0.009745618 = weight(_text_:of in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009745618 = score(doc=1652,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.049857445 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.19546966 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
        0.017278884 = product of:
          0.034557767 = sum of:
            0.034557767 = weight(_text_:22 in 1652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034557767 = score(doc=1652,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.111649215 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1652, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5714286 = coord(4/7)
    
    Abstract
    Profile of UMI founded in 1938 by Eugene Power as University Microfilms, describing its progress from microfilms to ProQuest Direct, the company's latest Web based product which provides access to all its electronic databases. Dan Arbour recounts the history and philosophy of UMI, and explains production methods, the firm's structure and business strategies and current and future plans
    Source
    Information world review. 1998, no.133, S.22-23
  6. Ackermann, E.: Piaget's constructivism, Papert's constructionism : what's the difference? (2001) 0.12
    0.1174525 = product of:
      0.27405584 = sum of:
        0.16221671 = product of:
          0.32443342 = sum of:
            0.12659708 = weight(_text_:3a in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12659708 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
            0.19783634 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19783634 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33790597 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.5 = coord(2/4)
        0.09891817 = product of:
          0.19783634 = sum of:
            0.19783634 = weight(_text_:2c in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19783634 = score(doc=692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33790597 = queryWeight, product of:
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.5854775 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  10.598275 = idf(docFreq=2, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.012920985 = weight(_text_:of in 692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012920985 = score(doc=692,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.049857445 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.25915858 = fieldWeight in 692, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=692)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    What is the difference between Piaget's constructivism and Papert's "constructionism"? Beyond the mere play on the words, I think the distinction holds, and that integrating both views can enrich our understanding of how people learn and grow. Piaget's constructivism offers a window into what children are interested in, and able to achieve, at different stages of their development. The theory describes how children's ways of doing and thinking evolve over time, and under which circumstance children are more likely to let go of-or hold onto- their currently held views. Piaget suggests that children have very good reasons not to abandon their worldviews just because someone else, be it an expert, tells them they're wrong. Papert's constructionism, in contrast, focuses more on the art of learning, or 'learning to learn', and on the significance of making things in learning. Papert is interested in how learners engage in a conversation with [their own or other people's] artifacts, and how these conversations boost self-directed learning, and ultimately facilitate the construction of new knowledge. He stresses the importance of tools, media, and context in human development. Integrating both perspectives illuminates the processes by which individuals come to make sense of their experience, gradually optimizing their interactions with the world.
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Piaget-%E2%80%99-s-Constructivism-%2C-Papert-%E2%80%99-s-%3A-What-%E2%80%99-s-Ackermann/89cbcc1e740a4591443ff4765a6ae8df0fdf5554. Darunter weitere Hinweise auf verwandte Beiträge. Auch unter: Learning Group Publication 5(2001) no.3, S.438.
  7. Manzi, S.: Classifying philosophy at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore (Pisa, Italy) : Part B: evaluation and experience (2009) 0.11
    0.11473412 = product of:
      0.26771295 = sum of:
        0.14395072 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14395072 = score(doc=1858,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17596108 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.8180827 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
        0.015505182 = weight(_text_:of in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015505182 = score(doc=1858,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.049857445 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.3109903 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
        0.10825704 = sum of:
          0.08233871 = weight(_text_:mind in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.08233871 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19900054 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03188311 = queryNorm
              0.41376126 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
          0.025918325 = weight(_text_:22 in 1858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025918325 = score(doc=1858,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.111649215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03188311 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1858, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1858)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The verification of the functionality of the Philosophy classification schema adopted at the Library of the Scuola Normale Superiore needs to take into account the context: the Library is both a special and a multidisciplinary library; its collections reflect the history of the SNS. The philosophy collection has a specialized and selective nature, as do others within the same Library; the Library is open shelves, and classification is used as a shelving and location device. Bearing in mind the above conditions, the second part of this paper examines the strengths and weaknesses of the schema in order to highlight its suitability to match a coherent classification of documents with the effective fruition by the users.
    Date
    9. 1.2010 14:22:20
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "The philosophy of classifying philosophy"
  8. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.11
    0.1146171 = product of:
      0.2674399 = sum of:
        0.037979122 = product of:
          0.15191649 = sum of:
            0.15191649 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15191649 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.21484236 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21484236 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.014618427 = weight(_text_:of in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014618427 = score(doc=2514,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.049857445 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.2932045 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we present two ways to improve the precision of HITS-based algorithms onWeb documents. First, by analyzing the limitations of current HITS-based algorithms, we propose a new weighted HITS-based method that assigns appropriate weights to in-links of root documents. Then, we combine content analysis with HITS-based algorithms and study the effects of four representative relevance scoring methods, VSM, Okapi, TLS, and CDR, using a set of broad topic queries. Our experimental results show that our weighted HITS-based method performs significantly better than Bharat's improved HITS algorithm. When we combine our weighted HITS-based method or Bharat's HITS algorithm with any of the four relevance scoring methods, the combined methods are only marginally better than our weighted HITS-based method. Between the four relevance scoring methods, there is no significant quality difference when they are combined with a HITS-based algorithm.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
    Source
    WWW '02: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on World Wide Web, May 7-11, 2002, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
  9. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.11
    0.113627166 = product of:
      0.26513004 = sum of:
        0.050638832 = product of:
          0.20255533 = sum of:
            0.20255533 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.20255533 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.20255533 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20255533 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.011935896 = weight(_text_:of in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011935896 = score(doc=230,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.049857445 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    In this lecture I intend to challenge those who uphold a monist or even a dualist view of the universe; and I will propose, instead, a pluralist view. I will propose a view of the universe that recognizes at least three different but interacting sub-universes.
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  10. Dreyfus, H.L.: From micro-worlds to knowledge representation : AI at an impasse (1981) 0.11
    0.110714465 = product of:
      0.25833374 = sum of:
        0.15021233 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15021233 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17596108 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.853668 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
        0.012059587 = weight(_text_:of in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012059587 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049857445 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.24188137 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
        0.09606183 = product of:
          0.19212367 = sum of:
            0.19212367 = weight(_text_:mind in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19212367 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19900054 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.96544296 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Imprint
    Cambridge, Mass. : Massachusetts Inst. of Technology Pr.
    Source
    Mind design: philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence. Ed. by J. Haugeland
  11. Verwer, K.: Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Hans Jonas (2011) 0.11
    0.10851178 = product of:
      0.37979123 = sum of:
        0.075958245 = product of:
          0.30383298 = sum of:
            0.30383298 = weight(_text_:3a in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.30383298 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.30383298 = weight(_text_:2f in 973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.30383298 = score(doc=973,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            1.1240361 = fieldWeight in 973, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=973)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fcreativechoice.org%2Fdoc%2FHansJonas.pdf&usg=AOvVaw1TM3teaYKgABL5H9yoIifA&opi=89978449.
  12. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.10
    0.10178495 = product of:
      0.23749822 = sum of:
        0.04430898 = product of:
          0.17723592 = sum of:
            0.17723592 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17723592 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.17723592 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17723592 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.015953334 = weight(_text_:of in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015953334 = score(doc=306,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.049857445 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.31997898 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Although service-oriented architectures go a long way toward providing interoperability in distributed, heterogeneous environments, managing semantic differences in such environments remains a challenge. We give an overview of the issue of semantic interoperability (integration), provide a semantic characterization of services, and discuss the role of ontologies. Then we analyze four basic models of semantic interoperability that differ in respect to their mapping between service descriptions and ontologies and in respect to where the evaluation of the integration logic is performed. We also provide some guidelines for selecting one of the possible interoperability models.
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  13. Searle, J.R.: ¬Die Wiederentdeckung des Geistes (1993) 0.10
    0.097886726 = product of:
      0.22840236 = sum of:
        0.1213899 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1213899 = score(doc=4384,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17596108 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.6898679 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
        0.011935896 = weight(_text_:of in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011935896 = score(doc=4384,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.049857445 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
        0.09507656 = product of:
          0.19015312 = sum of:
            0.19015312 = weight(_text_:mind in 4384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19015312 = score(doc=4384,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.19900054 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.9555408 = fieldWeight in 4384, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4384)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Footnote
    Originaltitel: The rediscovery of the mind. Weitere Ausgabe bei Suhrkamp (Suhrkamp-Taschenbuch ; 2550)
    RSWK
    Philosophy of Mind
    Subject
    Philosophy of Mind
  14. Open MIND (2015) 0.10
    0.09594528 = product of:
      0.2238723 = sum of:
        0.053647265 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053647265 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17596108 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.30488142 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
        0.011395238 = weight(_text_:of in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011395238 = score(doc=1648,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.049857445 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.22855641 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
        0.15882981 = sum of:
          0.1372312 = weight(_text_:mind in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.1372312 = score(doc=1648,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.19900054 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03188311 = queryNorm
              0.68960214 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
          0.021598605 = weight(_text_:22 in 1648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021598605 = score(doc=1648,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.111649215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03188311 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1648, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1648)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    This is an edited collection of 39 original papers and as many commentaries and replies. The target papers and replies were written by senior members of the MIND Group, while all commentaries were written by junior group members. All papers and commentaries have undergone a rigorous process of anonymous peer review, during which the junior members of the MIND Group acted as reviewers. The final versions of all the target articles, commentaries and replies have undergone additional editorial review. Besides offering a cross-section of ongoing, cutting-edge research in philosophy and cognitive science, this collection is also intended to be a free electronic resource for teaching. It therefore also contains a selection of online supporting materials, pointers to video and audio files and to additional free material supplied by the 92 authors represented in this volume. We will add more multimedia material, a searchable literature database, and tools to work with the online version in the future. All contributions to this collection are strictly open access. They can be downloaded, printed, and reproduced by anyone.
    Date
    27. 1.2015 11:48:22
    Imprint
    Frankfurt am Main : MIND Group
  15. Corbett, E.V.: ¬The classification of fiction (1938) 0.09
    0.09459831 = product of:
      0.33109406 = sum of:
        0.31731167 = product of:
          0.63462335 = sum of:
            0.63462335 = weight(_text_:1938 in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.63462335 = score(doc=915,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.26905486 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                2.3587136 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  8.43879 = idf(docFreq=25, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013782386 = weight(_text_:of in 915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013782386 = score(doc=915,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.049857445 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 915, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=915)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Library Association Record. 40(1938), S
    Year
    1938
  16. Jacob, E.K.: ¬The legacy of pragmatism : implications for knowledge organization in a pluralistic universe (2000) 0.09
    0.09448884 = product of:
      0.22047395 = sum of:
        0.07510617 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07510617 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17596108 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.426834 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
        0.019067882 = weight(_text_:of in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019067882 = score(doc=119,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.049857445 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.38244802 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
        0.12629989 = sum of:
          0.09606183 = weight(_text_:mind in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09606183 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19900054 = queryWeight, product of:
                6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03188311 = queryNorm
              0.48272148 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
          0.030238047 = weight(_text_:22 in 119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030238047 = score(doc=119,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.111649215 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03188311 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 119, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=119)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    Although postmodernist philosophy is frequently characterized as unconstrained relativism and radical skepticism, It shares with pragmatism a strong antipathy to modernity's separation of mind and body, of subject and object, of the human and the material. The criticisms raised by postmodernism have significant implications for current understandings of classification theory and practice. The critical tenets of pragmatism provide an epistemological framework for the development of classificatory structures that will address current failings and respond to the demands of an increasingly interdisciplinary store of knowledge
    Pages
    S.16-22
    Source
    Dynamism and stability in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the 6th International ISKO-Conference, 10-13 July 2000, Toronto, Canada. Ed.: C. Beghtol et al
  17. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.09
    0.09042648 = product of:
      0.31649268 = sum of:
        0.06329854 = product of:
          0.25319415 = sum of:
            0.25319415 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.25319415 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.25319415 = weight(_text_:2f in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.25319415 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  18. Chalmers, D.J.: ¬The conscious mind : in search of a fundamental theory (1996) 0.09
    0.08778261 = product of:
      0.20482609 = sum of:
        0.095967144 = weight(_text_:philosophy in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.095967144 = score(doc=4413,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.17596108 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.54538846 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.5189433 = idf(docFreq=481, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
        0.013782386 = weight(_text_:of in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013782386 = score(doc=4413,freq=32.0), product of:
            0.049857445 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.27643585 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
              5.656854 = tf(freq=32.0), with freq of:
                32.0 = termFreq=32.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
        0.09507656 = product of:
          0.19015312 = sum of:
            0.19015312 = weight(_text_:mind in 4413) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19015312 = score(doc=4413,freq=24.0), product of:
                0.19900054 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.9555408 = fieldWeight in 4413, product of:
                  4.8989797 = tf(freq=24.0), with freq of:
                    24.0 = termFreq=24.0
                  6.241566 = idf(docFreq=233, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4413)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    What is consciousness? How do physical processes in the brain give rise to the self-aware mind and to feelings as profoundly varied as love or hate, aesthetic pleasure or spiritual yearning? These questions today are among the most hotly debated issues among scientists and philosophers, and we have seen in recent years superb volumes by such eminent figures as Francis Crick, Daniel C. Dennett, Gerald Edelman, and Roger Penrose, all firing volleys in what has come to be called the consciousness wars. Now, in The Conscious Mind, philosopher David J. Chalmers offers a cogent analysis of this heated debate as he unveils a major new theory of consciousness, one that rejects the prevailing reductionist trend of science, while offering provocative insights into the relationship between mind and brain. Writing in a rigorous, thought-provoking style, the author takes us on a far-reaching tour through the philosophical ramifications of consciousness. Chalmers convincingly reveals how contemporary cognitive science and neurobiology have failed to explain how and why mental events emerge from physiological occurrences in the brain. He proposes instead that conscious experience must be understood in an entirely new light--as an irreducible entity (similar to such physical properties as time, mass, and space) that exists at a fundamental level and cannot be understood as the sum of its parts. And after suggesting some intriguing possibilities about the structure and laws of conscious experience, he details how his unique reinterpretation of the mind could be the focus of a new science. Throughout the book, Chalmers provides fascinating thought experiments that trenchantly illustrate his ideas. For example, in exploring the notion that consciousness could be experienced by machines as well as humans, Chalmers asks us to imagine a thinking brain in which neurons are slowly replaced by silicon chips that precisely duplicate their functions--as the neurons are replaced, will consciousness gradually fade away? The book also features thoughtful discussions of how the author's theories might be practically applied to subjects as diverse as artificial intelligence and the interpretation of quantum mechanics.
    LCSH
    Philosophy of mind
    Mind and body
    RSWK
    Philosophy of Mind
    Series
    Philosophy of mind series
    Subject
    Philosophy of Mind
    Philosophy of mind
    Mind and body
  19. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.09
    0.086809516 = product of:
      0.20255554 = sum of:
        0.037979122 = product of:
          0.15191649 = sum of:
            0.15191649 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15191649 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.15191649 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15191649 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.012659928 = weight(_text_:of in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012659928 = score(doc=2918,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.049857445 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    The employees of an organization often use a personal hierarchical classification scheme to organize digital documents that are stored on their own workstations. As this may make it hard for other employees to retrieve these documents, there is a risk that the organization will lose track of needed documentation. Furthermore, the inherent boundaries of such a hierarchical structure require making arbitrary decisions about which specific criteria the classification will b.e based on (for instance, the administrative activity or the document type, although a document can have several attributes and require classification in several classes).A faceted classification model to support corporate information organization is proposed. Partially based on Ranganathan's facets theory, this model aims not only to standardize the organization of digital documents, but also to simplify the management of a document throughout its life cycle for both individuals and organizations, while ensuring compliance to regulatory and policy requirements.
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  20. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.09
    0.086809516 = product of:
      0.20255554 = sum of:
        0.037979122 = product of:
          0.15191649 = sum of:
            0.15191649 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15191649 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03188311 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
        0.15191649 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15191649 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27030537 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.012659928 = weight(_text_:of in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012659928 = score(doc=400,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.049857445 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03188311 = queryNorm
            0.25392252 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Abstract
    On a scientific concept hierarchy, a parent concept may have a few attributes, each of which has multiple values being a group of child concepts. We call these attributes facets: classification has a few facets such as application (e.g., face recognition), model (e.g., svm, knn), and metric (e.g., precision). In this work, we aim at building faceted concept hierarchies from scientific literature. Hierarchy construction methods heavily rely on hypernym detection, however, the faceted relations are parent-to-child links but the hypernym relation is a multi-hop, i.e., ancestor-to-descendent link with a specific facet "type-of". We use information extraction techniques to find synonyms, sibling concepts, and ancestor-descendent relations from a data science corpus. And we propose a hierarchy growth algorithm to infer the parent-child links from the three types of relationships. It resolves conflicts by maintaining the acyclic structure of a hierarchy.
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
    Source
    Graph-Based Methods for Natural Language Processing - proceedings of the Thirteenth Workshop (TextGraphs-13): November 4, 2019, Hong Kong : EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019. Ed.: Dmitry Ustalov

Authors

Languages

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications