Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Tenopir, C."
  1. Tenopir, C.: Moving to the information village (1996) 0.08
    0.08371661 = product of:
      0.20929152 = sum of:
        0.19671969 = weight(_text_:engineering in 4944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19671969 = score(doc=4944,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.21172935 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03940963 = queryNorm
            0.9291092 = fieldWeight in 4944, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4944)
        0.012571834 = product of:
          0.037715502 = sum of:
            0.037715502 = weight(_text_:29 in 4944) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037715502 = score(doc=4944,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03940963 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4944, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4944)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the familiar problem of users are now confronted with the needs to impose order on myriad sources of information and to present them in an integrated way to users. Describes an attempt to provide such integration in the engineering field, Engineering Information Village, or Ei Village, produced by Engineering Information Inc. It resembles a WWW site, and integrates a traditional online abstracting and indexing service with access to WWW sites in the engineering field, contacts to engineering consultants, and access to other sources of interest to engineers. Explains how the metaphor of the village is carried though in the service and stresses the vetting process which seeks to guarantee that sources provided are authoritative. Also details the pricing of the service
    Source
    Library journal. 121(1996) no.4, S.29-30
  2. Allard, S.; Levine, K.J.; Tenopir, C.: Design engineers and technical professionals at work : observing information usage in the workplace (2009) 0.03
    0.02869556 = product of:
      0.0717389 = sum of:
        0.0628398 = weight(_text_:engineering in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0628398 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21172935 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03940963 = queryNorm
            0.29679304 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
        0.008899102 = product of:
          0.026697304 = sum of:
            0.026697304 = weight(_text_:22 in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026697304 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03940963 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This exploratory study examines how design engineers and technical professionals (hereafter referred to as engineers) in innovative high-tech firms in the United States and India use information in their daily work activities including research, development, and management. The researchers used naturalistic observation to conduct a series of daylong workplace observations with 103 engineers engaged in product design and testing in four U.S.- and two India-based firms. A key finding is that engineers spend about one fourth of their day engaged in some type of information event, which was somewhat lower than the percentage identified in previous research. The explanation may be rooted in the significant change in the information environment and corporate expectations in the last 15 years, which is the time of the original study. Searching technology has improved, making searching less time consuming, and engineers are choosing the Internet as a primary source even though information may not be as focused, as timely, or as authoritative. The study extends our understanding of the engineering workplace, and the information environment in the workplace, and provides information useful for improving methods for accessing and using information, which could ultimately lead to better job performance, facilitate innovation, and encourage economic growth.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:37
  3. Wilson, C.S.; Tenopir, C.: Local citation analysis, publishing and reading patterns : using multiple methods to evaluate faculty use of an academic library's research collection (2008) 0.02
    0.01777378 = product of:
      0.08886889 = sum of:
        0.08886889 = weight(_text_:engineering in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08886889 = score(doc=1960,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21172935 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03940963 = queryNorm
            0.41972876 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This study assessed the intermix of local citation analysis and survey of journal use and reading patterns for evaluating an academic library's research collection. Journal articles and their cited references from faculties at the University of New South Wales were downloaded from the Web of Science (WoS) and journal impact factors from the Journal Citation Reports. The survey of the University of New South Wales (UNSW) academic staff asked both reader-related and reading-related questions. Both methods showed that academics in medicine published more and had more coauthors per paper than academics in the other faculties; however, when correlated with the number of students and academic staff, science published more and engineering published in higher impact journals. When recalled numbers of articles published were compared to actual numbers, all faculties over-estimated their productivity by nearly two-fold. The distribution of cited serial references was highly skewed with over half of the titles cited only once. The survey results corresponded with U.S. university surveys with one exception: Engineering academics reported the highest number of article readings and read mostly for research related activities. Citation analysis data showed that the UNSW library provided the majority of journals in which researchers published and cited, mostly in electronic formats. However, the availability of non-journal cited sources was low. The joint methods provided both confirmatory and contradictory results and proved useful in evaluating library research collections.
  4. Tenopir, C.; Wang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Simmons, B.; Pollard, R.: Academic users' interactions with ScienceDirect in search tasks : affective and cognitive behaviors (2008) 0.02
    0.01777378 = product of:
      0.08886889 = sum of:
        0.08886889 = weight(_text_:engineering in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08886889 = score(doc=2027,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.21172935 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03940963 = queryNorm
            0.41972876 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents part of phase 2 of a research project funded by the NSF-National Science Digital Library Project, which observed how academic users interact with the ScienceDirect information retrieval system for simulated class-related assignments. The ultimate goal of the project is twofold: (1) to find ways to improve science and engineering students' use of science e-journal systems; (2) to develop methods to measure user interaction behaviors. Process-tracing technique recorded participants' processes and interaction behaviors that are measurable; think-aloud protocol captured participants' affective and cognitive verbalizations; pre- and post-search questionnaires solicited demographic information, prior experience with the system, and comments. We explored possible relationships between affective feelings and cognitive behaviors. During search interactions both feelings and thoughts occurred frequently. Positive feelings were more common and were associated more often with thoughts about results. Negative feelings were associated more often with thoughts related to the system, search strategy, and task. Learning styles are also examined as a factor influencing behavior. Engineering graduate students with an assimilating learning style searched longer and paused less than those with a converging learning style. Further exploration of learning styles is suggested.
  5. Tenopir, C.: Searching by controlled vocabulary or free text (1987) 0.01
    0.005747124 = product of:
      0.02873562 = sum of:
        0.02873562 = product of:
          0.08620686 = sum of:
            0.08620686 = weight(_text_:29 in 1350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08620686 = score(doc=1350,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03940963 = queryNorm
                0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 1350, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1350)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library journal. 112(1987) Nov.15, S.58-29
  6. Tenopir, C.; Ennis, L.: ¬The digital reference work of academic libraries (1998) 0.00
    0.0035238646 = product of:
      0.017619323 = sum of:
        0.017619323 = product of:
          0.052857965 = sum of:
            0.052857965 = weight(_text_:22 in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052857965 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03940963 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.22-28
  7. Tenopir, C.: Front end software proliferates (1996) 0.00
    0.002873562 = product of:
      0.01436781 = sum of:
        0.01436781 = product of:
          0.04310343 = sum of:
            0.04310343 = weight(_text_:29 in 5133) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04310343 = score(doc=5133,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03940963 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5133, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5133)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library journal. 121(1996) no.8, S.29-30
  8. Tenopir, C.: Online databases : taking online interaction for granted (1997) 0.00
    0.002873562 = product of:
      0.01436781 = sum of:
        0.01436781 = product of:
          0.04310343 = sum of:
            0.04310343 = weight(_text_:29 in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04310343 = score(doc=1675,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03940963 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 7.1998 19:07:18
  9. Tenopir, C.: Reference services from RLG (1995) 0.00
    0.0028477125 = product of:
      0.014238562 = sum of:
        0.014238562 = product of:
          0.042715687 = sum of:
            0.042715687 = weight(_text_:22 in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042715687 = score(doc=2612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03940963 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    25.11.1995 19:22:01
  10. Tenopir, C.: Integrating electronic reference (1995) 0.00
    0.0028477125 = product of:
      0.014238562 = sum of:
        0.014238562 = product of:
          0.042715687 = sum of:
            0.042715687 = weight(_text_:22 in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042715687 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03940963 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    25.11.1995 19:22:01
  11. Tenopir, C.; Neufang, R.: Electronic reference options : how they stack up in research libraries (1992) 0.00
    0.0024917484 = product of:
      0.012458742 = sum of:
        0.012458742 = product of:
          0.037376225 = sum of:
            0.037376225 = weight(_text_:22 in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037376225 = score(doc=2343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03940963 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Online. 16(1992) no.2, S.22-28
  12. Douglass, K.; Allard, S.; Tenopir, C.; Wu, L.W.; Frame, M.: Managing scientific data as public assets : data sharing practices and policies among full-time government employees (2014) 0.00
    0.0017959764 = product of:
      0.008979882 = sum of:
        0.008979882 = product of:
          0.026939645 = sum of:
            0.026939645 = weight(_text_:29 in 1195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026939645 = score(doc=1195,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03940963 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1195, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1195)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 1.2014 16:13:06