-
Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001)
0.07
0.06516214 = product of:
0.16290534 = sum of:
0.15392545 = weight(_text_:engineering in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.15392545 = score(doc=5767,freq=12.0), product of:
0.21172935 = queryWeight, product of:
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.72699153 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.008979882 = product of:
0.026939645 = sum of:
0.026939645 = weight(_text_:29 in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026939645 = score(doc=5767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- We explore the intellectual subject structure and research themes in software engineering through the identification and analysis of a core journal literature. We examine this literature via two expert perspectives: that of the author, who identified significant work by citing it (journal cocitation analysis), and that of the professional indexer, who tags published work with subject terms to facilitate retrieval from a bibliographic database (subject profile analysis). The data sources are SCISEARCH (the on-line version of Science Citation Index), and INSPEC (a database covering software engineering, computer science, and information systems). We use data visualization tools (cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling, and PFNets) to show the "intellectual maps" of software engineering. Cocitation and subject profile analyses demonstrate that software engineering is a distinct interdisciplinary field, valuing practical and applied aspects, and spanning a subject continuum from "programming-in-the-smalI" to "programming-in-the-large." This continuum mirrors the software development life cycle by taking the operating system or major application from initial programming through project management, implementation, and maintenance. Object orientation is an integral but distinct subject area in software engineering. Key differences are the importance of management and programming: (1) cocitation analysis emphasizes project management and systems development; (2) programming techniques/languages are more influential in subject profiles; (3) cocitation profiles place object-oriented journals separately and centrally while the subject profile analysis locates these journals with the programming/languages group
- Date
- 29. 9.2001 14:01:01
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.04
0.03620401 = product of:
0.090510026 = sum of:
0.07540775 = weight(_text_:engineering in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07540775 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21172935 = queryWeight, product of:
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.35615164 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.015102277 = product of:
0.045306828 = sum of:
0.045306828 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045306828 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- This article challenges recent research (Evans, 2008) reporting that the concentration of cited scientific literature increases with the online availability of articles and journals. Using Thomson Reuters' Web of Science, the present article analyses changes in the concentration of citations received (2- and 5-year citation windows) by papers published between 1900 and 2005. Three measures of concentration are used: the percentage of papers that received at least one citation (cited papers); the percentage of papers needed to account for 20%, 50%, and 80% of the citations; and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI). These measures are used for four broad disciplines: natural sciences and engineering, medical fields, social sciences, and the humanities. All these measures converge and show that, contrary to what was reported by Evans, the dispersion of citations is actually increasing.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Braun, T.; Glanzel, W.; Grupp, H.: ¬The scientometric weight of 50 nations in 27 scientific areas, 1989-1993 : Pt.1: All fields combined, mathematics, engineering, chemistry and physics (1995)
0.02
0.02488329 = product of:
0.124416456 = sum of:
0.124416456 = weight(_text_:engineering in 761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.124416456 = score(doc=761,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21172935 = queryWeight, product of:
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.58762026 = fieldWeight in 761, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=761)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Attempts some new approaches to the presentation of bibliometric macro level indicators. Mathematics, engineering, physics and chemistry subfields are assigned to 13 science areas. Each science area then appears on 1 table (left page) and 2 graphs (right page). The 1st graph shows the main citation rates with respect to the world average on a relational chart. The countries are represented by letter codes that can be found in the corresponding table on the facing page. The 2nd graph visualizes the countries' relative research activity in the given science areas as compared to the world standard
-
Wilson, C.S.; Tenopir, C.: Local citation analysis, publishing and reading patterns : using multiple methods to evaluate faculty use of an academic library's research collection (2008)
0.02
0.01777378 = product of:
0.08886889 = sum of:
0.08886889 = weight(_text_:engineering in 1960) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08886889 = score(doc=1960,freq=4.0), product of:
0.21172935 = queryWeight, product of:
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.41972876 = fieldWeight in 1960, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1960)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- This study assessed the intermix of local citation analysis and survey of journal use and reading patterns for evaluating an academic library's research collection. Journal articles and their cited references from faculties at the University of New South Wales were downloaded from the Web of Science (WoS) and journal impact factors from the Journal Citation Reports. The survey of the University of New South Wales (UNSW) academic staff asked both reader-related and reading-related questions. Both methods showed that academics in medicine published more and had more coauthors per paper than academics in the other faculties; however, when correlated with the number of students and academic staff, science published more and engineering published in higher impact journals. When recalled numbers of articles published were compared to actual numbers, all faculties over-estimated their productivity by nearly two-fold. The distribution of cited serial references was highly skewed with over half of the titles cited only once. The survey results corresponded with U.S. university surveys with one exception: Engineering academics reported the highest number of article readings and read mostly for research related activities. Citation analysis data showed that the UNSW library provided the majority of journals in which researchers published and cited, mostly in electronic formats. However, the availability of non-journal cited sources was low. The joint methods provided both confirmatory and contradictory results and proved useful in evaluating library research collections.
-
Milman, B.L.: Individual co-citation clusters as nuclei of complete and dynamic informetric models of scientific and technological areas (1994)
0.02
0.017595144 = product of:
0.08797572 = sum of:
0.08797572 = weight(_text_:engineering in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08797572 = score(doc=37,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21172935 = queryWeight, product of:
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.41551027 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Describes the construction of improved informetric models of individual scientific and technological areas on the basis of individual co citation clusters. The developed methodology of replenishment of research front with accidently absent papers describes the model more completely. Proposes the simple method of cluster 'dynamization' for the study of evolution of research area. The transition under consideration from co citation clusters to lexical maps of papers and patents enables the monitoring of the relationshuip between R and D in a given technological area. Provides the example from modern chemical engineering of Pressure-Swing Adsorption
-
Trkulja, V.: Weltgrößte Abstracts- und Zitationsdatenbank aus dem wissenschaftlichen Web (2005)
0.02
0.017595144 = product of:
0.08797572 = sum of:
0.08797572 = weight(_text_:engineering in 3437) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08797572 = score(doc=3437,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21172935 = queryWeight, product of:
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.41551027 = fieldWeight in 3437, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3437)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Content
- Datenbestand Scopus beinhaltet - 12.650 akademische Zeitschriften (davon 1.100 Medline-Zeitschriften und 465 Open Access-Zeitschriften), - 750 Conference Proceedings, - 600 Trade Publications, - 27 Millionen Kurzfassungen der letzten zwanzig Jahre, - 230 Millionen Referenzen zu allen Kurzfassungen ab 1996 und - 180 Millionen wissenschaftliche Webseiten via Scirus. Der Inhalt wird täglich aktualisiert. Auf die Fachbereiche teilen sich die Quellen wie folgt auf: - 4.500 Chemistry, Physics, Mathematics and Engineering, - 5.900 Life and Health Sciences (100 Medline-Abdeckung), - 2.700 Social Sciences, Psychology and Economics und - 2.500 Biological, Agricultural and Environmental Sciences.
-
Robinson-García, N.; Jiménez-Contreras, E.; Torres-Salinas, D.: Analyzing data citation practices using the data citation index : a study of backup strategies of end users (2016)
0.01
0.01256796 = product of:
0.0628398 = sum of:
0.0628398 = weight(_text_:engineering in 3225) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0628398 = score(doc=3225,freq=2.0), product of:
0.21172935 = queryWeight, product of:
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.29679304 = fieldWeight in 3225, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.372528 = idf(docFreq=557, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3225)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- We present an analysis of data citation practices based on the Data Citation Index (DCI) (Thomson Reuters). This database launched in 2012 links data sets and data studies with citations received from the other citation indexes. The DCI harvests citations to research data from papers indexed in the Web of Science. It relies on the information provided by the data repository. The findings of this study show that data citation practices are far from common in most research fields. Some differences have been reported on the way researchers cite data: Although in the areas of science and engineering & technology data sets were the most cited, in the social sciences and arts & humanities data studies play a greater role. A total of 88.1% of the records have received no citation, but some repositories show very low uncitedness rates. Although data citation practices are rare in most fields, they have expanded in disciplines such as crystallography and genomics. We conclude by emphasizing the role that the DCI could play in encouraging the consistent, standardized citation of research data-a role that would enhance their value as a means of following the research process from data collection to publication.
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.01
0.005695425 = product of:
0.028477125 = sum of:
0.028477125 = product of:
0.085431375 = sum of:
0.085431375 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085431375 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.01
0.005695425 = product of:
0.028477125 = sum of:
0.028477125 = product of:
0.085431375 = sum of:
0.085431375 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.085431375 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.005034092 = product of:
0.025170458 = sum of:
0.025170458 = product of:
0.07551137 = sum of:
0.07551137 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07551137 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Williams, R.M.: ISI search network research front specialities (1983)
0.01
0.0050287335 = product of:
0.025143668 = sum of:
0.025143668 = product of:
0.075431004 = sum of:
0.075431004 = weight(_text_:29 in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075431004 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Remler, A.: Lässt sich wissenschaftliche Leistung messen? : Wer zitiert wird, liegt vorne - in den USA berechnet man Forschungsleistung nach einem Zitat-Index (2000)
0.01
0.0050287335 = product of:
0.025143668 = sum of:
0.025143668 = product of:
0.075431004 = sum of:
0.075431004 = weight(_text_:29 in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.075431004 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 30.10.2000 17:47:29
-
Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.: Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities : the flow of ides within and among disciplines (1998)
0.00
0.0035919528 = product of:
0.017959764 = sum of:
0.017959764 = product of:
0.05387929 = sum of:
0.05387929 = weight(_text_:29 in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05387929 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 29. 3.1996 18:19:32
-
Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002)
0.00
0.0035596408 = product of:
0.017798204 = sum of:
0.017798204 = product of:
0.05339461 = sum of:
0.05339461 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05339461 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
-
Pao, M.L.: Term and citation retrieval : a field study (1993)
0.00
0.002873562 = product of:
0.01436781 = sum of:
0.01436781 = product of:
0.04310343 = sum of:
0.04310343 = weight(_text_:29 in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04310343 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.1, S.95-112
-
Rousseau, R.: Timelines in citation research (2006)
0.00
0.002873562 = product of:
0.01436781 = sum of:
0.01436781 = product of:
0.04310343 = sum of:
0.04310343 = weight(_text_:29 in 1746) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04310343 = score(doc=1746,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1746, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1746)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 18. 8.2006 14:29:40
-
Garfield, E.; Pudovkin, A.I.; Istomin, V.S.: Why do we need algorithmic historiography? (2003)
0.00
0.002873562 = product of:
0.01436781 = sum of:
0.01436781 = product of:
0.04310343 = sum of:
0.04310343 = weight(_text_:29 in 1606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04310343 = score(doc=1606,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1606, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1606)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:52:23
-
Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005)
0.00
0.002873562 = product of:
0.01436781 = sum of:
0.01436781 = product of:
0.04310343 = sum of:
0.04310343 = weight(_text_:29 in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04310343 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 27.12.2007 17:16:29
-
Bensman, S.J.: Eugene Garfield, Francis Narin, and PageRank : the theoretical bases of the Google search engine (2013)
0.00
0.0028477125 = product of:
0.014238562 = sum of:
0.014238562 = product of:
0.042715687 = sum of:
0.042715687 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042715687 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13800581 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 17.12.2013 11:02:22
-
East, J.W.: Citations to conference papers and the implications for cataloging (1985)
0.00
0.0025143668 = product of:
0.012571834 = sum of:
0.012571834 = product of:
0.037715502 = sum of:
0.037715502 = weight(_text_:29 in 7928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037715502 = score(doc=7928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13863076 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03940963 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 7928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7928)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Library resources and technical services. 29(1985), S.189-194
