Search (82 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Dokumentenmanagement"
  1. Schardt-Sahelijo, L.P.; Pastowsky, M.: ¬Der iARD-Marktreport : optoelektronische Systeme für Imageverarbeitung, Archivierung, Information Retrieval, Dokumenten-Management (1994) 0.06 
    0.060255557 = product of:
  0.090383336 = sum of:
    0.06229972 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06229972 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
    0.028083611 = product of:
      0.08425083 = sum of:
        0.08425083 = weight(_text_:29 in 3103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08425083 = score(doc=3103,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3103, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3103)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 10:05:39
  2. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.05 
    0.054631665 = product of:
  0.0819475 = sum of:
    0.069911666 = product of:
      0.20973499 = sum of:
        0.20973499 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.20973499 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.37318197 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.012035834 = product of:
      0.0361075 = sum of:
        0.0361075 = weight(_text_:29 in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0361075 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    29. 8.2009 21:15:48
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  3. Huang, T.; Mehrotra, S.; Ramchandran, K.: Multimedia Access and Retrieval System (MARS) project (1997) 0.05 
    0.05081014 = product of:
  0.07621521 = sum of:
    0.06229972 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06229972 = score(doc=758,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
    0.01391549 = product of:
      0.04174647 = sum of:
        0.04174647 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04174647 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  4. Meiss, B.: Information Retrieval und Dokumentmanagement im Multimedia-Zeitalter (1997) 0.04 
    0.04362373 = product of:
  0.065435596 = sum of:
    0.05339976 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05339976 = score(doc=710,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 710, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=710)
    0.012035834 = product of:
      0.0361075 = sum of:
        0.0361075 = weight(_text_:29 in 710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0361075 = score(doc=710,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 710, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=710)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    "Das Buch ist ein praxisbezogenes VADEMECUM für alle, die in einer Welt der Datennetze Wissen/Informationen sammeln, ordnen und Relevantes aus der stetig anwachsenden Informationsflut wiederfinden müssen (Retrieval). Behandelt werden alle Bedingungen, die für Aufbau und Pflege einer Datenbank notwendig sind. Themen wie der Wert eines Thesaurus als Basis geordneten Wissens werden dabei ebenso erfaßt wie die Indexierungspraxis, die Vor- und Nachteile von Volltextsystemen sowie moderne Verfahren. Hier geht es um Dokument-Management-Systeme, das Prinzip des Data-Warehouse, optische Archivsysteme und Informationsverbünde. Internationale Datenbanken sowie das technische Umfeld in der Medienwelt werden bis hin zum Internet angesprochen. Ein Ausblick in die Zukunft des Dokumentars runden das Werk ab
    Date
    29. 8.1997 10:30:14
    RSWK
    Information retrieval / Einführung
    Subject
    Information retrieval / Einführung
  5. Ehrmann, S.: ¬Die Nadel im Bytehaufen : Finden statt suchen: Text Retrieval, Multimediadatenbanken, Dokumentenmanagement (2000) 0.04 
    0.04303968 = product of:
  0.06455952 = sum of:
    0.0444998 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0444998 = score(doc=5317,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
    0.020059723 = product of:
      0.060179166 = sum of:
        0.060179166 = weight(_text_:29 in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.060179166 = score(doc=5317,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    29. 3.2009 11:10:42
  6. Jain, R.: Visual information retrieval in digital libraries (1997) 0.04 
    0.038645364 = product of:
  0.057968043 = sum of:
    0.044052552 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044052552 = score(doc=760,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
    0.01391549 = product of:
      0.04174647 = sum of:
        0.04174647 = weight(_text_:22 in 760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04174647 = score(doc=760,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 760, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=760)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore
  7. Pemberton, M.; Nugent, C.R.: Information studies : emergent field, convergent curriculum (1995) 0.03 
    0.034431748 = product of:
  0.05164762 = sum of:
    0.03559984 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03559984 = score(doc=3064,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
    0.016047778 = product of:
      0.04814333 = sum of:
        0.04814333 = weight(_text_:29 in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04814333 = score(doc=3064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    traditionally, librarianship, archives management, and records management have functioned largely as autonomous disciplines. However, economic, technological and higher education trends conspire against continued, possibly self defeating, claims to uniqueness. Areas of convergence include the information life cycle concept, gatekeepers, information storage and retrieval, information representation, assistive and instructional roles, ethics, and custodial and preservation concerns. Suggests implications for education and research in an emerging field of 'information management' or information studies
    Date
    27. 1.1996 18:29:24
  8. Alexander, J.: Customs and excise process 2.5 million documents (1997) 0.03 
    0.034431748 = product of:
  0.05164762 = sum of:
    0.03559984 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03559984 = score(doc=2427,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2427, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2427)
    0.016047778 = product of:
      0.04814333 = sum of:
        0.04814333 = weight(_text_:29 in 2427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04814333 = score(doc=2427,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2427, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2427)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    The HM Customs and Excise operation in Salford, Manchster, UK, has installed an electronic document management system from Graphic Data to streamline handling of import entries. It aims was to reduce filing and storage and improve access to documentation. The system involves scanning documents and CD storage and retrieval. Because of legal admissibility issues, documentation is retained in its paper format in deep storage
    Date
    31.12.1998 9:53:29
  9. Mas, S.; Zaher, L'H.; Zacklad, M.: Design & evaluation of multi-viewed knowledge system for administrative electronic document organization (2008) 0.03 
    0.034431748 = product of:
  0.05164762 = sum of:
    0.03559984 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03559984 = score(doc=2480,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
    0.016047778 = product of:
      0.04814333 = sum of:
        0.04814333 = weight(_text_:29 in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04814333 = score(doc=2480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    This communication describes part of a current research carried out at the Université de Technologie de Troyes and funded by a postdoctoral grant from the Fonds québécois de la recherche sur la société et la culture. Under the title "Design and evaluation of a faceted classification for uniform and personal organization of administrative electronic documents", our research investigates the feasibility of creating a faceted and multi-points-of-view classification scheme for administrative document organization and retrieval in online environments.
    Date
    29. 8.2009 21:15:48
  10. Vasudevan, M.C.; Mohan, M.; Kapoor, A.: Information system for knowledge management in the specialized division of a hospital (2006) 0.03 
    0.030127779 = product of:
  0.045191668 = sum of:
    0.03114986 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03114986 = score(doc=1499,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
    0.014041806 = product of:
      0.042125415 = sum of:
        0.042125415 = weight(_text_:29 in 1499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042125415 = score(doc=1499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1499)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    Abstract
    Information systems are essential support for knowledge management in all types of enterprises. This paper describes the evolution and development of a specialized hospital information system. The system is designed to integrate for access and retrieval from databases of patients' case records, and related images - CATSCAN, MRI, X-Ray - and to enable online access to full text of relevant papers on the Internet/WWW. The generation of information products and services from the system is briefly described.
    Date
    29. 2.2008 17:26:51
  11. Merve, N. v.d.: ¬The integration of document image processing and text retrieval principles (1993) 0.03 
    0.029067148 = product of:
  0.08720144 = sum of:
    0.08720144 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08720144 = score(doc=6564,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.6549133 = fieldWeight in 6564, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6564)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Only 10% of information used by an organisation is in electronic form hence the need to examine ways of processing and loading paper documents automatically in an electronic database. Discusses the principles of a document image processing (DIP) system; the difference between text retrieval and DIP; text retrieval systems and concept retrieval. Describes the TOPIC intelligent text retrieval system based on concept retrieval. Covers the TYPO operator developed for mispellings, character transpositions and 'dirty' text retrieved as output form OCR processes. Refers to an electronic news clipping service application
  12. Ashford, J.H.: Full text retrieval in document management : a review (1995) 0.02 
    0.023733227 = product of:
  0.07119968 = sum of:
    0.07119968 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07119968 = score(doc=2054,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Full text management which applied to document management tends to be centred on text storage and retrieval. Recent developments are concerned with integration with relational database management system products to deliver document management services offering both the flexibility of text retrieval and the ability to support process based funnctions. There has been a move towards client server architectures, more user friendly user interfaces and more flexible and easier to understand retrieval. Advocates caution in choosing tasks for full text methods. Identifies document management functions for which the combined use of database management systems or special purpose tools should be considered
  13. Celentano, A.; Fugini, M.G.; Pozzi, S.: Knowledge-based document retrieval in office environments : the Kabiria system (1995) 0.02 
    0.023733227 = product of:
  0.07119968 = sum of:
    0.07119968 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3224) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07119968 = score(doc=3224,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 3224, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3224)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Proposes a document retrieval model and system on the representation of knowledge describing the semantic contents of dicuments, the way in which the documents are managed by producers and by people in the office, and the application domain where the office operates. Discusses the knowledge representation issues needed for the document retrieval system and presents a document retrieval model that captures these issues. Describes such a system named Kabiria. Covers the querying and browsing environments and the architecture of the system
  14. Koulopoulos, T.M.; Frappaolo, C.: Electronic document management systems : where are they today? (1993) 0.02 
    0.023217736 = product of:
  0.069653206 = sum of:
    0.069653206 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 982) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.069653206 = score(doc=982,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 982, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=982)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Reports results of a market study to determine the changes that have taken place in text retrieval and imaging systems: the 2 dominant components of electronic document management systems (EDMS). Organizations are focusing on integrated technologies, a sign that imaging and text retrieval are making their way towards the mainstream of information management. Reports data for: text retrieval market revenue by customer segment (industry, government and library); components of an integrated image based EDMS; component platforms of the text retreival system (PC, Macintosh atc.); areas of improvement for current imaging systems; importance of key benefits to implementing text retrieval within the organization; and areas of improvement for current text retrieval systems
  15. Rapke, K.: Automatische Indexierung von Volltexten für die Gruner+Jahr Pressedatenbank (2001) 0.02 
    0.02180036 = product of:
  0.06540108 = sum of:
    0.06540108 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6386) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06540108 = score(doc=6386,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 6386, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6386)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Retrieval Tests sind die anerkannteste Methode, um neue Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung gegenüber traditionellen Verfahren zu rechtfertigen. Im Rahmen einer Diplomarbeit wurden zwei grundsätzlich unterschiedliche Systeme der automatischen inhaltlichen Erschließung anhand der Pressedatenbank des Verlagshauses Gruner + Jahr (G+J) getestet und evaluiert. Untersucht wurde dabei natürlichsprachliches Retrieval im Vergleich zu Booleschem Retrieval. Bei den beiden Systemen handelt es sich zum einen um Autonomy von Autonomy Inc. und DocCat, das von IBM an die Datenbankstruktur der G+J Pressedatenbank angepasst wurde. Ersteres ist ein auf natürlichsprachlichem Retrieval basierendes, probabilistisches System. DocCat demgegenüber basiert auf Booleschem Retrieval und ist ein lernendes System, das auf Grund einer intellektuell erstellten Trainingsvorlage indexiert. Methodisch geht die Evaluation vom realen Anwendungskontext der Textdokumentation von G+J aus. Die Tests werden sowohl unter statistischen wie auch qualitativen Gesichtspunkten bewertet. Ein Ergebnis der Tests ist, dass DocCat einige Mängel gegenüber der intellektuellen Inhaltserschließung aufweist, die noch behoben werden müssen, während das natürlichsprachliche Retrieval von Autonomy in diesem Rahmen und für die speziellen Anforderungen der G+J Textdokumentation so nicht einsetzbar ist
  16. Haynes, D.: Retention and control of electronic records (1994) 0.02 
    0.020977406 = product of:
  0.062932216 = sum of:
    0.062932216 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062932216 = score(doc=981,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 981, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=981)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    With the proliferation of electronic data one of the key problems is identifying and organizing electronic records for retention and retrieval. Defines electronic records and sets out strategies for management of electronic records. Covers: policy, information and assett analysis, retention scheduling, inactive records, indexing and retrieval, version control, standards, and electronic mail
  17. Hofmeister, H.-W.: Gezielte Informationsrecherche durch Konzept-Retrieval (1995) 0.02 
    0.020766575 = product of:
  0.06229972 = sum of:
    0.06229972 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06229972 = score(doc=2559,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2559, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2559)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  18. Boeri, R.J.; Hensel, M.: Set up a winning text retrieval system : carefully (1995) 0.02 
    0.020553578 = product of:
  0.061660733 = sum of:
    0.061660733 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.061660733 = score(doc=2809,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Considers some of the practical issues involved when a company plans to develop an in house computerized document management system: conversion of paper to electronic form via optical character recognition (OCR) or rekeying; coding of document elements using SGML; indexing for information searching and retrieval (including proximity searching); and hybrid CD-ROM and online information retrieval systems
  19. Lam-Adesina, A.M.; Jones, G.J.F.: Examining and improving the effectiveness of relevance feedback for retrieval of scanned text documents (2006) 0.02 
    0.019622568 = product of:
  0.0588677 = sum of:
    0.0588677 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 977) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0588677 = score(doc=977,freq=14.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.442117 = fieldWeight in 977, product of:
          3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
            14.0 = termFreq=14.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=977)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    Abstract
    Important legacy paper documents are digitized and collected in online accessible archives. This enables the preservation, sharing, and significantly the searching of these documents. The text contents of these document images can be transcribed automatically using OCR systems and then stored in an information retrieval system. However, OCR systems make errors in character recognition which have previously been shown to impact on document retrieval behaviour. In particular relevance feedback query-expansion methods, which are often effective for improving electronic text retrieval, are observed to be less reliable for retrieval of scanned document images. Our experimental examination of the effects of character recognition errors on an ad hoc OCR retrieval task demonstrates that, while baseline information retrieval can remain relatively unaffected by transcription errors, relevance feedback via query expansion becomes highly unstable. This paper examines the reason for this behaviour, and introduces novel modifications to standard relevance feedback methods. These methods are shown experimentally to improve the effectiveness of relevance feedback for errorful OCR transcriptions. The new methods combine similar recognised character strings based on term collection frequency and a string edit-distance measure. The techniques are domain independent and make no use of external resources such as dictionaries or training data.
  20. Sugimoto, M.: ¬A document retrieval system for assisting creative research (1995) 0.02 
    0.017799921 = product of:
  0.05339976 = sum of:
    0.05339976 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3143) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05339976 = score(doc=3143,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 3143, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3143)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 57
  • d 22
  • f 2
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 67
  • m 8
  • s 3
  • r 2
  • x 2
  • el 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications