Search (165 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002) 0.07
    0.066393554 = product of:
      0.09959033 = sum of:
        0.07551867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07551867 = score(doc=3807,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
        0.024071667 = product of:
          0.072215 = sum of:
            0.072215 = weight(_text_:29 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.072215 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    18. 5.2002 17:29:00
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  2. Jarvelin, K.: ¬A deductive data model for thesaurus navigation and query expansion (1996) 0.06
    0.05816497 = product of:
      0.08724745 = sum of:
        0.07119968 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07119968 = score(doc=5625,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
        0.016047778 = product of:
          0.04814333 = sum of:
            0.04814333 = weight(_text_:29 in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04814333 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a deductive data model based on 3 abstraction levels for representing vocabularies for information retrieval: conceptual level; expression level; and occurrence level. The proposed data model can be used for the representation and navigation of indexing and retrieval thesauri and as a vocabulary source for concept based query expansion in heterogeneous retrieval environments
    Date
    2. 3.1997 17:29:07
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  3. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.06
    0.05804297 = product of:
      0.08706445 = sum of:
        0.03114986 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03114986 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
        0.055914592 = product of:
          0.083871886 = sum of:
            0.042125415 = weight(_text_:29 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042125415 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
            0.04174647 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04174647 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. In Form einer Taxonomie wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, die eine detaillierte und damit aussagekräftige Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Das bringt einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines bestehenden Gegenstandsbereichs heraus.
    Date
    2. 3.2013 12:29:05
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  4. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.05
    0.051503256 = product of:
      0.077254884 = sum of:
        0.05339976 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05339976 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
        0.023855126 = product of:
          0.071565375 = sum of:
            0.071565375 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071565375 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
  5. Mu, X.; Lu, K.; Ryu, H.: Explicitly integrating MeSH thesaurus help into health information retrieval systems : an empirical user study (2014) 0.04
    0.039854765 = product of:
      0.059782147 = sum of:
        0.049752288 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049752288 = score(doc=2703,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.37365708 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
        0.010029862 = product of:
          0.030089583 = sum of:
            0.030089583 = weight(_text_:29 in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030089583 = score(doc=2703,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    When consumers search for health information, a major obstacle is their unfamiliarity with the medical terminology. Even though medical thesauri such as the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and related tools (e.g., the MeSH Browser) were created to help consumers find medical term definitions, the lack of direct and explicit integration of these help tools into a health retrieval system prevented them from effectively achieving their objectives. To explore this issue, we conducted an empirical study with two systems: One is a simple interface system supporting query-based searching; the other is an augmented system with two new components supporting MeSH term searching and MeSH tree browsing. A total of 45 subjects were recruited to participate in the study. The results indicated that the augmented system is more effective than the simple system in terms of improving user-perceived topic familiarity and question-answer performance, even though we did not find users spend more time on the augmented system. The two new MeSH help components played a critical role in participants' health information retrieval and were found to allow them to develop new search strategies. The findings of the study enhanced our understanding of consumers' search behaviors and shed light on the design of future health information retrieval systems.
    Date
    25. 1.2016 18:43:29
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  6. Pollard, R.: ¬A hypertext-based thesaurus as a subject browsing aid for bibliographic databases (1993) 0.04
    0.038729575 = product of:
      0.05809436 = sum of:
        0.044052552 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044052552 = score(doc=5096,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5096, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5096)
        0.014041806 = product of:
          0.042125415 = sum of:
            0.042125415 = weight(_text_:29 in 5096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042125415 = score(doc=5096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5096)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Part of a special issue on hypertext and information retrieval. Conventional information retrieval systems provide little support for browsing. Browsing is the major method of searching in hypertext system but users can become disoriented even when browsing small information space. If hypertext is to be used to support browsing in bibliographic databases navigational assistance will be required. Examines the role of thesauri as navigational aids for subject domains of Bibliographic databases. Presents the design of an experimental hypertext-based browsing inference for a thesaurus and its implementation using a commercially available hypertext program. Examines strategies for linking the thesaurus to a database
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.3, S.345-357
  7. Crouch, C.J.: ¬An approach to the automatic construction of global thesauri (1990) 0.04
    0.038645364 = product of:
      0.057968043 = sum of:
        0.044052552 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044052552 = score(doc=4042,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
        0.01391549 = product of:
          0.04174647 = sum of:
            0.04174647 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04174647 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The benefits of a well constructed thesaurus to an information retrieval system have long been recognised by both researchers and practitioners in the field. Examines both early and current approaches to automatic thesaurus construction and describes an approach to the automatic generation of global thesauri based on the term discrimination value model of Salton Yang, and Yu and on an appropriate clustering algorithm. This method has been implemented and applied to 2 document collections. Preliminary results indicate that this method, which produces improvements in retrieval performance in excess of 10 and 15% in the test collections, is viable and worthy of continued investigation.
    Date
    22. 4.1996 3:39:53
  8. Gilchrist, A.: ¬The thesaurus in retrieval (1971) 0.04
    0.036333937 = product of:
      0.10900181 = sum of:
        0.10900181 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10900181 = score(doc=4593,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.81864166 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    LCSH
    Information retrieval
    RSWK
    Schlagwortnormdatei / Information Retrieval
    Subject
    Schlagwortnormdatei / Information Retrieval
    Information retrieval
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  9. Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995) 0.03
    0.034335505 = product of:
      0.051503256 = sum of:
        0.03559984 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03559984 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
        0.015903417 = product of:
          0.04771025 = sum of:
            0.04771025 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04771025 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  10. Z39.19-1993: Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual thesauri (1993) 0.03
    0.034335505 = product of:
      0.051503256 = sum of:
        0.03559984 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03559984 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
        0.015903417 = product of:
          0.04771025 = sum of:
            0.04771025 = weight(_text_:22 in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04771025 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This 1993 edition is the authoritative guide constructing single-language thesauri, one of the most powerful tools for information retrieval. Written by experts, Z39.19 shows how to formulate descriptors, establish relationships among terms, and present the information in print and on a screen. Also included are thesaurus maintenance procedures and recommended features for thesaurus management systems
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.180-181 (M. Hudon)
  11. Conlon, S.P.N.; Evens, M.; Ahlswede, T.: Developing a large lexical database for information retrieval, parsing, and text generation systems (1993) 0.03
    0.033196777 = product of:
      0.049795166 = sum of:
        0.037759334 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037759334 = score(doc=5813,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 5813, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5813)
        0.012035834 = product of:
          0.0361075 = sum of:
            0.0361075 = weight(_text_:29 in 5813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0361075 = score(doc=5813,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5813, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5813)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Shows that it is possible to construct a lexical database by combining material from a number of machine-readable sources. Discusses the kind of lexical information required for applications in information retrieval and in other natural language processing areas, such as database interfaces and automatic filing systems. Describes the organization of the lexical database which is stored in an Oracle relational database management system and the design of the tables that comprise the database. In addition to the traditional alphabetic listing, access is privided from roots to derived forms and from derived forms to roots, and also through lexical and semantic relations between words, so that the database functions as a thesaurus as well as a dictionary. The database is designed to be open-ended and self-defined. Every attribute of every table is defined in the database itself. The lexical database can easily be extended through an SQL forms interface that facilitates additions to the tables
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.5, S.415-431
  12. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-assisted search term selection and query expansion : a review of user-centred studies (2002) 0.03
    0.033196777 = product of:
      0.049795166 = sum of:
        0.037759334 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037759334 = score(doc=1330,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 1330, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1330)
        0.012035834 = product of:
          0.0361075 = sum of:
            0.0361075 = weight(_text_:29 in 1330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0361075 = score(doc=1330,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1330, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1330)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper provides a review of the literature related to the application of domain-specific thesauri in the search and retrieval process. Focusing an studies that adopt a user-centred approach, the review presents a survey of the methodologies and results from empirical studies undertaken an the use of thesauri as sources of term selection for query formulation and expansion during the search process. It summarises the ways in which domain-specific thesauri from different disciplines have been used by various types of users and how these tools aid users in the selection of search terms. The review consists of two main sections: first, studies an thesaurus-aided search term selection; and second, studies dealing with query expansion using thesauri. Both sections are illustrated with case studies that have adopted a user-centred approach.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.1, S.1-19
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  13. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.03
    0.030043568 = product of:
      0.04506535 = sum of:
        0.03114986 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03114986 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
        0.01391549 = product of:
          0.04174647 = sum of:
            0.04174647 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04174647 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    A thesaurus in the controlled vocabulary environment is a tool designed to support effective infonnation retrieval (IR) by guiding indexers and searchers consistently to choose the same terms for expressing a given concept or combination of concepts. Terms in the thesaurus are linked by relationships of three well-known types: equivalence, hierarchical, and associative. The functions and properties of these three basic types and some subcategories are described, as well as some additional relationship types conunonly found in thesauri. Progressive automation of IR processes and the capability for simultaneous searching of vast networked resources are creating some pressures for change in the categorization and consistency of relationships.
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
  14. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.03
    0.030043568 = product of:
      0.04506535 = sum of:
        0.03114986 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03114986 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
        0.01391549 = product of:
          0.04174647 = sum of:
            0.04174647 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04174647 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Die geschichtliche Entwicklung von ISO 2788: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri und ISO 5964: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri wird kurz beschrieben. 2001 begann die Arbeit an der Entwicklung von BS 8723: Structured Vocabularies for Information Retrieval - Guide, einer fünfteiligen Norm, die konzipiert wurde, um die internationalen Normen zu aktualisieren, insbesondere mit Hinblick auf Interoperabilität. Der Verfahrensablauf zur Übernahme von BS 8723 als internationale Norm hat begonnen.
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  15. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: End-user interaction with thesauri : an evaluation of cognitive overlap in search term selection (2004) 0.03
    0.02582381 = product of:
      0.038735714 = sum of:
        0.02669988 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02669988 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
        0.012035834 = product of:
          0.0361075 = sum of:
            0.0361075 = weight(_text_:29 in 2658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0361075 = score(doc=2658,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2658, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2658)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2004 16:27:16
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  16. Assem, M. van; Malaisé, V.; Miles, A.; Schreiber, G.: ¬A method to convert thesauri to SKOS (2006) 0.03
    0.02582381 = product of:
      0.038735714 = sum of:
        0.02669988 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02669988 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
        0.012035834 = product of:
          0.0361075 = sum of:
            0.0361075 = weight(_text_:29 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0361075 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Thesauri can be useful resources for indexing and retrieval on the Semantic Web, but often they are not published in RDF/OWL. To convert thesauri to RDF for use in Semantic Web applications and to ensure the quality and utility of the conversion a structured method is required. Moreover, if different thesauri are to be interoperable without complicated mappings, a standard schema for thesauri is required. This paper presents a method for conversion of thesauri to the SKOS RDF/OWL schema, which is a proposal for such a standard under development by W3Cs Semantic Web Best Practices Working Group. We apply the method to three thesauri: IPSV, GTAA and MeSH. With these case studies we evaluate our method and the applicability of SKOS for representing thesauri.
    Date
    29. 7.2011 14:44:56
  17. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Thesaurus and beyond : an advanced formula for linguistic engineering and information retrieval (1999) 0.03
    0.025751628 = product of:
      0.038627442 = sum of:
        0.02669988 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02669988 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
        0.011927563 = product of:
          0.035782687 = sum of:
            0.035782687 = weight(_text_:22 in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035782687 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.1, S.10-22
  18. Joyce, T.; Needham, R.M.: ¬The thesaurus approach to information retrieval (1958) 0.03
    0.02517289 = product of:
      0.07551867 = sum of:
        0.07551867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1959) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07551867 = score(doc=1959,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 1959, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1959)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgang Kaufmann 1997. S.15-20.
  19. Shiri, A.: Powering search : the role of thesauri in new information environments (2012) 0.03
    0.02517289 = product of:
      0.07551867 = sum of:
        0.07551867 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07551867 = score(doc=1322,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 1322, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1322)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Powering search offers a clear and comprehensive treatment of the role of thesauri in search user interfaces across a range of information search and retrieval systems - from bibliographic and full-text databases to digital libraries, portals, open archives, and content management systems.
    Content
    Thesauri : introduction and recent developments -- Thesauri in interactive information retrieval -- User-centered approach to the evaluation of thesauri : query formulation and expansion -- Thesauri in web-based search systems -- Thesaurus-based search and browsing functionalities in new thesaurus construction standards -- Design of search user interfaces for thesauri -- Design of user interfaces for multilingual and meta-thesauri -- User-centered evaluation of thesaurus-enhanced search user interfaces -- Guidelines for the design of thesaurus-enhanced search user interfaces -- Current trends and developments.
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Information retrieval
    RSWK
    Information Retrieval
    Subject
    Information Retrieval
    Information storage and retrieval systems
    Information retrieval
  20. Lancaster, F.W.: Vocabulary control in information retrieval systems (1977) 0.02
    0.023733227 = product of:
      0.07119968 = sum of:
        0.07119968 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1774) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07119968 = score(doc=1774,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 1774, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1774)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    

Authors

Languages

  • e 127
  • d 29
  • f 4
  • sp 3
  • es 1
  • ru 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 135
  • el 14
  • m 11
  • n 5
  • x 4
  • r 3
  • s 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…