Search (485 results, page 1 of 25)

  • × type_ss:"el"
  1. Guidi, F.; Sacerdoti Coen, C.: ¬A survey on retrieval of mathematical knowledge (2015) 0.06
    0.0646368 = product of:
      0.09695519 = sum of:
        0.07707591 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07707591 = score(doc=5865,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
        0.019879272 = product of:
          0.059637815 = sum of:
            0.059637815 = weight(_text_:22 in 5865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059637815 = score(doc=5865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5865)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    We present a short survey of the literature on indexing and retrieval of mathematical knowledge, with pointers to 72 papers and tentative taxonomies of both retrieval problems and recurring techniques.
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:51:57
  2. Rindflesch, T.C.; Aronson, A.R.: Semantic processing in information retrieval (1993) 0.06
    0.055796675 = product of:
      0.08369501 = sum of:
        0.069653206 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069653206 = score(doc=4121,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
        0.014041806 = product of:
          0.042125415 = sum of:
            0.042125415 = weight(_text_:29 in 4121) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042125415 = score(doc=4121,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4121, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4121)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Intuition suggests that one way to enhance the information retrieval process would be the use of phrases to characterize the contents of text. A number of researchers, however, have noted that phrases alone do not improve retrieval effectiveness. In this paper we briefly review the use of phrases in information retrieval and then suggest extensions to this paradigm using semantic information. We claim that semantic processing, which can be viewed as expressing relations between the concepts represented by phrases, will in fact enhance retrieval effectiveness. The availability of the UMLS® domain model, which we exploit extensively, significantly contributes to the feasibility of this processing.
    Date
    29. 6.2015 14:51:28
  3. Mayfield, J.; Finin, T.: Information retrieval on the Semantic Web : integrating inference and retrieval 0.06
    0.05571246 = product of:
      0.08356869 = sum of:
        0.069653206 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.069653206 = score(doc=4330,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
        0.01391549 = product of:
          0.04174647 = sum of:
            0.04174647 = weight(_text_:22 in 4330) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04174647 = score(doc=4330,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4330, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4330)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    One vision of the Semantic Web is that it will be much like the Web we know today, except that documents will be enriched by annotations in machine understandable markup. These annotations will provide metadata about the documents as well as machine interpretable statements capturing some of the meaning of document content. We discuss how the information retrieval paradigm might be recast in such an environment. We suggest that retrieval can be tightly bound to inference. Doing so makes today's Web search engines useful to Semantic Web inference engines, and causes improvements in either retrieval or inference to lead directly to improvements in the other.
    Date
    12. 2.2011 17:35:22
  4. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.05
    0.045526393 = product of:
      0.068289585 = sum of:
        0.058259726 = product of:
          0.17477918 = sum of:
            0.17477918 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.17477918 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37318197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.010029862 = product of:
          0.030089583 = sum of:
            0.030089583 = weight(_text_:29 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030089583 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  5. Qi, Q.; Hessen, D.J.; Heijden, P.G.M. van der: Improving information retrieval through correspondenceanalysis instead of latent semantic analysis (2023) 0.04
    0.04362373 = product of:
      0.065435596 = sum of:
        0.05339976 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05339976 = score(doc=1045,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1045, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1045)
        0.012035834 = product of:
          0.0361075 = sum of:
            0.0361075 = weight(_text_:29 in 1045) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0361075 = score(doc=1045,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1045, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1045)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The initial dimensions extracted by latent semantic analysis (LSA) of a document-term matrixhave been shown to mainly display marginal effects, which are irrelevant for informationretrieval. To improve the performance of LSA, usually the elements of the raw document-term matrix are weighted and the weighting exponent of singular values can be adjusted.An alternative information retrieval technique that ignores the marginal effects is correspon-dence analysis (CA). In this paper, the information retrieval performance of LSA and CA isempirically compared. Moreover, it is explored whether the two weightings also improve theperformance of CA. The results for four empirical datasets show that CA always performsbetter than LSA. Weighting the elements of the raw data matrix can improve CA; however,it is data dependent and the improvement is small. Adjusting the singular value weightingexponent often improves the performance of CA; however, the extent of the improvementdepends on the dataset and the number of dimensions. (PDF) Improving information retrieval through correspondence analysis instead of latent semantic analysis.
    Date
    15. 9.2023 12:28:29
  6. Reiner, U.: Automatische DDC-Klassifizierung von bibliografischen Titeldatensätzen (2009) 0.04
    0.042919382 = product of:
      0.06437907 = sum of:
        0.0444998 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0444998 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
        0.019879272 = product of:
          0.059637815 = sum of:
            0.059637815 = weight(_text_:22 in 611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059637815 = score(doc=611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=611)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2009 12:54:24
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  7. Sojka, P.; Liska, M.: ¬The art of mathematics retrieval (2011) 0.04
    0.04248802 = product of:
      0.06373203 = sum of:
        0.044052552 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044052552 = score(doc=3450,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
        0.019679476 = product of:
          0.059038427 = sum of:
            0.059038427 = weight(_text_:22 in 3450) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.059038427 = score(doc=3450,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 3450, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3450)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The design and architecture of MIaS (Math Indexer and Searcher), a system for mathematics retrieval is presented, and design decisions are discussed. We argue for an approach based on Presentation MathML using a similarity of math subformulae. The system was implemented as a math-aware search engine based on the state-ofthe-art system Apache Lucene. Scalability issues were checked against more than 400,000 arXiv documents with 158 million mathematical formulae. Almost three billion MathML subformulae were indexed using a Solr-compatible Lucene.
    Content
    Vgl.: DocEng2011, September 19-22, 2011, Mountain View, California, USA Copyright 2011 ACM 978-1-4503-0863-2/11/09
    Date
    22. 2.2017 13:00:42
  8. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2012) 0.04
    0.038854256 = product of:
      0.058281384 = sum of:
        0.046245553 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046245553 = score(doc=310,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
        0.012035834 = product of:
          0.0361075 = sum of:
            0.0361075 = weight(_text_:29 in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0361075 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Authority files have played an important role in improving the quality of indexing and subject cataloging. Although authorities can significantly improve search by increasing the number of access points, they are rarely an integral part of the information retrieval process, particularly end-users searches. A retrieval prototype, searchFAST, was developed to test the feasibility of using an authority file as an index to bibliographic records. searchFAST uses FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) as an index to OCLC's WorldCat.org bibliographic database. The searchFAST methodology complements, rather than replaces, existing WorldCat.org access. The bibliographic file is searched indirectly; first the authority file is searched to identify appropriate subject headings, then the headings are used to retrieve the matching bibliographic records. The prototype demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of using an authority file as an index. Searching the authority file leverages authority control work by increasing the number of access points while supporting a simple interface designed for end-users.
    Date
    29. 5.2015 20:57:41
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  9. Kleineberg, M.: Context analysis and context indexing : formal pragmatics in knowledge organization (2014) 0.04
    0.038839817 = product of:
      0.11651945 = sum of:
        0.11651945 = product of:
          0.34955835 = sum of:
            0.34955835 = weight(_text_:3a in 1826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.34955835 = score(doc=1826,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37318197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.93669677 = fieldWeight in 1826, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1826)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=5&ved=0CDQQFjAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F3131107&ei=HzFWVYvGMsiNsgGTyoFI&usg=AFQjCNE2FHUeR9oQTQlNC4TPedv4Mo3DaQ&sig2=Rlzpr7a3BLZZkqZCXXN_IA&bvm=bv.93564037,d.bGg&cad=rja
  10. Beppler, F.D.; Fonseca, F.T.; Pacheco, R.C.S.: Hermeneus: an architecture for an ontology-enabled information retrieval (2008) 0.04
    0.03878208 = product of:
      0.058173116 = sum of:
        0.046245553 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046245553 = score(doc=3261,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
        0.011927563 = product of:
          0.035782687 = sum of:
            0.035782687 = weight(_text_:22 in 3261) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035782687 = score(doc=3261,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3261, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3261)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologies improve IR systems regarding its retrieval and presentation of information, which make the task of finding information more effective, efficient, and interactive. In this paper we argue that ontologies also greatly improve the engineering of such systems. We created a framework that uses ontology to drive the process of engineering an IR system. We developed a prototype that shows how a domain specialist without knowledge in the IR field can build an IR system with interactive components. The resulting system provides support for users not only to find their information needs but also to extend their state of knowledge. This way, our approach to ontology-enabled information retrieval addresses both the engineering aspect described here and also the usability aspect described elsewhere.
    Date
    28.11.2016 12:43:22
  11. Zanibbi, R.; Yuan, B.: Keyword and image-based retrieval for mathematical expressions (2011) 0.04
    0.03878208 = product of:
      0.058173116 = sum of:
        0.046245553 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046245553 = score(doc=3449,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 3449, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3449)
        0.011927563 = product of:
          0.035782687 = sum of:
            0.035782687 = weight(_text_:22 in 3449) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035782687 = score(doc=3449,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3449, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3449)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    Two new methods for retrieving mathematical expressions using conventional keyword search and expression images are presented. An expression-level TF-IDF (term frequency-inverse document frequency) approach is used for keyword search, where queries and indexed expressions are represented by keywords taken from LATEX strings. TF-IDF is computed at the level of individual expressions rather than documents to increase the precision of matching. The second retrieval technique is a form of Content-Base Image Retrieval (CBIR). Expressions are segmented into connected components, and then components in the query expression and each expression in the collection are matched using contour and density features, aspect ratios, and relative positions. In an experiment using ten randomly sampled queries from a corpus of over 22,000 expressions, precision-at-k (k= 20) for the keyword-based approach was higher (keyword: µ= 84.0,s= 19.0, image-based:µ= 32.0,s= 30.7), but for a few of the queries better results were obtained using a combination of the two techniques.
    Date
    22. 2.2017 12:53:49
  12. Francu, V.: Does convenience trump accuracy? : the avatars of the UDC in Romania (2007) 0.04
    0.038729575 = product of:
      0.05809436 = sum of:
        0.044052552 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044052552 = score(doc=544,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 544, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=544)
        0.014041806 = product of:
          0.042125415 = sum of:
            0.042125415 = weight(_text_:29 in 544) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042125415 = score(doc=544,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 544, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=544)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This paper will concentrate on some major issues regarding the potential of UDC and the current controversy about its use UDC in Romania: i) the importance of hierarchical structures in controlled vocabularies with a direct impact on improved information retrieval given by the browsing function which enables visualizing the hierarchies in subject areas rather than just locating a particular topic; ii) the lack of popularity of the UDC as an indexing and information retrieval language among its users be they librarians or end users of library OPACs; and iii) the situation of UDC teachers and teaching in Romanian universities.
    Source
    Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 29(2007), S.263-272
  13. Knorz, G.; Rein, B.: Semantische Suche in einer Hochschulontologie : Ontologie-basiertes Information-Filtering und -Retrieval mit relationalen Datenbanken (2005) 0.04
    0.038645364 = product of:
      0.057968043 = sum of:
        0.044052552 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044052552 = score(doc=4324,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
        0.01391549 = product of:
          0.04174647 = sum of:
            0.04174647 = weight(_text_:22 in 4324) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04174647 = score(doc=4324,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4324, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4324)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    11. 2.2011 18:22:25
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  14. Maple, A.: Faceted access : a review of the literature (1995) 0.03
    0.034431748 = product of:
      0.05164762 = sum of:
        0.03559984 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03559984 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
        0.016047778 = product of:
          0.04814333 = sum of:
            0.04814333 = weight(_text_:29 in 5099) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04814333 = score(doc=5099,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5099, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5099)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this paper is to define what is meant by facet analysis, and to review briefly the history of facet analysis within the context of other types of subject analysis in libraries and within the context of information retrieval research
    Date
    20. 8.2006 12:29:16
  15. Mas, S.; Zaher, L'H.; Zacklad, M.: Design & evaluation of multi-viewed knowledge system for administrative electronic document organization (2008) 0.03
    0.034431748 = product of:
      0.05164762 = sum of:
        0.03559984 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03559984 = score(doc=2480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
        0.016047778 = product of:
          0.04814333 = sum of:
            0.04814333 = weight(_text_:29 in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04814333 = score(doc=2480,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Abstract
    This communication describes part of a current research carried out at the Université de Technologie de Troyes and funded by a postdoctoral grant from the Fonds québécois de la recherche sur la société et la culture. Under the title "Design and evaluation of a faceted classification for uniform and personal organization of administrative electronic documents", our research investigates the feasibility of creating a faceted and multi-points-of-view classification scheme for administrative document organization and retrieval in online environments.
    Date
    29. 8.2009 21:15:48
  16. Hoppe, T.: Semantische Filterung : ein Werkzeug zur Steigerung der Effizienz im Wissensmanagement (2013) 0.03
    0.034431748 = product of:
      0.05164762 = sum of:
        0.03559984 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03559984 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
        0.016047778 = product of:
          0.04814333 = sum of:
            0.04814333 = weight(_text_:29 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04814333 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15484026 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2015 18:56:44
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  17. Henrich, A.: Information Retrieval : Grundlagen, Modelle und Anwendungen (2008) 0.03
    0.034335505 = product of:
      0.051503256 = sum of:
        0.03559984 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03559984 = score(doc=1525,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1525, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1525)
        0.015903417 = product of:
          0.04771025 = sum of:
            0.04771025 = weight(_text_:22 in 1525) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04771025 = score(doc=1525,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1525, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1525)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2015 21:23:08
  18. Van Dijck, P.: Introduction to XFML (2003) 0.03
    0.034335505 = product of:
      0.051503256 = sum of:
        0.03559984 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03559984 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
        0.015903417 = product of:
          0.04771025 = sum of:
            0.04771025 = weight(_text_:22 in 2474) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04771025 = score(doc=2474,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15414225 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2474, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2474)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
    
    Source
    http://www.xml.com/lpt/a/2003/01/22/xfml.html
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  19. Information retrieval research : Proceedings of the 19th Annual BCS-IRSG Colloquium on IR Research, Aberdeen, Scotland, 8-9 April 1997 (1997) 0.03
    0.031396106 = product of:
      0.09418832 = sum of:
        0.09418832 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09418832 = score(doc=5393,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04401763 = queryNorm
            0.7073872 = fieldWeight in 5393, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5393)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Research / Congresses
    Information retrieval / Research / Congresses
    RSWK
    Information retrieval / Kongress / Aberdeen <1997>
    Subject
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Research / Congresses
    Information retrieval / Research / Congresses
    Information retrieval / Kongress / Aberdeen <1997>
  20. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.03
    0.031071853 = product of:
      0.093215555 = sum of:
        0.093215555 = product of:
          0.27964666 = sum of:
            0.27964666 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.27964666 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.37318197 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04401763 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H

Years

Languages

  • e 289
  • d 184
  • a 3
  • el 3
  • es 1
  • nl 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 219
  • i 20
  • r 10
  • s 9
  • x 9
  • m 8
  • p 6
  • b 3
  • n 1
  • More… Less…

Themes