Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

0.016584096 = product of:
  0.049752288 = sum of:
    0.049752288 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.049752288 = score(doc=1520,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.37365708 = fieldWeight in 1520, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1520)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract

This paper discusses issues concerning the augmentation of thesaurus relationships, in light of new application possibilities for retrieval. We first discuss a case study that explored the retrieval potential of an augmented set of thesaurus relationships by specialising standard relationships into richer subtypes, in particular hierarchical geographical containment and the associative relationship. We then locate this work in a broader context by reviewing various attempts to build taxonomies of thesaurus relationships, and conclude by discussing the feasibility of hierarchically augmenting the core set of thesaurus relationships, particularly the associative relationship. We discuss the possibility of enriching the specification and semantics of Related Term (RT relationships), while maintaining compatibility with traditional thesauri via a limited hierarchical extension of the associative (and hierarchical) relationships. This would be facilitated by distinguishing the type of term from the (sub)type of relationship and explicitly specifying semantic categories for terms following a faceted approach. We first illustrate how hierarchical spatial relationships can be used to provide more flexible retrieval for queries incorporating place names in applications employing online gazetteers and geographical thesauri. We then employ a set of experimental scenarios to investigate key issues affecting use of the associative (RT) thesaurus relationships in semantic distance measures. Previous work has noted the potential of RTs in thesaurus search aids but also the problem of uncontrolled expansion of query term sets. Results presented in this paper suggest the potential for taking account of the hierarchical context of an RT link and specialisations of the RT relationship

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.014833267 = product of:
  0.0444998 = sum of:
    0.0444998 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5346) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0444998 = score(doc=5346,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 5346, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5346)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.007342092 = product of:
  0.022026276 = sum of:
    0.022026276 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022026276 = score(doc=1800,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.1331496 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04401763 = queryNorm
        0.16542503 = fieldWeight in 1800, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1800)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Content

Enthält: Appendix A: Subcommittee on Subject Relationships/Reference Structures - REPORT TO THE ALCTS/CCS SUBJECT ANALYSIS COMMITTEE - July 1996 Appendix B (part 1): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (alphabetical display) (Separat in: http://web2.ala.org/ala/alctscontent/CCS/committees/subjectanalysis/subjectrelations/msrscu2.pdf) Appendix B (part 2): Taxonomy of Subject Relationships. Compiled by Dee Michel with the assistance of Pat Kuhr - June 1996 draft (hierarchical display) Appendix C: Checklist of Candidate Subject Relationships for Information Retrieval. Compiled by Dee Michel, Pat Kuhr, and Jane Greenberg; edited by Greg Wool - June 1997 Appendix D: Review of Reference Displays in Selected CD-ROM Abstracts and Indexes by Harriette Hemmasi and Steven Riel Appendix E: Analysis of Relationships in Six LC Subject Authority Records by Harriette Hemmasi and Gary Strawn Appendix F: Report of a Preliminary Survey of Subject Referencing in OPACs by Gregory Wool Appendix G: LC Subject Referencing in OPACs--Why Bother? by Gregory Wool Appendix H: Research Needs on Subject Relationships and Reference Structures in Information Access compiled by Jane Greenberg and Steven Riel with contributions from Dee Michel and others edited by Gregory Wool Appendix I: Bibliography on Subject Relationships compiled mostly by Dee Michel with additional contributions from Jane Greenberg, Steven Riel, and Gregory Wool

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval