-
Pao, M.L.: Term and citation retrieval : a field study (1993)
0.02
0.016460637 = product of:
0.057612225 = sum of:
0.043686952 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043686952 = score(doc=3741,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
0.013925271 = product of:
0.04177581 = sum of:
0.04177581 = weight(_text_:29 in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04177581 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Investigates the relative efficacy of searching by terms and by citations in searches collected in health science libraries. In pilot and field studies the odds that overlap items retrieved would be relevant or partially relevant were greatly improved. In the field setting citation searching was able to add average of 24% recall to traditional subject retrieval. Attempts to identify distinguishing characteristics in queries which might benefit most from additional citation searches proved inclusive. Online access of citation databases has been hampered by their high cost
- Source
- Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.1, S.95-112
-
Gorraiz, J.: "Web of Science" versus "Scopus" oder das aktuelle Dilemma der Bibliotheken (2006)
0.02
0.015177874 = product of:
0.053122558 = sum of:
0.042678602 = weight(_text_:bibliothek in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042678602 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15681393 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.27216077 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1055303 = idf(docFreq=1980, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
0.010443954 = product of:
0.03133186 = sum of:
0.03133186 = weight(_text_:29 in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03133186 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Bei den nachfolgenden Ausführungen handelt es sich um eine Zusammenstellung von Kommentaren, Vorträgen und Rückmeldungen von Kollegen bzw. Benutzern der Bibliothek sowie meine eigenen Erfahrungen als Vortragender im Universitätslehrgang "Master of Science", in dessen Rahmen ich das Fach "Bibliometrie" unterrichte. Schwerpunkt dieses Beitrages ist eine Zusammenfassung der Diskussion "Web of Science versus Scopus", die den aktuellen Stand der Kontroverse (vor allem an der Universität Wien im naturwissenschaftlichen Sektor) widerspiegelt. Hier ist zu bemerken, dass diese Problematik auch fachspezifisch ist und deswegen an jeder Universität bzw. in jedem Fachgebiet anders zu betrachten ist. Startpunkt meiner Betrachtung ist die allgemein akzeptierte Notwendigkeit des "Journal of Citation Reports (JCR)". Nur in diesem bibliometrischen Verzeichnis sind derzeit die "Impact Factors" zu finden, die als Grundlage jeder akademischen Evaluation dienen. Deswegen ist JCR heutzutage an jeder Universität mit naturwissenschaftlichen Fächern unentbehrlich und das aktuelle Dilemma der Bibliothekare lautet nicht wirklich "Web of Science versus Scopus", sondern genaugesagt "Fallbeispiel A: Web of Science &JCR" oder "Fallbeispiel B: Scopus &JCR".
- Date
- 4. 6.2006 17:36:29
-
Aström, F.: Changes in the LIS research front : time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004 (2007)
0.01
0.013055672 = product of:
0.04569485 = sum of:
0.027304346 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027304346 = score(doc=329,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
0.018390507 = weight(_text_:internet in 329) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018390507 = score(doc=329,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.16308975 = fieldWeight in 329, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=329)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Based on articles published in 1990-2004 in 21 library and information science (LIS) journals, a set of cocitation analyses was performed to study changes in research fronts over the last 15 years, where LIS is at now, and to discuss where it is heading. To study research fronts, here defined as current and influential cocited articles, a citations among documents methodology was applied; and to study changes, the analyses were time-sliced into three 5-year periods. The results show a stable structure of two distinct research fields: informetrics and information seeking and retrieval (ISR). However, experimental retrieval research and user oriented research have merged into one ISR field; and IR and informetrics also show signs of coming closer together, sharing research interests and methodologies, making informetrics research more visible in mainstream LIS research. Furthermore, the focus on the Internet, both in ISR research and in informetrics-where webometrics quickly has become a dominating research area-is an important change. The future is discussed in terms of LIS dependency on technology, how integration of research areas as well as technical systems can be expected to continue to characterize LIS research, and how webometrics will continue to develop and find applications.
-
Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005)
0.01
0.012385738 = product of:
0.043350082 = sum of:
0.02942481 = weight(_text_:internet in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02942481 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.2609436 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.013925271 = product of:
0.04177581 = sum of:
0.04177581 = weight(_text_:29 in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04177581 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- It has been shown (Lawrence, S. (2001). Online or invisible? Nature, 411, 521) that journal articles which have been posted without charge on the internet are more heavily cited than those which have not been. Using data from the NASA Astrophysics Data System (ads.harvard.edu) and from the ArXiv e-print archive at Cornell University (arXiv.org) we examine the causes of this effect.
- Date
- 27.12.2007 17:16:29
-
Davis, P.M.; Cohen, S.A.: ¬The effect of the Web on undergraduate citation behavior 1996-1999 (2001)
0.01
0.011901052 = product of:
0.041653678 = sum of:
0.031209724 = weight(_text_:internet in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031209724 = score(doc=5768,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.27677247 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
0.010443954 = product of:
0.03133186 = sum of:
0.03133186 = weight(_text_:29 in 5768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03133186 = score(doc=5768,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5768, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5768)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- A citation analysis of undergraduate term papers in microeconomics revealed a significant decrease in the frequency of scholarly resources cited between 1996 and 1999. Book citations decreased from 30% to 19%, newspaper citations increased from 7% to 19%, and Web citations increased from 9% to 21%. Web citations checked in 2000 revealed that only 18% of URLs cited in 1996 led to the correct Internet document. For 1999 bibliographies, only 55% of URLs led to the correct document. The authors recommend (1) setting stricter guidelines for acceptable citations in course assignments; (2) creating and maintaining scholarly portals for authoritative Web sites with a commitment to long-term access; and (3) continuing to instruct students how to critically evaluate resources
- Date
- 29. 9.2001 14:01:09
- Theme
- Internet
-
Mendez, A.: Some considerations on the retrieval of literature based on citations (1978)
0.01
0.008826098 = product of:
0.061782684 = sum of:
0.061782684 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 778) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061782684 = score(doc=778,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 778, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=778)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
MacCain, K.W.: Descriptor and citation retrieval in the medical behavioral sciences literature : retrieval overlaps and novelty distribution (1989)
0.01
0.008107289 = product of:
0.056751017 = sum of:
0.056751017 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056751017 = score(doc=2290,freq=12.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 2290, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2290)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Search results for nine topics in the medical behavioral sciences are reanalyzed to compare the overall perfor-mance of descriptor and citation search strategies in identifying relevant and novel documents. Overlap per- centages between an aggregate "descriptor-based" database (MEDLINE, EXERPTA MEDICA, PSYCINFO) and an aggregate "citation-based" database (SCISEARCH, SOCIAL SCISEARCH) ranged from 1% to 26%, with a median overlap of 8% relevant retrievals found using both search strategies. For seven topics in which both descriptor and citation strategies produced reasonably substantial retrievals, two patterns of search performance and novelty distribution were observed: (1) where descriptor and citation retrieval showed little overlap, novelty retrieval percentages differed by 17-23% between the two strategies; (2) topics with a relatively high percentage retrieval overlap shoed little difference (1-4%) in descriptor and citation novelty retrieval percentages. These results reflect the varying partial congruence of two literature networks and represent two different types of subject relevance
-
Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001)
0.01
0.008002967 = product of:
0.028010383 = sum of:
0.019307088 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019307088 = score(doc=5767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.008703294 = product of:
0.026109882 = sum of:
0.026109882 = weight(_text_:29 in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026109882 = score(doc=5767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- We explore the intellectual subject structure and research themes in software engineering through the identification and analysis of a core journal literature. We examine this literature via two expert perspectives: that of the author, who identified significant work by citing it (journal cocitation analysis), and that of the professional indexer, who tags published work with subject terms to facilitate retrieval from a bibliographic database (subject profile analysis). The data sources are SCISEARCH (the on-line version of Science Citation Index), and INSPEC (a database covering software engineering, computer science, and information systems). We use data visualization tools (cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling, and PFNets) to show the "intellectual maps" of software engineering. Cocitation and subject profile analyses demonstrate that software engineering is a distinct interdisciplinary field, valuing practical and applied aspects, and spanning a subject continuum from "programming-in-the-smalI" to "programming-in-the-large." This continuum mirrors the software development life cycle by taking the operating system or major application from initial programming through project management, implementation, and maintenance. Object orientation is an integral but distinct subject area in software engineering. Key differences are the importance of management and programming: (1) cocitation analysis emphasizes project management and systems development; (2) programming techniques/languages are more influential in subject profiles; (3) cocitation profiles place object-oriented journals separately and centrally while the subject profile analysis locates these journals with the programming/languages group
- Date
- 29. 9.2001 14:01:01
-
Stock, W.G.: Publikation und Zitat : Die problematische Basis empirischer Wissenschaftsforschung (2001)
0.01
0.0077410867 = product of:
0.027093802 = sum of:
0.018390507 = weight(_text_:internet in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018390507 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.16308975 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
0.008703294 = product of:
0.026109882 = sum of:
0.026109882 = weight(_text_:29 in 5787) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026109882 = score(doc=5787,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13436082 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5787, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5787)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Die empirische Wissenschaftsforschung arbeitet bei den Indikatoren wissenschaftlicher Leistung und wissenschaftlicher Wirkung mit Publikations- und Zitationsraten. Die vorliegende Arbeit befaßt sich mit dabei auftretenden methodischen Problemen. Was ist überhaupt eine Publikation? Was heißt Zitation? Zentral ist auch die Zählbasis, d.h. die Einheitenbildung: Was ist 1 Publikation? und: Was ist 1 Zitation? Bei Printpublikationen gibt es eine Reihe von beachtenswerten Faktoren (u.a. Mehrautorenwerke, Gewichtungsfaktoren wie den Impact Factor, Dokumenttypen). Bei elektronischen Publikationen im Internet mit ihrem dynamischen Charakter ist die Einheitenbildung noch weitaus problematischer. Zitationen, verstanden als zitierte Publikationen, werfen alle methodischen Probleme der Publikationseinheiten auf, hinzu kommen weitere, spezifische Probleme. Lösungsmöglichkeiten im syntaktischen Bereich (Relativierung auf Textseiten oder Zeichen) ändern am grundlegenden Problem nur wenig, Lösungsversuche im semantischen Bereich (etwa im Rahmen der semantischen Informationstheorie) sind im Rahmen der Publikations- und Zitationsanalysen nicht durchführbar und verweisen sowohl auf themenanalytische Methoden als auch auf die Wissenschaftstheorie. Mit diesem Working Paper wollen wir vor allem auf offene Probleme hinweisen; "endgültige" Lösungen wird der Leser nicht finden, wohl aber Lösungsvorschläge, die meist durchaus noch diskussionswürdig sind. In der Informationswissenschaft wie in der Wissenschaftsforschung sind wir bisher viel zu sicher davon ausgegangen, daß wir wissen, was Publikationen und Zitationen sind
- Series
- Kölner Arbeitspapiere zur Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft; Bd.29
-
Garfield, E.: Agony and ecstasy of the Internet : experiences of an information scientist qua publisher (1996)
0.01
0.0073562027 = product of:
0.051493417 = sum of:
0.051493417 = weight(_text_:internet in 3044) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051493417 = score(doc=3044,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.45665127 = fieldWeight in 3044, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3044)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Reports recent experiences with the publishing, via the Internet and WWW of ISI's biweekly newspaper, The Scientist; which was originally mounted on the NSFnet. Compares the use of the Internet for SDI by comparing Web searches via AltaVista with similar searches on CD-ROM. Predicts that future current awareness services and SDI services will be linked to electronic periodicals in electronic libraries. Concludes with a note on cited reference searching, a variation on the theme of hypertext searching, with particular reference to SCI and Web crawlers
- Theme
- Internet
-
Cronin, B.: Bibliometrics and beyond : some thoughts on web-based citation analysis (2001)
0.01
0.0073562027 = product of:
0.051493417 = sum of:
0.051493417 = weight(_text_:internet in 3890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051493417 = score(doc=3890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.45665127 = fieldWeight in 3890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3890)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Internet
-
Barnett, G.A.; Fink, E.L.: Impact of the internet and scholar age distribution on academic citation age (2008)
0.01
0.0070495587 = product of:
0.04934691 = sum of:
0.04934691 = weight(_text_:internet in 1376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04934691 = score(doc=1376,freq=10.0), product of:
0.11276311 = queryWeight, product of:
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.43761572 = fieldWeight in 1376, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1376)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- This article examines the impact of the Internet and the age distribution of research scholars on academic citation age with a mathematical model proposed by Barnett, Fink, and Debus (1989) and a revised model that incorporates information about the online environment and scholar age distribution. The modified model fits the data well, accounting for 99.6% of the variance for science citations and 99.8% for social science citations. The Internet's impact on the aging process of academic citations has been very small, accounting for only 0.1% for the social sciences and 0.8% for the sciences. Rather than resulting in the use of more recent citations, the Internet appears to have lengthened the average life of academic citations by 6 to 8 months. The aging of scholars seems to have a greater impact, accounting for 2.8% of the variance for the sciences and 0.9% for the social sciences. However, because the diffusion of the Internet and the aging of the professoriate are correlated over this time period, differentiating their effects is somewhat problematic.
- Theme
- Internet
-
Yoon, L.L.: ¬The performance of cited references as an approach to information retrieval (1994)
0.01
0.006688172 = product of:
0.046817202 = sum of:
0.046817202 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046817202 = score(doc=8219,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 8219, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8219)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Explores the relationship between the number of cited references used in a citation search and retrieval effectiveness. Focuses on analysing in terms of information retrieval effectiveness, the overlap among posting sets retrieved by various combinations of cited references. Findings from three case studies show the more cited references used for a citation search, the better the performance, in terms of retrieving more relevant documents, up to a point of diminishing returns. The overall level of overlap among relevant documents sets was found to be low. If only some of the cited references among many candidates are used for a citation search, a significant proportion of relevant documents may be missed. The characteristics of cited references showed that some variables are good indicators to predict relevance to a given question
-
Larsen, B.: Exploiting citation overlaps for information retrieval : generating a boomerang effect from the network of scientific papers (2002)
0.01
0.0066195736 = product of:
0.046337012 = sum of:
0.046337012 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046337012 = score(doc=4175,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 4175, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4175)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
He, Y.; Hui, S.C.: PubSearch : a Web citation-based retrieval system (2001)
0.01
0.0066195736 = product of:
0.046337012 = sum of:
0.046337012 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046337012 = score(doc=4806,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 4806, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4806)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Many scientific publications are now available on the World Wide Web for researchers to share research findings. However, they tend to be poorly organised, making the search of relevant publications difficult and time-consuming. Most existing search engines are ineffective in searching these publications, as they do not index Web publications that normally appear in PDF (portable document format) or PostScript formats. Proposes a Web citation-based retrieval system, known as PubSearch, for the retrieval of Web publications. PubSearch indexes Web publications based on citation indices and stores them into a Web Citation Database. The Web Citation Database is then mined to support publication retrieval. Apart from supporting the traditional cited reference search, PubSearch also provides document clustering search and author clustering search. Document clustering groups related publications into clusters, while author clustering categorizes authors into different research areas based on author co-citation analysis.
-
Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003)
0.01
0.0063844784 = product of:
0.022345673 = sum of:
0.015445671 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015445671 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.0069000013 = product of:
0.020700004 = sum of:
0.020700004 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020700004 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13375512 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Ahlgren, Jarneving, and. Rousseau review accepted procedures for author co-citation analysis first pointing out that since in the raw data matrix the row and column values are identical i,e, the co-citation count of two authors, there is no clear choice for diagonal values. They suggest the number of times an author has been co-cited with himself excluding self citation rather than the common treatment as zeros or as missing values. When the matrix is converted to a similarity matrix the normal procedure is to create a matrix of Pearson's r coefficients between data vectors. Ranking by r and by co-citation frequency and by intuition can easily yield three different orders. It would seem necessary that the adding of zeros to the matrix will not affect the value or the relative order of similarity measures but it is shown that this is not the case with Pearson's r. Using 913 bibliographic descriptions form the Web of Science of articles form JASIS and Scientometrics, authors names were extracted, edited and 12 information retrieval authors and 12 bibliometric authors each from the top 100 most cited were selected. Co-citation and r value (diagonal elements treated as missing) matrices were constructed, and then reconstructed in expanded form. Adding zeros can both change the r value and the ordering of the authors based upon that value. A chi-squared distance measure would not violate these requirements, nor would the cosine coefficient. It is also argued that co-citation data is ordinal data since there is no assurance of an absolute zero number of co-citations, and thus Pearson is not appropriate. The number of ties in co-citation data make the use of the Spearman rank order coefficient problematic.
- Date
- 9. 7.2006 10:22:35
-
Shaw, W.M.: Subject and citation indexing : pt.2: the optimal, cluster-based retrieval performance of composite representations (1991)
0.01
0.0062409933 = product of:
0.043686952 = sum of:
0.043686952 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4842) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043686952 = score(doc=4842,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 4842, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4842)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Fortsetzung von pt.1: experimental retrieval results are presented as a function of the exhaustivity and similarity of the composite representations and reveal consistent patterns from which optimal performance levels can be identified. The optimal performance values provide an assessment of the absolute capacity of each composite representation to associate documents relevant to different queries in single-link hierarchies. The effectiveness of the exhaustive representation composed of references and citations is materially superior to the effectiveness of exhaustive composite representations that include subject descriptions
-
Araújo, P.C. de; Gutierres Castanha, R.C.; Hjoerland, B.: Citation indexing and indexes (2021)
0.01
0.0057327193 = product of:
0.040129032 = sum of:
0.040129032 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 444) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040129032 = score(doc=444,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 444, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=444)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- A citation index is a bibliographic database that provides citation links between documents. The first modern citation index was suggested by the researcher Eugene Garfield in 1955 and created by him in 1964, and it represents an important innovation to knowledge organization and information retrieval. This article describes citation indexes in general, considering the modern citation indexes, including Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar, Microsoft Academic, Crossref, Dimensions and some special citation indexes and predecessors to the modern citation index like Shepard's Citations. We present comparative studies of the major ones and survey theoretical problems related to the role of citation indexes as subject access points (SAP), recognizing the implications to knowledge organization and information retrieval. Finally, studies on citation behavior are presented and the influence of citation indexes on knowledge organization, information retrieval and the scientific information ecosystem is recognized.
-
Garfield, E.: From citation indexes to informetrics : is the tail now wagging the dog? (1998)
0.01
0.005460869 = product of:
0.038226083 = sum of:
0.038226083 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038226083 = score(doc=2809,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2809, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2809)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Provides a synoptic review and history of citation indexes and their evolution into research evaluation tools including a discussion of the use of bibliometric data for evaluating US institutions (academic departments) by the National Research Council (NRC). Covers the origin and uses of periodical impact factors, validation studies of citation analysis, information retrieval and dissemination (current awareness), citation consciousness, historiography and science mapping, Citation Classics, and the history of contemporary science. Illustrates the retrieval of information by cited reference searching, especially as it applies to avoiding duplicated research. Discusses the 15 year cumulative impacts of periodicals and the percentage of uncitedness, the emergence of scientometrics, old boy networks, and citation frequency distributions. Concludes with observations about the future of citation indexing
-
Cawkell, T.: Checking research progress on 'image retrieval by shape matching' using the Web of Science (1998)
0.01
0.005460869 = product of:
0.038226083 = sum of:
0.038226083 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038226083 = score(doc=3571,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11553899 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03819578 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3571, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3571)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Discusses the Web of Science database recently introduced by ISI, and which is compiled from 8.000 journals covered in the SCI, SSCI and AHCI. Briefly compares the database with the Citation Indexes as provided by the BIDS service at the University of Bath. Explores the characteristics and usefulness of the WoS through a search of it for articles on the topic of image retrieval by shape matching. Suggests that the selection of articles of interest is much easier and far quicker using the WoS than other methods of conducting a search using ISI's data
