Search (55 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.05 
    0.05356811 = product of:
  0.10713622 = sum of:
    0.06414994 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06414994 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045324896 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
    0.04298628 = product of:
      0.08597256 = sum of:
        0.08597256 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08597256 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  2. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.03 
    0.026784055 = product of:
  0.05356811 = sum of:
    0.03207497 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03207497 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045324896 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
    0.02149314 = product of:
      0.04298628 = sum of:
        0.04298628 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04298628 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die geschichtliche Entwicklung von ISO 2788: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri und ISO 5964: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri wird kurz beschrieben. 2001 begann die Arbeit an der Entwicklung von BS 8723: Structured Vocabularies for Information Retrieval - Guide, einer fünfteiligen Norm, die konzipiert wurde, um die internationalen Normen zu aktualisieren, insbesondere mit Hinblick auf Interoperabilität. Der Verfahrensablauf zur Übernahme von BS 8723 als internationale Norm hat begonnen.
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  3. Armitage, J.E.; Lynch, M.F.: Some structural characteristics of articulated subject indexes (1968) 0.02 
    0.018328553 = product of:
  0.07331421 = sum of:
    0.07331421 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07331421 = score(doc=2303,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045324896 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2303, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2303)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Information storage and retrieval. 4(1968) no.2, S.101-111
  4. Booth, P.F.: Indexing : the manual of good practice (2001) 0.02 
    0.016593777 = product of:
  0.033187553 = sum of:
    0.0091642765 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0091642765 = score(doc=1968,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045324896 = queryNorm
        0.06684181 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
    0.024023276 = product of:
      0.04804655 = sum of:
        0.04804655 = weight(_text_:lehrbuch in 1968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04804655 = score(doc=1968,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.3139294 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.1530489 = fieldWeight in 1968, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.926203 = idf(docFreq=117, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1968)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Der Zugang zum Informationsspeicher ist auch von verwandten Begriffen her zu gewährleisten, denn der Suchende lässt sich gern mit seiner Fragestellung zu allgemeineren und vor allem zu spezifischeren Begriffen leiten. Verweisungen der Art "siehe auch" dienen diesem Zweck. Der Zugang ist auch von unterschiedlichen, aber bedeutungsgleichen Ausdrücken mithilfe einer Verweisung von der Art "siehe" zu gewährleisten, denn ein Fragesteller könnte sich mit einem von diesen Synonymen auf die Suche begeben haben und würde dann nicht fündig werden. Auch wird Vieles, wofür ein Suchender sein Schlagwort parat hat, in einem Text nur in wortreicher Umschreibung und paraphrasiert angetroffen ("Terms that may not appear in the text but are likely to be sought by index users"), d.h. praktisch unauffindbar in einer derartig mannigfaltigen Ausdrucksweise. All dies sollte lexikalisch ausgedrückt werden, und zwar in geläufiger Terminologie, denn in dieser Form erfolgt auch die Fragestellung. Hier wird die Grenze zwischen "concept indexing" gegenüber dem bloßen "word indexing" gezogen, welch letzteres sich mit der Präsentation von nicht interpretierten Textwörtern begnügt. Nicht nur ist eine solche Grenze weit verbreitet unbekannt, ihre Existenz wird zuweilen sogar bestritten, obwohl doch ein Wort meistens viele Begriffe ausdrückt und obwohl ein Begriff meistens durch viele verschiedene Wörter und Sätze ausgedrückt wird. Ein Autor kann und muss sich in seinen Texten oft mit Andeutungen begnügen, weil ein Leser oder Zuhörer das Gemeinte schon aus dem Zusammenhang erkennen kann und nicht mit übergroßer Deutlichkeit (spoon feeding) belästigt sein will, was als Unterstellung von Unkenntnis empfunden würde. Für das Retrieval hingegen muss das Gemeinte explizit ausgedrückt werden. In diesem Buch wird deutlich gemacht, was alles an außertextlichem und Hintergrund-Wissen für ein gutes Indexierungsergebnis aufgeboten werden muss, dies auf der Grundlage von sachverständiger und sorgfältiger Interpretation ("The indexer must understand the meaning of a text"). All dies lässt gutes Indexieren nicht nur als professionelle Dienstleistung erscheinen, sondern auch als Kunst. Als Grundlage für all diese Schritte wird ein Thesaurus empfohlen, mit einem gut strukturierten Netzwerk von verwandtschaftlichen Beziehungen und angepasst an den jeweiligen Buchtext. Aber nur selten wird man auf bereits andernorts vorhandene Thesauri zurückgreifen können. Hier wäre ein Hinweis auf einschlägige Literatur zur Thesaurus-Konstruktion nützlich gewesen.
    Es wird auch die Frage erörtert, wer wegen seines Naturells lieber Abstand vom Indexieren nehmen sollte. Diese Ausführungen sind ebenso nützlich wie die konkrete Indexierungsanleitung. Es könnte manch einem erspart bleiben, sich einer Arbeit zuzuwenden, mit der er überfordert wäre. Hier klärt sich auch die oft gestellte Frage, wer ein Register erstellen soll, der Autor oder ein professioneller Indexer: Der Autor ist dieser Aufgabe gewachsen, sofern er das Indexieren gelernt hat, und zwar mehr als lediglich das Entnehmen von Textwörtern (oder ihrer morphologischen Varianten) und deren programmierte Weiterverarbeitung. Auch darf der Autor beim Indexieren nicht nur die eigene Terminologie im Kopf haben. Der professionelle Indexer ist dieser Aufgabe erst recht gewachsen, wenn er sich auf dem Sachgebiet der Texte gut auskennt. Manch ein Buchautor, der glaubt (oder sich einreden lässt), dass er zum Indexieren nur den Markierstift und die Kenntnis vom Alphabet braucht, müsste sich hier den Spiegel vorhalten, oder auch ein Verleger, der in solchen oder ähnlichen Primitivvarianten eine billige und vollwertige Alternative erblickt. Ein Buch dieser Art lädt zu einem Seitenblick auf die Situation der professionellen Indexierung hierzulande ein. Weder ist hier eine Indexierungs-Profession etabliert, noch scheint sie bei Verlegern und Autoren wenigstens so weit bekannt zu sein, dass sich eine solche Profession entwickeln könnte. Das Ergebnis sind Buchregister voller Anfängerfehler, zum Beispiel überfüllt mit unsinnigen Schlagwörtern (Beispiele hierzu sind in diesem Buch aufgeführt) oder mit Schlagwörtern in unvorhersehbaren und dadurch wertlosen Formulierungen, und dies selbst im informationswissenschaftlichen Lehrbuch oder in der Enzyklopädie. Viele Schlagwörter für wichtige Themen fehlen oftmals gänzlich. Das Nachschlagen gestaltet sich dann zur ungeliebten Mühe und Glücksache. Das Ergebnis sind demzufolge hierzulande Bücher meistens weit unter demjenigen Wert, den sie hätten, wenn sie durch ein gutes Register erschlossen wären.
  5. Anderson, J.D.: Indexing, teaching of, See: Information retrieval design (2002) 0.02 
    0.016037485 = product of:
  0.06414994 = sum of:
    0.06414994 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06414994 = score(doc=550,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045324896 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  6. Bennion, B.C.: Performance testing of a book and its index as an information retrieval system (1980) 0.02 
    0.016037485 = product of:
  0.06414994 = sum of:
    0.06414994 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06414994 = score(doc=7763,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045324896 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 7763, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7763)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  7. Z39.4-199X: Indexes and related information retrieval devices (1993) 0.02 
    0.016037485 = product of:
  0.06414994 = sum of:
    0.06414994 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06414994 = score(doc=8518,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045324896 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 8518, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=8518)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  8. Stelmach, M.: ¬The application of index entries to search and retrieval of books and book content (1999) 0.02 
    0.016037485 = product of:
  0.06414994 = sum of:
    0.06414994 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06414994 = score(doc=6311,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045324896 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 6311, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6311)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  9. Craven, T.C.: Adapting of string indexing systems for retrieval using proximity operators (1988) 0.01 
    0.012960245 = product of:
  0.05184098 = sum of:
    0.05184098 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 705) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05184098 = score(doc=705,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045324896 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 705, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=705)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This article explores the idea of using a conventional string indexing source description, together with a special phrase generator, to generate multiple descriptor phrases for inclusion in a database record for online retrieval. For use with proximity operators, these multiple descriptor phrases should attempt to meet such objectives as bringing together groups of syntactically related words. Software for generating multiple descriptor phrases from source descriptions in a specific existing string indexing system is briefly described
  10. Parsons, J.: Finding your way around the information maze : indexes as a signpost to information retrieval (1992) 0.01 
    0.012960245 = product of:
  0.05184098 = sum of:
    0.05184098 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05184098 = score(doc=3053,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045324896 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Consideration of some of the choices for computerization of indexes, including word processing, records administration systems, and text-retrieval packages. Some of the general concepts relating to indexes are also covered, including various approaches to indexing such as subject, word, and hierarchical indexing, and the use of coordinated themes. The options available within each type of computerization of indexing are also specified
  11. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.01 
    0.012281795 = product of:
  0.04912718 = sum of:
    0.04912718 = product of:
      0.09825436 = sum of:
        0.09825436 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09825436 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  12. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.01 
    0.012281795 = product of:
  0.04912718 = sum of:
    0.04912718 = product of:
      0.09825436 = sum of:
        0.09825436 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09825436 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  13. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.01 
    0.012281795 = product of:
  0.04912718 = sum of:
    0.04912718 = product of:
      0.09825436 = sum of:
        0.09825436 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09825436 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  14. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.01 
    0.012281795 = product of:
  0.04912718 = sum of:
    0.04912718 = product of:
      0.09825436 = sum of:
        0.09825436 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09825436 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  15. Clarke, M.: Retrieving information from scientific periodicals (1996) 0.01 
    0.011455346 = product of:
  0.045821384 = sum of:
    0.045821384 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045821384 = score(doc=7185,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045324896 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 7185, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7185)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Considers the indexing of scientific and medical periodicals, covering the need for indexes, the effect on information retrieval of the electronic revolution, types of journals and entries, the process of indexing, cumulation and publisher-indexer relations
  16. Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1994) 0.01 
    0.011340214 = product of:
  0.045360856 = sum of:
    0.045360856 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045360856 = score(doc=949,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045324896 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 949, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=949)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Reports a comparative study carried out at Sheffield University to compare the performance of 2 manual indexes and 3 related online databases in the retrieval of records in the technological subject of: Cathodic protection of concrete structures. The manual sources were: Engineering Index and Current Technology Index; and the online databases were: COMPENDEX, NTIS and SCISEARCH. Performance was measured in terms of relative recall and prescision. While online searches showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources still manifested some qualities which render them valuable. Emphasizes the selection of databases on the basis of a compromise between high recall and high precision, and ultimately between both of these factors and cost
  17. Odini, C.: ¬The performance of manual indexes and online databases in information retrieval (1997) 0.01 
    0.011340214 = product of:
  0.045360856 = sum of:
    0.045360856 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045360856 = score(doc=3905,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13710396 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.045324896 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 3905, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3905)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Reports a comparative study carried out at Sheffield University to compare the performance of 2 manual indexes and 3 related online databases in the retrieval of records in the technological subject of: Cathodic protection of concrete structures. The manual sources were: Engineering Index and Current Technology Index; and the online databases were: COMPENDEX, NTIS and SCISEARCH. Performance was measured in terms of relative recall and prescision. While online searches showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources showed some considerable advantages over manual searches, the manual sources still manifested some qualities which render them valuable. Emphasizes the selection of databases on the basis of a compromise between high recall and high precision, and ultimately between both of these factors and cost
  18. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.01 
    0.01074657 = product of:
  0.04298628 = sum of:
    0.04298628 = product of:
      0.08597256 = sum of:
        0.08597256 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08597256 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  19. Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.01 
    0.01074657 = product of:
  0.04298628 = sum of:
    0.04298628 = product of:
      0.08597256 = sum of:
        0.08597256 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08597256 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
  20. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.01 
    0.01074657 = product of:
  0.04298628 = sum of:
    0.04298628 = product of:
      0.08597256 = sum of:
        0.08597256 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08597256 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15872006 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045324896 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 51
  • d 3
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 48
  • m 5
  • n 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications