Search (299 results, page 1 of 15)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Cochenour, D.: Linking remote users and information : cataloguing Internet publications (1994) 0.02 
    0.023168758 = product of:
  0.057921894 = sum of:
    0.034681883 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034681883 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
    0.02324001 = product of:
      0.04648002 = sum of:
        0.04648002 = weight(_text_:22 in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04648002 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Libraries can add value to Internet resources by adding them to the library's catalogue in a manner consistent with the other resources held within the collection. Reports on OCLC studies into cataloguing Internet resources and accessing electronic periodicals. Existing retrieval methods on the Internet are limited because of shallow directory structures and idiosyncratic naming conventions. Catalogue entries for electronic resources need to provide a complete description of the access methodology if they are to satisfactorily connect remote users without the immediate possibility of backup from reference staff
    Date
    17.10.1995 18:22:54
  2. Harmon, J.C.: ¬The death of quality cataloging : does it make a difference for library users? (1996) 0.02 
    0.023168758 = product of:
  0.057921894 = sum of:
    0.034681883 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034681883 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
    0.02324001 = product of:
      0.04648002 = sum of:
        0.04648002 = weight(_text_:22 in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04648002 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Defends the role of quality cataloguing. It is only with adequate records that users will be able to find the information they require. It is a prerequisite for efficient machine retrieval and integrated services. Quality MARC records and the intellectual structure of cataloguing are essential is standards of service are to be maintained
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.4, S.306-307
  3. Lee, E.: Cataloguing (and reference) at the crossroads (1996) 0.02 
    0.023168758 = product of:
  0.057921894 = sum of:
    0.034681883 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.034681883 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
    0.02324001 = product of:
      0.04648002 = sum of:
        0.04648002 = weight(_text_:22 in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04648002 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Alerts librarians to directions in research in artificial intelligence relevant to information retrieval which will change current technology and user expectations and consequently the requirements for data provision and access at the base level. Predicts a reevaluation of priorities for using the expertise of cataloguers (and reference librarians) and of cataloguing methodologies. Debates the future of cataloguing, arguing for the need to monitor developments in adjacent research areas and to plan with these in mind
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.68-75
  4. Nicholson, D.; Steele, M.: CATRIONA: a distributed, locally-oriented. Z39.50 OPAC-based approach to cataloguing the Internet (1996) 0.02 
    0.02168628 = product of:
  0.0542157 = sum of:
    0.036785692 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036785692 = score(doc=6734,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 6734, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6734)
    0.017430007 = product of:
      0.034860015 = sum of:
        0.034860015 = weight(_text_:22 in 6734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034860015 = score(doc=6734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6734)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Describes the origins of the CATaloguing and Retrieval of Information Over Network Applications (CATRIONA) Study in the BUBL Subject Tree service and nots its aims: to investigate the requirements for developing procedures and applications for cataloguing and retrieval of networked resources (particularly via the Internet); and to explore the feasibility of a collaborative project to develop and integrate them with existing library systems. The project established that a distributed catalogue of networked resources integrated with standard Z39.50 library system OPAC interfaces with information on hard copy resources is already a practical proposition at a basic level. Notes that at least one Z30.50 OPAC client can searcg remote Z39.50 OPACs, retrieve USMARC records with URLs in MARC field 856
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  5. Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023) 0.02 
    0.02168628 = product of:
  0.0542157 = sum of:
    0.036785692 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036785692 = score(doc=941,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
    0.017430007 = product of:
      0.034860015 = sum of:
        0.034860015 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034860015 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Inferring the gender of named entities present in a text has several practical applications in information sciences. Existing approaches toward name gender identification rely exclusively on using the gender distributions from labeled data. In the absence of such labeled data, these methods fail. In this article, we propose a two-stage model that is able to infer the gender of names present in text without requiring explicit name-gender labels. We use coreference resolution as the backbone for our proposed model. To aid coreference resolution where the existing contextual information does not suffice, we use a retrieval-assisted context aggregation framework. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art name gender inference is possible without supervision. Our proposed method matches or outperforms several supervised approaches and commercially used methods on five English language datasets from different domains.
    Date
    22. 3.2023 12:00:14
  6. Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996) 0.02 
    0.020272663 = product of:
  0.050681658 = sum of:
    0.030346649 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030346649 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
    0.020335007 = product of:
      0.040670015 = sum of:
        0.040670015 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040670015 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  7. Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: ¬The effectiveness of copy cotaloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records (2004) 0.02 
    0.020272663 = product of:
  0.050681658 = sum of:
    0.030346649 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030346649 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
    0.020335007 = product of:
      0.040670015 = sum of:
        0.040670015 = weight(_text_:22 in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040670015 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Typographical errors in bibliographic records can cause retrieval problems in online catalogs. This study examined one hundred typographical errors in records in the OCLC WorldCat database. The local catalogs of five libraries holding the items described by the bibliographic records with typographical errors were searched to determine whether each library had corrected the errors. The study found that only 35.8 percent of the errors had been corrected. Knowledge of copy cataloging error rates can help underscore the importance of quality data in bibliographic utilities and, further, can serve as an indication to libraries whether they need to pay more attention to correcting types in the copy cataloging process.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998) 0.02 
    0.020272663 = product of:
  0.050681658 = sum of:
    0.030346649 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030346649 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
    0.020335007 = product of:
      0.040670015 = sum of:
        0.040670015 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040670015 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
    Date
    24. 1.2007 19:38:22
  9. Antelman, K.: Identifying the serial work as a bibliographic entity (2004) 0.02 
    0.01737657 = product of:
  0.043441422 = sum of:
    0.026011413 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026011413 = score(doc=130,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
    0.017430007 = product of:
      0.034860015 = sum of:
        0.034860015 = weight(_text_:22 in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034860015 = score(doc=130,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    A solid theoretical foundation has been built over the years exploring the bibliographic work and developing cataloging rules and practices to describe the work in the traditional catalog. With the increasing prevalence of multiple manifestations of serial titles, as well as tools that automate discovery and retrieval, bibliographic control of serials at a higher level of abstraction is more necessary than ever before. At the same time, models such as the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records offer new opportunities to control all bibliographic entities at this higher level and build more useful catalog displays. The bibliographic mechanisms that control the work for monographs - author, title, and uniform title - are weak identifiers for serials. New identifiers being adopted by the content industry are built on models and practices that are fundamentally different from those underlying the new bibliographic models. What is needed is a work identifier for serials that is both congruent with the new models and can enable us to meet the objective of providing work-level access to all resources in our catalogs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000) 0.01 
    0.013146535 = product of:
  0.06573267 = sum of:
    0.06573267 = product of:
      0.13146535 = sum of:
        0.13146535 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13146535 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15016761 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:22:27
  11. Lau, S.-F.; Wang, V.: Chinese personal names and titles : issues in cataloging and retrieval (1993) 0.01 
    0.01213866 = product of:
  0.060693298 = sum of:
    0.060693298 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060693298 = score(doc=1250,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1250, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1250)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
  12. Smiraglia, R.P.: Further reflections on the nature of a work : introduction (2002) 0.01 
    0.01213866 = product of:
  0.060693298 = sum of:
    0.060693298 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060693298 = score(doc=5623,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5623, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5623)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The purpose of this volume is to extend our understanding of the work entity and its role in information retrieval. Basic definitions are reviewed to provide a summary of current thought about works, their role in the catalog, and the potential for better accommodating them in future information retrieval environments. A discussion of entities for information retrieval and works as entities follows. Research in knowledge organization is summarized, indicating ways in which ontology, epistemology, and semiotics have lately been used as looking glasses through which to view the social informational roles of works.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
  13. Altenhöner, R.; Gömpel, R.; Jahns, Y.; Junger, U.; Mahnke, C.; Meyer, A.; Oehlschläger, S.: Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information 75. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in Mailand, Italien : Aus den Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control und ihren Sektionen und der Arbeitsgruppe für die Informationsgesellschaft (2009) 0.01 
    0.010836208 = product of:
  0.02709052 = sum of:
    0.010838089 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010838089 = score(doc=3147,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.08355226 = fieldWeight in 3147, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3147)
    0.01625243 = product of:
      0.03250486 = sum of:
        0.03250486 = weight(_text_:netz in 3147) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03250486 = score(doc=3147,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22464268 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.2385488 = idf(docFreq=637, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042882618 = queryNorm
            0.14469583 = fieldWeight in 3147, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.2385488 = idf(docFreq=637, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3147)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Content
    Die Arbeitsgruppe hat nach erfolgreicher Arbeit Richtlinien für Nationalbibliografien vorgelegt, die sich an den neuen Nutzeranforderungen und nach den Erfordernissen einer digitalen Umgebung ausrichten und damit sowohl den konventionellen als auch den - nicht mehr ganz so - neuen Medien gerecht werden. "From FRBR to FRAD: Extending the model" war der Titel des Vortrags von Glenn Patton (OCLC), der über die Arbeit der IFLA Working Group on Functional Requirements and Numbering of Authority Records (FRANAR) berichtete. Die Aufgabe der Arbeitsgruppe bestand darin, das Modell der FRBR auf Normdaten auszuweiten. Das Ergebnis, die FRAD, ist kürzlich in gedruckter Form erschienen. Die Inhalte dieses konzeptionellen Modells für Normdaten sind bereits als Grundlagen im Statement of International Cataloguing Principles sowie dem neuen Regelwerk Resource Description and Access (RDA) enthalten. Den Abschluss der Veranstaltung bildete der Beitrag "Guidelines for Multilingual Thesauri: a new contribution to multilingual access and retrieval standards" von Patrice Landry (Schweizer Nationalbibliothek), der von 2006 bis 2008 die Working Group on Guidelines for Multilingual Thesauri leitete. In dem Vortrag wurden die Entstehungsgeschichte sowie die wichtigsten Inhalte der Publikation vorgestellt, die 2009 in der Serie der IFLA Professional Reports veröffentlicht wurde. Damit wurden in diesem Jahr insgesamt vier wichtige IFLA-Publikationen publiziert, die aus der Arbeit der Division und ihrer Sektionen entstanden sind. An dieser Stelle sei darauf hingewiesen, dass alle diese in Printform erschienen IFLA-Richtlinien oder Empfehlungen nach etwa sechs Monaten auch frei im IFLAnet verfügbar sein werden.
    - Classification and Indexing Section (Sektion Klassifikation und Indexierung) (S.1010-1012) . . . "FRBRisierung" der bibliografischen Daten - klare Erkennbarkeit einzelner Werke und ihrer Ausgaben - mit übersichtlichen Angaben zum Inhalt einschließlich direkter Zugänge zu Inhaltsverzeichnissen sowie semantische Navigation sind nur einige Stichworte in diesem Kontext. Interessant dürfte hier der neue OCLC-Ansatz der Work Pages in WorldCat sein. Erschließungsdaten werden so aufbereitet, dass sie üblichen Webangeboten und Suchgewohnheiten folgen, und so aggregiert, dass sie Nutzern einen raschen Überblick über Inhalte von Werken geben. Apropos Nutzer: der Hype des Social Taggings scheint vorbei, jedenfalls ist klar, dass von Nutzern selbst erstellte Daten kein Ersatz für bibliothekarische Erschließung sind. Verschiedene Umfragen und Untersuchungen zeigen, dass Nutzern die wirklich thematische Auswertung von Publikationen viel zu aufwändig ist. Sie zeigen andererseits aber auch, welche Suchgewohnheiten von Katalogen unterstützt werden sollten, z.B. das Recherchieren nach Abkürzungen oder nach Genres. Aufgrund dieser vielfältigen Beiträge im Vorfeld des Weltkongresses fiel das diesjährige Sektionsprogramm in Mailand etwas kürzer aus. Wie bereits in Florenz anschaulich und fundiert von italienischen Kollegen vorgetragen, ging es zum einen um das neue Katalogisierungsregelwerk REICAT, Regole italiane di catalogazione, sowie den neuen Universalthesaurus Nouvo Soggettario. Federica Paradisi (Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze) stellte die Entwicklung der italienischen Sacherschließungswerkzeuge einschließlich der italienischen DDC vor. Zum anderen präsentierten Marcia Zeng (Kent State University) und Maja Zumer (University of Ljubljana) den Entwurf der FRSAD - funktionelle Anforderungen an thematische Normdaten" Bei diesem Modell handelt es sich um ein weiteres Glied in der FRBR-Familie, das eine international gültige Normdatenstruktur für alle Daten bereithält, die Themen eines Werkes beschreiben. Die Arbeitsgruppe der Sektion hat dazu im Juni den Modellentwurf zur internationalen Stellungnahme ins Netz gestellt. Während des Weltkongresses arbeiteten die Mitglieder an den zahlreich eingegangenen Kommentaren. Eine revidierte Fassung kann im November 2009 erwartet werden.
  14. Andersen, J.: ¬The bibliographic record as text (2002) 0.01 
    0.010512387 = product of:
  0.052561935 = sum of:
    0.052561935 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052561935 = score(doc=5621,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 5621, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5621)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Conceptualizing the bibliographic record as text implies that it needs to be treated as such in order to fully exploit its function in information retrieval activities, which affects how access to works can be achieved. A theoretical framework is outlined, including methodological consequences in terms of how to go about teaching students of knowledge organization and users of information retrieval systems the literate activity of using the bibliographic record as a text. For knowledge organization research this implies that providing access to texts and the works they embody is not a technical matter, but rather a literate issue.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
  15. Patton, G.E,: Understanding the relationship between FRBR and FRAD (2007) 0.01 
    0.010404565 = product of:
  0.052022826 = sum of:
    0.052022826 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052022826 = score(doc=6244,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 6244, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6244)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Understanding FRBR: what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools. Ed. by Arlene Taylor
  16. O'Neill, E.T.: ¬The impact of research on the development of FRBR (2007) 0.01 
    0.010404565 = product of:
  0.052022826 = sum of:
    0.052022826 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052022826 = score(doc=1673,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1673, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1673)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Understanding FRBR: what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools. Ed. by Arlene Taylor
  17. Smiraglia, R.P.: Bibliographic families and superworks (2007) 0.01 
    0.010404565 = product of:
  0.052022826 = sum of:
    0.052022826 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052022826 = score(doc=1674,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1674, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1674)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Understanding FRBR: what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools. Ed. by Arlene Taylor
  18. Patton, G.E.: ¬An Introduction to Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD) (2007) 0.01 
    0.010404565 = product of:
  0.052022826 = sum of:
    0.052022826 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1676) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052022826 = score(doc=1676,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1676, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1676)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Understanding FRBR: what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools. Ed. by Arlene Taylor
  19. Shadle, S.C.: FRBR and serials (2007) 0.01 
    0.010404565 = product of:
  0.052022826 = sum of:
    0.052022826 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052022826 = score(doc=1678,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1678, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1678)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Understanding FRBR: what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools. Ed. by Arlene Taylor
  20. Taylor, A.G.: ¬An introduction to Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (2007) 0.01 
    0.010404565 = product of:
  0.052022826 = sum of:
    0.052022826 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052022826 = score(doc=1679,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12971628 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042882618 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Understanding FRBR: what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools. Ed. by Arlene Taylor

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 244
  • d 47
  • i 2
  • sp 2
  • chi 1
  • f 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 272
  • m 21
  • b 15
  • s 11
  • el 4
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • n 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications