Search (65 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × language_ss:"f"
  1. Cahier, J.-P.; Zaher, L'H.; Isoard , G.: Document et modèle pour l'action, une méthode pour le web socio-sémantique : application à un web 2.0 en développement durable (2010) 0.05
    0.05206014 = product of:
      0.13015035 = sum of:
        0.08752273 = weight(_text_:semantic in 4836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08752273 = score(doc=4836,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.45476598 = fieldWeight in 4836, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4836)
        0.042627618 = product of:
          0.085255235 = sum of:
            0.085255235 = weight(_text_:web in 4836) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085255235 = score(doc=4836,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.5643819 = fieldWeight in 4836, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4836)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    We present the DOCMA method (DOCument and Model for Action) focused to Socio-Semantic web applications in large communities of interest. DOCMA is dedicated to end-users without any knowledge in Information Science. Community Members can elicit, structure and index shared business items emerging from their inquiry (such as projects, actors, products, geographically situated objects of interest.). We apply DOCMA to an experiment in the field of Sustainable Development: the Cartodd-Map21 collaborative Web portal.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  2. Collas, D.; Chartron, G.: Logique conceptuelle et récherche d'information (1994) 0.04
    0.043265842 = product of:
      0.1081646 = sum of:
        0.03743556 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03743556 = score(doc=7957,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 7957, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7957)
        0.07072904 = weight(_text_:semantic in 7957) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07072904 = score(doc=7957,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.36750638 = fieldWeight in 7957, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7957)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Demonstrates how the efficiency of online searching can be increased the application of conceptual logic; which consists of making systematically explicit all the notional, semantic, and cognitive elements contained in the subject to be searched. Unlike a thesaurus, which has been designed for the most probable, multiple uses, conceptual logic makes it possible to access information through means fully adapted to specific uses. Examples are presented from the TOPIC information retrieval software
  3. Zarri, G.P.: Utilisation de structures conceptuelles complexes pour représenter le "contenu sémantique" de textes narratifs (1999) 0.04
    0.043265842 = product of:
      0.1081646 = sum of:
        0.03743556 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03743556 = score(doc=6168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 6168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6168)
        0.07072904 = weight(_text_:semantic in 6168) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07072904 = score(doc=6168,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.36750638 = fieldWeight in 6168, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6168)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: The use of complex conceptual structures to represent the "semantic content" of narrative texts
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  4. Degez, D.: Compatibilité des langages d'indexation mariage, cohabitation ou fusion? : Quelques examples concrèts (1998) 0.03
    0.033534992 = product of:
      0.08383748 = sum of:
        0.06188791 = weight(_text_:semantic in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06188791 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.32156807 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
        0.021949572 = product of:
          0.043899145 = sum of:
            0.043899145 = weight(_text_:22 in 2245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043899145 = score(doc=2245,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2245, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2245)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    To illustrate the theoretical analysis presented by J. Maniez published in Documentaliste 34(1997) nos.4/5 presents some concrete examples drawn for experience of the difficulties increasingly faced in trying to make different indexing languages compatible. Various types of problems may be considered: comparing semantic terms and relationships that compose indexing languages, setting standards for writing and vocabulary, and opposing pre and post coordinated descriptors. Proposes several solutions and discusses the need for further applied research in this area
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  5. Hannech, A.: Système de recherche d'information étendue basé sur une projection multi-espaces (2018) 0.03
    0.03108348 = product of:
      0.051805798 = sum of:
        0.01871778 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01871778 = score(doc=4472,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
        0.01768226 = weight(_text_:semantic in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01768226 = score(doc=4472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.091876596 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
        0.0154057555 = product of:
          0.030811511 = sum of:
            0.030811511 = weight(_text_:web in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030811511 = score(doc=4472,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    Depuis son apparition au début des années 90, le World Wide Web (WWW ou Web) a offert un accès universel aux connaissances et le monde de l'information a été principalement témoin d'une grande révolution (la révolution numérique). Il est devenu rapidement très populaire, ce qui a fait de lui la plus grande et vaste base de données et de connaissances existantes grâce à la quantité et la diversité des données qu'il contient. Cependant, l'augmentation et l'évolution considérables de ces données soulèvent d'importants problèmes pour les utilisateurs notamment pour l'accès aux documents les plus pertinents à leurs requêtes de recherche. Afin de faire face à cette explosion exponentielle du volume de données et faciliter leur accès par les utilisateurs, différents modèles sont proposés par les systèmes de recherche d'information (SRIs) pour la représentation et la recherche des documents web. Les SRIs traditionnels utilisent, pour indexer et récupérer ces documents, des mots-clés simples qui ne sont pas sémantiquement liés. Cela engendre des limites en termes de la pertinence et de la facilité d'exploration des résultats. Pour surmonter ces limites, les techniques existantes enrichissent les documents en intégrant des mots-clés externes provenant de différentes sources. Cependant, ces systèmes souffrent encore de limitations qui sont liées aux techniques d'exploitation de ces sources d'enrichissement. Lorsque les différentes sources sont utilisées de telle sorte qu'elles ne peuvent être distinguées par le système, cela limite la flexibilité des modèles d'exploration qui peuvent être appliqués aux résultats de recherche retournés par ce système. Les utilisateurs se sentent alors perdus devant ces résultats, et se retrouvent dans l'obligation de les filtrer manuellement pour sélectionner l'information pertinente. S'ils veulent aller plus loin, ils doivent reformuler et cibler encore plus leurs requêtes de recherche jusqu'à parvenir aux documents qui répondent le mieux à leurs attentes. De cette façon, même si les systèmes parviennent à retrouver davantage des résultats pertinents, leur présentation reste problématique. Afin de cibler la recherche à des besoins d'information plus spécifiques de l'utilisateur et améliorer la pertinence et l'exploration de ses résultats de recherche, les SRIs avancés adoptent différentes techniques de personnalisation de données qui supposent que la recherche actuelle d'un utilisateur est directement liée à son profil et/ou à ses expériences de navigation/recherche antérieures. Cependant, cette hypothèse ne tient pas dans tous les cas, les besoins de l'utilisateur évoluent au fil du temps et peuvent s'éloigner de ses intérêts antérieurs stockés dans son profil.
    Dans d'autres cas, le profil de l'utilisateur peut être mal exploité pour extraire ou inférer ses nouveaux besoins en information. Ce problème est beaucoup plus accentué avec les requêtes ambigües. Lorsque plusieurs centres d'intérêt auxquels est liée une requête ambiguë sont identifiés dans le profil de l'utilisateur, le système se voit incapable de sélectionner les données pertinentes depuis ce profil pour répondre à la requête. Ceci a un impact direct sur la qualité des résultats fournis à cet utilisateur. Afin de remédier à quelques-unes de ces limitations, nous nous sommes intéressés dans ce cadre de cette thèse de recherche au développement de techniques destinées principalement à l'amélioration de la pertinence des résultats des SRIs actuels et à faciliter l'exploration de grandes collections de documents. Pour ce faire, nous proposons une solution basée sur un nouveau concept d'indexation et de recherche d'information appelé la projection multi-espaces. Cette proposition repose sur l'exploitation de différentes catégories d'information sémantiques et sociales qui permettent d'enrichir l'univers de représentation des documents et des requêtes de recherche en plusieurs dimensions d'interprétations. L'originalité de cette représentation est de pouvoir distinguer entre les différentes interprétations utilisées pour la description et la recherche des documents. Ceci donne une meilleure visibilité sur les résultats retournés et aide à apporter une meilleure flexibilité de recherche et d'exploration, en donnant à l'utilisateur la possibilité de naviguer une ou plusieurs vues de données qui l'intéressent le plus. En outre, les univers multidimensionnels de représentation proposés pour la description des documents et l'interprétation des requêtes de recherche aident à améliorer la pertinence des résultats de l'utilisateur en offrant une diversité de recherche/exploration qui aide à répondre à ses différents besoins et à ceux des autres différents utilisateurs. Cette étude exploite différents aspects liés à la recherche personnalisée et vise à résoudre les problèmes engendrés par l'évolution des besoins en information de l'utilisateur. Ainsi, lorsque le profil de cet utilisateur est utilisé par notre système, une technique est proposée et employée pour identifier les intérêts les plus représentatifs de ses besoins actuels dans son profil. Cette technique se base sur la combinaison de trois facteurs influents, notamment le facteur contextuel, fréquentiel et temporel des données. La capacité des utilisateurs à interagir, à échanger des idées et d'opinions, et à former des réseaux sociaux sur le Web, a amené les systèmes à s'intéresser aux types d'interactions de ces utilisateurs, au niveau d'interaction entre eux ainsi qu'à leurs rôles sociaux dans le système. Ces informations sociales sont abordées et intégrées dans ce travail de recherche. L'impact et la manière de leur intégration dans le processus de RI sont étudiés pour améliorer la pertinence des résultats.
    Since its appearance in the early 90's, the World Wide Web (WWW or Web) has provided universal access to knowledge and the world of information has been primarily witness to a great revolution (the digital revolution). It quickly became very popular, making it the largest and most comprehensive database and knowledge base thanks to the amount and diversity of data it contains. However, the considerable increase and evolution of these data raises important problems for users, in particular for accessing the documents most relevant to their search queries. In order to cope with this exponential explosion of data volume and facilitate their access by users, various models are offered by information retrieval systems (IRS) for the representation and retrieval of web documents. Traditional SRIs use simple keywords that are not semantically linked to index and retrieve these documents. This creates limitations in terms of the relevance and ease of exploration of results. To overcome these limitations, existing techniques enrich documents by integrating external keywords from different sources. However, these systems still suffer from limitations that are related to the exploitation techniques of these sources of enrichment. When the different sources are used so that they cannot be distinguished by the system, this limits the flexibility of the exploration models that can be applied to the results returned by this system. Users then feel lost to these results, and find themselves forced to filter them manually to select the relevant information. If they want to go further, they must reformulate and target their search queries even more until they reach the documents that best meet their expectations. In this way, even if the systems manage to find more relevant results, their presentation remains problematic. In order to target research to more user-specific information needs and improve the relevance and exploration of its research findings, advanced SRIs adopt different data personalization techniques that assume that current research of user is directly related to his profile and / or previous browsing / search experiences.
    However, this assumption does not hold in all cases, the needs of the user evolve over time and can move away from his previous interests stored in his profile. In other cases, the user's profile may be misused to extract or infer new information needs. This problem is much more accentuated with ambiguous queries. When multiple POIs linked to a search query are identified in the user's profile, the system is unable to select the relevant data from that profile to respond to that request. This has a direct impact on the quality of the results provided to this user. In order to overcome some of these limitations, in this research thesis, we have been interested in the development of techniques aimed mainly at improving the relevance of the results of current SRIs and facilitating the exploration of major collections of documents. To do this, we propose a solution based on a new concept and model of indexing and information retrieval called multi-spaces projection. This proposal is based on the exploitation of different categories of semantic and social information that enrich the universe of document representation and search queries in several dimensions of interpretations. The originality of this representation is to be able to distinguish between the different interpretations used for the description and the search for documents. This gives a better visibility on the results returned and helps to provide a greater flexibility of search and exploration, giving the user the ability to navigate one or more views of data that interest him the most. In addition, the proposed multidimensional representation universes for document description and search query interpretation help to improve the relevance of the user's results by providing a diversity of research / exploration that helps meet his diverse needs and those of other different users. This study exploits different aspects that are related to the personalized search and aims to solve the problems caused by the evolution of the information needs of the user. Thus, when the profile of this user is used by our system, a technique is proposed and used to identify the interests most representative of his current needs in his profile. This technique is based on the combination of three influential factors, including the contextual, frequency and temporal factor of the data. The ability of users to interact, exchange ideas and opinions, and form social networks on the Web, has led systems to focus on the types of interactions these users have at the level of interaction between them as well as their social roles in the system. This social information is discussed and integrated into this research work. The impact and how they are integrated into the IR process are studied to improve the relevance of the results.
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  6. Belbenoit-Avich, P.-M.: ¬Des phares dans la nuit (1996) 0.03
    0.026310131 = product of:
      0.06577533 = sum of:
        0.032756116 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032756116 = score(doc=5783,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 5783, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5783)
        0.03301921 = product of:
          0.06603842 = sum of:
            0.06603842 = weight(_text_:web in 5783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06603842 = score(doc=5783,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 5783, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5783)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Internet, especially for information retrieval, is a labyrinth in which it is virtually impossible to find one's way without markers. Web pages are easily created and offer free access but payment is required before anything more useful is retrievd. Evaluation and indexing of these sites is extremely difficults. Librarians and information officers will need to keep themselves informed about databases and guide end users through the labyrinth. Discusses search engines and briefly reviews InfoSeek, Folio Retriever, Star-Web, World Trade Center State, Electronic Library, AltaVista, Yahoo and OCLC's Netfirst
    Object
    Star-Web
  7. Lespinasse, K.: TREC: une conference pour l'evaluation des systemes de recherche d'information (1997) 0.03
    0.025008315 = product of:
      0.06252079 = sum of:
        0.03743556 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03743556 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
        0.025085226 = product of:
          0.05017045 = sum of:
            0.05017045 = weight(_text_:22 in 744) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05017045 = score(doc=744,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 744, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=744)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: TREC: the Text REtrieval Conference
  8. Gourbin, G.: ¬Une nouvelle profession : cyber-documentaliste l'exemple de Nomade (1998) 0.02
    0.01956386 = product of:
      0.09781929 = sum of:
        0.09781929 = sum of:
          0.053920146 = weight(_text_:web in 2980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.053920146 = score(doc=2980,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 2980, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2980)
          0.043899145 = weight(_text_:22 in 2980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043899145 = score(doc=2980,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2980, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2980)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Users who want to exploit all the information sources on the Web will need an efficient search and selection tool e.g. a directory or search engine. Directories list Web sites and analyze their contents. Describes the behind-the-scenes work of documentalists specialized in surfing, tracking and indexing French language sites for the directory Nomade. Describes the creation of Nomade, its functioning and indexing, and how this new profession of 'cyber-documentalist' is changing the practices and functions of information professionals as they become Internet information organizers
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  9. Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997) 0.02
    0.018756237 = product of:
      0.04689059 = sum of:
        0.028076671 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028076671 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
        0.01881392 = product of:
          0.03762784 = sum of:
            0.03762784 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03762784 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the apparently unattainable goal of compatibility of information languages. While controlled languages can improve retrieval performance within a single system, they make cooperation across different systems more difficult. The Internet and downloading accentuate this adverse outcome and the acceleration of data exchange aggravates the problem of compatibility. Defines this familiar concept and demonstrates that coherence is just as necessary as it was for indexing languages, the proliferation of which has created confusion in grouped data banks. Describes 2 types of potential solutions, similar to those applied to automatic translation of natural languages: - harmonizing the information languages themselves, both difficult and expensive, or, the more flexible solution involving automatic harmonization of indexing formulae based on pre established concordance tables. However, structural incompatibilities between post coordinated languages and classifications may lead any harmonization tools up a blind alley, while the paths of a universal concordance model are rare and narrow
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  10. Martin, P.: Intranet presentation technique et perspectives (1996) 0.02
    0.018748902 = product of:
      0.09374451 = sum of:
        0.09374451 = sum of:
          0.043574058 = weight(_text_:web in 6998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043574058 = score(doc=6998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 6998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6998)
          0.05017045 = weight(_text_:22 in 6998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05017045 = score(doc=6998,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6998, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6998)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Considers how Intranets are being developed by adapting Internet technologies. Discusses the Internet technologies of data transport, file transfer, massage exchange, and information and document dissemination on the Web and explains how these may be implemented within an organization. Documentation professionals may use these techniques to improve the circulation of information within a company and increase the accumulation of knowledge
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:01:00
  11. Crosnier, H. Le: Nouveaux besoins, nouveaux services, nouveaux catalogues (1997) 0.02
    0.017766777 = product of:
      0.04441694 = sum of:
        0.028076671 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028076671 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
        0.01634027 = product of:
          0.03268054 = sum of:
            0.03268054 = weight(_text_:web in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03268054 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    For users, the catalogue is a tool to assist in satisfying information demands. Bibliographic databases raise the question of how to describe a document to facilitate retrieval. Information technology development have led to the creation of hypercatalogues, affording links to related material and other services. This necessitates improved descriptive cataloguing and also improved search interfaces to simplify user manipulation, along the lines of the Web. Given the massive output of electronic documents, the librarian's role is to select, prioritise and organise. The information society and its consequent economic consequences for the social organisation of knowledge raise the prospect of marginalisation of libraries. Catalogues enable access to knowledge as a public good, but this access must be democratic
  12. Chibout, K.; Vilnat, A.: Primitive sémantiques, classification des verbes et polysémie (1999) 0.02
    0.01768226 = product of:
      0.0884113 = sum of:
        0.0884113 = weight(_text_:semantic in 6229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0884113 = score(doc=6229,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.45938298 = fieldWeight in 6229, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6229)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Semantic primitives, classification of verbs and polysemy
  13. Maranda, P.: Proposition de mesure de puissance sémantique (1999) 0.02
    0.01768226 = product of:
      0.0884113 = sum of:
        0.0884113 = weight(_text_:semantic in 6230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0884113 = score(doc=6230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.45938298 = fieldWeight in 6230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6230)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Suggestion for measuring of semantic power
  14. Dachelet, R.: ¬Les thésauri multilingues : interopérabilité linguistique et interopérabilité sémantique (1999) 0.02
    0.01768226 = product of:
      0.0884113 = sum of:
        0.0884113 = weight(_text_:semantic in 6300) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0884113 = score(doc=6300,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.45938298 = fieldWeight in 6300, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6300)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Multilingual thesauri: linguistic and semantic influencing
  15. Piccotti, P.: ¬Les nouvelles technologies et la recherche documentaire (1998) 0.02
    0.01640529 = product of:
      0.08202645 = sum of:
        0.08202645 = sum of:
          0.038127303 = weight(_text_:web in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038127303 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
          0.043899145 = weight(_text_:22 in 2226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043899145 = score(doc=2226,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2226, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2226)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The Venice University Institute of Architecture has developed Easyweb, a software package to integrate its heterogeneous non-compatible bibliographic and multimedia databases, standardise access and create internal links, by transferring all existing OPAC applications to the Web. Features include importation of UNIMARC data, multiple window searching, multibase searching and special applications, e.g. circulation management. Easyweb is notable user friendly and has become the point of reference for OPACs in Italy
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1998, no.178, S.20-22
  16. Sevigny, M.; Marcoux, Y.: Construction et evaluation d'un prototype d'interface-utilisateurs pour l'interrogation de bases de documents structures (1996) 0.01
    0.014648981 = product of:
      0.07324491 = sum of:
        0.07324491 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07324491 = score(doc=752,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The creation of electronic information in the form of structured documents is gaining popularity. It is thus necessary to develop information retrieval tools fitted to this type of document. Presents the results of a research project aimed at identifying human-computer interface elements that can support information retrieval in structured-document bases. The research included a review of the literature and of existing systems, as well as the design, development, and user testing of a prototype information retrieval system for SGML document bases. Makes 5 recommendations for the design of structured-retrieval systems
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: The creation and evaluation of a human-computer interface for information retrieval in structured-document bases
  17. Mailho-Daboussi, L.: Creation d'un thesaurus images : l'experience de la banque de données Iconos sur les fonds de photographies (1995) 0.01
    0.014145808 = product of:
      0.07072904 = sum of:
        0.07072904 = weight(_text_:semantic in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07072904 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.36750638 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the development of ICONOS, the Documentation Francaise's database for tracking and describing publicly accessible collections of photographs in France. A thesaurus specific to the database was constructed to rationalize and standardise previous work with several different indexing tools. The stages of the thesaurus design included creating a body of descriptors based on those already in use; statistical and qualitative assessment of indexing terms; surmounting semantic and linguistic problems and finally the collection of terminology into a multidisciplinary thesaurus
  18. Organisation des connaissances en vue de leur intégration dans les systèmes de représentation et de recherche d'information (1999) 0.01
    0.011844519 = product of:
      0.029611295 = sum of:
        0.01871778 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01871778 = score(doc=6348,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 6348, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6348)
        0.010893514 = product of:
          0.021787029 = sum of:
            0.021787029 = weight(_text_:web in 6348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021787029 = score(doc=6348,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 6348, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6348)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Enthält die Beiträge: ABRAHAM, M.: ALEx, la machine où parler, c'est montrer des représentations. AUSSENAC-GILLES, N., A. CONDAMINES: Bases de connaissances terminologiques: Enjeux pour la consultation documentaire. BONHOMME, P., L. ROMARY: Apport de la statistique lexicale dans la recherche d'information. BRASSART, D.-G.: Effet de l'opposition "nom pleine vs anaphore" sur le traitment des textes épistémiques. CHEVALLET, J.-P., M.F. BRUANDET: Impact de l'utilisation de multi terms sur la qualité des résponses dùn système de recherche d'information a indexation automatique. CHIBOUT, K., A. VILNAT: Primitive sémantiques, classification des verbes et polysémie. COTE, C.: Conception de systèmes d'information utilisé dans le cours d'une activité: méthologie et outils de formalisation pour l'identification des opportunités informationelles. DACHELET, R.: Les thésauri multilingues: interopérabilité linguistique et interopérabilité sémantique. DAVID, A.A.: Modélisation de l'utilisateur et recherche coopérative dans les systèmes de recherche d'information. EYMARD, G., J.-M. FRANCONY: Vers un serveur d'indexation et de recherche sur le WEB. FERRET, O., B. GRAU U. N. MASSON: Utilisation d'un réseau de cooccurences lexikales pour a méliorer une analyse thématique fondée sur la distribution des mots. GROS, C., H. ASSADI: Intégration de connaissances dans un système de consultation de documentation technique. KOLMAYER, E.: Organisation des connaissances et expertises chez les usagers. MAJID, I.: L'organisation des connaissances dans les bibliothèques universitaires en France. MARANDA, P.: Proposition de mesure de puissance sémantique. MEUNIER, J.-G.: Vers un modèle générique des systèmes de traitment d'information. PAGANELLI, C.: Étude de l'activité des utilisaterus erepérage d'indices linguistiques pour la recherche d'information textuelle dans les documents techniques. POLANCO, X.: Extraction et modélisation des connaissances: une approche et ses technologies (EMCAT). POLITY, Y.: L'organisation des connaissances en France: état des lieux. SCHMITZ-ESSER, W.: Modélisation, au moyen d'un thésaurus encyclopédique et plurilingue, des connaissances présentées au cours de l'Exposition Mondialede l'an 2000. SIMONI, J.-L., C. FLUHR: Accès a l'information a travers les graphes de termes. TCHENAR, F.: Modélisation de l'utilisateur fondée sur ses croyances et ses buts en vue d'améliorer l'efficacité des sytèmes de recherche d'information. VAZOV, N.: Identification des differentes structures temporelles dans des textes et leur rôles dans le raisonnement temporel. VIDALENC, I., L. BOUZIDI: Nouvelle approche de conception de systèmes d'information multimédias centrée sur la distinction entre les données conceptuelles et les données sensibles. VIEIRA, L.: Modèle d'analyse pur une classification du document iconographique. ZARRI, G.P.: Utilisation de structures conceptuelles complexes pour représenter le "contenu sémantique" de textes narratifs.
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Knowledge organisation with a view to integration with representation systems and information retrieval
  19. Maniez, J.: Actualité des langages documentaires : fondements théoriques de la recherche d'information (2002) 0.01
    0.011230669 = product of:
      0.056153342 = sum of:
        0.056153342 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056153342 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Actuality of information languages: theoretical foundation of information retrieval
  20. Aussenac-Gilles, N.; Condamines, A.: Bases de connaissances terminologiques : Enjeux pour la consultation documentaire (1999) 0.01
    0.00935889 = product of:
      0.04679445 = sum of:
        0.04679445 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04679445 = score(doc=6227,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 6227, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6227)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Footnote
    Übers. d. Titels: Bases of terminological knowledge: stakes for information retrieval

Years

Types

  • a 62
  • el 2
  • m 2
  • s 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…