Search (21 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Informationsethik"
  1. Benedetto, C. di; Leone, L.; Seta, M. Della: Semantic approach to bioethics in the Ethicsweb project : building a semantic architecture for a European documentation system 0.02
    0.021218713 = product of:
      0.10609356 = sum of:
        0.10609356 = weight(_text_:semantic in 3548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10609356 = score(doc=3548,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.5512596 = fieldWeight in 3548, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3548)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this paper is to present the activities of the European project Ethicsweb, funded under the 7th Framework Program of the European Commission, placing special emphasis on the semantic approach provided by this project. The objectives of Ethicsweb are basically those of: (a) facilitating access to information on ethics in science through an integrated infrastructure; (b) developing sophisticated tools, both technical and semantic to establish the above mentioned infrastructure; (c) creating a European Reference Center for Bioethics, in order to collect the information provided by various local centers and international organizations; (d) developing multilingual tools (thesauri and ontologies) for indexing and searching of documents in bioethics. In this paper the authors will present the steps undertaken until now, such as application profiles, XML schemes and examples.
  2. Nagenborg, M.: Privatheit - Menschenrecht oder eine Frage des Anstandes? (2008) 0.02
    0.020727908 = product of:
      0.051819768 = sum of:
        0.032756116 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032756116 = score(doc=1698,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
        0.019063652 = product of:
          0.038127303 = sum of:
            0.038127303 = weight(_text_:web in 1698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038127303 = score(doc=1698,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 1698, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1698)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Im ersten Teil des Beitrages wird eine kurze Zusammenfassung der Diskussion um den Schutz der Privatheit in Recht und Ethik gegeben. Der Schwerpunkt liegt dabei auf der Informationsethik. Im zweiten Teil werden einige für die Wissensorganisation relevante Beispiele für den Umgang mit personenbezogenen Daten diskutiert: u. a. Web Information Retrieval, Data Mining sowie FOAF als Beispiel für die Standardisierung von personenbezogenen Informationen.
  3. Informations- und Kommunikationsutopien (2008) 0.02
    0.02030811 = product of:
      0.050770275 = sum of:
        0.03536452 = weight(_text_:semantic in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03536452 = score(doc=213,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.18375319 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
        0.0154057555 = product of:
          0.030811511 = sum of:
            0.030811511 = weight(_text_:web in 213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030811511 = score(doc=213,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 213, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=213)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Rafael Capurro: Einleitung Klaus Wiegerling: Ubiquitous Computing als konkrete Utopie Michael Nagenborg: Wenn Roboter alles wissen und Kühlschränke nicht lügen Tassilo Pellegrini: Semantic Web als konkrete Utopie - Eine praktische Annäherung Falko Blask: TV kontra Web: Mythos Medien - Medienmythen Hans Kräh: Filme als Zeitreisen: Medienszenarien in Zukunftsszenarien Uwe Jochum: Zur Zeit wird hier der Raum - Die digitale Inversion des Karfreitagszaubers Thomas Nisslmüller: Der cybergnostische Imperativ: Sich lesen in Zeiten virtueller Versuchsspiele Manfred Lang: Good Night, and Good Luck! Zur Geschichte informationspolitischer Utopien
  4. Homan, P.A.: Library catalog notes for "bad books" : ethics vs. responsibilities (2012) 0.01
    0.011718064 = product of:
      0.05859032 = sum of:
        0.05859032 = sum of:
          0.027233787 = weight(_text_:web in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.027233787 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
          0.031356532 = weight(_text_:22 in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031356532 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The conflict between librarians' ethics and their responsibilities in the process of progressive collection management, which applies the principles of cost accounting to libraries, to call attention to the "bad books" in their collections that are compromised by age, error, abridgement, expurgation, plagiarism, copyright violation, libel, or fraud, is discussed. According to Charles Cutter, notes in catalog records should call attention to the best books but ignore the bad ones. Libraries that can afford to keep their "bad books," however, which often have a valuable second life, must call attention to their intellectual contexts in notes in the catalog records. Michael Bellesiles's Arming America, the most famous case of academic fraud at the turn of the twenty-first century, is used as a test case. Given the bias of content enhancement that automatically pulls content from the Web into library catalogs, catalog notes for "bad books" may be the only way for librarians to uphold their ethical principles regarding collection management while fulfilling their professional responsibilities to their users in calling attention to their "bad books."
    Date
    27. 9.2012 14:22:00
  5. Van der Walt, M.S.: Ethics in indexing and clssification (2006) 0.01
    0.005294188 = product of:
      0.026470939 = sum of:
        0.026470939 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5876) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026470939 = score(doc=5876,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.18905719 = fieldWeight in 5876, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5876)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    To start off I would like to briefly address the relationship between indexing and classification, which are very technical activities performed by information professionals, and the concept of social responsibility (the focus of this conference), which refer to the human side of the profession. Although indexing and classification involve many technicalities, the basic objective of these activities is to provide access to informationbearing objects, thereby contributing to the social process of information transfer. Information transfer takes place between authors (creators of information- bearing objects) and information users. The authors have something to communicate, and the users have information needs that must be satisfied by the information professional acting as intermediary. In the process of facilitating this information transfer the indexer and classifier therefore has a responsibility towards both authors and information users. Authors can expect the information professional to represent their creations as accurately and exhaustively as possible in retrieval systems, within the constraints of time and cost. Users can expect the information professional to index and classify in such a way as to ensure that information that can satisfy their information needs will be retrievable within the shortest time and with the least effort possible. One can also see the social responsibility of indexers and classifiers in a broader context. They do not only have a responsibility towards specific authors and users, but also towards communities as a whole, e.g. the scientific community, the business community, or society at large. In the case of the scientific community effective transfer of information about advances in research can be seen as essential for the progress of science. Providing effective and suitable information retrieval systems to make this transfer possible can therefore be seen as a responsibility of information professionals. In a business enterprise the effective organization of business records and other business information sources can make a significant contribution to the smooth operation of the enterprise, may be essential for legal purposes, and can enable management to use the information for decision-making at all levels. The information manager therefore has a responsibility towards the enterprise to properly organize and index all these resources.
  6. Miller, S.: Privacy, data bases and computers (1998) 0.01
    0.0050170454 = product of:
      0.025085226 = sum of:
        0.025085226 = product of:
          0.05017045 = sum of:
            0.05017045 = weight(_text_:22 in 3027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05017045 = score(doc=3027,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3027, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3027)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:57:43
  7. Seadle, M.: Copyright in a networked world : ethics and infringement (2004) 0.01
    0.0050170454 = product of:
      0.025085226 = sum of:
        0.025085226 = product of:
          0.05017045 = sum of:
            0.05017045 = weight(_text_:22 in 2833) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05017045 = score(doc=2833,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2833, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2833)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.106-110
  8. Hammwöhner, R.: Anmerkungen zur Grundlegung der Informationsethik (2006) 0.01
    0.0050170454 = product of:
      0.025085226 = sum of:
        0.025085226 = product of:
          0.05017045 = sum of:
            0.05017045 = weight(_text_:22 in 6063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05017045 = score(doc=6063,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6063, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6063)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    13.10.2006 10:22:03
  9. O'Neil, R.M.: Free speech in cyberspace (1998) 0.01
    0.0050170454 = product of:
      0.025085226 = sum of:
        0.025085226 = product of:
          0.05017045 = sum of:
            0.05017045 = weight(_text_:22 in 248) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05017045 = score(doc=248,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 248, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=248)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 15:50:50
  10. Helbing, D.: ¬Das große Scheitern (2019) 0.01
    0.0050170454 = product of:
      0.025085226 = sum of:
        0.025085226 = product of:
          0.05017045 = sum of:
            0.05017045 = weight(_text_:22 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05017045 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    25.12.2019 14:19:22
  11. San Segundo, R.; Martínez-Ávila, D.; Frías Montoya, J.A.: Ethical issues in control by algorithms : the user is the content (2023) 0.00
    0.004621727 = product of:
      0.023108633 = sum of:
        0.023108633 = product of:
          0.046217266 = sum of:
            0.046217266 = weight(_text_:web in 1132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046217266 = score(doc=1132,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 1132, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1132)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper we discuss some ethical issues and challenges of the use of algorithms on the web from the perspective of knowledge organization. We review some of the problems that these algorithms and the filter bubbles pose for the users. We contextualize these issues within the user-based approaches to knowledge organization in a larger sense. We review some of the technologies that have been developed to counter these problems as well as initiatives from the knowledge organization field. We conclude with the necessity of adopting a critical and ethical stance towards the use of algorithms on the web and the need for an education in knowledge organization that addresses these issues.
  12. Aghemo, A.: Etica professionale e servizio di informazione (1993) 0.00
    0.0043899147 = product of:
      0.021949572 = sum of:
        0.021949572 = product of:
          0.043899145 = sum of:
            0.043899145 = weight(_text_:22 in 2453) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043899145 = score(doc=2453,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2453, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2453)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    6. 4.1996 13:22:31
  13. Lengauer, E.: Analytische Rechtsethik im Kontext säkularer Begründungsdiskurse zur Würde biologischer Entitäten (2008) 0.00
    0.0043899147 = product of:
      0.021949572 = sum of:
        0.021949572 = product of:
          0.043899145 = sum of:
            0.043899145 = weight(_text_:22 in 1697) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043899145 = score(doc=1697,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1697, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1697)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    17. 3.2008 15:17:22
  14. Brody, R.: ¬The problem of information naïveté (2008) 0.00
    0.004357406 = product of:
      0.021787029 = sum of:
        0.021787029 = product of:
          0.043574058 = sum of:
            0.043574058 = weight(_text_:web in 1865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043574058 = score(doc=1865,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 1865, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1865)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    With the rapidly changing Web-enabled world, the already existing dichotomy between knowing of and knowing about, or information naïveté, widens daily. This article explores the ethical dilemmas that can result from the lack of information literacy. The article also discusses conditions and consequences of information naïveté, media bias, possessive memory, and limited contexts and abilities. To help avoid information failure, the author recommends producers, contributors, disseminators, and aggregators of information be less information naïve.
  15. Reed, G.M.; Sanders, J.W.: ¬The principle of distribution (2008) 0.00
    0.0031356532 = product of:
      0.015678266 = sum of:
        0.015678266 = product of:
          0.031356532 = sum of:
            0.031356532 = weight(_text_:22 in 1868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031356532 = score(doc=1868,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1868, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1868)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    1. 6.2008 12:22:41
  16. Zhang, J.: Archival context, digital content, and the ethics of digital archival representation : the ethics of identification in digital library metadata (2012) 0.00
    0.0027233788 = product of:
      0.013616893 = sum of:
        0.013616893 = product of:
          0.027233787 = sum of:
            0.027233787 = weight(_text_:web in 419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027233787 = score(doc=419,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 419, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=419)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    The findings of a recent study on digital archival representation raise some ethical concerns about how digital archival materials are organized, described, and made available for use on the Web. Archivists have a fundamental obligation to preserve and protect the authenticity and integrity of records in their holdings and, at the same time, have the responsibility to promote the use of records as a fundamental purpose of the keeping of archives (SAA 2005 Code of Ethics for Archivists V & VI). Is it an ethical practice that digital content in digital archives is deeply embedded in its contextual structure and generally underrepresented in digital archival systems? Similarly, is it ethical for archivists to detach digital items from their archival context in order to make them more "digital friendly" and more accessible to meet needs of some users? Do archivists have an obligation to bring the two representation systems together so that the context and content of digital archives can be better represented and archival materials "can be located and used by anyone, for any purpose, while still remaining authentic evidence of the work and life of the creator"? (Millar 2010, 157) This paper discusses the findings of the study and their ethical implications relating to digital archival description and representation.
  17. Bagatini, J.A.; Chaves Guimarães, J.A.: Algorithmic discriminations and their ethical impacts on knowledge organization : a thematic domain-analysis (2023) 0.00
    0.0027233788 = product of:
      0.013616893 = sum of:
        0.013616893 = product of:
          0.027233787 = sum of:
            0.027233787 = weight(_text_:web in 1134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027233787 = score(doc=1134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 1134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Personal data play a fundamental role in contemporary socioeconomic dynamics, with one of its primary aspects being the potential to facilitate discriminatory situations. This situation impacts the knowledge organization field especially because it considers personal data as elements (facets) to categorize persons under an economic and sometimes discriminatory perspective. The research corpus was collected at Scopus and Web of Science until the end of 2021, under the terms "data discrimination", "algorithmic bias", "algorithmic discrimination" and "fair algorithms". The obtained results allowed to infer that the analyzed knowledge domain predominantly incorporates personal data, whether in its behavioral dimension or in the scope of the so-called sensitive data. These data are susceptible to the action of algorithms of different orders, such as relevance, filtering, predictive, social ranking, content recommendation and random classification. Such algorithms can have discriminatory biases in their programming related to gender, sexual orientation, race, nationality, religion, age, social class, socioeconomic profile, physical appearance, and political positioning.
  18. Information ethics : privacy, property, and power (2005) 0.00
    0.0022172416 = product of:
      0.011086208 = sum of:
        0.011086208 = product of:
          0.022172416 = sum of:
            0.022172416 = weight(_text_:22 in 2392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022172416 = score(doc=2392,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.13679022 = fieldWeight in 2392, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2392)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Classification
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
    DDC
    323.44/5 22 (GBV;LoC)
  19. "Code of Ethics" verabschiedet (2007) 0.00
    0.0021949573 = product of:
      0.010974786 = sum of:
        0.010974786 = product of:
          0.021949572 = sum of:
            0.021949572 = weight(_text_:22 in 459) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021949572 = score(doc=459,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 459, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=459)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Im Rahmen des 3. Leipziger Kongresses für Information und Bibliothek 19.-22. März 2007 hat Bibliothek & Information Deutschland (BID) die im folgenden wiedergegebenen "Ethischen Grundsätze der Bibliotheks- und Informationsberufe" verabschiedet und der Presse und Fachöffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Damit folgt Deutschland den rund 40 Ländern weltweit, die bereits einen "Code of Ethics" veröffentlicht haben. Diese ethischen Richtlinien sind auf der IFLA/FAIFE-Website gesammelt unter www.ifla.org/faife/ethics/codes.htm.
  20. Huber, W.: Menschen, Götter und Maschinen : eine Ethik der Digitalisierung (2022) 0.00
    0.002178703 = product of:
      0.010893514 = sum of:
        0.010893514 = product of:
          0.021787029 = sum of:
            0.021787029 = weight(_text_:web in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021787029 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Content
    Vorwort -- 1. Das digitale Zeitalter -- Zeitenwende -- Die Vorherrschaft des Buchdrucks geht zu Ende -- Wann beginnt das digitale Zeitalter? -- 2. Zwischen Euphorie und Apokalypse -- Digitalisierung. Einfach. Machen -- Euphorie -- Apokalypse -- Verantwortungsethik -- Der Mensch als Subjekt der Ethik -- Verantwortung als Prinzip -- 3. Digitalisierter Alltag in einer globalisierten Welt -- Vom World Wide Web zum Internet der Dinge -- Mobiles Internet und digitale Bildung -- Digitale Plattformen und ihre Strategien -- Big Data und informationelle Selbstbestimmung -- 4. Grenzüberschreitungen -- Die Erosion des Privaten -- Die Deformation des Öffentlichen -- Die Senkung von Hemmschwellen -- Das Verschwinden der Wirklichkeit -- Die Wahrheit in der Infosphäre -- 5. Die Zukunft der Arbeit -- Industrielle Revolutionen -- Arbeit 4.0 -- Ethik 4.0 -- 6. Digitale Intelligenz -- Können Computer dichten? -- Stärker als der Mensch? -- Maschinelles Lernen -- Ein bleibender Unterschied -- Ethische Prinzipien für den Umgang mit digitaler Intelligenz -- Medizin als Beispiel -- 7. Die Würde des Menschen im digitalen Zeitalter -- Kränkungen oder Revolutionen -- Transhumanismus und Posthumanismus -- Gibt es Empathie ohne Menschen? -- Wer ist autonom: Mensch oder Maschine? -- Humanismus der Verantwortung -- 8. Die Zukunft des Homo sapiens -- Vergöttlichung des Menschen -- Homo deus -- Gott und Mensch im digitalen Zeitalter -- Veränderung der Menschheit -- Literatur -- Personenregister.

Years

Languages

Types