Search (213 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchoberflächen"
  1. Barker, A.L.: DataStar Web : a comparison with 'classic' DataStar command language searching (1998) 0.07
    0.071433924 = product of:
      0.1785848 = sum of:
        0.052941877 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052941877 = score(doc=7691,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 7691, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7691)
        0.12564293 = sum of:
          0.07547248 = weight(_text_:web in 7691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.07547248 = score(doc=7691,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.49962097 = fieldWeight in 7691, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7691)
          0.05017045 = weight(_text_:22 in 7691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05017045 = score(doc=7691,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7691, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7691)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Compares and contrasts online searching on DataStar using the 'classic' command language, with access via the more recent Web interface (DataStar Web). The search functionality of the 2 interfaces is not identical, although both use the same retrieval software and access the same databases. Many of the differences affect retrieval effectiveness and may trip up novice and experienced searchers alike
    Source
    Online and CD-ROM review. 22(1998) no.3, S.155-167
  2. Li, W.-S.; Shim, J.: Facilitating complex Web queries through visual user interfaces and query relaxation (1998) 0.07
    0.06873019 = product of:
      0.17182547 = sum of:
        0.06188791 = weight(_text_:semantic in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06188791 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.32156807 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
        0.10993756 = sum of:
          0.06603842 = weight(_text_:web in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.06603842 = score(doc=3602,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
          0.043899145 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043899145 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes a novel visual user interface, WebIFQ (Web-In-Frame-Query), to assist users in specifying queries and visualising query criteria including document metadata, strucutres, and linkage information. WebIFQ automatically generates corresponding query statements for WebDB. As a result, users are not required to be aware of underlying complex schema design and language syntax. WebDB supports automated query relaxation to include additional terms related by semantic or co-occurence relationship. WebIFQ can facilitate users to reformulate queries perpetually in an interactive mode
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
  3. Sah, M.; Wade, V.: Personalized concept-based search on the Linked Open Data (2015) 0.05
    0.0455216 = product of:
      0.07586933 = sum of:
        0.01871778 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01871778 = score(doc=2511,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 2511, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2511)
        0.03536452 = weight(_text_:semantic in 2511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03536452 = score(doc=2511,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.18375319 = fieldWeight in 2511, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2511)
        0.021787029 = product of:
          0.043574058 = sum of:
            0.043574058 = weight(_text_:web in 2511) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043574058 = score(doc=2511,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2511, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2511)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we present a novel personalized concept-based search mechanism for the Web of Data based on results categorization. The innovation of the paper comes from combining novel categorization and personalization techniques, and using categorization for providing personalization. In our approach, search results (Linked Open Data resources) are dynamically categorized into Upper Mapping and Binding Exchange Layer (UMBEL) concepts using a novel fuzzy retrieval model. Then, results with the same concepts are grouped together to form categories, which we call conceptlenses. Such categorization enables concept-based browsing of the retrieved results aligned to users' intent or interests. When the user selects a concept lens for exploration, results are immediately personalized. In particular, all concept lenses are personally re-organized according to their similarity to the selected lens. Within the selected concept lens; more relevant results are included using results re-ranking and query expansion, as well as relevant concept lenses are suggested to support results exploration. This allows dynamic adaptation of results to the user's local choices. We also support interactive personalization; when the user clicks on a result, within the interacted lens, relevant lenses and results are included using results re-ranking and query expansion. Extensive evaluations were performed to assess our approach: (i) Performance of our fuzzy-based categorization approach was evaluated on a particular benchmark (~10,000 mappings). The evaluations showed that we can achieve highly acceptable categorization accuracy and perform better than the vector space model. (ii) Personalized search efficacy was assessed using a user study with 32 participants in a tourist domain. The results revealed that our approach performed significantly better than a non-adaptive baseline search. (iii) Dynamic personalization performance was evaluated, which illustrated that our personalization approach is scalable. (iv) Finally, we compared our system with the existing LOD search engines, which showed that our approach is unique.
    Source
    Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web. 35(2015) [in press]
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  4. Lassalle, E.: Telmi: a reusable information retrieval system and its applications (1993) 0.04
    0.043284822 = product of:
      0.108212054 = sum of:
        0.04632414 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04632414 = score(doc=2726,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2726, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2726)
        0.06188791 = weight(_text_:semantic in 2726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06188791 = score(doc=2726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.32156807 = fieldWeight in 2726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2726)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    There are 2 ways to use Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques: as a user interface coupled with a factual database or as an integrated part of a system which deals with a textual database. Describes Telmi, an information retrieval system designed for use with medium sized databases of short text and MGS, a commercialized system used in France Telecom. Telmi is integrated into a production scale prototype which implements a Minitel information service for the public. Discusses the Minitel service and user needs; MGS; the Telmi research system and the full version, the NLP architecture, the lexical and semantic levels; an example of the use of a generic system and the development of a multilingual system
  5. Lee, C.; Chen, Y.T.: Distributed visual reasoning for intelligent information retrieval on the Web (2000) 0.04
    0.041455816 = product of:
      0.103639536 = sum of:
        0.06551223 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06551223 = score(doc=2018,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2018, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2018)
        0.038127303 = product of:
          0.076254606 = sum of:
            0.076254606 = weight(_text_:web in 2018) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076254606 = score(doc=2018,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 2018, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2018)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  6. Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996) 0.04
    0.038077794 = product of:
      0.09519448 = sum of:
        0.07324491 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07324491 = score(doc=6958,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
        0.021949572 = product of:
          0.043899145 = sum of:
            0.043899145 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043899145 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the design of a GUI for the Okapi 'best match' retrieval system developed at the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, UK, for online library catalogues. The X-Windows interface includes an interactive query expansion (IQE) facilty which involves the user in the selection of query terms to reformulate a search. Presents the design rationale, based on a game board metaphor, and describes the features of each of the stages of the search interaction. Reports on the early operational field trial and discusses relevant evaluation issues and objectives
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  7. Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002) 0.04
    0.036455717 = product of:
      0.09113929 = sum of:
        0.04679445 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04679445 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
        0.04434483 = product of:
          0.08868966 = sum of:
            0.08868966 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08868966 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:17:40
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  8. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.04
    0.035970207 = product of:
      0.08992552 = sum of:
        0.064840294 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064840294 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.025085226 = product of:
          0.05017045 = sum of:
            0.05017045 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05017045 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  9. Tunender, H.; Ervin, J.: How to succeed in promoting your Web site : the impact of search engine registration on retrieval of a World Wide Web site (1998) 0.03
    0.03378058 = product of:
      0.084451444 = sum of:
        0.04632414 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04632414 = score(doc=6756,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 6756, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6756)
        0.038127303 = product of:
          0.076254606 = sum of:
            0.076254606 = weight(_text_:web in 6756) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076254606 = score(doc=6756,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 6756, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6756)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Reports results of study, undertaken at the Project Whistlestop Web site, Missouri University at Columbia to examine the indexing and retrieval rates of 5 WWW search engines: InfoSeek; Excite; Yahoo; Lycos and AltaVista. Character strings were planted in the Project Whistlestop Web site and daily searches were performed for 6 weeks. The HTML tag was indexed in 4 of the 5 search engines and problems encountered include insufficient and inconsistent indexing
  10. Wolff, C.: Leistungsvergleich der Retrievaloberflächen zwischen Web und klassischen Expertensystemen (2001) 0.03
    0.033478133 = product of:
      0.08369533 = sum of:
        0.05673526 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05673526 = score(doc=5870,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 5870, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5870)
        0.026960073 = product of:
          0.053920146 = sum of:
            0.053920146 = weight(_text_:web in 5870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053920146 = score(doc=5870,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 5870, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5870)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die meisten Web-Auftritte der Hosts waren bisher für den Retrieval-Laien gedacht. Im Hintergrund steht dabei das Ziel: mehr Nutzung durch einfacheres Retrieval. Dieser Ansatz steht aber im Konflikt mit der wachsenden Datenmenge und Dokumentgröße, die eigentlich ein immer ausgefeilteres Retrieval verlangen. Häufig wird von Information Professionals die Kritik geäußert, dass die Webanwendungen einen Verlust an Relevanz bringen. Wie weit der Nutzer tatsächlich einen Kompromiss zwischen Relevanz und Vollständigkeit eingehen muss, soll in diesem Beitrag anhand verschiedener Host-Rechner quantifiziert werden
  11. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.03
    0.03094621 = product of:
      0.077365525 = sum of:
        0.04632414 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04632414 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
        0.031041384 = product of:
          0.062082767 = sum of:
            0.062082767 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.062082767 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  12. Chowdhury, S.; Chowdhury, G.G.: Using DDC to create a visual knowledge map as an aid to online information retrieval (2004) 0.03
    0.028623639 = product of:
      0.071559094 = sum of:
        0.05615334 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05615334 = score(doc=2643,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.40105084 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
        0.0154057555 = product of:
          0.030811511 = sum of:
            0.030811511 = weight(_text_:web in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030811511 = score(doc=2643,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    1. Introduction Web search engines and digital libraries usually expect the users to use search terms that most accurately represent their information needs. Finding the most appropriate search terms to represent an information need is an age old problem in information retrieval. Keyword or phrase search may produce good search results as long as the search terms or phrase(s) match those used by the authors and have been chosen for indexing by the concerned information retrieval system. Since this does not always happen, a large number of false drops are produced by information retrieval systems. The retrieval results become worse in very large systems that deal with millions of records, such as the Web search engines and digital libraries. Vocabulary control tools are used to improve the performance of text retrieval systems. Thesauri, the most common type of vocabulary control tool used in information retrieval, appeared in the late fifties, designed for use with the emerging post-coordinate indexing systems of that time. They are used to exert terminology control in indexing, and to aid in searching by allowing the searcher to select appropriate search terms. A large volume of literature exists describing the design features, and experiments with the use, of thesauri in various types of information retrieval systems (see for example, Furnas et.al., 1987; Bates, 1986, 1998; Milstead, 1997, and Shiri et al., 2002).
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  13. Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998) 0.03
    0.027463714 = product of:
      0.13731857 = sum of:
        0.13731857 = sum of:
          0.087148115 = weight(_text_:web in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.087148115 = score(doc=2878,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
          0.05017045 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.05017045 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Ovid has supported a sophisticated interface for searching bibliographic and full text databases for some time. It is now offering a Web based version of this interface that is capable of accessing Z39.50-compliant OPACs and databases anywhere in the world. The Ovid Web Gateway builds on the Ovid Server, thus allowing for a variety of functions and configurations at user, group and database-specific level. The Web Gateway has a selection of download formats and delivery options
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  14. Schweibenz, W.; Thissen, F.: Qualität im Web : Benutzerfreundliche Webseiten durch Usability Evaluation (2003) 0.03
    0.027366508 = product of:
      0.13683254 = sum of:
        0.13683254 = sum of:
          0.105476 = weight(_text_:web in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.105476 = score(doc=767,freq=30.0), product of:
              0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.69824153 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                5.477226 = tf(freq=30.0), with freq of:
                  30.0 = termFreq=30.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
          0.031356532 = weight(_text_:22 in 767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.031356532 = score(doc=767,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 767, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=767)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Für Webseiten ist, wie für alle interaktiven Anwendungen vom einfachen Automaten bis zur komplexen Software, die Benutzerfreundlichkeit von zentraler Bedeutung. Allerdings wird eine sinnvolle Benutzung von Informationsangeboten im World Wide Web häufig durch "cooles Design" unnötig erschwert, weil zentrale Punkte der Benutzerfreundlichkeit (Usability) vernachlässigt werden. Durch Usability Evaluation kann die Benutzerfreundlichkeit von Webseiten und damit auch die Akzeptanz bei den Benutzern verbessert werden. Ziel ist die Gestaltung von ansprechenden benutzerfreundlichen Webangeboten, die den Benutzern einen effektiven und effizienten Dialog ermöglichen. Das Buch bietet eine praxisorientierte Einführung in die Web Usability Evaluation und beschreibt die Anwendung ihrer verschiedenen Methoden.
    Classification
    ST 252 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Web-Programmierung, allgemein
    Content
    Einführung.- Grundlagen des Web-Designs.- Usability und Usability Engineering.- Usability Engineering und das Web.- Methodenfragen zur Usability Evaluation.Expertenorientierte Methoden.- Benutzerorientierte Methoden.- Suchmaschinenorientierte Methoden.- Literatur.Glossar.- Index.- Checklisten.
    Date
    22. 3.2008 14:24:08
    RSWK
    Web-Seite / Gestaltung / Benutzerorientierung / Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    World Wide Web / Web Site / Gebrauchswert / Kundenorientierung / Kommunikationsdesign (GBV)
    Web-Seite / Qualität (BVB)
    RVK
    ST 252 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Web-Programmierung, allgemein
    Subject
    Web-Seite / Gestaltung / Benutzerorientierung / Benutzerfreundlichkeit
    World Wide Web / Web Site / Gebrauchswert / Kundenorientierung / Kommunikationsdesign (GBV)
    Web-Seite / Qualität (BVB)
  15. Given, L.M.; Ruecker, S.; Simpson, H.; Sadler, E.; Ruskin, A.: Inclusive interface design for seniors : Image-browsing for a health information context (2007) 0.03
    0.026155118 = product of:
      0.06538779 = sum of:
        0.04632414 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04632414 = score(doc=579,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
        0.019063652 = product of:
          0.038127303 = sum of:
            0.038127303 = weight(_text_:web in 579) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038127303 = score(doc=579,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 579, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=579)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This study explores an image-based retrieval interface for drug information, focusing on usability for a specific population - seniors. Qualitative, task-based interviews examined participants' health information behaviors and documented search strategies using an existing database (www.drugs.com) and a new prototype that uses similarity-based clustering of pill images for retrieval. Twelve participants (aged 65 and older), reflecting a diversity of backgrounds and experience with Web-based resources, located pill information using the interfaces and discussed navigational and other search preferences. Findings point to design features (e.g., image enlargement) that meet seniors' needs in the context of other health-related information-seeking strategies (e.g., contacting pharmacists).
  16. Hawk, W.B.; Wang, P.: Users' interaction with the World Wide Web : problems and problem solving (1999) 0.03
    0.025699163 = product of:
      0.064247906 = sum of:
        0.023397226 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023397226 = score(doc=6714,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 6714, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6714)
        0.040850677 = product of:
          0.08170135 = sum of:
            0.08170135 = weight(_text_:web in 6714) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08170135 = score(doc=6714,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.5408555 = fieldWeight in 6714, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6714)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In this paper, we report on the second part of an empirical study designed to observe how users interact with World Wide Web resources. Applying a holistic approach, the researches examine users' cognitive, affective, and physical behaviors during user-Web interaction in order to understand better the nature of information retrieval on the Web, the needs of Web users, and the problem-solving strategies Web users employ. From analyses and the participant verbalizations collected during monitored searches, the researchers developed a taxonomy of problem solving strategies. The coding scheme was developed based on a content analysis of the integrated process data. Information from triangulation follow-up with participants via anonymously completed questionnaires, the taxonomy, and analyses of search transcripts were collected to determine 1) what problems users encountered during the interaction and how users solved these problems; and 2) which problem-solving strategies Web users considered and selected for finding factual information. The focus of the coding was on the participants' cognitive, affective, and physical behaviors in response to the components of the problems encountered, which included problems of the following types: Web interfaces, users' mental models, and the Web information sources. Searching behavior and problem-solving patterns are described and interpreted within the relevant situational context and the problems users encountered are identified and analyzed. Both the problems users faced and their problem-solving approaches endeavored evidence a strong reliance on mental models of the features available on sites, the location of those features, and other interface design concepts
  17. Hearst, M.A.: Search user interfaces (2009) 0.02
    0.02471768 = product of:
      0.0617942 = sum of:
        0.03743556 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03743556 = score(doc=4029,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4029, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4029)
        0.02435864 = product of:
          0.04871728 = sum of:
            0.04871728 = weight(_text_:web in 4029) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04871728 = score(doc=4029,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.32250395 = fieldWeight in 4029, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4029)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    This book outlines the human side of the information seeking process, and focuses on the aspects of this process that can best be supported by the user interface. It describes the methods behind user interface design generally, and search interface design in particular, with an emphasis on how best to evaluate search interfaces. It discusses research results and current practices surrounding user interfaces for query specification, display of retrieval results, grouping retrieval results, navigation of information collections, query reformulation, search personalization, and the broader tasks of sensemaking and text analysis. Much of the discussion pertains to Web search engines, but the book also covers the special considerations surrounding search of other information collections.
    LCSH
    Web search engines
    RSWK
    World Wide Web / Information Retrieval / Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation / Benutzerorientierung (HBZ)
    Subject
    World Wide Web / Information Retrieval / Mensch-Maschine-Kommunikation / Benutzerorientierung (HBZ)
    Web search engines
  18. Appelt, W.; Hinrichs, E.; Woetzel, G.: Effectiveness and efficiency : the need for tailorable user interfaces on the Web (1998) 0.02
    0.02403075 = product of:
      0.120153755 = sum of:
        0.120153755 = sum of:
          0.076254606 = weight(_text_:web in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.076254606 = score(doc=3608,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
          0.043899145 = weight(_text_:22 in 3608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043899145 = score(doc=3608,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.04628742 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3608, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3608)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses the need for tailorable user interfaces, in particular for Web-based systems. User interfaces need to be configurable by the end users to match their skills and work requirements. Describes what configurability has been induced by user feedback and how tailorability for various degrees of user skills was integrated and implemented in the BSCW Shared Workspace system, a Web-based groupware tool
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special issue devoted to the Proceedings of the 7th International World Wide Web Conference, held 14-18 April 1998, Brisbane, Australia
  19. Denning, R.; Shuttleworth, M.; Smith, P.: Interface design concepts in the development of a Web-based information retrieval system (1998) 0.02
    0.023689037 = product of:
      0.05922259 = sum of:
        0.03743556 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03743556 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
        0.021787029 = product of:
          0.043574058 = sum of:
            0.043574058 = weight(_text_:web in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043574058 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
  20. Lucas, H.: Representing WWW navigational data : a graphical methodology to support qualitative analysis (1998) 0.02
    0.022551542 = product of:
      0.056378856 = sum of:
        0.028076671 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 62) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028076671 = score(doc=62,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04628742 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 62, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=62)
        0.028302183 = product of:
          0.056604367 = sum of:
            0.056604367 = weight(_text_:web in 62) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056604367 = score(doc=62,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15105948 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04628742 = queryNorm
                0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 62, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=62)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    The growth of medical, academic resources on the World Wide Web has led to much greater incentives and opportunities for nursing and medical students, researchers and practitioners to access Web resources. However, usersindividual differences and the variety of information-retrieval mechanisms provided by medical web resources may combine to reduce the benefits of this information resource. In a study designed to qualitatively analyse the interaction of such individual- and system-differences, a reliable method of representing WWW navigational data was found to be important in assisting traditional methodologies of representation and analysis. The methodology of graphically representing such navigational data, and the support such a technique may offer the qualitative analysis of user-system interactions, is thus described in detail and with reference to one specific example drawn from the data collected. Further, some preliminary findings deriving from the use of graphical and more traditional methodologies in this study are also represented

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 181
  • m 17
  • s 9
  • el 3
  • r 3
  • x 2
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications