-
Collins, A.M.; Quillian, M.R.: Retrieval time from semantic memory (1969)
0.09
0.086531684 = product of:
0.2163292 = sum of:
0.07487112 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07487112 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
0.14145808 = weight(_text_:semantic in 2749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14145808 = score(doc=2749,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.73501277 = fieldWeight in 2749, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2749)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
-
Casagrande, J.B.; Hale, K.L.: Semantic relations in Papago folk definitions (1967)
0.05
0.0540823 = product of:
0.13520575 = sum of:
0.04679445 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04679445 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
0.0884113 = weight(_text_:semantic in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0884113 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.45938298 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Footnote
- Zitiert in: Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval. In: The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: R. Green u.a. Dordrecht: Kluwer 2002. S.143-160.
-
Quillian, M.R.: Semantic memory (1968)
0.04
0.04001039 = product of:
0.20005195 = sum of:
0.20005195 = weight(_text_:semantic in 1478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.20005195 = score(doc=1478,freq=4.0), product of:
0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
1.0394651 = fieldWeight in 1478, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1478)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Semantic information processing. Ed.: M. Minsky
-
Mooers, C.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1963)
0.04
0.039013553 = product of:
0.09753388 = sum of:
0.066177346 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066177346 = score(doc=1641,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 1641, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1641)
0.031356532 = product of:
0.062713064 = sum of:
0.062713064 = weight(_text_:22 in 1641) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.062713064 = score(doc=1641,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1641, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1641)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Source
- Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Cetre for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by. Wesley Simonton
-
Maron, M.E.; Kuhns, I.L.: On relevance, probabilistic indexing and information retrieval (1960)
0.03
0.033892334 = product of:
0.084730834 = sum of:
0.040525187 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040525187 = score(doc=1928,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 1928, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1928)
0.04420565 = weight(_text_:semantic in 1928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04420565 = score(doc=1928,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.22969149 = fieldWeight in 1928, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1928)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Reports on a novel technique for literature indexing and searching in a mechanized library system. The notion of relevance is taken as the key concept in the theory of information retrieval and a comparative concept of relevance is explicated in terms of the theory of probability. The resulting technique called 'Probabilistic indexing' allows a computing machine, given a request for information, to make a statistical inference and derive a number (called the 'relevance number') for each document, which is a measure of the probability that the document will satisfy the given request. The result of a search is an ordered list of those documents which satisfy the request ranked according to their probable relevance. The paper goes on to show that whereas in a conventional library system the cross-referencing ('see' and 'see also') is based soley on the 'semantic closeness' between index terms, statistical measures of closeness between index terms can be defined and computed. Thus, given an arbitrary request consisting of one (or many) index term(s), a machine can eleborate on it to increase the probability of selecting relevant documents that would not otherwise have been selected. Finally, the paper suggest an interpretation of the whole library problem as one where the request is considered as a clue on the basis of which the library system makes a concatenated statistical inference in order to provide as an output an ordered list of those documents which most probably satisfy the information needs of the user
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.39-46.
-
Doyle, L.B.: Semantic road maps for literature searchers (1961)
0.03
0.028291617 = product of:
0.14145808 = sum of:
0.14145808 = weight(_text_:semantic in 5463) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14145808 = score(doc=5463,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.73501277 = fieldWeight in 5463, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5463)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Sharp, J.R.: Some fundamentals of information retrieval (1965)
0.02
0.022461338 = product of:
0.112306684 = sum of:
0.112306684 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3894) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.112306684 = score(doc=3894,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.80210173 = fieldWeight in 3894, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.1875 = fieldNorm(doc=3894)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Blagden, J.F.: How much noise in a role-free and link-free co-ordinate indexing system? (1966)
0.02
0.021882275 = product of:
0.054705687 = sum of:
0.032756116 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032756116 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
0.021949572 = product of:
0.043899145 = sum of:
0.043899145 = weight(_text_:22 in 2718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043899145 = score(doc=2718,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16209066 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2718, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2718)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- A study of the number of irrelevant documents retrieved in a co-ordinate indexing system that does not employ eitherr roles or links. These tests were based on one hundred actual inquiries received in the library and therefore an evaluation of recall efficiency is not included. Over half the enquiries produced no noise, but the mean average percentage niose figure was approximately 33 per cent based on a total average retireval figure of eighteen documents per search. Details of the size of the indexed collection, methods of indexing, and an analysis of the reasons for the retrieval of irrelevant documents are discussed, thereby providing information officers who are thinking of installing such a system with some evidence on which to base a decision as to whether or not to utilize these devices
- Source
- Journal of documentation. 22(1966), S.203-209
-
Goffman, W.; Newill, V.A.: ¬A methodology for test and evaluation of information retrieval systems (1966/67)
0.02
0.021176752 = product of:
0.105883755 = sum of:
0.105883755 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.105883755 = score(doc=1310,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 1310, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1310)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 3(1966/67), S.19-26
-
Cooper, W.S.: Expected search length : a single measure of retrieval effectiveness based on the weak ordering action of retrieval systems (1968)
0.02
0.021176752 = product of:
0.105883755 = sum of:
0.105883755 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.105883755 = score(doc=5904,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 5904, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5904)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Farradane, J.E.L.: ¬The challenge of information retrieval (1961)
0.02
0.01871778 = product of:
0.0935889 = sum of:
0.0935889 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0935889 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.6684181 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Vickery, B.C.: Bibliographic description, arrangement and retrieval (1968)
0.02
0.01871778 = product of:
0.0935889 = sum of:
0.0935889 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0935889 = score(doc=5008,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.6684181 = fieldWeight in 5008, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5008)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Swets, J.A.: Information retrieval systems (1963)
0.02
0.01871778 = product of:
0.0935889 = sum of:
0.0935889 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0935889 = score(doc=5482,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.6684181 = fieldWeight in 5482, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5482)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Swets, J.A.: Effectiveness of information retrieval systems (1969)
0.02
0.01871778 = product of:
0.0935889 = sum of:
0.0935889 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0935889 = score(doc=5483,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.6684181 = fieldWeight in 5483, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=5483)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Farradane, J.: Concept organization for information retrieval (1967)
0.02
0.018529657 = product of:
0.09264828 = sum of:
0.09264828 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09264828 = score(doc=35,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 3(1967) S.297-314
-
Quillian, M.R.: Word concepts : a theory and simulation of some basic semantic capabilities. (1967)
0.02
0.018375946 = product of:
0.091879725 = sum of:
0.091879725 = weight(_text_:semantic in 4414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.091879725 = score(doc=4414,freq=6.0), product of:
0.19245663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.47740483 = fieldWeight in 4414, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4414)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- In order to discover design principles for a large memory that can enable it to serve as the base of knowledge underlying human-like language behavior, experiments with a model memory are being performed. This model is built up within a computer by "recoding" a body of information from an ordinary dictionary into a complex network of elements and associations interconnecting them. Then, the ability of a program to use the resulting model memory effectively for simulating human performance provides a test of its design. One simulation program, now running, is given the model memory and is required to compare and contrast the meanings of arbitrary pairs of English words. For each pair, the program locates any relevant semantic information within the model memory, draws inferences on the basis of this, and thereby discovers various relationships between the meanings of the two words. Finally, it creates English text to express its conclusions. The design principles embodied in the memory model, together with some of the methods used by the program, constitute a theory of how human memory for semantic and other conceptual material may be formatted, organized, and used.
-
Luhn, H.P.: ¬The automatic derivation of information retrieval encodements from machine-readable texts (1961)
0.02
0.016210075 = product of:
0.08105037 = sum of:
0.08105037 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08105037 = score(doc=1926,freq=6.0), product of:
0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 1926, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1926)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.21-24.
- Source
- Information retrieval and machine translation. Vol.3. Pt.2. Ed. A. Kent
-
Swanson, D.R.: Searching natural language by computer (1960)
0.01
0.014974224 = product of:
0.07487112 = sum of:
0.07487112 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07487112 = score(doc=403,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 403, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=403)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Footnote
- Ein Klassiker der Beiträge zum Information Retrieval
-
Fairthorne, R.A.: Towards information retrieval (1961)
0.01
0.014974224 = product of:
0.07487112 = sum of:
0.07487112 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07487112 = score(doc=1651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 1651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1651)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
-
Armitage, J.E.; Lynch, M.F.: Some structural characteristics of articulated subject indexes (1968)
0.01
0.014974224 = product of:
0.07487112 = sum of:
0.07487112 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2303) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07487112 = score(doc=2303,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14001551 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.04628742 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2303, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2303)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 4(1968) no.2, S.101-111
