Search (113 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Datenformate"
  1. Wolters, C.: Wie muß man seine Daten formulieren bzw. strukturieren, damit ein Computer etwas Vernünftiges damit anfangen kann? : Mit einem Glossar von Carlos Saro (1991) 0.01 
    0.014532322 = product of:
  0.10172625 = sum of:
    0.10172625 = weight(_text_:textverarbeitung in 4013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10172625 = score(doc=4013,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28832662 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.983315 = idf(docFreq=40, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.35281602 = fieldWeight in 4013, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.983315 = idf(docFreq=40, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4013)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Die Dokumentationsabteilung im Institut für Museumskunde der Staatlichen Museen Preußischer Kulturbesitz (IfM) hat die Aufgabe, bundesweit Museen und museale Einrichtungen bei der Einführung der Informationstechnik mit Rat und Tat zu unterstützen. Hierbei arbeitet sie mit dem Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum für Informationstechnik Berlin (ZIB) zusammen. Diese Aktivitäten liegen im Bereich einer professionell durchgeführten Rationalisierung; Computerisierung ist nicht Selbstzweck, sondern eine Möglichkeit, ohnehin durchzuführende Arbeiten in puncto Zeit und Kosten effizienter zu gestalten bzw. Dinge durchzuführen, für die man beim Einsatz konventioneller Methoden weder die Zeit noch das Geld hätte. Mit der Vermittlung der hierfür notwendigen Kenntnisse und Fertigkeiten ist ein kleines Institut wie das IfM wegen des rapide ansteigenden Beratungsbedarfs der Museen heute noch weit überfordert. Wir konzentrieren daher unsere Aktivitäten auf eine Zusammenarbeit mit den für die Museumsbetreuung zuständigen Einrichtungen in den Bundesländern. Wir haben die Hoffnung, daß mehr und mehr Bundesländer für diese Aufgabe eigene Dienstleistungsangebote entwickeln werden. Bevor das erreicht ist, versucht das HM interessierten Museen zumindest eine "Hilfe zur Selbsthilfe" anzubieten; auch wenn dieses oder jenes Bundesland noch nicht in der Lage ist, seine Museen auf diesem Gebiet professionell zu beraten, soll es einzelnen Museen zumindest erleichtert werden, sich hier selber schlau zu machen. Zum Inhalt: Zur Zeit der Großrechner waren sich noch alle Beteiligten darüber einig, daß man für den Einsatz der Informationstechnik professioneller Hilfe bedarf. Man war bereit, sich den Anforderungen der Maschine anzupassen, man versuchte, sich "computergerecht" zu verhalten. Die Einführung leicht zu bedienender und leistungsstarker Computer im Bürobereich hat diese Arbeitsbedingungen aber grundlegend verändert. Auch Leute, die von Computer noch nichts verstehen, können heute in wenigen Tagen lernen, mit Programmen für "Textverarbeitung" ganz selbstverständlich umzugehen. Sie erwarten daher, daß das bei einem Einsatz des Computers für die Inventarisierung genauso problemlos sei. Von einer solchen Benutzerfreundlichkeit der Programme sind wir im deutschen Museumswesen aber noch weit entfernt. Das hat einen einfachen Grund: In die eben erwähnten einfach zu handhabenden Programme wurde inzwischen hunderte oder gar tausende von "Mannjahren" investiert; ein erheblicher Teil dieser Mittel diente dazu, den Computer den spezifischen Bedürfnissen bestimmter Arbeitsplätze anzupassen, bzw. die daran arbeitenden Mitarbeiter auszubilden. Bis das auch für das Museum gilt, wird wohl noch einige Zeit vergehen; dieser Markt ist zu klein, als daß sich solche Investitionen auf rein kommerzieller Basis kurzfristig auszahlen könnten. Das Institut für Museumskunde versucht hier Hilfestellung zu geben. Das vorliegende Heft 33 der "Materialien" ist aus Beratungen und Kursen hervorgegangen. Es versucht, die für die Einführung der Informationstechnik im Museum unabdingbaren grundlegenden Computerkenntnisse für Museumsleute in Form eines Lern- und Lesebuchs zu vermitteln. Es schließt damit an Heft 30 (Jane Sunderland und Leonore Sarasan, Was muß man alles tun, um den Computer im Museum erfolgreich einzusetzen?) direkt an und soll zusammen mit ihm benutzt werden.
  2. Bales, K.: ¬The USMARC formats and visual materials (1989) 0.01 
    0.012073731 = product of:
  0.042258058 = sum of:
    0.029209416 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029209416 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
    0.01304864 = product of:
      0.03914592 = sum of:
        0.03914592 = weight(_text_:22 in 2861) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03914592 = score(doc=2861,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2861, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2861)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Paper presented at a symposium on 'Implementing the Art and Architecture Thesaurus (AAT): Controlled Vocabulary in the Extended MARC format', held at the 1989 Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America. Describes how changes are effected in MARC and the role of the various groups in the library community that are involved in the implementing these changes. Discusses the expansion of the formats to accomodate cataloguing and retrieval for visual materials. Expanded capabilities for coding visual materials offer greater opportunity for user access.
    Date
    4.12.1995 22:40:20
  3. Paulus, W.; Weishaupt, K.: Bibliotheksdaten werden mehr wert : LibLink wertet bibliothekarische Dienstleistung auf (1996) 0.01 
    0.009362761 = product of:
  0.06553932 = sum of:
    0.06553932 = product of:
      0.09830898 = sum of:
        0.049376577 = weight(_text_:29 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049376577 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
        0.0489324 = weight(_text_:22 in 5228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0489324 = score(doc=5228,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5228, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5228)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    29. 9.1996 18:58:22
  4. Concise UNIMARC Classification Format : Draft 5 (20000125) (2000) 0.01 
    0.008345548 = product of:
  0.058418833 = sum of:
    0.058418833 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058418833 = score(doc=4421,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4421, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4421)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  5. Carini, P.; Shepherd, K.: ¬The MARC standard and encoded archival description (2004) 0.01 
    0.0074902084 = product of:
  0.052431457 = sum of:
    0.052431457 = product of:
      0.07864718 = sum of:
        0.03950126 = weight(_text_:29 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03950126 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
        0.03914592 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03914592 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:29:32
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1, S.18-27
  6. Coyle, K.: Future considerations : the functional library systems record (2004) 0.01 
    0.0074902084 = product of:
  0.052431457 = sum of:
    0.052431457 = product of:
      0.07864718 = sum of:
        0.03950126 = weight(_text_:29 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03950126 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.03914592 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03914592 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    9.12.2005 19:21:29
    Source
    Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.2, S.166-174
  7. Woods, E.W.; IFLA Section on classification and Indexing and Indexing and Information Technology; Joint Working Group on a Classification Format: Requirements for a format of classification data : Final report, July 1996 (1996) 0.01 
    0.0062591606 = product of:
  0.043814123 = sum of:
    0.043814123 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3008) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043814123 = score(doc=3008,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 3008, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3008)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  8. Leazer, G.H.: ¬A conceptual schema for the control of bibliographic works (1994) 0.01 
    0.0052159675 = product of:
  0.03651177 = sum of:
    0.03651177 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03651177 = score(doc=3033,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3033, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3033)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    In this paper I describe a conceptual design of a bibliographic retrieval system that enables more thourough control of bibliographic entities. A bibliographic entity has 2 components: the intellectual work and the physical item. Users searching bibliographic retrieval systems generally do not search for a specific item, but are willing to retrieve one of several alternative manifestations of a work. However, contemporary bibliographic retrieval systems are based solely on the descriptions of items. Works are described only implcitly by collocating descriptions of items. This method has resulted in a tool that does not include important descriptive attributes of the work, e.g. information regarding its history, its genre, or its bibliographic relationships. A bibliographic relationship is an association between 2 bibliographic entities. A system evaluation methodology wasused to create a conceptual schema for a bibliographic retrieval system. The model is based upon an analysis of data elements in the USMARC Formats for Bibliographic Data. The conceptual schema describes a database comprising 2 separate files of bibliographic descriptions, one of works and the other of items. Each file consists of individual descriptive surrogates of their respective entities. the specific data content of each file is defined by a data dictionary. Data elements used in the description of bibliographic works reflect the nature of works as intellectual and linguistic objects. The descriptive elements of bibliographic items describe the physical properties of bibliographic entities. Bibliographic relationships constitute the logical strucutre of the database
  9. Guenther, R.S.: Bringing the Library of Congress into the computer age : converting LCC to machine-readable form (1996) 0.01 
    0.0052159675 = product of:
  0.03651177 = sum of:
    0.03651177 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03651177 = score(doc=4578,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 4578, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4578)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  10. ISO 8459: Bibliographic data element directory : Pt.1: Interloan applications (ISO 8459-1:1988). - Pt.2: Acquisition applications (ISO 8459-2:1992). - Pt.3: Information retrieval applications (ISO 8459-3:1994). - Pt.4: Circulation applications (ISO/CD 8459-4:1996) - Pt.5: Data elements for the exchange of cataloguing and metadata (ISO/DIS 8459-5:2000) (1988-) 0.01 
    0.0052159675 = product of:
  0.03651177 = sum of:
    0.03651177 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03651177 = score(doc=4439,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 4439, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4439)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  11. Kernernman, V.Y.; Koenig, M.E.D.: USMARC as a standardized format for the Internet hypermedia document control/retrieval/delivery system design (1996) 0.01 
    0.005163544 = product of:
  0.036144804 = sum of:
    0.036144804 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036144804 = score(doc=5565,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5565, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5565)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Surveys how the USMARC integrated bibliographic format (UBIF) could be mapped onto an hypermedia document USMARC format (HDUF) to meet the requirements of a hypermedia document control/retrieval/delivery (HDRD) system for the Internet. Explores the characteristics of such a system using an example of the WWW's directory and searching engine Yahoo!. Discusses additional standard specifications for the UBIF's structure, content designation, and data content to map this format into the HDUF that can serve as a proxy for the Net HDRD system
  12. Chowdhury, G.G.: Record formats for integrated databases : a review and comparison (1996) 0.01 
    0.005163544 = product of:
  0.036144804 = sum of:
    0.036144804 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.036144804 = score(doc=7679,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 7679, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7679)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Discusses the issues involved in the development of data formats for computerized information retrieval systems. Integrated databases capable of holding both bibliographic and factual information, in a single database structure, are more convenient for searching and retrieval by end users. Several bibliographic formats have been developed and are used for these bibliographic control puposes. Reviews features of 6 major bibliographic formats: USMARC, UKMARC, UNIMARC, CCF, MIBIS and ABNCD are reviewed. Only 2 formats: CCF and ABNCD are capable of holding both bibliographic and factual information and supporting the design of integrated databases. The comparison suggests that, while CCF makes more detailed provision for bibliographic information, ABNCD makes better provision for factual information such as profiles of institutions, information systems, projects and human experts
  13. Giordano, R.: ¬The documentation of electronic texts : using Text Encoding Initiative headers: an introduction (1994) 0.00 
    0.004425895 = product of:
  0.030981263 = sum of:
    0.030981263 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030981263 = score(doc=866,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 866, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=866)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Presents a general introduction to the form and functions of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) headers and explains their relationship to the MARC record. The TEI header's main strength is that it documents electronic texts in a standard exchange format that should be understandable to both librarian cataloguers and text encoders outside of librarianship. TEI gives encoders the ability to document the the electronic text itself, its source, its encoding principles, and revisions, as well as non bibliographic characteristics of the text that can support both scholarly analysis and retrieval. Its bibliographic descriptions can be loaded into standard remote bibliographic databases, which should make electronic texts as easy to find for researchers as texts in other media. Presents a brief overview of the TEI header, the file description and ways in which the TEI headers have counterparts in MARC, the Encoding Description, the Profile Description, the Revision Description, the size and complexity of the TEI header, and the use of the TEI header to support document retrieval and analysis, with notes on some of the prospects and problems
  14. McBride, J.L.: Faceted subject access for music through USMARC : a case for linked fields (2000) 0.00 
    0.004425895 = product of:
  0.030981263 = sum of:
    0.030981263 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5403) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030981263 = score(doc=5403,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 5403, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5403)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    The USMARC Format for Bibliographic Description contains three fields (045, 047, and 048) designed to facilitate subject access to music materials. The fields cover three of the main aspects of subject description for music: date of composition, form or genre, and number of instruments or voices, respectively. The codes are rarely used for subject access, because of the difficulty of coding them and because false drops would result in retrieval of bibliographic records where more than one musical work is present, a situation that occurs frequently with sound recordings. It is proposed that the values of the fields be converted to natural language and that subfield 8 be used to link all access fields in a bibliographic record for greater precision in retrieval. This proposal has implications beyond music cataloging, especially for metadata and any bibliographic records describing materials containing many works and subjects.
  15. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The USMARC Format for Classification Data : development and implementation (1992) 0.00 
    0.004172774 = product of:
  0.029209416 = sum of:
    0.029209416 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029209416 = score(doc=2996,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2996, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2996)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  16. Guenther, R.S.: ¬The development and implementation of the USMARC format for classification data (1992) 0.00 
    0.004172774 = product of:
  0.029209416 = sum of:
    0.029209416 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8865) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029209416 = score(doc=8865,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 8865, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8865)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  17. Postlkethwaite, B.: LITA MARC Holdings Interest Group, American Library Association Conference, new Orleans, June 1993 (1994) 0.00 
    0.004172774 = product of:
  0.029209416 = sum of:
    0.029209416 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029209416 = score(doc=859,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 859, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=859)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Discusses standards related to the USMARC holdings format. Considers issues of concern surrounding the following standards: Z39.71, the proposed standard for holdings statements for bibliographic items; Z39.50, the standard for intersystem search and retrieval; and X12, the national standard for the transmission of business data. Aslo discusses the relationship between EDI and the USMARC holdings format. Work is currently in progress to update the holdings format
  18. Mueller, C.J.; Whittaker, M.A.: What is this thing called MARC(S)? (1990) 0.00 
    0.004172774 = product of:
  0.029209416 = sum of:
    0.029209416 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3588) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029209416 = score(doc=3588,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3588, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3588)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Contribution to an issue devoted to serials and reference services. Familiarity with the basic elements of the MARC format and their effect on the display and retrieval of bibliographic data is an essential element of public service in those libraries with MARC-based on-line catalogues. Describes the components of a MARC record. To successfully retrieve the information sought from an on-line catalogue, the catalogue user must know whether it is in an indexed field and, if so, must be familiar with the search strategies required by the system.
  19. Jimenez, V.O.R.: Nuevas perspectivas para la catalogacion : metadatos ver MARC (1999) 0.00 
    0.0039543356 = product of:
  0.027680349 = sum of:
    0.027680349 = product of:
      0.08304104 = sum of:
        0.08304104 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08304104 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    30. 3.2002 19:45:22
    Source
    Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219
  20. Boßmeyer, C.; Henze, V.: ¬2. MAB-Expertengespräch (1995) 0.00 
    0.003762025 = product of:
  0.026334174 = sum of:
    0.026334174 = product of:
      0.07900252 = sum of:
        0.07900252 = weight(_text_:29 in 2914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07900252 = score(doc=2914,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 2914, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2914)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.2, S. 322-327

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 75
  • d 23
  • f 8
  • pl 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 96
  • s 9
  • m 7
  • el 3
  • b 2
  • l 2
  • n 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications