Search (517 results, page 1 of 26)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Catalogue 2.0 : the future of the library catalogue (2013) 0.04
    0.04343548 = product of:
      0.15202418 = sum of:
        0.014604708 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014604708 = score(doc=1339,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
        0.13741948 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 1339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13741948 = score(doc=1339,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.23696128 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.57992375 = fieldWeight in 1339, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1339)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Will there be a library catalogue in the future and, if so, what will it look like? In the last 25 years, the library catalogue has undergone an evolution, from card catalogues to OPACs, discovery systems and even linked data applications making library bibliographic data accessible on the web. At the same time, users expectations of what catalogues will be able to offer in the way of discovery have never been higher. This groundbreaking edited collection brings together some of the foremost international cataloguing practitioners and thought leaders, including Lorcan Dempsey, Emmanuelle Bermès, Marshall Breeding and Karen Calhoun, to provide an overview of the current state of the art of the library catalogue and look ahead to see what the library catalogue might become. Practical projects and cutting edge concepts are showcased in discussions of linked data and the Semantic Web, user expectations and needs, bibliographic control, the FRBRization of the catalogue, innovations in search and retrieval, next-generation discovery products and mobile catalogues.
    RSWK
    Bibliothekskatalog / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Online-Katalog / Zukunft / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Bibliothekskatalog / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
    Online-Katalog / Zukunft / Discovery Service / Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Semantic Web / Aufsatzsammlung
  2. Understanding FRBR : what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools (2007) 0.04
    0.0380438 = product of:
      0.08876887 = sum of:
        0.010953531 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010953531 = score(doc=1675,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.10026272 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
        0.07287768 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07287768 = score(doc=1675,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23696128 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.30755103 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
        0.0049376576 = product of:
          0.014812972 = sum of:
            0.014812972 = weight(_text_:29 in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014812972 = score(doc=1675,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.11659596 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.42857143 = coord(3/7)
    
    Content
    1. An Introduction to Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) - Arlene G. Taylor (1-20) 2. An Introduction to Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD) - Glenn E. Patton (21-28) 3. Understanding the Relationship between FRBR and FRAD - Glenn E. Patton (29-34) 4. FRBR and the History of Cataloging - William Denton (35-58) 5. The Impact of Research on the Development of FRBR - Edward T. O'Neill (59-72) 6. Bibliographic Families and Superworks - Richard P. Smiraglia (73-86) 7. FRBR and RDA (Resource Description and Access) - Barbara B. Tillett (87-96) 8. FRBR and Archival Materials - Alexander C. Thurman (97-102) 9. FRBR and Works of Art, Architecture, and Material Culture - Murtha Baca and Sherman Clarke (103-110) 10. FRBR and Cartographic Materials - Mary Lynette Larsgaard (111-116) 11. FRBR and Moving Image Materials - Martha M. Yee (117-130) 12. FRBR and Music - Sherry L. Vellucci (131-152) 13. FRBR and Serials - Steven C. Shadle (153-174)
    RSWK
    Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records / Aufsatzsammlung
  3. Conversations with catalogers in the 21st century (2011) 0.03
    0.028631458 = product of:
      0.1002101 = sum of:
        0.010953531 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010953531 = score(doc=4530,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.10026272 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
        0.08925657 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08925657 = score(doc=4530,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.23696128 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.37667155 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in Mitt VÖB 64(2011) H.1, S.151-153 (S. Breitling): "Wie sieht die Rolle der Katalogisierung im 21. Jahrhundert aus? In diversen Blogs und Mailinglisten wird darüber seit geraumer Zeit diskutiert. Der Bereich Katalogisierung befindet sich in einer Phase tiefgreifenden Wandels, ausgelöst durch eine Vielzahl von Faktoren, von denen veränderte Nutzererwartungen bei der Recherche und die wachsende Menge an neuen zu katalogisierenden Materialien (e-Books, Web-Ressourcen etc.) und Formaten nur zwei Aspekte darstellen. Das technische Umfeld wird nicht zuletzt durch fortgeschrittene Möglichkeiten im Bereich Retrieval und Präsentation geprägt. Wie schafft man es, dass Katalogisierung als Teil des gesamten Bibliothekswesens relevant und zeitgemäß bleibt? Welche der in Jahrzehnten Katalogisierungspraxis erarbeiteten Standards sind erhaltenswert, und welche sind im Hinblick auf den Fortschritt der IT und ein mögliches Semantic Web vielleicht gar nicht mehr nötig oder müssen an die Gegebenheiten angepasst werden? Mit diesen und anderen Fragen beschäftigt sich die Aufsatzsammlung "Conversations with catalogers in the 21st century". In der Community bekannte Personen wie Martha Yee, Christine Schwartz oder James Weinheimer kommen zu Wort, aus dem deutschsprachigen Raum Bernhard Eversberg, Entwickler des Bibliothekssystems Allegro.
    RSWK
    Katalogisierung / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Katalogisierung / Aufsatzsammlung
  4. Patton, G.E,: Understanding the relationship between FRBR and FRAD (2007) 0.02
    0.01816136 = product of:
      0.063564755 = sum of:
        0.043814123 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043814123 = score(doc=6244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 6244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6244)
        0.01975063 = product of:
          0.05925189 = sum of:
            0.05925189 = weight(_text_:29 in 6244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05925189 = score(doc=6244,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6244, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6244)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Pages
    S.29-34
    Source
    Understanding FRBR: what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools. Ed. by Arlene Taylor
  5. RAK-Mitteilung Nr.16 : Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung von Nichtbuchmaterialien (RAK-NBM). Entwurf (1995) 0.01
    0.013107862 = product of:
      0.09175503 = sum of:
        0.09175503 = product of:
          0.13763255 = sum of:
            0.0691272 = weight(_text_:29 in 2391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0691272 = score(doc=2391,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 2391, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2391)
            0.068505354 = weight(_text_:22 in 2391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.068505354 = score(doc=2391,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2391, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2391)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Pages
    22 S
    Source
    Beilage zu: Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.10
  6. Harej, V.; Zumer, M.: Analysis of FRBR user tasks (2013) 0.01
    0.0121075725 = product of:
      0.042376503 = sum of:
        0.029209416 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029209416 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
        0.013167087 = product of:
          0.03950126 = sum of:
            0.03950126 = weight(_text_:29 in 1955) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03950126 = score(doc=1955,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1955, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1955)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    FRBR, FRAD, and FRSAD models propose user tasks as a way to address and categorize functions that a catalog should support. The user tasks are not harmonized among these models, but to do that, they should first be fully understood and analyzed, especially "select" and "identify." We decided to look at the FRBR user tasks from the perspective of interactive information retrieval (IIR). Several IIR models were reviewed and Ellis' and Belkin's models were chosen for further analysis and interpretation of FRBR "select" and "identify" tasks.
    Date
    29. 5.2015 19:13:13
  7. Cochenour, D.: Linking remote users and information : cataloguing Internet publications (1994) 0.01
    0.012073731 = product of:
      0.042258058 = sum of:
        0.029209416 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029209416 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
        0.01304864 = product of:
          0.03914592 = sum of:
            0.03914592 = weight(_text_:22 in 2170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03914592 = score(doc=2170,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2170, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2170)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries can add value to Internet resources by adding them to the library's catalogue in a manner consistent with the other resources held within the collection. Reports on OCLC studies into cataloguing Internet resources and accessing electronic periodicals. Existing retrieval methods on the Internet are limited because of shallow directory structures and idiosyncratic naming conventions. Catalogue entries for electronic resources need to provide a complete description of the access methodology if they are to satisfactorily connect remote users without the immediate possibility of backup from reference staff
    Date
    17.10.1995 18:22:54
  8. Harmon, J.C.: ¬The death of quality cataloging : does it make a difference for library users? (1996) 0.01
    0.012073731 = product of:
      0.042258058 = sum of:
        0.029209416 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029209416 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
        0.01304864 = product of:
          0.03914592 = sum of:
            0.03914592 = weight(_text_:22 in 6435) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03914592 = score(doc=6435,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6435, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6435)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Defends the role of quality cataloguing. It is only with adequate records that users will be able to find the information they require. It is a prerequisite for efficient machine retrieval and integrated services. Quality MARC records and the intellectual structure of cataloguing are essential is standards of service are to be maintained
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 22(1996) no.4, S.306-307
  9. Lee, E.: Cataloguing (and reference) at the crossroads (1996) 0.01
    0.012073731 = product of:
      0.042258058 = sum of:
        0.029209416 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029209416 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
        0.01304864 = product of:
          0.03914592 = sum of:
            0.03914592 = weight(_text_:22 in 499) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03914592 = score(doc=499,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 499, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=499)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Alerts librarians to directions in research in artificial intelligence relevant to information retrieval which will change current technology and user expectations and consequently the requirements for data provision and access at the base level. Predicts a reevaluation of priorities for using the expertise of cataloguers (and reference librarians) and of cataloguing methodologies. Debates the future of cataloguing, arguing for the need to monitor developments in adjacent research areas and to plan with these in mind
    Source
    Cataloguing Australia. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.68-75
  10. Nicholson, D.; Steele, M.: CATRIONA: a distributed, locally-oriented. Z39.50 OPAC-based approach to cataloguing the Internet (1996) 0.01
    0.011647928 = product of:
      0.040767744 = sum of:
        0.030981263 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030981263 = score(doc=6734,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 6734, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6734)
        0.009786479 = product of:
          0.029359438 = sum of:
            0.029359438 = weight(_text_:22 in 6734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029359438 = score(doc=6734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6734)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the origins of the CATaloguing and Retrieval of Information Over Network Applications (CATRIONA) Study in the BUBL Subject Tree service and nots its aims: to investigate the requirements for developing procedures and applications for cataloguing and retrieval of networked resources (particularly via the Internet); and to explore the feasibility of a collaborative project to develop and integrate them with existing library systems. The project established that a distributed catalogue of networked resources integrated with standard Z39.50 library system OPAC interfaces with information on hard copy resources is already a practical proposition at a basic level. Notes that at least one Z30.50 OPAC client can searcg remote Z39.50 OPACs, retrieve USMARC records with URLs in MARC field 856
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  11. Das, S.; Paik, J.H.: Gender tagging of named entities using retrieval-assisted multi-context aggregation : an unsupervised approach (2023) 0.01
    0.011647928 = product of:
      0.040767744 = sum of:
        0.030981263 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030981263 = score(doc=941,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
        0.009786479 = product of:
          0.029359438 = sum of:
            0.029359438 = weight(_text_:22 in 941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029359438 = score(doc=941,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 941, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=941)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Inferring the gender of named entities present in a text has several practical applications in information sciences. Existing approaches toward name gender identification rely exclusively on using the gender distributions from labeled data. In the absence of such labeled data, these methods fail. In this article, we propose a two-stage model that is able to infer the gender of names present in text without requiring explicit name-gender labels. We use coreference resolution as the backbone for our proposed model. To aid coreference resolution where the existing contextual information does not suffice, we use a retrieval-assisted context aggregation framework. We demonstrate that state-of-the-art name gender inference is possible without supervision. Our proposed method matches or outperforms several supervised approaches and commercially used methods on five English language datasets from different domains.
    Date
    22. 3.2023 12:00:14
  12. Parent, I.: International and national cataloguing rules : current situation and future trends, Moscow, 20-24 April 1999 (2000) 0.01
    0.011235313 = product of:
      0.07864718 = sum of:
        0.07864718 = product of:
          0.117970765 = sum of:
            0.05925189 = weight(_text_:29 in 6465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05925189 = score(doc=6465,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6465, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6465)
            0.058718875 = weight(_text_:22 in 6465) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058718875 = score(doc=6465,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6465, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6465)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    11. 8.2001 17:22:42
    Source
    International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.1, S.9-12
  13. Diao, J.: "Fu hao," "fu hao," "fuHao," or "fu Hao"? : a cataloger's navigation of an ancient Chinese woman's name (2015) 0.01
    0.010594126 = product of:
      0.03707944 = sum of:
        0.025558239 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025558239 = score(doc=2009,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2009, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2009)
        0.011521201 = product of:
          0.0345636 = sum of:
            0.0345636 = weight(_text_:29 in 2009) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0345636 = score(doc=2009,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2009, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2009)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Chinese language catalogers' work is not only challenged by the revolution in cataloging standards and principles, but also by ancient Chinese names that emerged in archaeological discoveries and Chinese classic texts, which create a significant impact on bibliographic description and retrieval in terms of consistency and accuracy. This article takes an example of one ancient Chinese lady's name that is inconsistently romanized and described in OCLC to explore the reasons that cause the name variations and to propose an appropriate authorized access point after consulting both Western and Eastern scholarly practices. This article investigates the evolving history of pre-Qin Chinese names that are not addressed or exemplified in the Library of Congress Romanization Table, and recommends a revision of that Table.
    Date
    31. 5.2015 9:29:18
  14. Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996) 0.01
    0.010564514 = product of:
      0.036975797 = sum of:
        0.025558239 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025558239 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
        0.011417559 = product of:
          0.034252677 = sum of:
            0.034252677 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034252677 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  15. Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: ¬The effectiveness of copy cotaloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records (2004) 0.01
    0.010564514 = product of:
      0.036975797 = sum of:
        0.025558239 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025558239 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
        0.011417559 = product of:
          0.034252677 = sum of:
            0.034252677 = weight(_text_:22 in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034252677 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Typographical errors in bibliographic records can cause retrieval problems in online catalogs. This study examined one hundred typographical errors in records in the OCLC WorldCat database. The local catalogs of five libraries holding the items described by the bibliographic records with typographical errors were searched to determine whether each library had corrected the errors. The study found that only 35.8 percent of the errors had been corrected. Knowledge of copy cataloging error rates can help underscore the importance of quality data in bibliographic utilities and, further, can serve as an indication to libraries whether they need to pay more attention to correcting types in the copy cataloging process.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Brunt, R.: Old rules for a new game : Cutter revisited (1998) 0.01
    0.010564514 = product of:
      0.036975797 = sum of:
        0.025558239 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025558239 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
        0.011417559 = product of:
          0.034252677 = sum of:
            0.034252677 = weight(_text_:22 in 771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034252677 = score(doc=771,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 771, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=771)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    It is contended that while there are considerable numbers of people interested in the application of information retrieval (IR) software on their home computers in their professional, working and recreational activities, they are not very well served in using it to best advantage. Describes the writer's attempts to transfer some of the recorded good practice of the first information managers to contemporary problems. Data input standards devoted to library organisation may be developed to establish a set of principles to encourage the consistent organisation of the entire range of objects which might be represented in databases. Specific areas of difficulty are examined.
    Date
    24. 1.2007 19:38:22
  17. Petschar, H.; Strouhal, E.; Zobernig, H.: ¬Der Zettelkatalog : Ein historisches System geistiger Ordnung (1999) 0.01
    0.010411098 = product of:
      0.07287768 = sum of:
        0.07287768 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 2187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07287768 = score(doc=2187,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.23696128 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.30755103 = fieldWeight in 2187, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2187)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    RSWK
    Wien / Österreichische Nationalbibliothek / Alphabetischer Katalog / Zettelkatalog / Geschichte / Aufsatzsammlung (341256) (431256)
    Subject
    Wien / Österreichische Nationalbibliothek / Alphabetischer Katalog / Zettelkatalog / Geschichte / Aufsatzsammlung (341256) (431256)
  18. Gartner, R.: Metadata : shaping knowledge from antiquity to the semantic web (2016) 0.01
    0.009727757 = product of:
      0.03404715 = sum of:
        0.025817718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025817718 = score(doc=731,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
        0.00822943 = product of:
          0.024688289 = sum of:
            0.024688289 = weight(_text_:29 in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024688289 = score(doc=731,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    29. 9.2022 17:43:42
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval
    Subject
    Information storage and retrieval
  19. Briot, D.; Creff, J.A.: Enfin une norme francaise de description des resources électroniques (Z44-082) (2000) 0.01
    0.009362761 = product of:
      0.06553932 = sum of:
        0.06553932 = product of:
          0.09830898 = sum of:
            0.049376577 = weight(_text_:29 in 4634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049376577 = score(doc=4634,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4634, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4634)
            0.0489324 = weight(_text_:22 in 4634) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0489324 = score(doc=4634,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4634, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4634)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
    Source
    Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 2000, no.186, S.20-22
  20. Seminario FRBR : Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: reguisiti funzionali per record bibliografici, Florence, 27-28 January 2000, Proceedings (2000) 0.01
    0.009362761 = product of:
      0.06553932 = sum of:
        0.06553932 = product of:
          0.09830898 = sum of:
            0.049376577 = weight(_text_:29 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049376577 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
            0.0489324 = weight(_text_:22 in 3948) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0489324 = score(doc=3948,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036116153 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3948, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3948)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    29. 8.2005 12:54:22

Authors

Languages

Types

  • a 470
  • m 34
  • s 19
  • b 15
  • el 8
  • r 3
  • n 2
  • ? 1
  • l 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects