-
Conversations with catalogers in the 21st century (2011)
0.03
0.028631458 = product of:
0.1002101 = sum of:
0.010953531 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010953531 = score(doc=4530,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.10026272 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
0.08925657 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08925657 = score(doc=4530,freq=6.0), product of:
0.23696128 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.37667155 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Footnote
- Rez. in Mitt VÖB 64(2011) H.1, S.151-153 (S. Breitling): "Wie sieht die Rolle der Katalogisierung im 21. Jahrhundert aus? In diversen Blogs und Mailinglisten wird darüber seit geraumer Zeit diskutiert. Der Bereich Katalogisierung befindet sich in einer Phase tiefgreifenden Wandels, ausgelöst durch eine Vielzahl von Faktoren, von denen veränderte Nutzererwartungen bei der Recherche und die wachsende Menge an neuen zu katalogisierenden Materialien (e-Books, Web-Ressourcen etc.) und Formaten nur zwei Aspekte darstellen. Das technische Umfeld wird nicht zuletzt durch fortgeschrittene Möglichkeiten im Bereich Retrieval und Präsentation geprägt. Wie schafft man es, dass Katalogisierung als Teil des gesamten Bibliothekswesens relevant und zeitgemäß bleibt? Welche der in Jahrzehnten Katalogisierungspraxis erarbeiteten Standards sind erhaltenswert, und welche sind im Hinblick auf den Fortschritt der IT und ein mögliches Semantic Web vielleicht gar nicht mehr nötig oder müssen an die Gegebenheiten angepasst werden? Mit diesen und anderen Fragen beschäftigt sich die Aufsatzsammlung "Conversations with catalogers in the 21st century". In der Community bekannte Personen wie Martha Yee, Christine Schwartz oder James Weinheimer kommen zu Wort, aus dem deutschsprachigen Raum Bernhard Eversberg, Entwickler des Bibliothekssystems Allegro.
- RSWK
- Katalogisierung / Aufsatzsammlung
- Subject
- Katalogisierung / Aufsatzsammlung
-
Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000)
0.02
0.02343495 = product of:
0.082022324 = sum of:
0.036144804 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036144804 = score(doc=5365,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.045877516 = product of:
0.068816274 = sum of:
0.0345636 = weight(_text_:29 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0345636 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.034252677 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034252677 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.4, S.39-59
-
Arsenault, C.; Ménard, E.: Searching titles with initial articles in library catalogs : a case study and search behavior analysis (2007)
0.02
0.015314458 = product of:
0.0536006 = sum of:
0.043814123 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043814123 = score(doc=2264,freq=8.0), product of:
0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
0.009786479 = product of:
0.029359438 = sum of:
0.029359438 = weight(_text_:22 in 2264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029359438 = score(doc=2264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2264)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This study examines problems caused by initial articles in library catalogs. The problematic records observed are those whose titles begin with a word erroneously considered to be an article at the retrieval stage. Many retrieval algorithms edit queries by removing initial words corresponding to articles found in an exclusion list even whether the initial word is an article or not. Consequently, a certain number of documents remain more difficult to find. The study also examines user behavior during known-item retrieval using the title index in library catalogs, concentrating on the problems caused by the presence of an initial article or of a word homograph to an article. Measures of success and effectiveness are taken to determine if retrieval is affected in such cases.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Stoker, D.: Computer cataloguing in retrospect (1997)
0.01
0.014578728 = product of:
0.051025547 = sum of:
0.018255886 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018255886 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
0.03276966 = product of:
0.04915449 = sum of:
0.024688289 = weight(_text_:29 in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024688289 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
0.0244662 = weight(_text_:22 in 605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0244662 = score(doc=605,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 605, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=605)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Pays tribute to the recent advances in the ability to access computerized catalogues from the desktop via the Internet but emphasizes that there are problems still to be overcome before the ideal of universal access to catalogue records for UK libraries is achieved. Advances in computerized cataloguing over the past 40 years have been an obstacle to retrospective cataloguing in a coherent and standardized manner which even the adoption of common standards for information retrieval and the Z39.50 protocol have failed to prevent. Many libraries with modern methods for cataloguing new materials still have earlier sequences of records on microfiche or other hard copy format. Other specialized collections are such that they have never been catalogued to professional standards or in a convenient format. Illustrates the point with reference to practical searching of catalogues in Aberystwyth, Wales, and to 2 studies of the logistical and financial issues of a programme of retrospective cataloguing as reported in BLRIC report 53. Discusses the proposed UK coordinating body and coordinated natioanl prgramme, to select which catalogues should be converted, set priorities for work, ensure maintenance of requisite standards, and arrange collaboration between neighbouring or related institutions
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
- Source
- Journal of librarianship and information science. 29(1997) no.4, S.175-177
-
Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998)
0.01
0.011310612 = product of:
0.07917428 = sum of:
0.07917428 = product of:
0.11876142 = sum of:
0.069829024 = weight(_text_:29 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069829024 = score(doc=2268,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
0.0489324 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0489324 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 23.10.1996 17:26:29
12.12.1998 12:00:29
- Source
- Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
-
Solis, A.Q.; Navarrete, O.A.: Medidas de calidad en la creacion de catalogos de bibliotecas (1998)
0.01
0.010564514 = product of:
0.036975797 = sum of:
0.025558239 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025558239 = score(doc=2825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
0.011417559 = product of:
0.034252677 = sum of:
0.034252677 = weight(_text_:22 in 2825) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034252677 = score(doc=2825,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2825, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2825)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- A discussion of the importance of clear cataloguing policies and routines as the basis of quality control, in relation to the methods used in the College of Mexico Library. The fundamental principle is to prevent errors occuring rather than to correct them subsequently. Indices of quality and effiency in relation to errors which do and do not affect retrieval, established through monthly review of samples of the work of each cataloguer, are used to monitor activities and ensure high standards. This process, essentially collaborative, promotes an overall culture of quality
- Date
- 30. 1.1999 19:22:45
-
Randall, N.B.: Spelling errors in the database : shadow or substance? (1999)
0.01
0.010564514 = product of:
0.036975797 = sum of:
0.025558239 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025558239 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
0.011417559 = product of:
0.034252677 = sum of:
0.034252677 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034252677 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Describes the results of research to determine the extent of spelling errors in the State University of New York at Albany's online catalogue, whether these errors seriously affect users' access to library materials and what effect spelling errors will have on the group database planned for the State University of New York (SUNY). Using standard database tests, the catalogues of the four SUNY University Centers (Albany, Binghamton, Buffalo and Stony Brook) were studied. In addition, two comparison catalogues were studied: the New York State Library's Excelsior and California University's Melvyl. Results show that misspellings are unavoidable due to the way that most catalogues were built. These errors, however, are rarely an impediment to retrieval. Concludes with suggested ways to find and correct misspellings without expensive large scale efforts
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Petschar, H.; Strouhal, E.; Zobernig, H.: ¬Der Zettelkatalog : Ein historisches System geistiger Ordnung (1999)
0.01
0.010411098 = product of:
0.07287768 = sum of:
0.07287768 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 2187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07287768 = score(doc=2187,freq=4.0), product of:
0.23696128 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.30755103 = fieldWeight in 2187, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2187)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- RSWK
- Wien / Österreichische Nationalbibliothek / Alphabetischer Katalog / Zettelkatalog / Geschichte / Aufsatzsammlung (341256) (431256)
- Subject
- Wien / Österreichische Nationalbibliothek / Alphabetischer Katalog / Zettelkatalog / Geschichte / Aufsatzsammlung (341256) (431256)
-
Libraries and Google (2005)
0.01
0.009815677 = product of:
0.06870974 = sum of:
0.06870974 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 1973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06870974 = score(doc=1973,freq=8.0), product of:
0.23696128 = queryWeight, product of:
6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.28996187 = fieldWeight in 1973, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1973)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- RSWK
- Google / Bibliothek / Elektronische Bibliothek / Aufsatzsammlung
Bibliothek / Google / Aufsatzsammlung (BVB)
- Subject
- Google / Bibliothek / Elektronische Bibliothek / Aufsatzsammlung
Bibliothek / Google / Aufsatzsammlung (BVB)
-
Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994)
0.01
0.009362761 = product of:
0.06553932 = sum of:
0.06553932 = product of:
0.09830898 = sum of:
0.049376577 = weight(_text_:29 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049376577 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
0.0489324 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0489324 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 20. 4.2020 20:22:29
-
Crosnier, H. Le: Nouveaux besoins, nouveaux services, nouveaux catalogues (1997)
0.01
0.00908068 = product of:
0.031782378 = sum of:
0.021907061 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021907061 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.009875315 = product of:
0.029625945 = sum of:
0.029625945 = weight(_text_:29 in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029625945 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- For users, the catalogue is a tool to assist in satisfying information demands. Bibliographic databases raise the question of how to describe a document to facilitate retrieval. Information technology development have led to the creation of hypercatalogues, affording links to related material and other services. This necessitates improved descriptive cataloguing and also improved search interfaces to simplify user manipulation, along the lines of the Web. Given the massive output of electronic documents, the librarian's role is to select, prioritise and organise. The information society and its consequent economic consequences for the social organisation of knowledge raise the prospect of marginalisation of libraries. Catalogues enable access to knowledge as a public good, but this access must be democratic
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 16:50:24
-
Han, M.-J.: New discovery services and library bibliographic control (2012)
0.01
0.00908068 = product of:
0.031782378 = sum of:
0.021907061 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021907061 = score(doc=5569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5569)
0.009875315 = product of:
0.029625945 = sum of:
0.029625945 = weight(_text_:29 in 5569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029625945 = score(doc=5569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5569)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- To improve resource discovery and retrieval, libraries have implemented new discovery services, such as next generation catalogues, federated search, and Web-scale discovery, in addition to their traditional integrated library systems. These new discovery services greatly improve the user experience by utilizing existing cataloguing records housed within the library system or in combination with metadata from other sources, both in and outside of libraries. However, to maximize the functionality of these discovery services, libraries must reexamine current cataloguing practices and the way libraries control the bibliographic description to better serve the user's needs. This report discusses how new discovery services use the cataloguing records and the challenges that libraries encounter in bibliographic control to work with new discovery services, including the quality of cataloguing records, granular levels of bibliographic description, and integration of user-generated metadata into the cataloguing records. Each of these aspects requires further discussion.
- Date
- 11.12.2019 16:54:29
-
Hoffman, H.H.; Magner, J.L.: Future outlook : better retrieval through analytic catalogs (1985)
0.01
0.008345548 = product of:
0.058418833 = sum of:
0.058418833 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058418833 = score(doc=6365,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 6365, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6365)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Hilberer, T.: Numerus currens und iPod : die Organisation von Information mittels Metadaten und die Aufgabe der Bibliotheken im digitalen Zeitalter oder Die Kraft der digitalen Ordnung (2011)
0.01
0.007917429 = product of:
0.055422 = sum of:
0.055422 = product of:
0.083133 = sum of:
0.04888032 = weight(_text_:29 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04888032 = score(doc=162,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.38474706 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
0.034252677 = weight(_text_:22 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034252677 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 29. 5.2012 13:58:08
29. 5.2012 14:10:37
- Source
- ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
-
Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998)
0.01
0.0074902084 = product of:
0.052431457 = sum of:
0.052431457 = product of:
0.07864718 = sum of:
0.03950126 = weight(_text_:29 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03950126 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.03914592 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03914592 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 17:18:10
22. 2.1999 20:40:57
-
Bergman, O.; Gradovitch, N.; Bar-Ilan, J.; Beyth-Marom, R.: Folder versus tag preference in personal information management (2013)
0.01
0.007376491 = product of:
0.051635437 = sum of:
0.051635437 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1103) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051635437 = score(doc=1103,freq=16.0), product of:
0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 1103, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1103)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Users' preferences for folders versus tags was studied in 2 working environments where both options were available to them. In the Gmail study, we informed 75 participants about both folder-labeling and tag-labeling, observed their storage behavior after 1 month, and asked them to estimate the proportions of different retrieval options in their behavior. In the Windows 7 study, we informed 23 participants about tags and asked them to tag all their files for 2 weeks, followed by a period of 5 weeks of free choice between the 2 methods. Their storage and retrieval habits were tested prior to the learning session and, after 7 weeks, using special classification recording software and a retrieval-habits questionnaire. A controlled retrieval task and an in-depth interview were conducted. Results of both studies show a strong preference for folders over tags for both storage and retrieval. In the minority of cases where tags were used for storage, participants typically used a single tag per information item. Moreover, when multiple classification was used for storage, it was only marginally used for retrieval. The controlled retrieval task showed lower success rates and slower retrieval speeds for tag use. Possible reasons for participants' preferences are discussed.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Works as signs, symbols,and canons : The epistemology of the work (2001)
0.01
0.006997955 = product of:
0.048985682 = sum of:
0.048985682 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048985682 = score(doc=1119,freq=10.0), product of:
0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.44838852 = fieldWeight in 1119, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1119)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Works are key entities in the universe of recorded knowledge. Works are those deliberate creations (known variously as opera, oeuvres, Werke, etc.) that constitute individual sets of created conceptions that stand as the formal records of knowledge. In the information retrieval domain, the work as opposed to the document, has only recently received focused attention. In this paper, the definition of the work as an entity for information retrieval is examined. A taxonomic definition (that is, a definition built around a taxonomy) is presented. An epistemological perspective aids in understanding the components of the taxonomic definition. Works, thus defined as entities for information retrieval, are seen to constitute sets of varying instantiations of abstract creations. These variant instantiations must be explicitly identified in future systems for documentary information retrieval. An expanded perception of works, such as that presented in this paper, helps us understand the variety of ways in which mechanisms for their control and retrieval might better be shaped in future.
-
Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012)
0.01
0.006553931 = product of:
0.045877516 = sum of:
0.045877516 = product of:
0.068816274 = sum of:
0.0345636 = weight(_text_:29 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0345636 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.034252677 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034252677 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 11:08:22
-
Cochrane, P.A.: 34th UIUC clinic highlights visualizing subject access (1997)
0.01
0.0054205926 = product of:
0.037944146 = sum of:
0.037944146 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037944146 = score(doc=377,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Reports on the 34th Annual Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, held 2-4 Mar 1997 at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The clinic was entitled 'Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources'. Summarizes the following individual sessions: Visual browsing for information retrieval; Hypostatizing data collections, especially bibliographic; Simultaneous searching of distributed information and subject repositories on the WWW; Information filtering from multiple sources; Thesauri in the full text world; The role of controlled vocabulary in visualizing document associations; Rutgers' investigations of interactive information retrieval; Spatial abilities and visualizations; Using IODyne as an indexing tool; Knowledge structures for information visualizing; Visualizing digital libraries; what role for the OPAC?; How will we provide subject access in the Interspace of the 21st century?; Natural language processing based information retrieval; Building and accessing vocabulary resources for networked resource discovery and navigation; Using electronic services to become an interbetworked business; and Conference Wrap up
-
Gödert, W.; Lepsky, K.: Semantische Umfeldsuche im Information Retrieval (1998)
0.01
0.005163544 = product of:
0.036144804 = sum of:
0.036144804 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036144804 = score(doc=606,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.036116153 = queryNorm
0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 606, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=606)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
