Search (73 results, page 1 of 4)

0.022771174 = product of:
  0.07969911 = sum of:
    0.063240245 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.063240245 = score(doc=4521,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 4521, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4521)
    0.01645886 = product of:
      0.049376577 = sum of:
        0.049376577 = weight(_text_:29 in 4521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049376577 = score(doc=4521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4521)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

Presents a graph based object model that may be used as a uniform framework for direct manipulation of multimedia information. Outlines design and implementation issues for the MORE (Multimedia Object Retrieval Environment) prototype system. Discusses user interface functionalities. Presents interaction sessions including schema creation, information loading, and information retrieval

Source

ACM transactions on information systems. 14(1996) no.1, S.3-29

0.018165402 = product of:
  0.1271578 = sum of:
    0.1271578 = weight(_text_:textverarbeitung in 5560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1271578 = score(doc=5560,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28832662 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.983315 = idf(docFreq=40, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.44102 = fieldWeight in 5560, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.983315 = idf(docFreq=40, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5560)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Ein Problem der Erstellung von Multimediaanwendungen in Unternehmen ist, dass die Sachkompetenz bezüglich der darzustellenden Inhalte nicht immer bei denjenigen Mitarbeitern liegt, die die Kompetenz für die mediengerechte Aufbereitung haben. Um umfangreiche Hypertextanwendungen - ggf. auch mit interaktiven Aufgaben Lind Multimediaelernenten - zu erzeugen, können Sachautoren von dem Umgang mit Multimediasoftware weitgehend entlastet werden. Der von den Sachautoren verfasste Text ist dazu von vornherein mit minimalen Textauszeichnungen zu versehen. Dazu braucht er seine Textverarbeitung nicht zu verlassen. Um jetzt einen interaktiven Hypertext oder eine 1 lypermediaanwendung mit einzelnen Einträgen und zusätzlichen umfangreichen Navigationskomponenten zu erzeugen und weitere Medien an den jeweils richtigen Stellen einzufügen, ist ein Programm erforderlich, das die Anwendung erzeugen hilft (Engine). Zu den Themen "Hypertext" und "Multimedia" erscheinen etliche Publikationen. Eine Vielzahl von ihnen hat theoretische und konzeptionelle Aspekte zum Inhalt (z. B. Lobin 1999, Brusilovsky 1998, Rouet 1996). Manche betonen den Anwendungsbezug (Gerdes 1997, Hofinann/Simon 1995), der unter besonderer Berücksichtigung für Information oder Ausbildung gesehen werden kann (vgl. Glowalla 1992). Andere sind von historischem Interesse (Nelson 1992), klären die Begrifflichkeit und die Grundlagen (Schnupp 1992, Kuhlen 1991, Seyer 1991, Nielsen 1990, Hashim 1990) oder geben Hinweise auf die Benutzung (MacGrew 1989). Ferner gibt es programmspezifische Literatur, die die technische Handhabung bei der Erstellung unterstützt. Solche Literatur kann genutzt werden, um Aspekte zu gewinnen, die für die Anlage und Ausrichtung einer Hypertextanwendung sinnvoll sind. Werden hingegen existierende Hypertextanwendungen betrachtet, so bleibt der damit verbundene Aufwand und die Organisationsstruktur oft im Dunkeln

0.01816136 = product of:
  0.063564755 = sum of:
    0.043814123 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.043814123 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
    0.01975063 = product of:
      0.05925189 = sum of:
        0.05925189 = weight(_text_:29 in 179) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05925189 = score(doc=179,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 179, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=179)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Date

29. 9.2001 14:16:54

0.018048262 = product of:
  0.06316891 = sum of:
    0.051635437 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051635437 = score(doc=4888,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
    0.011533476 = product of:
      0.03460043 = sum of:
        0.03460043 = weight(_text_:22 in 4888) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03460043 = score(doc=4888,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 4888, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4888)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

This paper centres on the tools for the management of new digital documents, which are not only textual, but also visual-video, audio or multimedia in the full sense. Among the aims is to demonstrate that operating within the terms of generic Information Retrieval through textual language only is limiting, and it is instead necessary to consider ampler criteria, such as those of MultiMedia Information Retrieval, according to which, every type of digital document can be analyzed and searched by the proper elements of language for its proper nature. MMIR is presented as the organic complex of the systems of Text Retrieval, Visual Retrieval, Video Retrieval, and Audio Retrieval, each of which has an approach to information management that handles the concrete textual, visual, audio, or video content of the documents directly, here defined as content-based. In conclusion, the limits of this content-based objective access to documents is underlined. The discrepancy known as the semantic gap is that which occurs between semantic-interpretive access and content-based access. Finally, the integration of these conceptions is explained, gathering and composing the merits and the advantages of each of the approaches and of the systems to access to information.

Date

22. 1.2012 13:02:10

Footnote

Bezugnahme auf: Enser, P.G.B.: Visual image retrieval. In: Annual review of information science and technology. 42(2008), S.3-42.

Source

Knowledge organization. 39(2012) no.1, S.13-22

0.017866869 = product of:
  0.062534034 = sum of:
    0.051116478 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051116478 = score(doc=758,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
    0.011417559 = product of:
      0.034252677 = sum of:
        0.034252677 = weight(_text_:22 in 758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034252677 = score(doc=758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=758)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

Reports results of the MARS project, conducted at Illinois University, to bring together researchers in the fields of computer vision, compression, information management and database systems with the goal of developing an effective multimedia database management system. Describes the first step, involving the design and implementation of an image retrieval system incorporating novel approaches to image segmentation, representation, browsing and information retrieval supported by the developed system. Points to future directions for the MARS project

Date

22. 9.1997 19:16:05

Source

Digital image access and retrieval: Proceedings of the 1996 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 24-26 Mar 1996. Ed.: P.B. Heidorn u. B. Sandore

0.015564412 = product of:
  0.054475438 = sum of:
    0.04130835 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04130835 = score(doc=2637,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
    0.013167087 = product of:
      0.03950126 = sum of:
        0.03950126 = weight(_text_:29 in 2637) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03950126 = score(doc=2637,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2637, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2637)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

Traditional query methods are good at retrieving items an the basis of a precise specification, but they are not useful when the user wants to explore an information base in order to find interesting items. Dynamic Taxonomies were recently proposed for guided browsing and retrieval from heterogeneous information bases. We discuss their application to multimedia information bases and provide an example of interaction.

Date

29. 8.2004 10:15:02

Theme

Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

0.015134467 = product of:
  0.052970633 = sum of:
    0.03651177 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03651177 = score(doc=5317,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
    0.01645886 = product of:
      0.049376577 = sum of:
        0.049376577 = weight(_text_:29 in 5317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049376577 = score(doc=5317,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5317, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5317)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Date

29. 3.2009 11:10:42

0.012073731 = product of:
  0.042258058 = sum of:
    0.029209416 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029209416 = score(doc=3605,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
    0.01304864 = product of:
      0.03914592 = sum of:
        0.03914592 = weight(_text_:22 in 3605) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03914592 = score(doc=3605,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3605, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3605)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

Presents a multimedia model which describes the various multimedia components, their structure and their relationships with a pre-defined taxonomy of concepts, in order to support search engine information retrieval process

Date

1. 8.1996 22:08:06

0.011235313 = product of:
  0.07864718 = sum of:
    0.07864718 = product of:
      0.117970765 = sum of:
        0.05925189 = weight(_text_:29 in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05925189 = score(doc=2438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
        0.058718875 = weight(_text_:22 in 2438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058718875 = score(doc=2438,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2438, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2438)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

31.12.1998 22:05:21

Footnote

Rez. in: Australian academic and research libraries 29(1998) no.1, S.68 (B. Collins)

0.010701683 = product of:
  0.03745589 = sum of:
    0.025817718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025817718 = score(doc=2743,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
    0.011638171 = product of:
      0.034914512 = sum of:
        0.034914512 = weight(_text_:29 in 2743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034914512 = score(doc=2743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12704533 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.2748193 = fieldWeight in 2743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2743)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Abstract

Awareness of another's activity is an important aspect of facilitating collaboration between users, enabling an "understanding of the activities of others" (Dourish & Bellotti, 1992). In this paper we investigate the role of awareness and its effect on search performance and behaviour in collaborative multimedia retrieval. We focus on the scenario where two users are searching at the same time on the same task, and via an interface, can see the activity of the other user. The main research question asks: does awareness of another searcher aid a user when carrying out a multimedia search session? To encourage awareness, an experimental study was designed where two users were asked to compete to find as many relevant video shots as possible under different awareness conditions. These were individual search (no awareness), Mutual awareness (where both users could see the other's search screen), and unbalanced awareness (where one user is able to see the other's screen, but not vice-versa). Twelve pairs of users were recruited, and the four worst performing TRECVID 2006 search topics were used as search tasks, under four different awareness conditions. We present the results of this study, followed by a discussion of the implications for multimedia information retrieval systems.

Date

29. 1.2016 19:17:29

0.009841889 = product of:
  0.034446612 = sum of:
    0.027383827 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.027383827 = score(doc=150,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.25065678 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
    0.0070627844 = product of:
      0.021188352 = sum of:
        0.021188352 = weight(_text_:22 in 150) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021188352 = score(doc=150,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1264726 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036116153 = queryNorm
            0.16753313 = fieldWeight in 150, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=150)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Classification

006.7 22

Date

7. 3.2007 19:30:22

DDC

006.7 22

Footnote

Rez. in: JASIST 58(2007) no.3, S.457-458 (A.M.A. Ahmad): "The concept of the semantic web has emerged because search engines and text-based searching are no longer adequate, as these approaches involve an extensive information retrieval process. The deployed searching and retrieving descriptors arc naturally subjective and their deployment is often restricted to the specific application domain for which the descriptors were configured. The new era of information technology imposes different kinds of requirements and challenges. Automatic extracted audiovisual features are required, as these features are more objective, domain-independent, and more native to audiovisual content. This book is a useful guide for researchers, experts, students, and practitioners; it is a very valuable reference and can lead them through their exploration and research in multimedia content and the semantic web. The book is well organized, and introduces the concept of the semantic web and multimedia content analysis to the reader through a logical sequence from standards and hypotheses through system examples, presenting relevant tools and methods. But in some chapters readers will need a good technical background to understand some of the details. Readers may attain sufficient knowledge here to start projects or research related to the book's theme; recent results and articles related to the active research area of integrating multimedia with semantic web technologies are included. This book includes full descriptions of approaches to specific problem domains such as content search, indexing, and retrieval. This book will be very useful to researchers in the multimedia content analysis field who wish to explore the benefits of emerging semantic web technologies in applying multimedia content approaches. The first part of the book covers the definition of the two basic terms multimedia content and semantic web. The Moving Picture Experts Group standards MPEG7 and MPEG21 are quoted extensively. In addition, the means of multimedia content description are elaborated upon and schematically drawn. This extensive description is introduced by authors who are actively involved in those standards and have been participating in the work of the International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/MPEG for many years. On the other hand, this results in bias against the ad hoc or nonstandard tools for multimedia description in favor of the standard approaches. This is a general book for multimedia content; more emphasis on the general multimedia description and extraction could be provided.
The final part of the book discusses research in multimedia content management systems and the semantic web, and presents examples and applications for semantic multimedia analysis in search and retrieval systems. These chapters describe example systems in which current projects have been implemented, and include extensive results and real demonstrations. For example, real case scenarios such as ECommerce medical applications and Web services have been introduced. Topics in natural language, speech and image processing techniques and their application for multimedia indexing, and content-based retrieval have been elaborated upon with extensive examples and deployment methods. The editors of the book themselves provide the readers with a chapter about their latest research results on knowledge-based multimedia content indexing and retrieval. Some interesting applications for multimedia content and the semantic web are introduced. Applications that have taken advantage of the metadata provided by MPEG7 in order to realize advance-access services for multimedia content have been provided. The applications discussed in the third part of the book provide useful guidance to researchers and practitioners properly planning to implement semantic multimedia analysis techniques in new research and development projects in both academia and industry. A fourth part should be added to this book: performance measurements for integrated approaches of multimedia analysis and the semantic web. Performance of the semantic approach is a very sophisticated issue and requires extensive elaboration and effort. Measuring the semantic search is an ongoing research area; several chapters concerning performance measurement and analysis would be required to adequately cover this area and introduce it to readers."

LCSH

Information storage and retrieval systems

RSWK

Semantic Web / Multimedia / Automatische Indexierung / Information Retrieval

Subject

Semantic Web / Multimedia / Automatische Indexierung / Information Retrieval
Information storage and retrieval systems

0.009330606 = product of:
  0.06531424 = sum of:
    0.06531424 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06531424 = score(doc=1734,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 1734, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1734)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Die Menge an Daten im Internet steigt weiter rapide an. Damit wächst auch der Bedarf an qualitativ hochwertigen Information Retrieval Diensten zur Orientierung und problemorientierten Suche. Die Entscheidung für die Benutzung oder Beschaffung von Information Retrieval Software erfordert aussagekräftige Evaluierungsergebnisse. Dieser Beitrag stellt neuere Entwicklungen bei der Evaluierung von Information Retrieval Systemen vor und zeigt den Trend zu Spezialisierung und Diversifizierung von Evaluierungsstudien, die den Realitätsgrad derErgebnisse erhöhen. DerSchwerpunkt liegt auf dem Retrieval von Fachtexten, Internet-Seiten und Multimedia-Objekten.

0.008345548 = product of:
  0.058418833 = sum of:
    0.058418833 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.058418833 = score(doc=1185,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 1185, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1185)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.007665875 = product of:
  0.053661123 = sum of:
    0.053661123 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 717) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.053661123 = score(doc=717,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.49118498 = fieldWeight in 717, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=717)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

In this paper we discuss how browsing and querying, the two available major ways for accessing large amounts of data, form the point of view of interactive information retrieval. In this context we emphasize the notion of structured information and its impact on the performances of these two modalities of interaction. Aside natural complementarities between these two classes of retrieval environments, these considerations should enforce interest for models that fully integrate browsing and querying capabilities. We shortly present the main elements of such a model, with a particular attention to the retrieval component. Problems related to indexing structured information are also discussed and elements of a strategy for indexing hierarchical structures are presented. This strategy and the corresponding retrieval algorithm are aimed to ensure optimal granularity of system's responses considering redundancy among interrelated structural components

Source

Hypertext - Information Retrieval - Multimedia '97: Theorien, Modelle und Implementierungen integrierter elektronischer Informationssysteme. Proceedings HIM '97. Hrsg.: N. Fuhr u.a

0.007302354 = product of:
  0.051116478 = sum of:
    0.051116478 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 420) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051116478 = score(doc=420,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 420, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=420)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.007302354 = product of:
  0.051116478 = sum of:
    0.051116478 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051116478 = score(doc=730,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 730, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=730)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Hypertext - Information Retrieval - Multimedia '97: Theorien, Modelle und Implementierungen integrierter elektronischer Informationssysteme. Proceedings HIM '97. Hrsg.: N. Fuhr u.a

0.007302354 = product of:
  0.051116478 = sum of:
    0.051116478 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.051116478 = score(doc=1306,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1306, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1306)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.006997955 = product of:
  0.048985682 = sum of:
    0.048985682 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 518) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048985682 = score(doc=518,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.44838852 = fieldWeight in 518, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=518)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

The MPEG-7 standard supports the description of both the structure and the semantics of multimedia; however, the generation and consumption of MPEG-7 structural and semantic descriptions are outside the scope of the standard. This article presents two research prototype systems that demonstrate the generation and consumption of MPEG-7 structural and semantic descriptions in retrieval applications. The active system for MPEG-4 video object simulation (AMOS) is a video object segmentation and retrieval system that segments, tracks, and models objects in videos (e.g., person, car) as a set of regions with corresponding visual features and spatiotemporal relations. The region-based model provides an effective base for similarity retrieval of video objects. The second system, the Intelligent Multimedia Knowledge Application (IMKA), uses the novel MediaNet framework for representing semantic and perceptual information about the world using multimedia. MediaNet knowledge bases can be constructed automatically from annotated collections of multimedia data and used to enhance the retrieval of multimedia.

0.006997955 = product of:
  0.048985682 = sum of:
    0.048985682 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2911) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.048985682 = score(doc=2911,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.44838852 = fieldWeight in 2911, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2911)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Various kinds of knowledge organisation, such as thesauri, are routinely used to label or tag multimedia content such as images and music and to support information retrieval, i.e. user search for such content. In this paper, we outline why this is the case, in particular focusing on the semantic gap between content and concept based multimedia retrieval. We survey some indexing vocabularies used for multimedia retrieval, and argue that techniques such as thesauri will be needed for the foreseeable future in order to support users in their need for multimedia content. In particular, we argue that artificial intelligence techniques are not mature enough to solve the problem of indexing multimedia conceptually and will not be able to replace human indexers for the foreseeable future.

Content

Beitrag in einem Special issue: The Great Debate: "This House Believes that the Traditional Thesaurus has no Place in Modern Information Retrieval." [19 February 2015, 14:00-17:30 preceded by ISKO UK AGM and followed by networking, wine and nibbles; vgl.: http://www.iskouk.org/content/great-debate].

0.0063240244 = product of:
  0.04426817 = sum of:
    0.04426817 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04426817 = score(doc=473,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.109248295 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036116153 = queryNorm
        0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 473, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=473)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

This article provides an overview of our experiments in using MPEG-7 in a television news retrieval application. Our study is based on a survey of professional users in the Television Suisse Romande (TSR) television news production environment. We present here two main issues. First, we describe the way the generic and voluminous MPEG-7 Schema can be exploited in the context of a specific application domain. Second, we discuss the problem of how to search MPEG-7 descriptions, which are detailed and complex by nature, via a high-level user-oriented retrieval model.