-
Panizzi, A.K.C.B.: Passages in my official life (1871)
0.04
0.035009835 = product of:
0.07001967 = sum of:
0.07001967 = product of:
0.14003934 = sum of:
0.14003934 = weight(_text_:22 in 935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14003934 = score(doc=935,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.76602525 = fieldWeight in 935, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=935)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 7.2007 12:05:26
22. 7.2007 12:08:24
-
Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993)
0.03
0.027638454 = product of:
0.055276908 = sum of:
0.055276908 = product of:
0.16583072 = sum of:
0.16583072 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16583072 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
0.44259444 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
-
Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003)
0.02
0.017682636 = product of:
0.035365272 = sum of:
0.035365272 = product of:
0.070730545 = sum of:
0.070730545 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070730545 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Pages
- S.3-22
-
Steinhagen, E.N.: Historical perspective of a union catalog in Chile : authorities and periodicals (2003)
0.02
0.017682636 = product of:
0.035365272 = sum of:
0.035365272 = product of:
0.070730545 = sum of:
0.070730545 = weight(_text_:22 in 4064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.070730545 = score(doc=4064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 29. 7.2006 20:06:22
-
Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975)
0.01
0.014146109 = product of:
0.028292218 = sum of:
0.028292218 = product of:
0.056584436 = sum of:
0.056584436 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056584436 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
-
Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002)
0.01
0.012377845 = product of:
0.02475569 = sum of:
0.02475569 = product of:
0.04951138 = sum of:
0.04951138 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04951138 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22
-
Hoffmann, H.W.: Vom Bandkatalog zum OPAC (1995)
0.01
0.010555367 = product of:
0.021110734 = sum of:
0.021110734 = product of:
0.042221468 = sum of:
0.042221468 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042221468 = score(doc=5661,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5661, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5661)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Catalogue compilation and maintenance are time consuming. Developments from the mechanically produced guard catalogue to the OPAC have taken a course different from that which early pioineers might have predicted. Technical developments do not always match librarians' needs. The OPAC provides many retrieval possibilities, assists interlibrary cooperation and is available worldwide but cannot yet completely replace older catalogue forms. Only in the future will librarians realize whether online catalogues are the ideal system
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003)
0.01
0.009329714 = product of:
0.018659428 = sum of:
0.018659428 = product of:
0.037318856 = sum of:
0.037318856 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037318856 = score(doc=5631,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- From a historical perspective, one could consider the modern library catalog to be that bibliographical apparatus that stretches at least from Thomas Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian Library at Oxford to the near present. Mai and other recent authors have suggested postmodern approaches to knowledge organization. In these, we realize that there is no single and unique order of knowledge or documents but rather there are many appropriate orders, all of them contextually dependent. Works (oeuvres, opera, Werke, etc.), as are musical works, literary works, works of art, etc., are and always have been key entities for information retrieval. Yet catalogs in the modern era were designed to inventory (first) and retrieve (second) specific documents. From Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian until the late twentieth century, developments are epistemologically pragmatic--reflected in the structure of catalog records, in the rules for main entry headings, and in the rules for filing in card catalogs. After 1980 developments become empirical-reflected in research conducted by Tillett, Yee, Smiraglia, Leazer, Carlyle, and Vellucci. The influence of empiricism on the pragmatic notion of "the work" has led to increased focus on the concept of the work. The challenge for the postmodern online catalog is to fully embrace the concept of "the work," finally to facilitate it as a prime objective for information retrieval.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003)
0.01
0.009329714 = product of:
0.018659428 = sum of:
0.018659428 = product of:
0.037318856 = sum of:
0.037318856 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037318856 = score(doc=5652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- From a historical perspective, one could consider the modern library catalog to be that bibliographical apparatus that stretches at least from Thomas Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian Library at Oxford to the near present. Mai and other recent authors have suggested postmodern approaches to knowledge organization. In these, we realize that there is no single and unique order of knowledge or documents but rather there are many appropriate orders, all of them contextually dependent. Works (oeuvres, opera, Werke, etc.), as are musical works, literary works, works of art, etc., are and always have been key entities for information retrieval. Yet catalogs in the modern era were designed to inventory (first) and retrieve (second) specific documents. From Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian until the late twentieth century, developments are epistemologically pragmatic--reflected in the structure of catalog records, in the rules for main entry headings, and in the rules for filing in card catalogs. After 1980 developments become empirical-reflected in research conducted by Tillett, Yee, Smiraglia, Leazer, Carlyle, and Vellucci. The influence of empiricism on the pragmatic notion of "the work" has led to increased focus on the concept of the work. The challenge for the postmodern online catalog is to fully embrace the concept of "the work," finally to facilitate it as a prime objective for information retrieval.
-
Gartner, R.: Metadata : shaping knowledge from antiquity to the semantic web (2016)
0.01
0.009329714 = product of:
0.018659428 = sum of:
0.018659428 = product of:
0.037318856 = sum of:
0.037318856 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037318856 = score(doc=731,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- LCSH
- Information storage and retrieval
- Subject
- Information storage and retrieval
-
Denton, W.: FRBR and the history of cataloging (2007)
0.01
0.009235946 = product of:
0.018471893 = sum of:
0.018471893 = product of:
0.036943786 = sum of:
0.036943786 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036943786 = score(doc=1677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1677)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Understanding FRBR: what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools. Ed. by Arlene Taylor
-
Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985)
0.01
0.0070730546 = product of:
0.014146109 = sum of:
0.014146109 = product of:
0.028292218 = sum of:
0.028292218 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028292218 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.
-
Laaff, M.: Googles genialer Urahn (2011)
0.00
0.004420659 = product of:
0.008841318 = sum of:
0.008841318 = product of:
0.017682636 = sum of:
0.017682636 = weight(_text_:22 in 4610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017682636 = score(doc=4610,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 4610, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=4610)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 24.10.2008 14:19:22
-
Understanding FRBR : what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools (2007)
0.00
0.0039582625 = product of:
0.007916525 = sum of:
0.007916525 = product of:
0.01583305 = sum of:
0.01583305 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01583305 = score(doc=1675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.052204985 = queryNorm
0.10026272 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
