Search (95 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  1. Crestani, F.; Du, H.: Written versus spoken queries : a qualitative and quantitative comparative analysis (2006) 0.05
    0.052885264 = product of:
      0.10577053 = sum of:
        0.10577053 = sum of:
          0.0633322 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0633322 = score(doc=5047,freq=8.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
                2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                  8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
          0.04243833 = weight(_text_:22 in 5047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04243833 = score(doc=5047,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5047, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5047)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The authors report on an experimental study on the differences between spoken and written queries. A set of written and spontaneous spoken queries are generated by users from written topics. These two sets of queries are compared in qualitative terms and in terms of their retrieval effectiveness. Written and spoken queries are compared in terms of length, duration, and part of speech. In addition, assuming perfect transcription of the spoken queries, written and spoken queries are compared in terms of their aptitude to describe relevant documents. The retrieval effectiveness of spoken and written queries is compared using three different information retrieval models. The results show that using speech to formulate one's information need provides a way to express it more naturally and encourages the formulation of longer queries. Despite that, longer spoken queries do not seem to significantly improve retrieval effectiveness compared with written queries.
    Date
    5. 6.2006 11:22:23
  2. Xu, Y.: ¬The dynamics of interactive information retrieval behavior : part I: an activity theory perspective (2007) 0.05
    0.048642814 = product of:
      0.09728563 = sum of:
        0.09728563 = sum of:
          0.0548473 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0548473 = score(doc=331,freq=6.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
                2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                  6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
          0.04243833 = weight(_text_:22 in 331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04243833 = score(doc=331,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 331, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=331)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Human information-seeking behavior is a topic of increasing interest in many disciplines. However, the dynamics of this behavior remain elusive. The extant research has taken cognitive and behavioral perspectives to study information-seeking behavior, and observed its dynamics in multiple sessions. However, the underlying mechanisms that govern the dynamics of information-seeking behavior are not well understood. With a focus on interactive information retrieval behavior, this study proposes an integrated framework based on activity theory. This framework is not only comprehensive and integrated, but also offers an explanation of the mechanisms governing the interaction between users' cognitive states and their manifested behavior when using an information retrieval system. A set of four propositions are advanced to describe the mechanisms. The implications are discussed.
    Date
    27. 5.2007 13:55:22
  3. Saastamoinen, M.; Järvelin, K.: Search task features in work tasks of varying types and complexity (2017) 0.04
    0.037052214 = product of:
      0.07410443 = sum of:
        0.07410443 = sum of:
          0.0316661 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0316661 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
          0.04243833 = weight(_text_:22 in 3589) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.04243833 = score(doc=3589,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3589, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3589)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information searching in practice seldom is an end in itself. In work, work task (WT) performance forms the context, which information searching should serve. Therefore, information retrieval (IR) systems development/evaluation should take the WT context into account. The present paper analyzes how WT features: task complexity and task types, affect information searching in authentic work: the types of information needs, search processes, and search media. We collected data on 22 information professionals in authentic work situations in three organization types: city administration, universities, and companies. The data comprise 286 WTs and 420 search tasks (STs). The data include transaction logs, video recordings, daily questionnaires, interviews. and observation. The data were analyzed quantitatively. Even if the participants used a range of search media, most STs were simple throughout the data, and up to 42% of WTs did not include searching. WT's effects on STs are not straightforward: different WT types react differently to WT complexity. Due to the simplicity of authentic searching, the WT/ST types in interactive IR experiments should be reconsidered.
  4. Mansourian, Y.: Contextual elements and conceptual components of information visibility on the web (2008) 0.03
    0.030876845 = product of:
      0.06175369 = sum of:
        0.06175369 = sum of:
          0.026388418 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.026388418 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
          0.035365272 = weight(_text_:22 in 2603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.035365272 = score(doc=2603,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2603, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2603)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to report the result of follow-up research on end-users' conceptions of information visibility on the web and their conceptualizations of success and failure in web searching. Design/methodology/approach - The data were collected by a questionnaire followed by a brief interview with the participants. The questionnaire was developed based on the information visibility model suggested by the author in the original study. Fifty-two library and information sciences students from Tarbiat Mollem University (TMU) and Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS) in Tehran took part in the study. Findings - The model of information visibility can enable web users to gain a better understanding of their information seeking (IS) outcomes and it can assist them to improve their information literacy skills. The model can provide a theoretical framework to investigate web users' IS behavior and can be used as a diagnostic tool to explore the contextual and conceptual elements affecting the visibility of information for end-users. Research limitations/implications - The paper suggests a visibility learning diary (VLD), which might be useful to measure the efficiency of information literacy training courses. Originality/value - The contextual and conceptual approach of the paper provides a deeper insight into the issue of information visibility, which has received little attention by IS and information retrieval researchers until now.
    Date
    1. 1.2009 10:22:40
  5. Morse, P.M.: Search theory and browsing (1970) 0.03
    0.028292218 = product of:
      0.056584436 = sum of:
        0.056584436 = product of:
          0.11316887 = sum of:
            0.11316887 = weight(_text_:22 in 1448) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11316887 = score(doc=1448,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 1448, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1448)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:53:09
  6. Morse, P.M.: Browsing and search theory (1973) 0.02
    0.02475569 = product of:
      0.04951138 = sum of:
        0.04951138 = product of:
          0.09902276 = sum of:
            0.09902276 = weight(_text_:22 in 3339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09902276 = score(doc=3339,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3339, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3339)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2005 19:52:29
  7. Branch, J.L.: Investigating the information-seeking process of adolescents : the value of using think alouds and think afters (2000) 0.02
    0.02475569 = product of:
      0.04951138 = sum of:
        0.04951138 = product of:
          0.09902276 = sum of:
            0.09902276 = weight(_text_:22 in 3924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09902276 = score(doc=3924,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 3924, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3924)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 22(2000) no.4, S.371-382
  8. Drabenstott, K.M.: Web search strategies (2000) 0.02
    0.024701476 = product of:
      0.049402952 = sum of:
        0.049402952 = sum of:
          0.021110734 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021110734 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
          0.028292218 = weight(_text_:22 in 1188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028292218 = score(doc=1188,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.052204985 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 1188, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1188)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Surfing the World Wide Web used to be cool, dude, real cool. But things have gotten hot - so hot that finding something useful an the Web is no longer cool. It is suffocating Web searchers in the smoke and debris of mountain-sized lists of hits, decisions about which search engines they should use, whether they will get lost in the dizzying maze of a subject directory, use the right syntax for the search engine at hand, enter keywords that are likely to retrieve hits an the topics they have in mind, or enlist a browser that has sufficient functionality to display the most promising hits. When it comes to Web searching, in a few short years we have gone from the cool image of surfing the Web into the frying pan of searching the Web. We can turn down the heat by rethinking what Web searchers are doing and introduce some order into the chaos. Web search strategies that are tool-based-oriented to specific Web searching tools such as search en gines, subject directories, and meta search engines-have been widely promoted, and these strategies are just not working. It is time to dissect what Web searching tools expect from searchers and adjust our search strategies to these new tools. This discussion offers Web searchers help in the form of search strategies that are based an strategies that librarians have been using for a long time to search commercial information retrieval systems like Dialog, NEXIS, Wilsonline, FirstSearch, and Data-Star.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
  9. Mohan, K.C.: Boolean and nearest neighbour text searching in a multi-strategy retrieval system (1996) 0.02
    0.021110734 = product of:
      0.042221468 = sum of:
        0.042221468 = product of:
          0.084442936 = sum of:
            0.084442936 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7255) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084442936 = score(doc=7255,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 7255, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7255)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Information retrieval systems based on the Boolean model have been popular for some time. A major challenge to this model has come from the development of approaches based on the vector processing model. Both search strategies are explained and evaluated. Describes an experimental study in an opertational environment to compare the retrieval effectiveness of Boolean and nearest neighbour searching in a multi-strategy retrieval system based on query characteristic variables. Considers the significance of the results of the study
  10. Chamis, A.Y.: Vocabulary control and search strategies in online searching (1991) 0.02
    0.021110734 = product of:
      0.042221468 = sum of:
        0.042221468 = product of:
          0.084442936 = sum of:
            0.084442936 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.084442936 = score(doc=820,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 820, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=820)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    COMPASS
    Information retrieval
    Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
    Subject
    Information retrieval
    Information retrieval / Use of / On-line computers
  11. Pejtersen, A.M.: Cognitive engineering in information retrieval domains : merging paradigms? (1995) 0.02
    0.018471893 = product of:
      0.036943786 = sum of:
        0.036943786 = product of:
          0.07388757 = sum of:
            0.07388757 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07388757 = score(doc=3249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3249)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
  12. Spink, A.; Goodrum, A.; Robins, D.: Elicitation behavior during mediated information retrieval (1998) 0.02
    0.018471893 = product of:
      0.036943786 = sum of:
        0.036943786 = product of:
          0.07388757 = sum of:
            0.07388757 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3265) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07388757 = score(doc=3265,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3265, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3265)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Considers what elicitation or requests for information search intermediaries make of users with information requests during an information retrieval interaction - including prior to and during an information retrieval interaction - and for what purpose. Reports a study of elicitations during 40 mediated information retrieval interactions. Identifies a total of 1.557 search intermediary elicitations within 15 purpose categories. The elicitation purposes of search intermediaries included requests for information on search terms and strategies, database selection, search procedures, system's outputs and relevance of retrieved items, and users' knowledge and previous information seeking. Investigates the transition sequences from 1 type of search intermediary elicitation to another. Compares these findings with results from a study of end user questions
  13. Mayr, P.; Mutschke, P.; Petras, V.; Schaer, P.; Sure, Y.: Applying science models for search (2010) 0.02
    0.018282432 = product of:
      0.036564864 = sum of:
        0.036564864 = product of:
          0.07312973 = sum of:
            0.07312973 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07312973 = score(doc=4663,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 4663, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4663)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The paper proposes three different kinds of science models as value-added services that are integrated in the retrieval process to enhance retrieval quailty. The paper discusses the approaches Search Term Recommendation, Bradfordizing and Author Centrality on a general level and addresses implementation issues of the models within a real-life retrieval environment.
  14. Xu, Y.; Liu, C.: ¬The dynamics of interactive information retrieval : part II: an empirical study from the activity theory perspective (2007) 0.02
    0.01770189 = product of:
      0.03540378 = sum of:
        0.03540378 = product of:
          0.07080756 = sum of:
            0.07080756 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07080756 = score(doc=333,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.44838852 = fieldWeight in 333, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=333)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Human information-seeking behavior is complicated. Activity theory is a powerful theoretical instrument to untangle the "complications." Based on activity theory, a comprehensive framework is proposed in Part I (Y. Xu, 2007) of this report to describe interactive information retrieval (IIR) behavior. A set of propositions is also proposed to describe the mechanisms governing users' cognitive activity and the interaction between users' cognitive states and manifested retrieval behavior. An empirical study is carried out to verify the propositions. The authors' experimental simulation of 81 participants in one search session indicates the propositions are largely supported. Their findings indicate IIR behavior is planned. Users adopt a divide-and-conquer strategy in information retrieval. The planning of information retrieval activity is also partially manifested in query revision tactics. Users learn from previously read documents. A user's interaction with a system ultimately changes the user's information need and the resulting relevance judgment, but the dynamics of topicality perception and novelty perception occur at different paces.
  15. Pejtersen, A.M.: Design of a classification scheme for fiction based on an analysis of actual user-librarian communication, and use of the scheme for control of librarians' search strategies (1980) 0.02
    0.017682636 = product of:
      0.035365272 = sum of:
        0.035365272 = product of:
          0.070730545 = sum of:
            0.070730545 = weight(_text_:22 in 5835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.070730545 = score(doc=5835,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18281296 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 5835, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5835)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:44
  16. Mandala, R.; Tokunaga, T.; Tanaka, H.: Query expansion using heterogeneous thesauri (2000) 0.02
    0.01583305 = product of:
      0.0316661 = sum of:
        0.0316661 = product of:
          0.0633322 = sum of:
            0.0633322 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1277) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0633322 = score(doc=1277,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1277, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1277)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  17. Yuan, X.; Belkin, N.J.: Evaluating an integrated system supporting multiple information-seeking strategies (2010) 0.02
    0.01583305 = product of:
      0.0316661 = sum of:
        0.0316661 = product of:
          0.0633322 = sum of:
            0.0633322 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0633322 = score(doc=3992,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 3992, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3992)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Many studies have demonstrated that people engage in a variety of different information behaviors when engaging in information seeking. However, standard information retrieval systems such as Web search engines continue to be designed to support mainly one such behavior, specified searching. This situation has led to suggestions that people would be better served by information retrieval systems which support different kinds of information-seeking strategies. This article reports on an experiment comparing the retrieval effectiveness of an integrated interactive information retrieval (IIR) system which adapts to support different information-seeking strategies with that of a standard baseline IIR system. The experiment, with 32 participants each searching on eight different topics, indicates that using the integrated IIR system resulted in significantly better user satisfaction with search results, significantly more effective interaction, and significantly better usability than that using the baseline system.
  18. Keen, E.M.: Some aspects of proximity searching in text retrieval systems (1992) 0.01
    0.014927543 = product of:
      0.029855086 = sum of:
        0.029855086 = product of:
          0.05971017 = sum of:
            0.05971017 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05971017 = score(doc=6190,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 6190, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6190)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Describes and evaluates the proximity search facilities in external online systems and in-house retrieval software. Discusses and illustrates capabilities, syntax and circumstances of use. Presents measurements of the overheads required by proximity for storage, record input time and search time. The search strategy narrowing effect of proximity is illustrated by recall and precision test results. Usage and problems lead to a number of design ideas for better implementation: some based on existing Boolean strategies, one on the use of weighted proximity to automatically produce ranked output. A comparison of Boolean, quorum and proximate term pairs distance is included
  19. Ury, C.J.; Johnson, C.V.; Meldrem, J.A.: Teaching a heuristic approach to information retrieval (1997) 0.01
    0.014927543 = product of:
      0.029855086 = sum of:
        0.029855086 = product of:
          0.05971017 = sum of:
            0.05971017 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05971017 = score(doc=831,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 831, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=831)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    To become lifelong learners, students must acquire information retrieval skills for future as well as current information needs. Describes how the library use instruction programme at Northwest Missouri State University incorporates a heuristic model in which students continually evaluate and refine their information seeking practices while progressing through all levels of courses in diverse disciplines. Collegial partnerships with departmental faculty and ongoing instructional assessment are essential to the success of the programme
  20. Ford, N.; Miller, D.; Moss, N.: Web search strategies and retrieval effectiveness : an empirical study (2002) 0.01
    0.013711825 = product of:
      0.02742365 = sum of:
        0.02742365 = product of:
          0.0548473 = sum of:
            0.0548473 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0548473 = score(doc=4472,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15791564 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.052204985 = queryNorm
                0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 4472, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4472)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This paper reports the results of a study funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Board which sought to investigate links between Web search strategies and retrieval effectiveness. A total of 68 students, enrolled on masters programmes in librarianship, information management and information systems, searched for two topics using the AltaVista search engine. Logs of the resultant 341 queries, along with relevance judgements for over 4,000 retrieved items, were analysed using factor analysis and regression. The differing but complementary types and strengths of evidence produced by these two forms of analysis are discussed and presented. Retrieval effectiveness was associated positively with best-match searching and negatively with Boolean searching. The implications of these findings for Web searching are discussed.

Years

Languages

  • e 92
  • d 2
  • ja 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 86
  • m 8
  • el 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…