Search (18 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Tenopir, C."
  1. Tenopir, C.: Reference services from RLG (1995) 0.01
    0.007423487 = product of:
      0.025982203 = sum of:
        0.006351802 = product of:
          0.03175901 = sum of:
            0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03175901 = score(doc=2612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0196304 = product of:
          0.0392608 = sum of:
            0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 2612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0392608 = score(doc=2612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2612)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the variety of search services supporting library reference functions offered by the RLG in the USA. The best known of these is RLIN, the massive bibliographic database and related services originally developed for shared cataloguing. In the last few years RLG has added CitaDel, an online search system that provides access to indexing/abstracting databases; and Zephyr, a Z39.50 server that amkes the RLIN and CitaDel databases searchable through a library's online catalogue. RLG also offers document delivery connections, including Ariel and Internet based document delivery software, for a full complement of online reference support for academic and public libraries
    Date
    25.11.1995 19:22:01
  2. Tenopir, C.; Ennis, L.: ¬The digital reference work of academic libraries (1998) 0.00
    0.0034701976 = product of:
      0.024291381 = sum of:
        0.024291381 = product of:
          0.048582762 = sum of:
            0.048582762 = weight(_text_:22 in 5170) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048582762 = score(doc=5170,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5170, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5170)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Online. 22(1998) no.4, S.22-28
  3. Tenopir, C.; Wang, P.; Zhang, Y.; Simmons, B.; Pollard, R.: Academic users' interactions with ScienceDirect in search tasks : affective and cognitive behaviors (2008) 0.00
    0.003444207 = product of:
      0.024109447 = sum of:
        0.024109447 = product of:
          0.060273618 = sum of:
            0.025893483 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025893483 = score(doc=2027,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
            0.034380134 = weight(_text_:system in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034380134 = score(doc=2027,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.30135927 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    This article presents part of phase 2 of a research project funded by the NSF-National Science Digital Library Project, which observed how academic users interact with the ScienceDirect information retrieval system for simulated class-related assignments. The ultimate goal of the project is twofold: (1) to find ways to improve science and engineering students' use of science e-journal systems; (2) to develop methods to measure user interaction behaviors. Process-tracing technique recorded participants' processes and interaction behaviors that are measurable; think-aloud protocol captured participants' affective and cognitive verbalizations; pre- and post-search questionnaires solicited demographic information, prior experience with the system, and comments. We explored possible relationships between affective feelings and cognitive behaviors. During search interactions both feelings and thoughts occurred frequently. Positive feelings were more common and were associated more often with thoughts about results. Negative feelings were associated more often with thoughts related to the system, search strategy, and task. Learning styles are also examined as a factor influencing behavior. Engineering graduate students with an assimilating learning style searched longer and paused less than those with a converging learning style. Further exploration of learning styles is suggested.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenbereichs: Evaluation of Interactive Information Retrieval Systems
  4. Tenopir, C.: Integrating electronic reference (1995) 0.00
    0.0028043431 = product of:
      0.0196304 = sum of:
        0.0196304 = product of:
          0.0392608 = sum of:
            0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 2616) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0392608 = score(doc=2616,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2616, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2616)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    25.11.1995 19:22:01
  5. Tenopir, C.; Neufang, R.: Electronic reference options : how they stack up in research libraries (1992) 0.00
    0.0024538 = product of:
      0.0171766 = sum of:
        0.0171766 = product of:
          0.0343532 = sum of:
            0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 2343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0343532 = score(doc=2343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2343)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Online. 16(1992) no.2, S.22-28
  6. Tenopir, C.: Full text database retrieval performance (1985) 0.00
    0.0020925098 = product of:
      0.014647568 = sum of:
        0.014647568 = product of:
          0.07323784 = sum of:
            0.07323784 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 406) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07323784 = score(doc=406,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.6684181 = fieldWeight in 406, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.15625 = fieldNorm(doc=406)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  7. Tenopir, C.: ¬The user-system interface (1989) 0.00
    0.0018148007 = product of:
      0.012703604 = sum of:
        0.012703604 = product of:
          0.06351802 = sum of:
            0.06351802 = weight(_text_:system in 1047) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06351802 = score(doc=1047,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 1047, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1047)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  8. Allard, S.; Levine, K.J.; Tenopir, C.: Design engineers and technical professionals at work : observing information usage in the workplace (2009) 0.00
    0.0017527144 = product of:
      0.0122690005 = sum of:
        0.0122690005 = product of:
          0.024538001 = sum of:
            0.024538001 = weight(_text_:22 in 2735) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024538001 = score(doc=2735,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2735, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2735)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 12:43:37
  9. Lundeen, G.; Tenopir, C.: Text retrieval software for microcomputers and beyond : an overview and a review of four packages (1992) 0.00
    0.0016740077 = product of:
      0.011718053 = sum of:
        0.011718053 = product of:
          0.058590267 = sum of:
            0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058590267 = score(doc=3223,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 3223, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3223)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  10. Tenopir, C.: Ethics for online educators (1992) 0.00
    0.0016040723 = product of:
      0.0112285055 = sum of:
        0.0112285055 = product of:
          0.056142528 = sum of:
            0.056142528 = weight(_text_:system in 7334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056142528 = score(doc=7334,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.49211764 = fieldWeight in 7334, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7334)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The only monitoring of educators is performed by their internal sense of right and wrong. Following the aggred terms of system contracts, selecting the most appropriate systems for students, keeping up to date with system features, and instilling ethical behaviour in students are at the core of ethics for online educators
  11. Tenopir, C.: Online databases : overcoming the 'black box' syndrome (1994) 0.00
    0.0016040723 = product of:
      0.0112285055 = sum of:
        0.0112285055 = product of:
          0.056142528 = sum of:
            0.056142528 = weight(_text_:system in 8542) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056142528 = score(doc=8542,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.49211764 = fieldWeight in 8542, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8542)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Knowing the inner workings of an online or CD-ROM system may help to explain strange results, improve search strategies and aid trouble shooting. Discusses search strategies for Boolean and for statistical search engines; how DIALOG's Boolean system treats blank spaces; default settings for searches; how DIALOG defines words; stop words; automatioc truncation and automatic substitute features
  12. Tenopir, C.: Full-text retrieval : systems and files (1994) 0.00
    0.0011837021 = product of:
      0.008285915 = sum of:
        0.008285915 = product of:
          0.04142957 = sum of:
            0.04142957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2424) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04142957 = score(doc=2424,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 2424, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2424)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    State of the art review of the development of full text databases, encompassing: types of commercially available full text databases; online systems for full text databases; CD-ROM databases for full text databases; full text databases on magnetic discs or tapes; creation of full text databases; searching and display requirements for full text searching and software. Concludes that bibliographic information services without full text support solve only half of the retrieval problems
  13. Tenopir, C.: Online systems for information access and retrieval (2008) 0.00
    0.0010873 = product of:
      0.0076110996 = sum of:
        0.0076110996 = product of:
          0.0380555 = sum of:
            0.0380555 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5587) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0380555 = score(doc=5587,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 5587, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5587)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    In 1973 F. W. Lancaster published the first textbook about online information retrieval (with E. G. Fayen). That text and his later writings and books on the topics relating to online searching set the precedent for many books to follow. His early work also advocated many changes to the state-of-the-art systems and anticipated many of the characteristics of modern online information retrieval systems. Although the basic underlying structure of modern systems is still similar to what Lancaster wrote about thirty years ago, many of the changes he advocated have occurred. From an era of bibliographic databases on command-driven systems searched by library professionals, online systems have evolved to have friendlier interfaces, include full texts or links to full texts, and are targeted to the end users of the information. The information industry has evolved, as have the online search systems and tools that are so commonplace today.
  14. Tenopir, C.; Cahn, P.: TARGET & FREESTYLE : DIALOG and Mead join the relevance ranks (1994) 0.00
    0.0010462549 = product of:
      0.007323784 = sum of:
        0.007323784 = product of:
          0.03661892 = sum of:
            0.03661892 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03661892 = score(doc=2777,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 2777, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2777)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Footnote
    Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.446-456.
  15. Tenopir, C.; Hover, K.: When is the same database not the same : database differences among systems (1993) 0.00
    9.0740033E-4 = product of:
      0.006351802 = sum of:
        0.006351802 = product of:
          0.03175901 = sum of:
            0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 6286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03175901 = score(doc=6286,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 6286, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6286)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Academic and special research libraries in the US and Canada access on average 7,4 online systems. This probably doubles or triples when including CD-ROMs and locally loaded databases. Examines the many ways in which online versions of databases can vary on different systems. Discusses the differences of updating, dates covered, price, subfile structure, field subdivisions, content or inclusion, support features and system search features. Provides statistics on these differences
  16. Tenopir, C.; King, D.W.; Boyce, P.; Grayson, M.; Paulson, K.-L.: Relying an electronic journals : reading patterns of astronomers (2005) 0.00
    6.8055023E-4 = product of:
      0.0047638514 = sum of:
        0.0047638514 = product of:
          0.023819257 = sum of:
            0.023819257 = weight(_text_:system in 3558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023819257 = score(doc=3558,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 3558, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3558)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Surveys of the members of the American Astronomical Society identify how astronomers use journals and what features and formats they prefer. While every work field is distinct, the patterns of use by astronomers may provide a glimpse of what to expect of journal patterns and use by other scientists. Astronomers, like other scientists, continue to invest a large amount of their time in reading articles and place a high level of importance an journal articles. They use a wide variety of formats and means to get access to materials that are essential to their work in teaching, service, and research. They select access means that are convenient-whether those means be print, electronic, or both. The availability of a mature electronic journals system from their primary professional society has surely influenced their early adoption of e-journals.
  17. Nahl, D.; Tenopir, C.: Affective and cognitive searching behavior of novice end-users of a full-text database (1996) 0.00
    5.6712516E-4 = product of:
      0.003969876 = sum of:
        0.003969876 = product of:
          0.01984938 = sum of:
            0.01984938 = weight(_text_:system in 4213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01984938 = score(doc=4213,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 4213, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4213)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Footnote
    Novice end users were given 2 hours of training in searching a full-text magazine database (Magazine ASAP(TM)) on DIALOG. Subjects searched during 3 to 4 sessions in the presence of a trained monitor who prompted them to think aloud throughout the sessions. qualitative analysis of the transcripts and transaction logs yielded empirical information on user variables (purpose, motivation, satisfaction), uses of the database, move types, and every question users asked during the searches. The spontaneous, naturalistic questions were categorized according to affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor speech acts. Results show that most of the searches were performed for the self and were work related. The most common use of the database was to retrieve full-text articles online and to download and print them out rather than read them on screen. The majority of searches were judged satisfactory. Innovative uses included browsing for background information and obtaining contextualized sentences for language teaching. Searchers made twice as many moves to limit sets as moves to expand sets. Affective questions outnumbered cognitive and sensorimotor questions by two to one. This preponderance of affective micro-information needs during searching might be addressed by new system functions
  18. Rowlands, I.; Nicholas, D.; Williams, P.; Huntington, P.; Fieldhouse, M.; Gunter, B.; Withey, R.; Jamali, H.R.; Dobrowolski, T.; Tenopir, C.: ¬The Google generation : the information behaviour of the researcher of the future (2008) 0.00
    5.2312744E-4 = product of:
      0.003661892 = sum of:
        0.003661892 = product of:
          0.01830946 = sum of:
            0.01830946 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2017) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01830946 = score(doc=2017,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2017, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2017)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Rowlands, I.: Google generation: issues in information literacy. In: http://www.lucis.me.uk/retrieval%20issues.pdf.