-
Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003)
0.00
0.0035054288 = product of:
0.024538001 = sum of:
0.024538001 = product of:
0.049076002 = sum of:
0.049076002 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049076002 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Pages
- S.3-22
-
Eversberg, B.: ADV und Zetteldruck : ein Widerspruch? (1975)
0.00
0.0028043431 = product of:
0.0196304 = sum of:
0.0196304 = product of:
0.0392608 = sum of:
0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 4431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0392608 = score(doc=4431,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4431, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4431)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 22(1975) H.5, S.387-390
-
Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American cataloging alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2002)
0.00
0.0024538 = product of:
0.0171766 = sum of:
0.0171766 = product of:
0.0343532 = sum of:
0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 5479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0343532 = score(doc=5479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5479)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 35(2002) nos.1/2, S.3-22
-
Gündogar, F.: Kurztitelkatalogisierung in der Stadtbücherei Bochum : Überlegungen zur Verkürzung von Titelaufnahmen und ihre Realisierung in einem computergestützten System (1987)
0.00
0.0013611005 = product of:
0.009527703 = sum of:
0.009527703 = product of:
0.047638513 = sum of:
0.047638513 = weight(_text_:system in 2054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047638513 = score(doc=2054,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 2054, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2054)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Takawashi, T.: Cataloging in Japan : relationship between Japanese and Western cataloging rules (2002)
0.00
0.0013611005 = product of:
0.009527703 = sum of:
0.009527703 = product of:
0.047638513 = sum of:
0.047638513 = weight(_text_:system in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047638513 = score(doc=5490,freq=8.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- In 1943 the Japanese League of Young Librarians published Nippon Catalog Rules (NCR1942) based on ALA 1908, and adopted the author main-entry system for Japanese and Western materials. After World War II, the Japan Library Association (JLA) compiled and published NCR1952, based on ALA 1949 and LC 1949 but maintained the author main-entry system. The main-entry system was then replaced by an alternative heading method, which came to be known as the Description-Independent-System (DIS). NCR1965 adopted the main entry principle, which was based on the Paris Principles of 1961. NCR1977 was compiled and published by the JLA Cataloging Committee and based upon a "no-main-entry principle." Then in 1987, the Committee published the standard edition of the rules, which was completely compatible with the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD). NCR1987R was published in 1994 and NCR1987R01 in 2001, which included revised "Chapter 9: Computer Files," devised according to ISBD(ER).
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003)
0.00
7.398139E-4 = product of:
0.005178697 = sum of:
0.005178697 = product of:
0.025893483 = sum of:
0.025893483 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025893483 = score(doc=5631,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 5631, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5631)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- From a historical perspective, one could consider the modern library catalog to be that bibliographical apparatus that stretches at least from Thomas Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian Library at Oxford to the near present. Mai and other recent authors have suggested postmodern approaches to knowledge organization. In these, we realize that there is no single and unique order of knowledge or documents but rather there are many appropriate orders, all of them contextually dependent. Works (oeuvres, opera, Werke, etc.), as are musical works, literary works, works of art, etc., are and always have been key entities for information retrieval. Yet catalogs in the modern era were designed to inventory (first) and retrieve (second) specific documents. From Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian until the late twentieth century, developments are epistemologically pragmatic--reflected in the structure of catalog records, in the rules for main entry headings, and in the rules for filing in card catalogs. After 1980 developments become empirical-reflected in research conducted by Tillett, Yee, Smiraglia, Leazer, Carlyle, and Vellucci. The influence of empiricism on the pragmatic notion of "the work" has led to increased focus on the concept of the work. The challenge for the postmodern online catalog is to fully embrace the concept of "the work," finally to facilitate it as a prime objective for information retrieval.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The history of "The Work" in the modern catalog (2003)
0.00
7.398139E-4 = product of:
0.005178697 = sum of:
0.005178697 = product of:
0.025893483 = sum of:
0.025893483 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025893483 = score(doc=5652,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 5652, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5652)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- From a historical perspective, one could consider the modern library catalog to be that bibliographical apparatus that stretches at least from Thomas Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian Library at Oxford to the near present. Mai and other recent authors have suggested postmodern approaches to knowledge organization. In these, we realize that there is no single and unique order of knowledge or documents but rather there are many appropriate orders, all of them contextually dependent. Works (oeuvres, opera, Werke, etc.), as are musical works, literary works, works of art, etc., are and always have been key entities for information retrieval. Yet catalogs in the modern era were designed to inventory (first) and retrieve (second) specific documents. From Hyde's catalog for the Bodleian until the late twentieth century, developments are epistemologically pragmatic--reflected in the structure of catalog records, in the rules for main entry headings, and in the rules for filing in card catalogs. After 1980 developments become empirical-reflected in research conducted by Tillett, Yee, Smiraglia, Leazer, Carlyle, and Vellucci. The influence of empiricism on the pragmatic notion of "the work" has led to increased focus on the concept of the work. The challenge for the postmodern online catalog is to fully embrace the concept of "the work," finally to facilitate it as a prime objective for information retrieval.
-
Gartner, R.: Metadata : shaping knowledge from antiquity to the semantic web (2016)
0.00
7.398139E-4 = product of:
0.005178697 = sum of:
0.005178697 = product of:
0.025893483 = sum of:
0.025893483 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 731) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025893483 = score(doc=731,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 731, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=731)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- LCSH
- Information storage and retrieval
- Subject
- Information storage and retrieval
-
Denton, W.: FRBR and the history of cataloging (2007)
0.00
7.323784E-4 = product of:
0.0051266486 = sum of:
0.0051266486 = product of:
0.025633242 = sum of:
0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1677) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025633242 = score(doc=1677,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1677, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1677)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Understanding FRBR: what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools. Ed. by Arlene Taylor
-
Buizza, P.: Bibliographic control and authority control from Paris principles to the present (2004)
0.00
6.8055023E-4 = product of:
0.0047638514 = sum of:
0.0047638514 = product of:
0.023819257 = sum of:
0.023819257 = weight(_text_:system in 5667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023819257 = score(doc=5667,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 5667, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5667)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Forty years ago the ICCP in Paris laid the foundations of international co-operation in descriptive cataloging without explicitly speaking of authority control. Some of the factors in the evolution of authority control are the development of catalogs (from card catalog to local automation, to today's OPAC on the Web) and services provided by libraries (from individual service to local users to system networks, to the World Wide Web), as well as international agreements on cataloging (from Paris Principles to the UBC programme, to the report on Mandatory data elements for internationally shared resource authority records). This evolution progressed from the principle of uniform heading to the definition of authority entries and records, and from the responsibility of national bibliographic agencies for the form of the names of their own authors to be shared internationally to the concept of authorized equivalent heading. Some issues of the present state are the persisting differences among national rules and the aim of respecting both local culture and language and international readability.
-
Understanding FRBR : what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools (2007)
0.00
3.1387643E-4 = product of:
0.002197135 = sum of:
0.002197135 = product of:
0.010985675 = sum of:
0.010985675 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1675) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010985675 = score(doc=1675,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.10026272 = fieldWeight in 1675, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1675)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
