Search (41 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Geschichte der Sacherschließung"
  1. Zerbst, H.-J.; Kaptein, O.: Gegenwärtiger Stand und Entwicklungstendenzen der Sacherschließung : Auswertung einer Umfrage an deutschen wissenschaftlichen und Öffentlichen Bibliotheken (1993) 0.01
    0.014707889 = product of:
      0.05147761 = sum of:
        0.023012144 = product of:
          0.115060724 = sum of:
            0.115060724 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.115060724 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.3070917 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.028465465 = product of:
          0.05693093 = sum of:
            0.05693093 = weight(_text_:zugriff in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05693093 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2160124 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.26355398 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???
  2. Steierwald, U.: Wissen und System : zu Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz' Theorie einer Universalbibliothek (1995) 0.01
    0.01113523 = product of:
      0.0389733 = sum of:
        0.009527703 = product of:
          0.047638513 = sum of:
            0.047638513 = weight(_text_:system in 6041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047638513 = score(doc=6041,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.41757566 = fieldWeight in 6041, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6041)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0294456 = product of:
          0.0588912 = sum of:
            0.0588912 = weight(_text_:22 in 6041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0588912 = score(doc=6041,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6041, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6041)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Series
    Kölner Arbeiten zum Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen; H.22
  3. Kilgour, F.G.: Origins of coordinate searching (1997) 0.00
    0.0046406575 = product of:
      0.032484602 = sum of:
        0.032484602 = product of:
          0.08121151 = sum of:
            0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025633242 = score(doc=136,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
            0.055578265 = weight(_text_:system in 136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055578265 = score(doc=136,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 136, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=136)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Provides a history of the development of coordinate indexing and searching. In the 1930s scientists began to use edge notched punched cards for searching. The Batten system was invented in 1944. Following the World War 2 these systems underwent major enhancements: Calvin Mooers built up the punched card system with his Zatocoding, and Mortimer Taube enlarged the peek-a-boo system with his Uniterm development. 2 computerizations' of Taube's Uniterm system led to the present day world of information retrieval
  4. Pettee, J.: ¬The subject approach to books and the development of the dictionary catalog (1985) 0.00
    0.004376007 = product of:
      0.015316023 = sum of:
        0.005500822 = product of:
          0.027504109 = sum of:
            0.027504109 = weight(_text_:system in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027504109 = score(doc=3624,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.24108742 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0098152 = product of:
          0.0196304 = sum of:
            0.0196304 = weight(_text_:22 in 3624) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0196304 = score(doc=3624,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3624, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3624)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Julia Pettee's contribution to classification theory came about as part of her work an subject headings. Pettee (1872-1967) was for many years librarian of the Union Theological Seminary in New York and was best known for the classification system she developed for the seminary and as the author of the book Subiect Headings. She was one of the first to call attention to the fact that there was a classification system in subject headings. It was, as she put it, "completely concealed when scattered through the alphabetical sequence" (p. 98). On the other hand, she recognized that an index entry was a pointing device and existed to show users specific terms. Index terms, unlike subject headings, could be manipulated, inverted, repeated, and stated in as many words as might be desired. The subject heading, she reiterated, had in it "some idea of classification," but was designed to pull together like material and, unlike the index term, would have limited capability for supplying access by way of synonyms, catchwords, or other associative forms. It is interesting that she also thought of the subject heading in context as forming a three-dimensional system. Logically this is the case whenever one attempts to reach beyond the conventional hierarchy as described an a plane surface, and, in fact, thought out as if the classification were an a plane surface. Pettee described this dimension variously as names "reaching up and over the surface ... hands clasp[ing] in the air" from an individual term (pp. 99-100). Or, in other context, as the mapping of "the many third-dimensional criss-crossing relationships of subject headings." (p. 103) Investigations following Pettee's insight have shown the nature and the degree of the classification latent in subject headings and also in the cross-references of all indexing systems using cross-references of the associative type ("see also" or equivalent terminology). More importantly, study of this type of connection has revealed jumps in logic and meaning caused by homographs or homonyms and resulting in false connections in classification. Standardized rules for making thesauri have prevented some of the more glaring non sequiturs, but much more still needs to be done. The whole area of "related terms", for example, needs to be brought under control, especially in terms of classification mapping.
    Footnote
    Original in: Pettee, J.: The history and theory of the alphabetical subject approach to books. New York: Wilson 1946. S.22-25.
  5. Sveistrup, H.: ¬Der neue Realkatalog der SUB Hamburg (1947) 0.00
    0.0028043431 = product of:
      0.0196304 = sum of:
        0.0196304 = product of:
          0.0392608 = sum of:
            0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0392608 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Probleme des Wiederaufbaus im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen: aus d. Verhandlungen des 1. Bibliothekartagung der britischen Zone in Hamburg vom 22.-24.10.1946
  6. Riplinger, T.: ¬Die Bedeutung der Methode Eppelsheimer für Theorie und Praxis der bibliothekarischen und der dokumentarischen Sacherschließung (2004) 0.00
    0.0028043431 = product of:
      0.0196304 = sum of:
        0.0196304 = product of:
          0.0392608 = sum of:
            0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 2521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0392608 = score(doc=2521,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2521, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2521)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2008 13:33:51
  7. Hartmann, F.: Paul Otlets Hypermedium : Dokumentation als Gegenidee zur Bibliothek (2015) 0.00
    0.0028043431 = product of:
      0.0196304 = sum of:
        0.0196304 = product of:
          0.0392608 = sum of:
            0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0392608 = score(doc=1432,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2016 15:58:46
  8. McIlwaine, I.C.; Broughton, V.: ¬The Classification Research Group : then and now (2000) 0.00
    0.0025814078 = product of:
      0.018069854 = sum of:
        0.018069854 = product of:
          0.045174636 = sum of:
            0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029295133 = score(doc=6089,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
            0.015879504 = weight(_text_:system in 6089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015879504 = score(doc=6089,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.13919188 = fieldWeight in 6089, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6089)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The genesis of the Group: In 1948, as part of the post-war renewal of library services in the United Kingdom, the Royal Society organized a Conference on Scientific Information.' What, at the time, must have seemed a minute part of the grand plan, but was later to have a transforming effect on the theory of knowledge organization throughout the remainder of the century, was the setting up of a standing committee of a small group of specialists to investigate the organization and retrieval of scientific information. In 1950, the secretary of that committee, J.D. Bernal, suggested that it might be appropriate to ask a group of librarians to do a study of the problem. After a couple of years of informal discussion it was agreed, in February 1952, to form a Classification Research Group - the CRG as it has become known to subsequent generations. The Group published a brief corporate statement of its views in the Library Association Record in June 1953 and submitted a memorandum to the Library Association Research Committee in May 1955, entitled "The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval". This memorandum was published in the proceedings of what has become known as the "Dorking Conference" in 1957. Of the original fifteen members, four still belong to the Group, three of whom are in regular attendance: Eric Coates, Douglas Foskett and Jack Mills. Brian Vickery ceased attending regularly in the 1960s but has retained his interest in their doings: he was present at the 150th celebratory meeting in 1984 and played an active part in the "Dorking revisited" conference held in 1997. The stated aim of the Group was 'To review the basic principles of bibliographic classification, unhampered by allegiance to any particular published scheme' and it can truly be stated that the work of its members has had a fundamental influence on the teaching and practice of information retrieval. It is paradoxical that this collection of people has exerted such a strong theoretical sway because their aims were from the outset and remain essentially practical. This fact is sometimes overlooked in the literature on knowledge organization: there is a tendency to get carried away, and for researchers of today to concentrate so hard on what might be that they overlook what is needed, useful and practical - the entire objective of any retrieval system.
  9. Moneda Corrochano, M. de la; López-Huertas, M.J.; Jiménez-Contreras, E.: Spanish research in knowledge organization (2002-2010) (2013) 0.00
    0.0024538 = product of:
      0.0171766 = sum of:
        0.0171766 = product of:
          0.0343532 = sum of:
            0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0343532 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2013 12:10:07
  10. Burke, C.: Information and intrigue : from index cards to Dewey decimals to Alger Hiss (2014) 0.00
    0.0018502198 = product of:
      0.012951538 = sum of:
        0.012951538 = product of:
          0.032378845 = sum of:
            0.01553609 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01553609 = score(doc=2228,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.1417929 = fieldWeight in 2228, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2228)
            0.016842756 = weight(_text_:system in 2228) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016842756 = score(doc=2228,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.14763528 = fieldWeight in 2228, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2228)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    In Information and Intrigue Colin Burke tells the story of one man's plan to revolutionize the world's science information systems and how science itself became enmeshed with ideology and the institutions of modern liberalism. In the 1890s, the idealistic American Herbert Haviland Field established the Concilium Bibliographicum, a Switzerland-based science information service that sent millions of index cards to American and European scientists. Field's radical new idea was to index major ideas rather than books or documents. In his struggle to create and maintain his system, Field became entangled with nationalistic struggles over the control of science information, the new system of American philanthropy (powered by millionaires), the politics of an emerging American professional science, and in the efforts of another information visionary, Paul Otlet, to create a pre-digital worldwide database for all subjects. World War I shuttered the Concilium, and postwar efforts to revive it failed. Field himself died in the influenza epidemic of 1918. Burke carries the story into the next generation, however, describing the astonishingly varied career of Field's son, Noel, who became a diplomat, an information source for Soviet intelligence (as was his friend Alger Hiss), a secret World War II informant for Allen Dulles, and a prisoner of Stalin. Along the way, Burke touches on a range of topics, including the new entrepreneurial university, Soviet espionage in America, and further efforts to classify knowledge.
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Science
    Subject
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Science
  11. Baer, H.: Bibliothek - Fachbibliothek - Dokumentation : vom Katalog zum automatic information system (1963) 0.00
    0.0018148007 = product of:
      0.012703604 = sum of:
        0.012703604 = product of:
          0.06351802 = sum of:
            0.06351802 = weight(_text_:system in 4973) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06351802 = score(doc=4973,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 4973, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4973)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  12. Steierwald, U.: Wissen und System : zu Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz' Theorie einer Universalbibliothek (1994) 0.00
    0.0018148007 = product of:
      0.012703604 = sum of:
        0.012703604 = product of:
          0.06351802 = sum of:
            0.06351802 = weight(_text_:system in 8794) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06351802 = score(doc=8794,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5567675 = fieldWeight in 8794, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=8794)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  13. Vom Buch zur Datenbank : Paul Otlets Utopie der Wissensvisualisierung (2012) 0.00
    0.0017527144 = product of:
      0.0122690005 = sum of:
        0.0122690005 = product of:
          0.024538001 = sum of:
            0.024538001 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024538001 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 8.2016 16:06:54
  14. Roberts, N.: Historical studies in documentation : the pre-history of the information retrieval thesaurus (1984) 0.00
    0.0016740077 = product of:
      0.011718053 = sum of:
        0.011718053 = product of:
          0.058590267 = sum of:
            0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058590267 = score(doc=5140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5140)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  15. Buckland, M.: Emanuel Goldberg, electronic document retrieval, and Vannevar Bush's Memex (1992) 0.00
    0.0016376477 = product of:
      0.011463534 = sum of:
        0.011463534 = product of:
          0.05731767 = sum of:
            0.05731767 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05731767 = score(doc=2340,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 2340, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2340)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Vannevar Bush's famous article, 'As we may think' (Atlantic monthly 176(1945) S.101-108) described an imaginary information retrieval machine, the Memex. The Memex is usually viewed, unhistorically, in relation to subsequent developments using digital computers. This study reconstructs the little-known background of information retrieval in and before 1939 when 'As we may think' was originally written. The Memex was based on Bush's work during 1938-40 in developing an improved photoelectric microfilm selector, an electronic retrieval technology pioneered by Emanuel Goldberg of Zeiss, Ikon Dresden, in the 1920s. Visionary statements by Paul Otlet (1934) and Walter Schürmeyer (1935) and the development of electronic document retrieval technology before Bush are examined
  16. Kleinschmidt, H.: Vom System zur Ordnung: Bemerkungen zu Bewertungen von Sachkatalogen vornehmlich im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert (1987) 0.00
    0.0015879505 = product of:
      0.011115653 = sum of:
        0.011115653 = product of:
          0.055578265 = sum of:
            0.055578265 = weight(_text_:system in 1507) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055578265 = score(doc=1507,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 1507, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1507)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  17. Mogk, H.: System und Schlagwort : Erfahrungen am Fachkatalog der Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig (1954) 0.00
    0.0015879505 = product of:
      0.011115653 = sum of:
        0.011115653 = product of:
          0.055578265 = sum of:
            0.055578265 = weight(_text_:system in 1809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055578265 = score(doc=1809,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 1809, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1809)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  18. From classification to 'knowledge organization' : Dorking revisited or 'past is prelude'. A collection of reprints to commemorate the firty year span between the Dorking Conference (First International Study Conference on Classification Research 1957) and the Sixth International Study Conference on Classification Research (London 1997) (1997) 0.00
    0.0012813952 = product of:
      0.008969766 = sum of:
        0.008969766 = product of:
          0.04484883 = sum of:
            0.04484883 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04484883 = score(doc=561,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.40932083 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Content
    Enthält u.a. den Wiederabdruck der folgenden Beiträge: The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (Memorandum of the Classification Research Group, 1955); COATES, E.J.: Classification in information retrieval: the twenty years following Dorking (1978); VICKERY, B.C.: Structure and function in retrieval languages (1971); VICKERY, B.C.: Knowledge representation: a brief review (1986); LEWSI, D.D. u. K. SPARCK JONES: Natural language processing for information retrieval (1996); CLEVERDON, C.W. u. J. MILLS: The testing of indexing language devices (1963); SOERGEL, D.: Indexing and retrieval performance: the logical evidence (1994); SPARCK JONES, K.: Reflections on TREC (1995); KEREN, C.: On information science (1984); SALTON, G.: A note about information science research (1985); SVENONIUS, E.: Unanswered questions in the design of controlled vocabularies (1986); MILSTEAD, J.L.: Needs for research in indexing (1994); WEINER, M.L. u. E.D. LIDDY: Intelligent text processing, and intelligence tradecraft (1995); ZORN, P. et al.: Advanced searching: tricks of the trade (1996); CROFT, W.B.: What do people want from information retrieval? (1995)
  19. Hall, J.L.; Bawden, D.: Online retrieval history : how it all began (2011) 0.00
    0.0011837021 = product of:
      0.008285915 = sum of:
        0.008285915 = product of:
          0.04142957 = sum of:
            0.04142957 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04142957 = score(doc=4539,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 4539, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4539)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to discuss the history of online searching through the views of one of its pioneers. Design/methodology/approach - The paper presents, and comments on, the recollections of Jim Hall, one of the earliest UK-based operators of, and writers on, online retrieval systems. Findings - The paper gives an account of the development of online searching in the UK during the 1960s and 1970s. Originality/value - The paper presents the perspective of one of the pioneers of online searching.
  20. Heuvel, C. van den: ¬The Decimal Office : administration as a science in the Netherlands in the first decades of the twentieth century (2013) 0.00
    0.0011228506 = product of:
      0.007859954 = sum of:
        0.007859954 = product of:
          0.039299767 = sum of:
            0.039299767 = weight(_text_:system in 5521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039299767 = score(doc=5521,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.34448233 = fieldWeight in 5521, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5521)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    In 1983 Boyd Rayward described the early diffusion abroad of the Dewey Decimal Classification (and indirectly of the Universal Decimal Classification) in Australia, Great Britain, Belgium, France, Switzerland, and Russia. Here, I discuss the enormous interest in the decimal system in the Netherlands that went far beyond its original role for the classification of bibliographic knowledge. I will present Johan Zaalberg (1858-1934) and Ernst Hijmans (1890-1987) as two advocates for the use of the decimal system in the administration of public organizations and private companies and its role in the development of scientific management in the Netherlands.

Languages

  • e 28
  • d 12
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 32
  • m 6
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects