Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × author_ss:"Slavic, A."
  1. Slavic, A.: On the nature and typology of documentary classifications and their use in a networked environment (2007) 0.01
    0.00546202 = product of:
      0.01911707 = sum of:
        0.00439427 = product of:
          0.02197135 = sum of:
            0.02197135 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02197135 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0147228 = product of:
          0.0294456 = sum of:
            0.0294456 = weight(_text_:22 in 780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0294456 = score(doc=780,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 780, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=780)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    22.12.2007 17:22:31
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  2. Slavic, A.; Cordeiro, M.I.: Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications (2004) 0.00
    0.003136654 = product of:
      0.021956576 = sum of:
        0.021956576 = product of:
          0.054891437 = sum of:
            0.03107218 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03107218 = score(doc=2651,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
            0.023819257 = weight(_text_:system in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023819257 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The paper analyses the importance of data presentation and modelling and its role in improving the management, use and exchange of analytico-synthetic classifications in automated systems. Inefficiencies, in this respect, hinder the automation of classification systems that offer the possibility of building compound index/search terms. The lack of machine readable data expressing the semantics and structure of a classification vocabulary has negative effects on information management and retrieval, thus restricting the potential of both automated systems and classifications themselves. The authors analysed the data representation structure of three general analytico-synthetic classification systems (BC2-Bliss Bibliographic Classification; BSO-Broad System of Ordering; UDC-Universal Decimal Classification) and put forward some core requirements for classification data representation
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  3. Broughton, V.; Slavic, A.: Building a faceted classification for the humanities : principles and procedures (2007) 0.00
    0.0027553656 = product of:
      0.019287558 = sum of:
        0.019287558 = product of:
          0.048218895 = sum of:
            0.020714786 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020714786 = score(doc=2875,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.18905719 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
            0.027504109 = weight(_text_:system in 2875) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027504109 = score(doc=2875,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.24108742 = fieldWeight in 2875, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2875)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to provide an overview of principles and procedures involved in creating a faceted classification scheme for use in resource discovery in an online environment. Design/methodology/approach - Facet analysis provides an established rigorous methodology for the conceptual organization of a subject field, and the structuring of an associated classification or controlled vocabulary. This paper explains how that methodology was applied to the humanities in the FATKS project, where the objective was to explore the potential of facet analytical theory for creating a controlled vocabulary for the humanities, and to establish the requirements of a faceted classification appropriate to an online environment. A detailed faceted vocabulary was developed for two areas of the humanities within a broader facet framework for the whole of knowledge. Research issues included how to create a data model which made the faceted structure explicit and machine-readable and provided for its further development and use. Findings - In order to support easy facet combination in indexing, and facet searching and browsing on the interface, faceted classification requires a formalized data structure and an appropriate tool for its management. The conceptual framework of a faceted system proper can be applied satisfactorily to humanities, and fully integrated within a vocabulary management system. Research limitations/implications - The procedures described in this paper are concerned only with the structuring of the classification, and do not extend to indexing, retrieval and application issues. Practical implications - Many stakeholders in the domain of resource discovery consider developing their own classification system and supporting tools. The methods described in this paper may clarify the process of building a faceted classification and may provide some useful ideas with respect to the vocabulary maintenance tool. Originality/value - As far as the authors are aware there is no comparable research in this area.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  4. Slavic, A.: Interface to classification : some objectives and options (2006) 0.00
    0.0026166062 = product of:
      0.018316243 = sum of:
        0.018316243 = product of:
          0.045790605 = sum of:
            0.02197135 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02197135 = score(doc=2131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2131)
            0.023819257 = weight(_text_:system in 2131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023819257 = score(doc=2131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2131)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    This is a preprint to be published in the Extensions & Corrections to the UDC. The paper explains the basic functions of browsing and searching that need to be supported in relation to analytico-synthetic classifications such as Universal Decimal Classification (UDC), irrespective of any specific, real-life implementation. UDC is an example of a semi-faceted system that can be used, for instance, for both post-coordinate searching and hierarchical/facet browsing. The advantages of using a classification for IR, however, depend on the strength of the GUI, which should provide a user-friendly interface to classification browsing and searching. The power of this interface is in supporting visualisation that will 'convert' what is potentially a user-unfriendly indexing language based on symbols, to a subject presentation that is easy to understand, search and navigate. A summary of the basic functions of searching and browsing a classification that may be provided on a user-friendly interface is given and examples of classification browsing interfaces are provided.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  5. Slavic, A.; Turkulin, B.: Prevajanje klasifikacijskih oznak v naravni jezik (1998) 0.00
    0.0014647568 = product of:
      0.010253297 = sum of:
        0.010253297 = product of:
          0.051266484 = sum of:
            0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051266484 = score(doc=3229,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3229, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3229)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    By providing the means for systematic arrangement, library classification has been used for centuries to organise document collections. The development of systems such as DDC, LCC a,d UDC, made classification sophisticated enough to be used both for the systematic arrangement of a collection and for information retrieval through the use of classified catalogues. Relatively short alphanumeric classification indexes are able to indicate quite sophisticated concepts, helping to overcome language barriers. With the advent of library automation, their role in the document retrieval process has become less important, in comparison with retrieval by natural language
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  6. Slavic, A.: Classification revisited : a web of knowledge (2011) 0.00
    7.398139E-4 = product of:
      0.005178697 = sum of:
        0.005178697 = product of:
          0.025893483 = sum of:
            0.025893483 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025893483 = score(doc=12,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Innovations in information retrieval: perspectives for theory and practice. Eds.: A. Foster, u. P. Rafferty
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  7. Slavic, A.: UDC in subject gateways : experiment or opportunity? (2006) 0.00
    5.2312744E-4 = product of:
      0.003661892 = sum of:
        0.003661892 = product of:
          0.01830946 = sum of:
            0.01830946 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4879) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01830946 = score(doc=4879,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 4879, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4879)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval