Search (47 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. ETHICS: Detailanleitung zur On-line Abfrage; Titelwortabfrage und Sachabfrage. Stand: 30.7.1987 (1987) 0.12
    0.117244385 = product of:
      0.41035533 = sum of:
        0.011718053 = product of:
          0.058590267 = sum of:
            0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058590267 = score(doc=111,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.39863726 = weight(_text_:abfrage in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.39863726 = score(doc=111,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28580084 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.890225 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            1.3948078 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.890225 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  2. Hill, J.S.: Online classification number access : some practical considerations (1984) 0.01
    0.014565388 = product of:
      0.050978854 = sum of:
        0.011718053 = product of:
          0.058590267 = sum of:
            0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058590267 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0392608 = product of:
          0.0785216 = sum of:
            0.0785216 = weight(_text_:22 in 7684) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0785216 = score(doc=7684,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 7684, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=7684)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Journal of academic librarianship. 10(1984), S.17-22
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  3. Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989) 0.01
    0.013157567 = product of:
      0.046051484 = sum of:
        0.028874883 = product of:
          0.07218721 = sum of:
            0.044398077 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044398077 = score(doc=2509,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
            0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027789133 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
        0.0171766 = product of:
          0.0343532 = sum of:
            0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0343532 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
    Date
    8.11.1995 11:52:22
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  4. Gödert, W.: Klassifikationssysteme und Online-Katalog (1987) 0.00
    0.004099487 = product of:
      0.028696407 = sum of:
        0.028696407 = product of:
          0.071741015 = sum of:
            0.0380555 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0380555 = score(doc=5138,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
            0.033685513 = weight(_text_:system in 5138) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033685513 = score(doc=5138,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 5138, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5138)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Free text searching with keywords in a complete data store is not necessarily the best automatic retrieval method. There must be a proper classification of documents and concepts and the use of a proper classification system avoids problems of terminological deficiency. The dialogue search form makes the on-line catalogue a new information medium. A bibliographic unit must be created with as many search access points as possible, using verbal and classificatory search elements. Verbal search categories must include free text elements for individual search access requirements and a controlled vocabulary with syntactic connections. Classified data should consist of a universal classification system with clear structural notation for access and surface searching, together with several specialist subject classifications for differentiated documentation and retrieval. The universal classification needs no detailed subdivision: it serves mainly as a guide and entry to the detailed sub-systems
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  5. Duncan, E.B.: Structuring knowledge bases for designers of learning materials (1989) 0.00
    0.002650327 = product of:
      0.018552288 = sum of:
        0.018552288 = product of:
          0.04638072 = sum of:
            0.01830946 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01830946 = score(doc=2478,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
            0.028071264 = weight(_text_:system in 2478) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028071264 = score(doc=2478,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.24605882 = fieldWeight in 2478, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2478)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  6. Duncan, E.B.: ¬A faceted approach to hypertext (1989) 0.00
    0.002650327 = product of:
      0.018552288 = sum of:
        0.018552288 = product of:
          0.04638072 = sum of:
            0.01830946 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01830946 = score(doc=2480,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
            0.028071264 = weight(_text_:system in 2480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028071264 = score(doc=2480,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.24605882 = fieldWeight in 2480, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2480)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Three pre-web articles about using hypertext for knowledge representation. Duncan discusses how to use graphical, hypertext displays (she used Xerox PARC's NoteCards on a Xerox 1186 workstation) along with concept maps and facet analysis, a combination that would now be done with topic maps. The screen shots of her graphical displays are quite interesting. Her interest in facets is in how to use them to show things to different people in different ways, for example, so that experts can enter knowledge into a system in one way while novices can see it in another. Duncan found that facet labels (e.g. Process and Product) prompted the expert to think of related concepts when inputting data, and made navigation easier for users. Facets can be joined together, e.g. "Agents (causing) Process," leading to a "reasoning system." She is especially interested in how to show relstionships between two things: e.g., A causes B, A uses B, A occurs in B. This is an important question in facet theory, but probably not worth worrying about in a small online classification where the relations are fixed and obvious. These articles may be difficult to find, in which case the reader can find a nice sumary in the next article, by Ellis and Vasconcelos (2000). Anyone interested in tracing the history of facets and hypertext will, however, want to see the originals.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  7. Williamson, N.J.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification in the computer age (1989) 0.00
    0.0026166062 = product of:
      0.018316243 = sum of:
        0.018316243 = product of:
          0.045790605 = sum of:
            0.02197135 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02197135 = score(doc=2074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2074)
            0.023819257 = weight(_text_:system in 2074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023819257 = score(doc=2074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 2074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2074)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Research leading to a detailed content analysis and profile of the Library of Congress Classification schedules. A description of the design, methodology, and preliminary findings of research in progress. Final results of the study are expected to aid the Library of Congress in the development of a MARC format for its classification schedules and in the conversion of the schedules into machine-readable form. LC's ultimate goal is the design of an integrated system which will permit on-line editing, maintenance, and control of the schedules, on-line classification and shelflisting procedures, the production of the schedules in two or more physical formats, and the use of LCC to enhance search capabilities in on-line catalogues.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  8. Svenonius, E.: Use of classification in online retrieval (1983) 0.00
    0.0023674043 = product of:
      0.01657183 = sum of:
        0.01657183 = product of:
          0.08285914 = sum of:
            0.08285914 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08285914 = score(doc=108,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  9. Boeckx, T.: Onderwerpontsluiting in de on-line publiekscatalogus (1986) 0.00
    0.0023674043 = product of:
      0.01657183 = sum of:
        0.01657183 = product of:
          0.08285914 = sum of:
            0.08285914 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08285914 = score(doc=145,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 145, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=145)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  10. Williamson, N.J.: ¬The Library of Congress Classification : problems and prospects in online retrieval (1986) 0.00
    0.0023674043 = product of:
      0.01657183 = sum of:
        0.01657183 = product of:
          0.08285914 = sum of:
            0.08285914 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08285914 = score(doc=1905,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.75622874 = fieldWeight in 1905, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1905)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  11. Chan, L.M.: Library of Congress Classification as an online retrieval tool : potentials and limitations (1986) 0.00
    0.0020714786 = product of:
      0.01450035 = sum of:
        0.01450035 = product of:
          0.07250175 = sum of:
            0.07250175 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1145) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07250175 = score(doc=1145,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 1145, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1145)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  12. Anderson, J.D.: Indexing and classification : file organization and display for information retrieval (1989) 0.00
    0.0018121665 = product of:
      0.012685165 = sum of:
        0.012685165 = product of:
          0.063425824 = sum of:
            0.063425824 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 873) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.063425824 = score(doc=873,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 873, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=873)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  13. Borko, H.: ¬The role of classification in online retrieval systems and automated libraries (1982) 0.00
    0.0017755532 = product of:
      0.012428872 = sum of:
        0.012428872 = product of:
          0.06214436 = sum of:
            0.06214436 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06214436 = score(doc=37,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  14. Richmond, P.A.: Futuristic aspects of subject access (1983) 0.00
    0.0016740077 = product of:
      0.011718053 = sum of:
        0.011718053 = product of:
          0.058590267 = sum of:
            0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058590267 = score(doc=107,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 107, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=107)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  15. Markey, K.: Class number searching in an experimental online catalog (1986) 0.00
    0.0016740077 = product of:
      0.011718053 = sum of:
        0.011718053 = product of:
          0.058590267 = sum of:
            0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058590267 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  16. Schmidt, K.; Walser, M.: ETHICS: Anleitung für die Katalogabfrage und die Ausleihe (1989) 0.00
    0.0016740077 = product of:
      0.011718053 = sum of:
        0.011718053 = product of:
          0.058590267 = sum of:
            0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058590267 = score(doc=110,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 110, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=110)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  17. Meink, P.: ¬Die Dezimalklassifikation auf dem PC. T.1.2 (1988) 0.00
    0.0016740077 = product of:
      0.011718053 = sum of:
        0.011718053 = product of:
          0.058590267 = sum of:
            0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 112) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058590267 = score(doc=112,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 112, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=112)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  18. Huestis, J.C.: Clustering LC Classification numbers in an online catalog for improved browsability (1988) 0.00
    0.0016740077 = product of:
      0.011718053 = sum of:
        0.011718053 = product of:
          0.058590267 = sum of:
            0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058590267 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  19. Markey, K.: Findings of the Dewey Decimal Classification on-line project (1986) 0.00
    0.0016740077 = product of:
      0.011718053 = sum of:
        0.011718053 = product of:
          0.058590267 = sum of:
            0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058590267 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  20. Kowalk, W.: ¬Der OPAC der Universitätsbibliothek Saarbrücken (1989) 0.00
    0.0016740077 = product of:
      0.011718053 = sum of:
        0.011718053 = product of:
          0.058590267 = sum of:
            0.058590267 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058590267 = score(doc=569,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 569, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=569)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval