Search (174 results, page 1 of 9)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Busch, D.: Organisation eines Thesaurus für die Unterstützung der mehrsprachigen Suche in einer bibliographischen Datenbank im Bereich Planen und Bauen (2016) 0.02 
    0.015511481 = product of:
  0.054290183 = sum of:
    0.003969876 = product of:
      0.01984938 = sum of:
        0.01984938 = weight(_text_:system in 3308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01984938 = score(doc=3308,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 3308, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3308)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.05032031 = product of:
      0.10064062 = sum of:
        0.10064062 = weight(_text_:zugriff in 3308) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10064062 = score(doc=3308,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2160124 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.46590203 = fieldWeight in 3308, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3308)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Das Problem der mehrsprachigen Suche gewinnt in der letzten Zeit immer mehr an Bedeutung, da viele nützliche Fachinformationen in der Welt in verschiedenen Sprachen publiziert werden. RSWBPlus ist eine bibliographische Datenbank zum Nachweis der Fachliteratur im Bereich Planen und Bauen, welche deutsch- und englischsprachige Metadaten-Einträge enthält. Bis vor Kurzem war es problematisch Einträge zu finden, deren Sprache sich von der Anfragesprache unterschied. Zum Beispiel fand man auf deutschsprachige Anfragen nur deutschsprachige Einträge, obwohl die Datenbank auch potenziell nützliche englischsprachige Einträge enthielt. Um das Problem zu lösen, wurde nach einer Untersuchung bestehender Ansätze, die RSWBPlus weiterentwickelt, um eine mehrsprachige (sprachübergreifende) Suche zu unterstützen, welche unter Einbeziehung eines zweisprachigen begriffbasierten Thesaurus erfolgt. Der Thesaurus wurde aus bereits bestehenden Thesauri automatisch gebildet. Die Einträge der Quell-Thesauri wurden in SKOS-Format (Simple Knowledge Organisation System) umgewandelt, automatisch miteinander vereinigt und schließlich in einen Ziel-Thesaurus eingespielt, der ebenfalls in SKOS geführt wird. Für den Zugriff zum Ziel-Thesaurus werden Apache Jena und MS SQL Server verwendet. Bei der mehrsprachigen Suche werden Terme der Anfrage durch entsprechende Übersetzungen und Synonyme in Deutsch und Englisch erweitert. Die Erweiterung der Suchterme kann sowohl in der Laufzeit, als auch halbautomatisch erfolgen. Das verbesserte Recherchesystem kann insbesondere deutschsprachigen Benutzern helfen, relevante englischsprachige Einträge zu finden. Die Verwendung vom SKOS erhöht die Interoperabilität der Thesauri, vereinfacht das Bilden des Ziel-Thesaurus und den Zugriff zu seinen Einträgen.
  2. Nikolai, R.: Thesaurusföderationen : Ein Rahmenwerk für die flexible Integration von heterogenen, autonomen Thesauri (2002) 0.02 
    0.015097161 = product of:
  0.05284006 = sum of:
    0.015862333 = product of:
      0.03965583 = sum of:
        0.01902775 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01902775 = score(doc=165,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.17366013 = fieldWeight in 165, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=165)
        0.020628082 = weight(_text_:system in 165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020628082 = score(doc=165,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.18081556 = fieldWeight in 165, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=165)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    0.036977727 = product of:
      0.073955454 = sum of:
        0.073955454 = weight(_text_:zugriff in 165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073955454 = score(doc=165,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.2160124 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.3423667 = fieldWeight in 165, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=165)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Dem wachsenden Bedarf der "Informationsgesellschaft" nach Informationen folgten in den letzten Jahren rasch wachsende Informationssysteme, die heterogene Informationen global verteilt und einfach zugreifbar vorhalten. Solche modernen Informationssysteme und datenintensiven Anwendungen können als eine wesentliche Komponente "verteilter Informationsumgebungen" angesehen werden, die universellen Zugriff auf Informationen aus einer Vielzahl menschlicher Wissensgebiete ermöglichen. Charakteristische Eigenschaften derartiger großer Informationssysteme sind, dass sie auf großen, zum Teil autonomen Informationsquellen basieren, die häufig über offene Computernetze (lose) verbunden sind, eine große Anzahl von Benutzern unterstützen, eine Infrastruktur anbieten, die den einfachen Zugriff auf verschiedenen Dienste ermöglicht, und dass die Qualität dieser Dienste entscheidend für deren Erfolg ist. Von besonderer Bedeutung sind bei derartig großen zur Verfügung stehenden Datenmengen Dienste, die das gezielte Wiederauffinden von Informationen (Information Retrieval) ermöglichen. Thesauri sind ein bewährtes Werkzeug, um diesen Prozess zu unterstützen. Sie bieten ein einheitliches und konsistentes Vokabular, das als Grundlage für semantisches Information Retrieval verwendet werden kann. Bei einem häufig fachübergreifenden Datenbestand, der auch mehrsprachig sein kann, sind traditionelle Fachthesauri, die in der Regel nur einsprachig vorliegen, aber nicht mehr ausreichend. Selbst in Dokumentenbeständen eines Fachinformationssystems finden sich oft Ausweitungen auf Begriffe angrenzender Fachgebiete. Es wird ein umfangreicheres und zugleich spezialisierteres Vokabular gefordert.
    Zielbeschreibung: In dieser Arbeit soll ein Rahmenwerk für die lose Integration von heterogenen und autonomen Thesauri, Thesaurusföderationen genannt, erarbeitet werden. Das Konzept der Thesaurusföderationen soll den Anforderungen moderner Informationssysteme nach zugleich umfangreicheren und spezialisierteren Vokabularen unter Ausnutzung neuer technologischer Möglichkeiten gerecht werden. Der zu entwickelnde Integrations-Ansatz soll als Basis die mit großem Aufwand erstellten, bereits vorhandenen Thesauri (Komponententhesauri) verwenden und deren Vokabulare verknüpfen, so dass sie als ein Gesamtvokabular erscheinen. Existierende Ansätze für einen integrierten Zugriff auf verschiedene Informationssysteme sowie der gleichzeitigen Verwendung verschiedener Terminologien basieren auf so genannten MultiThesaurus-Systemen. Ein wesentlicher Kritikpunkt an diesen Ansätzen ist der, dass jeweils nur Teilaspekte behandelt werden. Was fehlt, ist ein in ganzheitliches Rahmenwerk, das die Aspekte der Integration, der Behandlung von Konflikten und Unvollständigkeiten, der Verwendung im Information Retrieval und schließlich die Bewertung der Güte des integrierten Vokabulars betrachtet. Ein solches Rahmenwerk soll in dieser Arbeit erstmals erarbeitet werden. Dabei gilt es zu berücksichtigen, dass eine Überforderung des Benutzers durch die Komplexität des Gesamtvokabulars vermieden wird. U.a. soll das dynamische Ein-/Ausblenden von teilhabenden Thesauri unterstützt werden. Die existierenden Ansätze der Multi-Thesaurus-Systeme berücksichtigen zudem nicht eine in verteilten Informationssystemen erstrebenswerte Autonomie der Thesauri und ihre häufig gegebene Heterogenität. Um diesen Anforderungen gerecht zu werden, soll sich unser Ansatz an den Konzepten föderierter Datenbanksysteme orientieren, allerdings ohne die Einschränkung, ausschließlich von Datenbankverwaltungsystemen verwaltete Thesauri zu integrieren. Der Schwerpunkt soll hier auf der semantischen Integration liegen, die in föderierten Datenbanksystemen häufig nur ein Randthema ist. Neue Integrationsverfahren auf semantischer Ebene (Begriffsintegration), die im Gegensatz zu bekannten Ansätzen die Ergebnisse einer rechner-unterstützten Analyse der Inhalte und Güte der Thesauri berücksichtigen und entsprechend konfiguriert werden, sollen eine verbesserte semi-automatische Integration ermöglichen, ebenso erstmals eine Bewertung der Integrationsergebnisse. Diese Verfahren sollen die Reichhaltigkeit der Informationen in den Thesauri selbst ausnutzen sowie auf weitere Wissensquellen zugreifen können, um den notwendigen menschlichen Einsatz zu minimieren. Die Thesaurusföderation soll ihre Dienste als Mehrwertdienste anbieten und dazu auf die an der Föderation beteiligten heterogenen Komponententhesauri zugreifen, deren Autonomie erhalten bleibt. Um den breiten Einsatz des entwickelten Ansatzes zu ermöglichen, soll das Konzept grundsätzlich fachgebietsunabhängig sein. Auch wenn eine (semi-)automatische Integration unter Berücksichtigung der Autonomie einem durch manuelle Verfahren und Anpassung der beteiligten Thesauri entstandenem SuperThesaurus unterlegen ist, ist dies möglicherweise die einzig praktikable Art und Weise, um ein flexibel skalierbares Multi-Thesaurus-System zu erstellen und zu pflegen.
    RSWK
    Thesaurus / Föderiertes System
    Subject
    Thesaurus / Föderiertes System
  3. Crouch, C.J.: ¬An approach to the automatic construction of global thesauri (1990) 0.01 
    0.012226459 = product of:
  0.042792603 = sum of:
    0.025616003 = product of:
      0.064040005 = sum of:
        0.036250874 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036250874 = score(doc=4042,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
        0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027789133 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    0.0171766 = product of:
      0.0343532 = sum of:
        0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0343532 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The benefits of a well constructed thesaurus to an information retrieval system have long been recognised by both researchers and practitioners in the field. Examines both early and current approaches to automatic thesaurus construction and describes an approach to the automatic generation of global thesauri based on the term discrimination value model of Salton Yang, and Yu and on an appropriate clustering algorithm. This method has been implemented and applied to 2 document collections. Preliminary results indicate that this method, which produces improvements in retrieval performance in excess of 10 and 15% in the test collections, is viable and worthy of continued investigation.
    Date
    22. 4.1996 3:39:53
  4. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.01 
    0.01092404 = product of:
  0.03823414 = sum of:
    0.00878854 = product of:
      0.0439427 = sum of:
        0.0439427 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0439427 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.0294456 = product of:
      0.0588912 = sum of:
        0.0588912 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0588912 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
  5. Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995) 0.01 
    0.007282694 = product of:
  0.025489427 = sum of:
    0.0058590267 = product of:
      0.029295133 = sum of:
        0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029295133 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.0196304 = product of:
      0.0392608 = sum of:
        0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0392608 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Source
    Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  6. Z39.19-1993: Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual thesauri (1993) 0.01 
    0.007282694 = product of:
  0.025489427 = sum of:
    0.0058590267 = product of:
      0.029295133 = sum of:
        0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029295133 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.0196304 = product of:
      0.0392608 = sum of:
        0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0392608 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    This 1993 edition is the authoritative guide constructing single-language thesauri, one of the most powerful tools for information retrieval. Written by experts, Z39.19 shows how to formulate descriptors, establish relationships among terms, and present the information in print and on a screen. Also included are thesaurus maintenance procedures and recommended features for thesaurus management systems
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.180-181 (M. Hudon)
  7. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.01 
    0.0072365343 = product of:
  0.025327869 = sum of:
    0.016739568 = product of:
      0.04184892 = sum of:
        0.022199038 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022199038 = score(doc=3644,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.20260347 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
        0.019649884 = weight(_text_:system in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019649884 = score(doc=3644,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.17224117 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    0.0085883 = product of:
      0.0171766 = sum of:
        0.0171766 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0171766 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
  8. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.01 
    0.0063723573 = product of:
  0.02230325 = sum of:
    0.0051266486 = product of:
      0.025633242 = sum of:
        0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025633242 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.0171766 = product of:
      0.0343532 = sum of:
        0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0343532 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    A thesaurus in the controlled vocabulary environment is a tool designed to support effective infonnation retrieval (IR) by guiding indexers and searchers consistently to choose the same terms for expressing a given concept or combination of concepts. Terms in the thesaurus are linked by relationships of three well-known types: equivalence, hierarchical, and associative. The functions and properties of these three basic types and some subcategories are described, as well as some additional relationship types conunonly found in thesauri. Progressive automation of IR processes and the capability for simultaneous searching of vast networked resources are creating some pressures for change in the categorization and consistency of relationships.
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
  9. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.01 
    0.0063723573 = product of:
  0.02230325 = sum of:
    0.0051266486 = product of:
      0.025633242 = sum of:
        0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025633242 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.0171766 = product of:
      0.0343532 = sum of:
        0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0343532 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Die geschichtliche Entwicklung von ISO 2788: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri und ISO 5964: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri wird kurz beschrieben. 2001 begann die Arbeit an der Entwicklung von BS 8723: Structured Vocabularies for Information Retrieval - Guide, einer fünfteiligen Norm, die konzipiert wurde, um die internationalen Normen zu aktualisieren, insbesondere mit Hinblick auf Interoperabilität. Der Verfahrensablauf zur Übernahme von BS 8723 als internationale Norm hat begonnen.
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  10. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.01 
    0.0063723573 = product of:
  0.02230325 = sum of:
    0.0051266486 = product of:
      0.025633242 = sum of:
        0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025633242 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.0171766 = product of:
      0.0343532 = sum of:
        0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0343532 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. In Form einer Taxonomie wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, die eine detaillierte und damit aussagekräftige Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Das bringt einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines bestehenden Gegenstandsbereichs heraus.
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  11. McMath, C.F.; Tamaru, R.S.; Rada, R.: ¬A graphical thesaurus-based information retrieval system (1989) 0.01 
    0.0061054146 = product of:
  0.0427379 = sum of:
    0.0427379 = product of:
      0.10684475 = sum of:
        0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051266484 = score(doc=4819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 4819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4819)
        0.055578265 = weight(_text_:system in 4819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055578265 = score(doc=4819,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 4819, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4819)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  12. Cheti, A.; Viti, E.: Functionality and merits of a faceted thesaurus : the case of the Nuovo soggettario (2023) 0.01 
    0.005567615 = product of:
  0.01948665 = sum of:
    0.0047638514 = product of:
      0.023819257 = sum of:
        0.023819257 = weight(_text_:system in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023819257 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.0147228 = product of:
      0.0294456 = sum of:
        0.0294456 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0294456 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The Nuovo soggettario, the official Italian subject indexing system edited by the National Central Library of Florence, is made up of interactive components, the core of which is a general thesaurus and some rules of a conventional syntax for subject string construction. The Nuovo soggettario Thesaurus is in compliance with ISO 25964: 2011-2013, IFLA LRM, and FAIR principle (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability). Its open data are available in the Zthes, MARC21, and in SKOS formats and allow for interoperability with l library, archive, and museum databases. The Thesaurus's macrostructure is organized into four fundamental macro-categories, thirteen categories, and facets. The facets allow for the orderly development of hierarchies, thereby limiting polyhierarchies and promoting the grouping of homogenous concepts. This paper addresses the main features and peculiarities which have characterized the consistent development of this categorical structure and its effects on the syntactic sphere in a predominantly pre-coordinated usage context.
    Date
    26.11.2023 18:59:22
  13. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Thesaurus and beyond : an advanced formula for linguistic engineering and information retrieval (1999) 0.01 
    0.00546202 = product of:
  0.01911707 = sum of:
    0.00439427 = product of:
      0.02197135 = sum of:
        0.02197135 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02197135 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.0147228 = product of:
      0.0294456 = sum of:
        0.0294456 = weight(_text_:22 in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0294456 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.1, S.10-22
  14. Mu, X.; Lu, K.; Ryu, H.: Explicitly integrating MeSH thesaurus help into health information retrieval systems : an empirical user study (2014) 0.01 
    0.0051178313 = product of:
  0.035824817 = sum of:
    0.035824817 = product of:
      0.08956204 = sum of:
        0.040941194 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040941194 = score(doc=2703,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.37365708 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
        0.048620854 = weight(_text_:system in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048620854 = score(doc=2703,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.42618635 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    When consumers search for health information, a major obstacle is their unfamiliarity with the medical terminology. Even though medical thesauri such as the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and related tools (e.g., the MeSH Browser) were created to help consumers find medical term definitions, the lack of direct and explicit integration of these help tools into a health retrieval system prevented them from effectively achieving their objectives. To explore this issue, we conducted an empirical study with two systems: One is a simple interface system supporting query-based searching; the other is an augmented system with two new components supporting MeSH term searching and MeSH tree browsing. A total of 45 subjects were recruited to participate in the study. The results indicated that the augmented system is more effective than the simple system in terms of improving user-perceived topic familiarity and question-answer performance, even though we did not find users spend more time on the augmented system. The two new MeSH help components played a critical role in participants' health information retrieval and were found to allow them to develop new search strategies. The findings of the study enhanced our understanding of consumers' search behaviors and shed light on the design of future health information retrieval systems.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  15. Zeng, M.L.; Chen, Y.: Features of an integrated thesaurus management and search system for the networked environment (2003) 0.01 
    0.005015522 = product of:
  0.035108652 = sum of:
    0.035108652 = product of:
      0.08777163 = sum of:
        0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025633242 = score(doc=3817,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3817, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3817)
        0.06213839 = weight(_text_:system in 3817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06213839 = score(doc=3817,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.5446744 = fieldWeight in 3817, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3817)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Reports an integrated system that employs an open structure for managing the distributed resources (thesauri and databases) and integrates a thesaurus management system with a crossthesaurus search system. Describes the functions of the system that highlight the unique design for the networked environment.
    Source
    Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  16. Röttsches, H.: Thesauruspflege im Verbund der Bibliotheken der obersten Bundesbehörden (1989) 0.00 
    0.0049076 = product of:
  0.0343532 = sum of:
    0.0343532 = product of:
      0.0687064 = sum of:
        0.0687064 = weight(_text_:22 in 4199) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0687064 = score(doc=4199,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4199, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4199)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Parlaments- und Behördenbibliotheken. 1989, H.67, S.1-22
  17. Davies, R.: Thesaurus-aided searching in search and retrieval protocols (1996) 0.00 
    0.0047142673 = product of:
  0.03299987 = sum of:
    0.03299987 = product of:
      0.08249967 = sum of:
        0.05074066 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05074066 = score(doc=5169,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
        0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03175901 = score(doc=5169,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Open system protocols for search and retrieval have not provided explicit ways in which to implement thesaurus-aided searching. A number of different approaches within the existing protocols, as well as a proposed service, are evaluated. A general approach to implementing thesaurus-aided searching, particularly during consultation of a thesaurus, requires an entirely new service, whose main features are described
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  18. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.00 
    0.004551684 = product of:
  0.015930893 = sum of:
    0.003661892 = product of:
      0.01830946 = sum of:
        0.01830946 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01830946 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.0122690005 = product of:
      0.024538001 = sum of:
        0.024538001 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024538001 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  19. Müller, T.: Wissensrepräsentation mit semantischen Netzen im Bereich Luftfahrt (2006) 0.00 
    0.004551684 = product of:
  0.015930893 = sum of:
    0.003661892 = product of:
      0.01830946 = sum of:
        0.01830946 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01830946 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.0122690005 = product of:
      0.024538001 = sum of:
        0.024538001 = weight(_text_:22 in 1670) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024538001 = score(doc=1670,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1670, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1670)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Es ist ein semantisches Netz für den Gegenstandsbereich Luftfahrt modelliert worden, welches Unternehmensinformationen, Organisationen, Fluglinien, Flughäfen, etc. enthält, Diese sind 10 Hauptkategorien zugeordnet worden, die untergliedert nach Facetten sind. Die Begriffe des Gegenstandsbereiches sind mit 23 unterschiedlichen Relationen verknüpft worden (Z. B.: 'hat Standort in', bietet an, 'ist Homebase von', etc). Der Schwerpunkt der Betrachtung liegt auf dem Unterschied zwischen den drei klassischen Standardrelationen und den zusätzlich eingerichteten Relationen, bezüglich ihrem Nutzen für ein effizientes Retrieval. Die angelegten Kategorien und Relationen sind sowohl für eine kognitive als auch für eine maschinelle Verarbeitung geeignet.
    Date
    26. 9.2006 21:00:22
  20. Jing, Y.; Croft, W.B.: ¬An association thesaurus for information retrieval (199?) 0.00 
    0.004517464 = product of:
  0.031622246 = sum of:
    0.031622246 = product of:
      0.079055615 = sum of:
        0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051266484 = score(doc=4494,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
        0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027789133 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Although commonly used in both commercial and experimental information retrieval systems, thesauri have not demonstrated consistent benefits for retrieval performance, and it is difficult to construct a thesaurus automatically for large text databases. In this paper, an approach, called PhraseFinder, is proposed to construct collection-dependent association thesauri automatically using large full-text document collections. The association thesaurus can be accessed through natural language queries in INQUERY, an information retrieval system based on the probabilistic inference network. Experiments are conducted in INQUERY to evaluate different types of association thesauri, and thesauri constructed for a variety of collections

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 141
  • el 15
  • m 11
  • n 5
  • r 4
  • s 4
  • x 4
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications