Search (131 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  • × language_ss:"e"
  1. Crouch, C.J.: ¬An approach to the automatic construction of global thesauri (1990) 0.01
    0.012226459 = product of:
      0.042792603 = sum of:
        0.025616003 = product of:
          0.064040005 = sum of:
            0.036250874 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036250874 = score(doc=4042,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
            0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027789133 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
        0.0171766 = product of:
          0.0343532 = sum of:
            0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 4042) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0343532 = score(doc=4042,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4042, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4042)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The benefits of a well constructed thesaurus to an information retrieval system have long been recognised by both researchers and practitioners in the field. Examines both early and current approaches to automatic thesaurus construction and describes an approach to the automatic generation of global thesauri based on the term discrimination value model of Salton Yang, and Yu and on an appropriate clustering algorithm. This method has been implemented and applied to 2 document collections. Preliminary results indicate that this method, which produces improvements in retrieval performance in excess of 10 and 15% in the test collections, is viable and worthy of continued investigation.
    Date
    22. 4.1996 3:39:53
  2. Byrne, C.C.; McCracken, S.A.: ¬An adaptive thesaurus employing semantic distance, relational inheritance and nominal compound interpretation for linguistic support of information retrieval (1999) 0.01
    0.01092404 = product of:
      0.03823414 = sum of:
        0.00878854 = product of:
          0.0439427 = sum of:
            0.0439427 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0439427 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0294456 = product of:
          0.0588912 = sum of:
            0.0588912 = weight(_text_:22 in 4483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0588912 = score(doc=4483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 4483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4483)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    15. 3.2000 10:22:37
  3. Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995) 0.01
    0.007282694 = product of:
      0.025489427 = sum of:
        0.0058590267 = product of:
          0.029295133 = sum of:
            0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029295133 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0196304 = product of:
          0.0392608 = sum of:
            0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0392608 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  4. Z39.19-1993: Guidelines for the construction, format, and management of monolingual thesauri (1993) 0.01
    0.007282694 = product of:
      0.025489427 = sum of:
        0.0058590267 = product of:
          0.029295133 = sum of:
            0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029295133 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0196304 = product of:
          0.0392608 = sum of:
            0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 4092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0392608 = score(doc=4092,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4092, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4092)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    This 1993 edition is the authoritative guide constructing single-language thesauri, one of the most powerful tools for information retrieval. Written by experts, Z39.19 shows how to formulate descriptors, establish relationships among terms, and present the information in print and on a screen. Also included are thesaurus maintenance procedures and recommended features for thesaurus management systems
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Knowledge organization 22(1995) no.3/4, S.180-181 (M. Hudon)
  5. Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985) 0.01
    0.0072365343 = product of:
      0.025327869 = sum of:
        0.016739568 = product of:
          0.04184892 = sum of:
            0.022199038 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.022199038 = score(doc=3644,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.20260347 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
            0.019649884 = weight(_text_:system in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019649884 = score(doc=3644,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.17224117 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
        0.0085883 = product of:
          0.0171766 = sum of:
            0.0171766 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0171766 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
    Footnote
    Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
  6. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001) 0.01
    0.0063723573 = product of:
      0.02230325 = sum of:
        0.0051266486 = product of:
          0.025633242 = sum of:
            0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025633242 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0171766 = product of:
          0.0343532 = sum of:
            0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0343532 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    A thesaurus in the controlled vocabulary environment is a tool designed to support effective infonnation retrieval (IR) by guiding indexers and searchers consistently to choose the same terms for expressing a given concept or combination of concepts. Terms in the thesaurus are linked by relationships of three well-known types: equivalence, hierarchical, and associative. The functions and properties of these three basic types and some subcategories are described, as well as some additional relationship types conunonly found in thesauri. Progressive automation of IR processes and the capability for simultaneous searching of vast networked resources are creating some pressures for change in the categorization and consistency of relationships.
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:45:57
  7. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.01
    0.0063723573 = product of:
      0.02230325 = sum of:
        0.0051266486 = product of:
          0.025633242 = sum of:
            0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025633242 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0171766 = product of:
          0.0343532 = sum of:
            0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0343532 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Die geschichtliche Entwicklung von ISO 2788: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri und ISO 5964: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri wird kurz beschrieben. 2001 begann die Arbeit an der Entwicklung von BS 8723: Structured Vocabularies for Information Retrieval - Guide, einer fünfteiligen Norm, die konzipiert wurde, um die internationalen Normen zu aktualisieren, insbesondere mit Hinblick auf Interoperabilität. Der Verfahrensablauf zur Übernahme von BS 8723 als internationale Norm hat begonnen.
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  8. McMath, C.F.; Tamaru, R.S.; Rada, R.: ¬A graphical thesaurus-based information retrieval system (1989) 0.01
    0.0061054146 = product of:
      0.0427379 = sum of:
        0.0427379 = product of:
          0.10684475 = sum of:
            0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051266484 = score(doc=4819,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 4819, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4819)
            0.055578265 = weight(_text_:system in 4819) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055578265 = score(doc=4819,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 4819, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4819)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
  9. Cheti, A.; Viti, E.: Functionality and merits of a faceted thesaurus : the case of the Nuovo soggettario (2023) 0.01
    0.005567615 = product of:
      0.01948665 = sum of:
        0.0047638514 = product of:
          0.023819257 = sum of:
            0.023819257 = weight(_text_:system in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023819257 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0147228 = product of:
          0.0294456 = sum of:
            0.0294456 = weight(_text_:22 in 1181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0294456 = score(doc=1181,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1181, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1181)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    The Nuovo soggettario, the official Italian subject indexing system edited by the National Central Library of Florence, is made up of interactive components, the core of which is a general thesaurus and some rules of a conventional syntax for subject string construction. The Nuovo soggettario Thesaurus is in compliance with ISO 25964: 2011-2013, IFLA LRM, and FAIR principle (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability). Its open data are available in the Zthes, MARC21, and in SKOS formats and allow for interoperability with l library, archive, and museum databases. The Thesaurus's macrostructure is organized into four fundamental macro-categories, thirteen categories, and facets. The facets allow for the orderly development of hierarchies, thereby limiting polyhierarchies and promoting the grouping of homogenous concepts. This paper addresses the main features and peculiarities which have characterized the consistent development of this categorical structure and its effects on the syntactic sphere in a predominantly pre-coordinated usage context.
    Date
    26.11.2023 18:59:22
  10. Schmitz-Esser, W.: Thesaurus and beyond : an advanced formula for linguistic engineering and information retrieval (1999) 0.01
    0.00546202 = product of:
      0.01911707 = sum of:
        0.00439427 = product of:
          0.02197135 = sum of:
            0.02197135 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02197135 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0147228 = product of:
          0.0294456 = sum of:
            0.0294456 = weight(_text_:22 in 4116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0294456 = score(doc=4116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 26(1999) no.1, S.10-22
  11. Mu, X.; Lu, K.; Ryu, H.: Explicitly integrating MeSH thesaurus help into health information retrieval systems : an empirical user study (2014) 0.01
    0.0051178313 = product of:
      0.035824817 = sum of:
        0.035824817 = product of:
          0.08956204 = sum of:
            0.040941194 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040941194 = score(doc=2703,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.37365708 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
            0.048620854 = weight(_text_:system in 2703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048620854 = score(doc=2703,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.42618635 = fieldWeight in 2703, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2703)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    When consumers search for health information, a major obstacle is their unfamiliarity with the medical terminology. Even though medical thesauri such as the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and related tools (e.g., the MeSH Browser) were created to help consumers find medical term definitions, the lack of direct and explicit integration of these help tools into a health retrieval system prevented them from effectively achieving their objectives. To explore this issue, we conducted an empirical study with two systems: One is a simple interface system supporting query-based searching; the other is an augmented system with two new components supporting MeSH term searching and MeSH tree browsing. A total of 45 subjects were recruited to participate in the study. The results indicated that the augmented system is more effective than the simple system in terms of improving user-perceived topic familiarity and question-answer performance, even though we did not find users spend more time on the augmented system. The two new MeSH help components played a critical role in participants' health information retrieval and were found to allow them to develop new search strategies. The findings of the study enhanced our understanding of consumers' search behaviors and shed light on the design of future health information retrieval systems.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  12. Zeng, M.L.; Chen, Y.: Features of an integrated thesaurus management and search system for the networked environment (2003) 0.01
    0.005015522 = product of:
      0.035108652 = sum of:
        0.035108652 = product of:
          0.08777163 = sum of:
            0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025633242 = score(doc=3817,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 3817, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3817)
            0.06213839 = weight(_text_:system in 3817) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06213839 = score(doc=3817,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.5446744 = fieldWeight in 3817, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3817)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Reports an integrated system that employs an open structure for managing the distributed resources (thesauri and databases) and integrates a thesaurus management system with a crossthesaurus search system. Describes the functions of the system that highlight the unique design for the networked environment.
    Source
    Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  13. Davies, R.: Thesaurus-aided searching in search and retrieval protocols (1996) 0.00
    0.0047142673 = product of:
      0.03299987 = sum of:
        0.03299987 = product of:
          0.08249967 = sum of:
            0.05074066 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05074066 = score(doc=5169,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
            0.03175901 = weight(_text_:system in 5169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03175901 = score(doc=5169,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.27838376 = fieldWeight in 5169, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5169)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Open system protocols for search and retrieval have not provided explicit ways in which to implement thesaurus-aided searching. A number of different approaches within the existing protocols, as well as a proposed service, are evaluated. A general approach to implementing thesaurus-aided searching, particularly during consultation of a thesaurus, requires an entirely new service, whose main features are described
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  14. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.00
    0.004551684 = product of:
      0.015930893 = sum of:
        0.003661892 = product of:
          0.01830946 = sum of:
            0.01830946 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01830946 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
        0.0122690005 = product of:
          0.024538001 = sum of:
            0.024538001 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024538001 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  15. Jing, Y.; Croft, W.B.: ¬An association thesaurus for information retrieval (199?) 0.00
    0.004517464 = product of:
      0.031622246 = sum of:
        0.031622246 = product of:
          0.079055615 = sum of:
            0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051266484 = score(doc=4494,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
            0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 4494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027789133 = score(doc=4494,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 4494, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4494)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Although commonly used in both commercial and experimental information retrieval systems, thesauri have not demonstrated consistent benefits for retrieval performance, and it is difficult to construct a thesaurus automatically for large text databases. In this paper, an approach, called PhraseFinder, is proposed to construct collection-dependent association thesauri automatically using large full-text document collections. The association thesaurus can be accessed through natural language queries in INQUERY, an information retrieval system based on the probabilistic inference network. Experiments are conducted in INQUERY to evaluate different types of association thesauri, and thesauri constructed for a variety of collections
  16. Qin, J.; Paling, S.: Converting a controlled vocabulary into an ontology : the case of GEM (2001) 0.00
    0.0042065145 = product of:
      0.0294456 = sum of:
        0.0294456 = product of:
          0.0588912 = sum of:
            0.0588912 = weight(_text_:22 in 3895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0588912 = score(doc=3895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 3895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3895)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    24. 8.2005 19:20:22
  17. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: ¬The Information Retrieval Thesaurus (2019) 0.00
    0.0038721121 = product of:
      0.027104784 = sum of:
        0.027104784 = product of:
          0.06776196 = sum of:
            0.0439427 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0439427 = score(doc=5210,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 5210, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5210)
            0.023819257 = weight(_text_:system in 5210) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023819257 = score(doc=5210,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 5210, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5210)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    In the post-war period before computers were readily available, urgent demand for scientific and industrial develop-ment stimulated research and development (R&D) that led to the birth of the information retrieval thesaurus. This article traces the early history, speciation and progressive improvement of the thesaurus to reach the state now conveyed by guidelines in inter-national and national standards. Despite doubts about the effec-tiveness of the thesaurus throughout this period, and notwith-standing the dominance of Google and other search engines in the information retrieval (IR) scene today, the thesaurus still plays a complementary part in the organization of knowledge and in-formation resources. Success today depends on interoperability, and is opening up opportunities in linked data applications. At the same time, the IR demand from workers in the knowledge society drives interest in hybrid forms of knowledge organization system (KOS) that may pool the genes of thesauri with those of ontologies and classification schemes.
    Object
    Information Retrieval Thesaurus
  18. Jones, S.: ¬A thesaurus data model for an intelligent retrieval system (1993) 0.00
    0.0037004396 = product of:
      0.025903076 = sum of:
        0.025903076 = product of:
          0.06475769 = sum of:
            0.03107218 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03107218 = score(doc=5279,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 5279, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5279)
            0.033685513 = weight(_text_:system in 5279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033685513 = score(doc=5279,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.29527056 = fieldWeight in 5279, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5279)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    This paper demonstrates the application of conventional database design techniques to thesaurus representation. The thesaurus is considered as a printed document, as a semantic net, and as a relational database to be used in conjunction with an intelligent information retrieval system. Some issues raised by analysis of two standard thesauri include: the prevalence of compound terms and the representation of term structure; thesaurus redundancy and the extent to which it can be eliminated in machine-readable versions; the difficulty of exploiting thesaurus knowledge originally designed for human rather than automatic interpretation; deriving 'strength of association' measures between terms in a thesaurus considered as a semantic net; facet representation and the need for variations in the data model to cater for structural differences between thesauri. A complete schema of database tables is presented, with an outline suggestion for using the stored information when matching one or more thesaurus terms with a user's query
  19. Pollard, R.: ¬A hypertext-based thesaurus as a subject browsing aid for bibliographic databases (1993) 0.00
    0.0036594293 = product of:
      0.025616003 = sum of:
        0.025616003 = product of:
          0.064040005 = sum of:
            0.036250874 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036250874 = score(doc=5096,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5096, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5096)
            0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 5096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027789133 = score(doc=5096,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 5096, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5096)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Part of a special issue on hypertext and information retrieval. Conventional information retrieval systems provide little support for browsing. Browsing is the major method of searching in hypertext system but users can become disoriented even when browsing small information space. If hypertext is to be used to support browsing in bibliographic databases navigational assistance will be required. Examines the role of thesauri as navigational aids for subject domains of Bibliographic databases. Presents the design of an experimental hypertext-based browsing inference for a thesaurus and its implementation using a commercially available hypertext program. Examines strategies for linking the thesaurus to a database
  20. Youlin, Z.; Baptista Nunes, J.M.; Zhonghua, D.: Construction and evolution of a Chinese Information Science and Information Service (CIS&IS) onto-thesaurus (2014) 0.00
    0.003613001 = product of:
      0.025291005 = sum of:
        0.025291005 = product of:
          0.06322751 = sum of:
            0.02197135 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02197135 = score(doc=1376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 1376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1376)
            0.041256163 = weight(_text_:system in 1376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041256163 = score(doc=1376,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03622214 = queryNorm
                0.36163113 = fieldWeight in 1376, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1376)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Thesauri are the most important tools for information and knowledge organization, and they undergo regular improvements according to the rapid development of new requirements and affordances of emerging information techniques. This paper attempts to integrate ontology into the conceptual organization scheme of thesauri and proposes a new solution to extend the functionality of thesauri based on ontological features, which is termed here as an onto-thesaurus. In this study, a prototype system named the Chinese Information Science and Information Service onto-thesaurus system (CIS&IS), was developed to analyze ontothesaurus with the category of information science and information service in the Chinese Topic Classification Dictionary with a two-stage approach. The first stage aims to define and construct the onto-thesaurus. The second stage aims to realize the evolution function of onto-thesaurus. The main purpose of this system was to achieve the function of self-learning and auto-evolution and to enable a much more effective conceptual retrieval by the newly proposed onto-thesaurus.

Authors

Types

  • a 105
  • el 13
  • m 9
  • n 5
  • s 4
  • r 2
  • b 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…