Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × theme_ss:"Normdateien"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Sandner, M.: Neues aus der Kommission für Sacherschließung : Das neue Tool "NSW online" (2011) 0.01 
    0.007910342 = product of:
  0.027686195 = sum of:
    0.0027789134 = product of:
      0.013894566 = sum of:
        0.013894566 = weight(_text_:system in 4529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013894566 = score(doc=4529,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.1217929 = fieldWeight in 4529, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4529)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.024907282 = product of:
      0.049814563 = sum of:
        0.049814563 = weight(_text_:zugriff in 4529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049814563 = score(doc=4529,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2160124 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.23060973 = fieldWeight in 4529, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4529)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Content
    "Die "Liste der fachlichen Nachschlagewerke zu den Normdateien" (NSW-Liste) stellt mit ihren derzeit rund 1.660 Einträgen ein verbindliches Arbeitsinstrument für die tägliche Praxis in der kooperativen Normdaten-pflege des deutschsprachigen Raumes, speziell für die Terminologiearbeit in der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung dar. In jedem Normdatensatz der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) werden für den Nachweis und die Begründung der Ansetzungs- und Verweisungsformen eines Deskriptors im Feld "Quelle" Referenzwerke aus der so genannten Prioritätenliste (Rangfolge der Nachschlagewerke), darüber hinaus aus der gesamten NSW-Liste, festgehalten und normiert abgekürzt. In gedruckter Form erscheint diese von der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (DNB) regelmäßig aktualisierte Liste jährlich mit einem Änderungsdienst (Änderungen, Neuauflagen; Neuaufnahmen) und steht seit einigen Jahren auch elektronisch abrufbar bereit. Dennoch ist sie "in die Jahre" gekommen. Eine verbesserte Form dieser Liste war ein langjähriges Desiderat für die Neuansetzungspraxis in der SWD. Erst eine Projektarbeit im Rahmen des ULG bot 2008/2009 in Wien die Gelegenheit, solch einem elektronischen Hilfsmittel entscheidend näher zu kommen. Das Projektergebnis war praxistauglich und wurde 2010 von der UB Wien in ein Content Management System (CMS) eingebettet. Zahlreiche Tests und funktionelle Anpassungen sowie eine genaue Durchsicht des Grunddatenbestandes und aller Links in den Katalog des Pilotverbundes (OBV) waren noch nötig, und auch die erste Aktualisierung nach der Druckausgabe 2010 führten wir durch, bevor wir im Herbst 2010 der Fachöffentlichkeit eine Beta-Version vorstellen konnten. Seither steht die Suche im NSW-Tool als Alternative zur Benützung der Druckausgabe allen frei zur Verfügung: http://www.univie.ac.at/nsw/. Sämtliche SWD-Kooperationspartner-Redaktionen und die Lokalen Redaktionen (ÖSWD-LRs) des Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbundes (OBV) können über das Web-Frontend von "NSW online" ihre Wünsche an die Redaktion der NSW-Liste (Fachabteilung SE, DNB) direkt im Tool deponieren (Korrekturanträge sowie Vorschläge zur Aufnahme fehlender oder neuer Nachschlagewerke) und frei im Internet zugängliche Volltexte zu den bereits in der Liste vorhandenen Titeln verlinken (Erstanmeldung über den Webmaster: via Hilfe-Seite im Tool).
    Nur die Verbundbibliotheken des OBV können überdies ihre zu den Nachschlagewerken passenden Bestände in Aleph hinzufügen, ggf. selbst via Web-Frontend im Tool einen Link zum eigenen Verbundkatalog neu anlegen, und insbesondere ihre lokal verfügbaren elektronischen Volltexte anbinden3. Im Backend werden neue Datensätze angelegt, vorhandene Einträge korrigiert, redaktionelle Kommentare platziert und Korrekturanträge abgeschöpft sowie Neuauflagen für die richtige Anzeige und Verknüpfung, etwa mit der Rangfolgeliste, zu ihrem "Anker-Datensatz" umgelenkt. Außerdem werden hier HTML-Seiten wie Hilfetext, Rangfolgeliste u. ä. gepflegt. - Zum Administrationsinterface haben nur der Webmaster der UB Wien, die SWD-Zentralredaktion des OBV sowie die Fachabteilung SE der DNB Zugang. (Nicht nur) Sacherschließerinnen können das Tool mit all seinen Vorteilen nutzen und dennoch in gewohnter Weise vorgehen, wenn sie nach Quellen für ihre Neuansetzungen suchen wollen und darin recherchieren müssen, denn die Struktur des Tools folgt dem Aufbau der Druckfassung. Es empfiehlt sich, im jeweiligen Bibliothekssystem für SWD und PND zum Feld Quelle einen Hypertextlink im Erfassungsmodul anzubringen. Die Normdateiarbeit ist komplex und anspruchsvoll. Die Einhaltung der für alle Neuansetzungen verbindlichen Rangfolge wird mit dem Tool und seiner praxisorientierten Aufbereitung ganz entscheidend erleichtert, was von Beginn an zu einer hohen Qualität jedes Normdatensatzes verhilft. Den größten Zeitgewinn in der täglichen Praxis bringt der sofortige Zugriff auf verlinkte Volltexte. - Angesichts des zunehmenden multilateralen Datentausches bei gleichzeitiger dramatischer Verknappung personeller Ressourcen trotz eines erheblichen Anstiegs des inhaltlich zu erschließenden Literaturaufkommens wird dies im Workflow des vor kurzem eingeführten Online-Redaktionsverfahrens (ONR) für Normdateien der wohl nachhaltigste Effekt von "NSW online" sein."
  2. Haffner, A.: Internationalisierung der GND durch das Semantic Web (2012) 0.00 
    0.0035581833 = product of:
  0.024907282 = sum of:
    0.024907282 = product of:
      0.049814563 = sum of:
        0.049814563 = weight(_text_:zugriff in 318) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049814563 = score(doc=318,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2160124 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.23060973 = fieldWeight in 318, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=318)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Seit Bestehen der Menschheit sammelt der Mensch Informationen, seit Bestehen des Internets stellt der Mensch Informationen ins Web, seit Bestehen des Semantic Webs sollen auch Maschinen in die Lage versetzt werden mit diesen Informationen umzugehen. Das Bibliothekswesen ist einer der Sammler. Seit Jahrhunderten werden Kataloge und Bibliografien sowie Inventarnachweise geführt. Mit der Aufgabe des Zettelkatalogs hin zum Onlinekatalog wurde es Benutzern plötzlich möglich in Beständen komfortabel zu suchen. Durch die Bereitstellung von Daten aus dem Bibliothekswesen im Semantic Web sollen nicht nur die eigenen Katalogsysteme Zugriff auf diese Informationen erhalten, sondern jede beliebige Anwendung, die auf das Web zugreifen kann. Darüber hinaus ist die Vorstellung, dass sich die im Web befindenden Daten - in sofern möglich - miteinander verlinken und zu einem gigantischen semantischen Netz werden, das als ein großer Datenpool verwendet werden kann. Die Voraussetzung hierfür ist wie beim Übergang zum Onlinekatalog die Aufbereitung der Daten in einem passenden Format. Normdaten dienen im Bibliothekswesen bereits dazu eine Vernetzung der unterschiedlichen Bestände zu erlauben. Bei der Erschließung eines Buches wird nicht bloß gesagt, dass jemand, der Thomas Mann heißt, der Autor ist - es wird eine Verknüpfung vom Katalogisat zu dem Thomas Mann erzeugt, der am 6. Juni 1875 in Lübeck geboren und am 12. August 1955 in Zürich verstorben ist. Der Vorteil von Normdateneintragungen ist, dass sie zum eindeutigen Nachweis der Verfasserschaft oder Mitwirkung an einem Werk beitragen. Auch stehen Normdateneintragungen bereits allen Bibliotheken für die Nachnutzung bereit - der Schritt ins Semantic Web wäre somit die Öffnung der Normdaten für alle denkbaren Nutzergruppen.
  3. Zedlitz, J.: Biographische Normdaten : ein Überblick (2017) 0.00 
    0.0021032572 = product of:
  0.0147228 = sum of:
    0.0147228 = product of:
      0.0294456 = sum of:
        0.0294456 = weight(_text_:22 in 3502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0294456 = score(doc=3502,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3502, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3502)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Archivar. 70(2017) H.1, S.22-25
  4. Junger, U.; Schwens, U.: ¬Die inhaltliche Erschließung des schriftlichen kulturellen Erbes auf dem Weg in die Zukunft : Automatische Vergabe von Schlagwörtern in der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (2017) 0.00 
    0.0017527144 = product of:
  0.0122690005 = sum of:
    0.0122690005 = product of:
      0.024538001 = sum of:
        0.024538001 = weight(_text_:22 in 3780) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024538001 = score(doc=3780,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3780, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3780)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    19. 8.2017 9:24:22
  5. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2012) 0.00 
    0.0010873 = product of:
  0.0076110996 = sum of:
    0.0076110996 = product of:
      0.0380555 = sum of:
        0.0380555 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0380555 = score(doc=310,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Authority files have played an important role in improving the quality of indexing and subject cataloging. Although authorities can significantly improve search by increasing the number of access points, they are rarely an integral part of the information retrieval process, particularly end-users searches. A retrieval prototype, searchFAST, was developed to test the feasibility of using an authority file as an index to bibliographic records. searchFAST uses FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) as an index to OCLC's WorldCat.org bibliographic database. The searchFAST methodology complements, rather than replaces, existing WorldCat.org access. The bibliographic file is searched indirectly; first the authority file is searched to identify appropriate subject headings, then the headings are used to retrieve the matching bibliographic records. The prototype demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of using an authority file as an index. Searching the authority file leverages authority control work by increasing the number of access points while supporting a simple interface designed for end-users.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  6. Francu, V.; Dediu, L.-I.: TinREAD - an integrative solution for subject authority control (2015) 0.00 
    9.822896E-4 = product of:
  0.0068760267 = sum of:
    0.0068760267 = product of:
      0.034380134 = sum of:
        0.034380134 = weight(_text_:system in 2297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034380134 = score(doc=2297,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.30135927 = fieldWeight in 2297, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2297)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    The paper introduces TinREAD (The Information Navigator for Readers), an integrated library system produced by IME Romania. The main feature of interest is the way TinREAD can handle a classification-based thesaurus in which verbal index terms are mapped to classification notations. It supports subject authority control interlinking the authority files (subject headings and UDC system). Authority files are used for indexing consistency. Although it is said that intellectual indexing is, unlike automated indexing, both subjective and inconsistent, TinREAD is using intellectual indexing as input (the UDC notations assigned to documents) for the automated indexing resulting from the implementation of a thesaurus structure based on UDC. Each UDC notation is represented by a UNIMARC subject heading record as authority data. One classification notation can be used to search simultaneously into more than one corresponding thesaurus. This way natural language terms are used in indexing and, at the same time, the link with the corresponding classification notation is kept. Additionally, the system can also manage multilingual data for the authority files. This, together with other characteristics of TinREAD are largely discussed and illustrated in the paper. Problems encountered and possible solutions to tackle them are shown.
  7. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2014) 0.00 
    9.0608327E-4 = product of:
  0.0063425824 = sum of:
    0.0063425824 = product of:
      0.031712912 = sum of:
        0.031712912 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031712912 = score(doc=1970,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Authority files have played an important role in improving the quality of indexing and subject cataloging. Although authorities can significantly improve searching by increasing the number of access points, they are rarely an integral part of the information retrieval process, particularly end-users' searches. A retrieval prototype, searchFAST, was developed to test the feasibility of using an authority file as an index to bibliographic records. searchFAST uses Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) as an index to OCLC's WorldCat.org bibliographic database. The searchFAST prototype complements, rather than replaces, existing WorldCat.org access. The bibliographic file is searched indirectly; first the authority file is searched to identify appropriate subject headings, then the headings are used to retrieve the matching bibliographic records. The prototype demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of using an authority file as an index. Searching the authority file leverages authority control work by increasing the number of access points while supporting a simple interface designed for end-users.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  8. Souza, R. de Mattos: ¬The representation of archival information in controlled vocabularies : the context of the archival institutions in Rio de Janeiro (2019) 0.00 
    9.0608327E-4 = product of:
  0.0063425824 = sum of:
    0.0063425824 = product of:
      0.031712912 = sum of:
        0.031712912 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5490) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031712912 = score(doc=5490,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 5490, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5490)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    We aim to trace the scenario of the use of controlled vocabularies as tools of research and work in the scope of representation and retrieval of information in institutions that have archival collections, in order to highlight the need for greater emphasis on the subject of representation of archival information in the academic field, increasing the visibility for the study and analysis of the collections in question and their contents, relevant to the information society. We investigate the current scenario of the use of controlled vocabularies in the archival collections of Rio de Janeiro, the theoretical-methodological changes arising from the impacts of information technologies on analysis, representation, such as classification and indexing, content retrieval, information needs in the contemporary world. The representation of information is associated with classification and retrieval of information to the organization of knowledge in information science. There is a gap in the archival area regarding the expression representation of information from the description of the nineteenth century. As for the theoretical-methodological aspect, there was a theoretical survey of the representation of information in publications in the interdisciplinary areas; as to the op-erational methodology, questionnaires were applied to information agencies on the use of controlled vocabularies, in relation to the treatment of information in archival collections. We conclude by demonstrating the importance of adopting the concept of information representation in archives, using controlled vocabularies associated with new information technologies and informational ecology, consolidating the area as a scientific and interdisciplinary field for information science.
  9. Gültekin, V.: ¬An historical look at the studies on the subject authority file in Turkey (2019) 0.00 
    8.3700387E-4 = product of:
  0.0058590267 = sum of:
    0.0058590267 = product of:
      0.029295133 = sum of:
        0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5480) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029295133 = score(doc=5480,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5480, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5480)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Libraries are bridges between information and the library user in the context of information retrieval. Library users want to access information resources according to their topic. Therefore, it is important to create subject entries in bibliographic records. If subject added entries and their redirects are done correctly, it will make it easier for users to access the information they are looking for. In this article the collaborative studies and projects made in Turkey are being discussed.
  10. Balíková, M.: Subject authority control supported by classification : the case of National Library of the Czech Republic (2015) 0.00 
    8.0203614E-4 = product of:
  0.0056142528 = sum of:
    0.0056142528 = product of:
      0.028071264 = sum of:
        0.028071264 = weight(_text_:system in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028071264 = score(doc=2294,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.24605882 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    From the very beginnings of library automation, subject authority control has been considered an important bibliographic tool in the Czech National Library (CNL). Effective subject access cannot exist without standardised access points. Subject authorities are considered an indispensable reference tool in supporting the selection of subject access points and normalizing content indexing. Most importantly, they are heavily relied upon when it comes to customisation of links between bibliographic records and subject access points in order to create a user-friendly subject browsing and searching environment. Because of the fact that the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) is widely used in Czech Libraries it has become a readily available language independent subject framework which can be complemented by a more user-friendly subject heading system. In this context, the subject authority control offers a means of enhancing subject headings' access points with terminology and the semantic links available in UDC. Furthermore classification is used to enrich relationships between authority records themselves. The author will discuss in more detail the different aspects and advantages of subject authorities in which a classification and a subject heading system complement one another and the way this is implemented in the CNL.
  11. Pika, J.; Pika-Biolzi, M.: Multilingual subject access and classification-based browsing through authority control : the experience of the ETH-Bibliothek, Zürich (2015) 0.00 
    8.0203614E-4 = product of:
  0.0056142528 = sum of:
    0.0056142528 = product of:
      0.028071264 = sum of:
        0.028071264 = weight(_text_:system in 2295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028071264 = score(doc=2295,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.24605882 = fieldWeight in 2295, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2295)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    The paper provides an illustration of the benefits of subject authority control improving multilingual subject access in NEBIS - Netzwerk von Bibliotheken und Informationsstellen in der Schweiz. This example of good practice focuses on some important aspects of classification and indexing. NEBIS subject authorities comprise a classification scheme and multilingual subject descriptor system. A bibliographic system supported by subject authority control empowers libraries as it enables them to expand and adjust vocabulary and link subjects to suit their specific audience. Most importantly it allows the management of different subject vocabularies in numerous languages. In addition, such an enriched subject index creates re-usable and shareable source of subject statements that has value in the wider context of information exchange. The illustrations and supporting arguments are based on indexing practice, subject authority control and use of classification in ETH-Bibliothek, which is the largest library within the NEBIS network.
  12. MacEwan, A.; Angjeli, A.; Gatenby, J.: ¬The International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI) : the evolving future of name authority control (2013) 0.00 
    7.9397525E-4 = product of:
  0.0055578267 = sum of:
    0.0055578267 = product of:
      0.027789133 = sum of:
        0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 1939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027789133 = score(doc=1939,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 1939, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1939)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    This article describes the project to build the initial International Standard Name Identifier (ISNI) database by deploying the techniques used to develop the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF). It focuses particularly on the work of the OCLC team in transforming the VIAF "resource file" model of matched data into a robust, operational, and authoritative file of uniquely assigned ISNIs as a base for an ongoing ISNI assignment system, and on the quality assurance validation of the database provided by the British Library and the Bibliothèque nationale de France. The need for future interaction between ongoing ISNI assignment and name authority control in libraries is also explored.
  13. Pestana, O.: Alignment in medical sciences : towards improvement of UDC (2015) 0.00 
    6.2775286E-4 = product of:
  0.00439427 = sum of:
    0.00439427 = product of:
      0.02197135 = sum of:
        0.02197135 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02197135 = score(doc=2298,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2298, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2298)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    A classification scheme represents a powerful indexing and retrieval tool. Obsolete terminology and misalignment between widely used systems is key impediment to better use of classification. This paper looks into the issues caused by delay in the revision of UDC class of medical sciences and possible solutions. Following a short description of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) and of the National Library of Medicine (NLM) Classification, the author analyses the notations and captions included in 61 class of the UDC Summary. All the classes, subclasses and special auxiliary subdivisions are covered in order to find compatible notations between both schemes, out-of-date vocabulary and out-of-date subdivisions of UDC. As a result of this study and in light of the most recent developments in medical sciences, one subdivision is questioned and several vocabulary expressions included in the caption fields are proposed to be changed or updated.
  14. Tillett, B.B.: Complementarity of perspectives for resource descriptions (2015) 0.00 
    5.6712516E-4 = product of:
  0.003969876 = sum of:
    0.003969876 = product of:
      0.01984938 = sum of:
        0.01984938 = weight(_text_:system in 2288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01984938 = score(doc=2288,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.17398985 = fieldWeight in 2288, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2288)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Bibliographic data is used to describe resources held in the collections of libraries, archives and museums. That data is mostly available on the Web today and mostly as linked data. Also on the Web are the controlled vocabulary systems of name authority files, like the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF), classification systems, and subject terms. These systems offer their own linked data to potentially help users find the information they want - whether at their local library or anywhere in the world that is willing to make their resources available. We have found it beneficial to merge authority data for names on a global level, as the entities are relatively clear. That is not true for subject concepts and terminology that have categorisation systems developed according to varying principles and schemes and are in multiple languages. Rather than requiring everyone in the world to use the same categorisation/classification system in the same language, we know that the Web offers us the opportunity to add descriptors assigned around the world using multiple systems from multiple perspectives to identify our resources. Those descriptors add value to refine searches, help users worldwide and share globally what each library does locally.
  15. Barrionuevo Almuzara, L.; Alvite Díez, M.L.; Rodríguez Bravo, B.: ¬A study of authority control in Spanish university repositories (2012) 0.00 
    5.2312744E-4 = product of:
  0.003661892 = sum of:
    0.003661892 = product of:
      0.01830946 = sum of:
        0.01830946 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01830946 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    This paper examines the current state of authority control development in Spanish university repositories. As a decade has now gone by since the initiation of the first projects for institutional repositories in Spain, it would seem a suitable time to draw attention to authority control, an element of the first rank in evaluating the consistency and integrity of systems for recovering bibliographic information. The work is focused on examining the implementation of authorities in twenty-six Spanish university repositories, taking into account the information provided by the standardization experts working in them. The study considers the responses of the coordinators for these digital collections using a set of analytic criteria set out in the study. The handling of authorities in the group of university repositories studied may be described as uneven. Greater interest may be observed in controlling author entries, with laxer solutions for authority control of subjects. It suggests the need to establish effective policies for the management of authorities by means of cooperative efforts permitting the building up of corpora of entries for authorities that would aid the processes of cataloguing, metadata creation, and information retrieval in systems based on syntactic and semantic interoperability in which manual intervention should be minimal.
  16. Kasprzik, A.; Kett, J.: Vorschläge für eine Weiterentwicklung der Sacherschließung und Schritte zur fortgesetzten strukturellen Aufwertung der GND (2018) 0.00 
    5.2312744E-4 = product of:
  0.003661892 = sum of:
    0.003661892 = product of:
      0.01830946 = sum of:
        0.01830946 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01830946 = score(doc=4599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 4599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4599)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval

Authors

Languages

  • e 11
  • d 4

Types

Themes