Search (66 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Hartmann, K.: Pressedatenbank: Online-Retrieval und gedruckte Register (1984) 0.06 
    0.058622193 = product of:
  0.20517766 = sum of:
    0.0058590267 = product of:
      0.029295133 = sum of:
        0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029295133 = score(doc=5184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 5184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5184)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.19931863 = weight(_text_:abfrage in 5184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19931863 = score(doc=5184,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28580084 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.890225 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03622214 = queryNorm
        0.6974039 = fieldWeight in 5184, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.890225 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5184)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Das PDS-Registerprogramm wird zur Produktion von Registern der Gruner+Jahr-Zeitschriften verwandt. Zusammen mit der Pressedatenbank können die Vorteile einer Suche in gedruckten Registern mit denen der Online-Recherche verbunden werden. Das Registerprogramm arbeitet mit einem modifizierten KWOC-Verfahren, das dem Indexierer eine genaue Steuerung der Registereinträge ermöglicht. Die Ausgabe kann über übliche DV-Drucker, z.B. Laserdrucker oder Lichtsatz erfolgen. Ein Bildschrimtextanschluß für die Online-Abfrage ist eingerichtet
  2. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.01 
    0.0127447145 = product of:
  0.0446065 = sum of:
    0.010253297 = product of:
      0.051266484 = sum of:
        0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051266484 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.0343532 = product of:
      0.0687064 = sum of:
        0.0687064 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0687064 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  3. Rosemann, L.: ¬Die Volltextabfrage und das Alleinstellungsmerkmal des physischen Buches (2006) 0.01 
    0.010677784 = product of:
  0.074744485 = sum of:
    0.074744485 = weight(_text_:abfrage in 5142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.074744485 = score(doc=5142,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.28580084 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.890225 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03622214 = queryNorm
        0.26152647 = fieldWeight in 5142, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.890225 = idf(docFreq=44, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=5142)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Content
    . . . Ich plädiere hier aus den oben genannten wissenstheoretischen Gründen nicht nur für die Aufrechterhaltung eines Mindestmaßes an Registern und Indexen im Anhang von physischen Büchern, sondern sogar für deren Ausbau, deren standardmäßige Zugabe bei Sach- und wissenschaftlichen Büchern gerade angesichts der Volltextnutzung durch Online-Abfragen. Warum? Hierzu sechs Argumente: 1. Wie oben bereits angerissen, lehrt die Erfahrung bei CD-ROM-Zugaben zu opulenten Werken, dass Parallelmedien mit Parallelinhalten von den Nutzern nicht wirklich angenommen werden; es ist umständlich, zur Auffindung bestimmter Textstellen den Computer befragen zu müssen und die Fundstellen dann zwischen zwei Buchdeckeln nachzuschlagen. 2. Über frei wählbare Suchbegriffe seitens des Nutzers ist noch keine Qualität der Suchergebnisse garantiert. Erst das Einrechnen entsprechender Verweisungsbegriffe und Synonyme in die Suchabfrage führt zu Qualität des Ergebnisses. Die scheinbar eingesparten Kosten einer einmaligen bzw. abonnementartigen Investition in eine Online-Verfügbarkeit der Buchinhalte vonseiten der Verlage werden dann über die Hintertür doch wieder fällig, wenn sich nämlich herausstellt, dass Nutzer bei der von ihnen gesuchten Information nicht fündig werden, weil sie unter dem "falschen", d.h. entweder ihnen nicht bekannten oder einem ihnen gerade nicht präsenten Schlagwort gesucht haben. Die Online-Suchabfrage, die auf den ersten Blick höchst nutzerfreundlich erscheint, da eine ungeheure Menge an Titeln die Abfrage umfasst, erweist sich womöglich als wenig brauchbar, wenn sich die Trefferqualität aus den genannten Gründen als beschränkt herausstellt. 3. Nur bei entsprechenden Restriktionen des Zugangs bzw. der präsentierten Textausschnitte werden die Verlage es gewährleistet sehen, dass die Nutzerin, der Nutzer nicht vom Kauf des physischen Buches Abstand nehmen. Nur wenn die Nutzer wissen, dass ihnen gerade jene Informationen am Bildschirm vorenthalten werden, die sie im zu erwerbenden Buch mit Gewissheit finden werden, werden sie das Buch noch erwerben wollen. Wer auf die Schnelle nur ein Kochrezept aus einem teuer bebilderten Kochbuch der Oberklasse abrufen kann, wird das teure Kochbuch eben nicht mehr kaufen. Analog stellt sich die Frage, ob nicht aus diesem Grunde auch Bibliotheken erwägen werden, angesichts der elektronischen Präsenz teuerer physischer Bücher auf den Erwerb der Letzteren zu verzichten, wohl wissend, dass den Wissenschaftlern im Zweifel einige Mausklicks genügen, um die gewünschte Begriffsrecherche erschöpfend beantwortet zu finden.
  4. Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Alphabetische Sachregister und Klassifikation (1986) 0.01 
    0.00813299 = product of:
  0.05693093 = sum of:
    0.05693093 = product of:
      0.11386186 = sum of:
        0.11386186 = weight(_text_:zugriff in 1557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11386186 = score(doc=1557,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2160124 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.52710795 = fieldWeight in 1557, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.963546 = idf(docFreq=308, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1557)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Abstract
    Anhand von 2 alphabetischen Sachregistern der Zeitschrift für Buch- und Druckgeschichte "Het Boek" wird dargestellt, welche Rolle die Klassifikation in Sachregistern spielt bei der Wahl der Erschließungseinheiten und bei der Bestimmung der Indexierungstiefe. Als Hauptfunktion der Klassifikation bei Registern erweist sich jedoch die Erleichterung und Verbesserung des Suchvorganges. Erklärt wird, wie die Methode des ersten Registers, Klassifizierung spezifischer Begriffe unter hierarchisch höhere Begriffe, nicht zum Ziel führt und wie die Kontextmethode einen besseren Zugriff gewährleistet
  5. Schroeder, K.A.: Layered indexing of images (1998) 0.01 
    0.0064955507 = product of:
  0.022734426 = sum of:
    0.0055578267 = product of:
      0.027789133 = sum of:
        0.027789133 = weight(_text_:system in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027789133 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.0171766 = product of:
      0.0343532 = sum of:
        0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0343532 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The General Motors Media Archives (GMMA) project is undertaking one of the largest digitization efforts in the world. GMMA houses over 3 million still photographic images and tens of thousands of motion picture films and videos spanning over a hundred years. The images are a rich history of the evolution of transport, urban growth, fashion, design, and popular culture. GMMA has developed a layered approach to visual indexing that dissects the objects, style and implication of each image, so that the indexing system can accomodate all potential approaches to the material. Explains each layer of indexing and provides examples which show implication layers that can easily be missed
    Date
    9. 4.2000 17:22:00
  6. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Evolution towards ISO 25964 : an international standard with guidelines for thesauri and other types of controlled vocabulary (2007) 0.01 
    0.0063723573 = product of:
  0.02230325 = sum of:
    0.0051266486 = product of:
      0.025633242 = sum of:
        0.025633242 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025633242 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.0171766 = product of:
      0.0343532 = sum of:
        0.0343532 = weight(_text_:22 in 749) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0343532 = score(doc=749,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 749, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=749)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    Die geschichtliche Entwicklung von ISO 2788: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of monolingual thesauri und ISO 5964: Documentation - Guidelines for the establishment and development of multilingual thesauri wird kurz beschrieben. 2001 begann die Arbeit an der Entwicklung von BS 8723: Structured Vocabularies for Information Retrieval - Guide, einer fünfteiligen Norm, die konzipiert wurde, um die internationalen Normen zu aktualisieren, insbesondere mit Hinblick auf Interoperabilität. Der Verfahrensablauf zur Übernahme von BS 8723 als internationale Norm hat begonnen.
    Date
    8.12.2007 19:25:22
  7. Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.01 
    0.0062837633 = product of:
  0.021993171 = sum of:
    0.009724171 = product of:
      0.048620854 = sum of:
        0.048620854 = weight(_text_:system in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048620854 = score(doc=5775,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.42618635 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    0.0122690005 = product of:
      0.024538001 = sum of:
        0.024538001 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024538001 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    Abstract
    The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
    Footnote
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft "Moving beyond the presentation layer: content and context in the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) System"
  8. Bennion, B.C.: Performance testing of a book and its index as an information retrieval system (1980) 0.01 
    0.0061054146 = product of:
  0.0427379 = sum of:
    0.0427379 = product of:
      0.10684475 = sum of:
        0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.051266484 = score(doc=7763,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 7763, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7763)
        0.055578265 = weight(_text_:system in 7763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055578265 = score(doc=7763,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.4871716 = fieldWeight in 7763, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7763)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
  9. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.01 
    0.0056086862 = product of:
  0.0392608 = sum of:
    0.0392608 = product of:
      0.0785216 = sum of:
        0.0785216 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0785216 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  10. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.01 
    0.0056086862 = product of:
  0.0392608 = sum of:
    0.0392608 = product of:
      0.0785216 = sum of:
        0.0785216 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0785216 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  11. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.01 
    0.0056086862 = product of:
  0.0392608 = sum of:
    0.0392608 = product of:
      0.0785216 = sum of:
        0.0785216 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0785216 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  12. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.01 
    0.0056086862 = product of:
  0.0392608 = sum of:
    0.0392608 = product of:
      0.0785216 = sum of:
        0.0785216 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0785216 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  13. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.00 
    0.0049076 = product of:
  0.0343532 = sum of:
    0.0343532 = product of:
      0.0687064 = sum of:
        0.0687064 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0687064 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  14. Browne, G.: ¬The definite article : acknowledging The in index entries (2001) 0.00 
    0.0049076 = product of:
  0.0343532 = sum of:
    0.0343532 = product of:
      0.0687064 = sum of:
        0.0687064 = weight(_text_:22 in 12) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0687064 = score(doc=12,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 12, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=12)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.119-122
  15. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.00 
    0.0049076 = product of:
  0.0343532 = sum of:
    0.0343532 = product of:
      0.0687064 = sum of:
        0.0687064 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0687064 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  16. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.00 
    0.0049076 = product of:
  0.0343532 = sum of:
    0.0343532 = product of:
      0.0687064 = sum of:
        0.0687064 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0687064 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  17. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.00 
    0.0049076 = product of:
  0.0343532 = sum of:
    0.0343532 = product of:
      0.0687064 = sum of:
        0.0687064 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0687064 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  18. Lee, D.: Judging indexes : the criteria for a good index (2001) 0.00 
    0.0049076 = product of:
  0.0343532 = sum of:
    0.0343532 = product of:
      0.0687064 = sum of:
        0.0687064 = weight(_text_:22 in 4162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0687064 = score(doc=4162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4162)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.191-194
  19. Weinberg, B.H.: Predecessors of scientific indexing structures in the domain of religion (2001) 0.00 
    0.0049076 = product of:
  0.0343532 = sum of:
    0.0343532 = product of:
      0.0687064 = sum of:
        0.0687064 = weight(_text_:22 in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0687064 = score(doc=4172,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.4, S.178-180
  20. Weinberg, B.H.: Index structures in early Hebrew Biblical word lists : preludes to the first Latin concordances (2004) 0.00 
    0.0049076 = product of:
  0.0343532 = sum of:
    0.0343532 = product of:
      0.0687064 = sum of:
        0.0687064 = weight(_text_:22 in 4180) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0687064 = score(doc=4180,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03622214 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4180, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4180)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    Date
    17.10.2005 13:54:22

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 59
  • d 6
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 56
  • m 8
  • n 1
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications