-
Magennis, M.: Expert rule-based query expansion (1995)
0.01
0.0056799245 = product of:
0.03975947 = sum of:
0.03975947 = product of:
0.09939867 = sum of:
0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051266484 = score(doc=5181,freq=8.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
0.048132192 = weight(_text_:system in 5181) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048132192 = score(doc=5181,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.42190298 = fieldWeight in 5181, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5181)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Examines how, for term based free text retrieval, Interactive Query Expansion (IQE) provides better retrieval performance tahn Automatic Query Expansion (AQE) but the performance of IQE depends on the strategy employed by the user to select expansion terms. The aim is to build an expert query expansion system using term selection rules based on expert users' strategies. It is expected that such a system will achieve better performance for novice or inexperienced users that either AQE or IQE. The procedure is to discover expert IQE users' term selection strategies through observation and interrogation, to construct a rule based query expansion (RQE) system based on these and to compare the resulting retrieval performance with that of comparable AQE and IQE systems
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Rösener, C.: ¬Die Stecknadel im Heuhaufen : Natürlichsprachlicher Zugang zu Volltextdatenbanken (2005)
0.00
0.0024669599 = product of:
0.01726872 = sum of:
0.01726872 = product of:
0.043171797 = sum of:
0.020714786 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020714786 = score(doc=548,freq=4.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.18905719 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
0.022457011 = weight(_text_:system in 548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022457011 = score(doc=548,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.19684705 = fieldWeight in 548, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=548)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Content
- Enthält die Kapitel: 2: Wissensrepräsentation 2.1 Deklarative Wissensrepräsentation 2.2 Klassifikationen des BMM 2.3 Thesauri und Ontologien: existierende kommerzielle Software 2.4 Erstellung eines Thesaurus im Rahmen des LeWi-Projektes 3: Analysekomponenten 3.1 Sprachliche Phänomene in der maschinellen Textanalyse 3.2 Analysekomponenten: Lösungen und Forschungsansätze 3.3 Die Analysekomponenten im LeWi-Projekt 4: Information Retrieval 4.1 Grundlagen des Information Retrieval 4.2 Automatische Indexierungsmethoden und -verfahren 4.3 Automatische Indexierung des BMM im Rahmen des LeWi-Projektes 4.4 Suchstrategien und Suchablauf im LeWi-Kontext
- RSWK
- Volltextdatenbank / Natürlichsprachiges System
- Subject
- Volltextdatenbank / Natürlichsprachiges System
-
Wenzel, F.: Semantische Eingrenzung im Freitext-Retrieval auf der Basis morphologischer Segmentierungen (1980)
0.00
0.0018121665 = product of:
0.012685165 = sum of:
0.012685165 = product of:
0.063425824 = sum of:
0.063425824 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2037) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.063425824 = score(doc=2037,freq=6.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 2037, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2037)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- The basic problem in freetext retrieval is that the retrieval language is not properly adapted to that of the author. Morphological segmentation, where words with the same root are grouped together in the inverted file, is a good eliminator of noise and information loss, providing high recall but low precision
-
Warner, A.J.: ¬The role of linguistic analysis in full-text retrieval (1994)
0.00
0.0014647568 = product of:
0.010253297 = sum of:
0.010253297 = product of:
0.051266484 = sum of:
0.051266484 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.051266484 = score(doc=2992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2992)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Pritchard-Schoch, T.: Comparing natural language retrieval : Win & Freestyle (1995)
0.00
8.3700387E-4 = product of:
0.0058590267 = sum of:
0.0058590267 = product of:
0.029295133 = sum of:
0.029295133 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029295133 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
-
Wacholder, N.; Byrd, R.J.: Retrieving information from full text using linguistic knowledge (1994)
0.00
6.2775286E-4 = product of:
0.00439427 = sum of:
0.00439427 = product of:
0.02197135 = sum of:
0.02197135 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8524) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02197135 = score(doc=8524,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 8524, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8524)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Examines how techniques in the field of natural language processing can be applied to the analysis of text in information retrieval. State of the art text searching programs cannot distinguish, for example, between occurrences of the sickness, AIDS and aids as tool or between library school and school nor equate such terms as online or on-line which are variants of the same form. To make these distinction, systems must incorporate knowledge about the meaning of words in context. Research in natural language processing has concentrated on the automatic 'understanding' of language; how to analyze the grammatical structure and meaning of text. Although many asoects of this research remain experimental, describes how these techniques to recognize spelling variants, names, acronyms, and abbreviations
