-
Dahlberg, I.: Begriffsarbeit in der Wissensorganisation (2010)
0.00
0.0028043431 = product of:
0.0196304 = sum of:
0.0196304 = product of:
0.0392608 = sum of:
0.0392608 = weight(_text_:22 in 3726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0392608 = score(doc=3726,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3726, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3726)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Treude, L.: ¬Das Problem der Konzeptdefinition in der Wissensorganisation : über einen missglückten Versuch der Klärung (2013)
0.00
0.0021032572 = product of:
0.0147228 = sum of:
0.0147228 = product of:
0.0294456 = sum of:
0.0294456 = weight(_text_:22 in 3060) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0294456 = score(doc=3060,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3060, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3060)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- LIBREAS: Library ideas. no.22, 2013, S.xx-xx
-
Marradi, A.: ¬The concept of concept : concepts and terms (2012)
0.00
0.0017527144 = product of:
0.0122690005 = sum of:
0.0122690005 = product of:
0.024538001 = sum of:
0.024538001 = weight(_text_:22 in 33) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024538001 = score(doc=33,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 33, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=33)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 22. 1.2012 13:11:25
-
Besler, G.; Szulc, J.: Gottlob Frege's theory of definition as useful tool for knowledge organization : definition of 'context' - case study (2014)
0.00
0.0017527144 = product of:
0.0122690005 = sum of:
0.0122690005 = product of:
0.024538001 = sum of:
0.024538001 = weight(_text_:22 in 1440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024538001 = score(doc=1440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12684377 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1440)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Knowledge organization in the 21st century: between historical patterns and future prospects. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International ISKO Conference 19-22 May 2014, Kraków, Poland. Ed.: Wieslaw Babik
-
Friedman, A.; Thellefsen, M.: Concept theory and semiotics in knowledge organization (2011)
0.00
6.8055023E-4 = product of:
0.0047638514 = sum of:
0.0047638514 = product of:
0.023819257 = sum of:
0.023819257 = weight(_text_:system in 292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023819257 = score(doc=292,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11408355 = queryWeight, product of:
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.20878783 = fieldWeight in 292, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=292)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the basics of semiotic analysis and concept theory that represent two dominant approaches to knowledge representation, and explore how these approaches are fruitful for knowledge organization. Design/methodology/approach - In particular the semiotic theory formulated by the American philosopher C.S. Peirce and the concept theory formulated by Ingetraut Dahlberg are investigated. The paper compares the differences and similarities between these two theories of knowledge representation. Findings - The semiotic model is a general and unrestricted model of signs and Dahlberg's model is thought from the perspective and demand of better knowledge organization system (KOS) development. It is found that Dahlberg's concept model provides a detailed method for analyzing and representing concepts in a KOS, where semiotics provides the philosophical context for representation. Originality/value - This paper is the first to combine theories of knowledge representation, semiotic and concept theory, within the context of knowledge organization.
-
O'Neill, E.T.; Kammerer, K.A.; Bennett, R.: ¬The aboutness of words (2017)
0.00
6.2775286E-4 = product of:
0.00439427 = sum of:
0.00439427 = product of:
0.02197135 = sum of:
0.02197135 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3835) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02197135 = score(doc=3835,freq=2.0), product of:
0.109568894 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03622214 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3835, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3835)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Word aboutness is defined as the relationship between words and subjects associated with them. An aboutness coefficient is developed to estimate the strength of the aboutness relationship. Words that are randomly distributed across subjects are assumed to lack aboutness and the degree to which their usage deviates from a random pattern indicates the strength of the aboutness. To estimate aboutness, title words and their associated subjects are extracted from the titles of non-fiction English language books in the OCLC WorldCat database. The usage patterns of the title words are analyzed and used to compute aboutness coefficients for each of the common title words. Words with low aboutness coefficients (An and In) are commonly found in stop word lists, whereas words with high aboutness coefficients (Carbonate, Autism) are unambiguous and have a strong subject association. The aboutness coefficient potentially can enhance indexing, advance authority control, and improve retrieval.
