Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Beghtol, C."
  1. Beghtol, C.: General classification systems : structural principles for multidisciplinary specification (1998) 0.06
    0.059789024 = product of:
      0.11957805 = sum of:
        0.03920956 = weight(_text_:world in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03920956 = score(doc=44,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
        0.052102152 = weight(_text_:wide in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052102152 = score(doc=44,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
        0.028266339 = weight(_text_:web in 44) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028266339 = score(doc=44,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 44, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=44)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    In this century, knowledge creation, production, dissemination and use have changed profoundly. Intellectual and physical barriers have been substantially reduced by the rise of multidisciplinarity and by the influence of computerization, particularly by the spread of the World Wide Web (WWW). Bibliographic classification systems need to respond to this situation. Three possible strategic responses are described: 1) adopting an existing system; 2) adapting an existing system; and 3) finding new structural principles for classification systems. Examples of these three responses are given. An extended example of the third option uses the knowledge outline in the Spectrum of Britannica Online to suggest a theory of "viewpoint warrant" that could be used to incorporate differing perspectives into general classification systems
  2. Beghtol, C.: Stories : applications of narrative discourse analysis to issues in information storage and retrieval (1997) 0.01
    0.0076240813 = product of:
      0.045744486 = sum of:
        0.045744486 = weight(_text_:world in 5844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045744486 = score(doc=5844,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 5844, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5844)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    The arts, humanities, and social sciences commonly borrow concepts and methods from the sciences, but interdisciplinary borrowing seldom occurs in the opposite direction. Research on narrative discourse is relevant to problems of documentary storage and retrieval, for the arts and humanities in particular, but also for other broad areas of knowledge. This paper views the potential application of narrative discourse analysis to information storage and retrieval problems from 2 perspectives: 1) analysis and comparison of narrative documents in all disciplines may be simplified if fundamental categories that occur in narrative documents can be isolated; and 2) the possibility of subdividing the world of knowledge initially into narrative and non-narrative documents is explored with particular attention to Werlich's work on text types
  3. Beghtol, C.: Knowledge domains : multidisciplinarity and bibliographic classification systems (1998) 0.01
    0.0065349266 = product of:
      0.03920956 = sum of:
        0.03920956 = weight(_text_:world in 2028) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03920956 = score(doc=2028,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 2028, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2028)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic classification systems purport to organize the world of knowledge for information storage and retrieval purposes in libraries and bibliographies, both manual and online. The major systems that have predominated during the 20th century were originally predicated on the academic disciplines. This structural principle is no longer adequate because multidisciplinray knowledge production has overtaken more traditional disciplinary perspectives and produced communities of cooperation whose documents cannot be accomodated in a disciplinary structure. This paper addresses the problems the major classifications face, reports some attempts to revise these systems to accomodate multidisciplinary works more appropriately, and describes some theoretical research perspectives that attempt to reorient classification research toward the pluralistic needs of multidisciplinary knowledge creation and the perspectives of different discourse communities. Traditionally, the primary desiderata of classification systems were mutual exclusivity and joint exhaustivity. The need to respond to multidisciplinary research may mean that hospitality will replace mutual exclusivity and joint exhaustivity as the most needed and useful characteristics of classification systems in both theory and practice
  4. Beghtol, C.: Semantic validity : concepts of warrants in bibliographic classification systems (1986) 0.01
    0.0054457723 = product of:
      0.032674633 = sum of:
        0.032674633 = weight(_text_:world in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032674633 = score(doc=3487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    This paper argues that the semantic axis of bibliographic classification systems can be found in the various warrants that have been used to justify the utility of classification systems. Classificationists, theorists, and critics have emphasized the syntactic aspects of classification theories and systems, but a number of semantic warrants can be identified. The evolution of four semantic warrants is traced through the development of twentieth-century classification theory: literary warrant, scientific/philosophical warrant, educational warrant, and cultural warrant. It is concluded that further examination of semantic warrants might make possible a rationalized approach to the creation of classification systems for particular uses. The attention of scholars on faceted schemes and classificatory structures had heretofore pulled our attention to the syntactic aspects (e.g., concept division and citation order), with semantics being considered more or less a question of the terms and their relationships and somewhat taken for granted, or at least construed as a unitary aspect. Attention is on the choice of the classes and their meaning, as well as their connection to the world, and not so much on their syntactic relationship. This notion is developed by providing an historical and conceptual overview of the various kinds of warrant discernible in working with bibliographic systems. In Beghtol's definition, warrant concerns more than just the selection of terms, but rather the mapping of a classification system to the context and uses.
  5. Beghtol, C.: Knowledge representation and organization in the ITER project : A Web-based digital library for scholars of the middle ages and renaissance (http://iter.utoronto.ca) (2001) 0.00
    0.0047110566 = product of:
      0.028266339 = sum of:
        0.028266339 = weight(_text_:web in 638) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028266339 = score(doc=638,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 638, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=638)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
  6. Beghtol, C.: ¬The Iter Bibliography : International standard subject access to medieval and renaissance materials (400-1700) (2003) 0.00
    0.004441627 = product of:
      0.02664976 = sum of:
        0.02664976 = weight(_text_:web in 3965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02664976 = score(doc=3965,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 3965, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3965)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Content
    "1. Iter: Gateway to the Middle Ages and Renaissance Iter is a non-profit research project dedicated to providing electronic access to all kinds and formats of materials pertaining to the Middle Ages and Renaissance (400-1700). Iter began in 1995 as a joint initiative of the Renaissance Society of America (RSA) in New York City and the Centre for Reformation and Renaissance Studies (CRRS), Univ. of Toronto. By 1997, three more partners had joined: Faculty of Information Studies (FIS), Univ. of Toronto; Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies (ACMRS), Arizona State Univ. at Tempe; and John P. Robarts Library, Univ. of Toronto. Iter was funded initially by the five partners and major foundations and, since 1998, has offered low-cost subscriptions to institutions and individuals. When Iter becomes financially self-sufficient, any profits will be used to enhance and expand the project. Iter databases are housed and maintained at the John P. Robarts Library. The interface is a customized version of DRA WebZ. A new interface using DRA Web can be searched now and will replace the DRA WebZ interface shortly. Iter was originally conceived as a comprehensive bibliography of secondary materials that would be an alternative to the existing commercial research tools for its period. These were expensive, generally appeared several years late, had limited subject indexing, were inconsistent in coverage, of uneven quality, and often depended an fragile networks of volunteers for identification of materials. The production of a reasonably priced, web-based, timely research tool was Iter's first priority. In addition, the partners wanted to involve graduate students in the project in order to contribute to the scholarly training and financial support of future scholars of the Middle Ages and Renaissance and to utilize as much automation as possible."
  7. Beghtol, C.: Toward a theory of fiction analysis for information storage and retrieval (1992) 0.00
    0.0024107702 = product of:
      0.0144646205 = sum of:
        0.0144646205 = product of:
          0.04339386 = sum of:
            0.04339386 = weight(_text_:22 in 5830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04339386 = score(doc=5830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14019686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04003532 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5830)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    5. 8.2006 13:22:08
  8. Beghtol, C.: ¬The facet concept as a universal principle of subdivision (2006) 0.00
    0.002128572 = product of:
      0.012771431 = sum of:
        0.012771431 = product of:
          0.038314294 = sum of:
            0.038314294 = weight(_text_:29 in 1483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038314294 = score(doc=1483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14083174 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04003532 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1483)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    29. 2.2008 19:19:30
  9. Beghtol, C.: Naïve classification systems and the global information society (2004) 0.00
    0.0015067314 = product of:
      0.009040388 = sum of:
        0.009040388 = product of:
          0.027121164 = sum of:
            0.027121164 = weight(_text_:22 in 3483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027121164 = score(doc=3483,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14019686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04003532 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3483, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3483)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Pages
    S.19-22