Search (50 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998) 0.07 
    0.071060464 = product of:
  0.14212093 = sum of:
    0.052279413 = weight(_text_:world in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052279413 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.33973572 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
    0.075376906 = weight(_text_:web in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.075376906 = score(doc=2878,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
    0.0144646205 = product of:
      0.04339386 = sum of:
        0.04339386 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04339386 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14019686 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    Ovid has supported a sophisticated interface for searching bibliographic and full text databases for some time. It is now offering a Web based version of this interface that is capable of accessing Z39.50-compliant OPACs and databases anywhere in the world. The Ovid Web Gateway builds on the Ovid Server, thus allowing for a variety of functions and configurations at user, group and database-specific level. The Web Gateway has a selection of download formats and delivery options
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  2. Schoonbaert, D.; Rosenberg, V.: Personal Bibliographic Systems (PBS) (2009) 0.06 
    0.059789024 = product of:
  0.11957805 = sum of:
    0.03920956 = weight(_text_:world in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03920956 = score(doc=3860,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
    0.052102152 = weight(_text_:wide in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052102152 = score(doc=3860,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
    0.028266339 = weight(_text_:web in 3860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028266339 = score(doc=3860,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3860, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3860)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    Personal Bibliographic Systems (PBS) manage the input, storage, retrieval, and output of bibliographic references. The software allows for references to a number of different document types such as journal articles, books, book chapters, dissertations, reports, unpublished papers, electronic documents, etc. Unlike general-purpose database management packages, PBS are made for bibliographic information, featuring a variety of import profiles for records downloaded from the major international databases, and the automatic generation of dozens of different output styles, including those used by the world's leading scientific journals. Modern PBS are thoroughly integrated with word processors. The software provides for the import, storage, retrieval, and output of World Wide Web-based information. This survey focuses on the various options and characteristics of PBS. Special attention is paid to structural flexibility, retrieval options, input, display, and output formats.
  3. McMahon, T.E.: Procite 4: a look at the latest release in bibliographic management software (1998) 0.05 
    0.045608476 = product of:
  0.09121695 = sum of:
    0.052102152 = weight(_text_:wide in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052102152 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
    0.028266339 = weight(_text_:web in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.028266339 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
    0.010848465 = product of:
      0.032545395 = sum of:
        0.032545395 = weight(_text_:22 in 2810) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032545395 = score(doc=2810,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14019686 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2810, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2810)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Abstract
    On Nov 26, 1997, Research Information Systems released its newest version of the ProCite bibliographic management software. The most notable change to the programme is the retooling for compatibility with Windows 95 and NT. In addition to the Windows 95 upgrade, ProCite added 2 new workforms. These forms allow users to capture information about Web pages and e-mail messages. This latest release builds on the Cite While You Write feature that allows users to link citations in a single manuscript to records in multiple databases. The program simplifies the generation of bibliographies and endnotes while allowing users to create bibliographic databases using 28 distinct workforms. Workforms cover a wide range of materials to patents. While there are a few idiosyncrasies users should be aware of, this product is a solid addition to the librarian's toolkit and should be considered by those libraries that have a need for a small but powerful programme to catalogue resources and create bibliographies
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  4. Phipps, N.: BRS/SEARCH (1993) 0.04 
    0.040582985 = product of:
  0.121748954 = sum of:
    0.052279413 = weight(_text_:world in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052279413 = score(doc=612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.33973572 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
    0.06946954 = weight(_text_:wide in 612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06946954 = score(doc=612,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 612, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=612)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Outlines the key features of BRS/SEARCH, noting its wide use by legal practices throughout the world for retrieving specific information from large amounts of archived data, including litigation support, know-how systems, skills registers, libraries and conflict of interest routines. Points out that up to 16 databases can be searched simultaneously. Version 6.1 was released in Feb. 1993. Also describes various 'add-on' products which are available
  5. EndNote X (2006) 0.04 
    0.03985935 = product of:
  0.0797187 = sum of:
    0.026139706 = weight(_text_:world in 3590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.026139706 = score(doc=3590,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 3590, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3590)
    0.03473477 = weight(_text_:wide in 3590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03473477 = score(doc=3590,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 3590, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3590)
    0.018844226 = weight(_text_:web in 3590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018844226 = score(doc=3590,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 3590, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3590)
  0.5 = coord(3/6)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VOEB 59(2006) H.4, S.81-88 (O. Oberhauser): ""Endnoten" erfüllen bekanntlich denselben Zweck wie Fußnoten, werden jedoch an das Ende des Werkes (Artikels, Kapitel, Buch usw.) gestellt, um die Textseiten nicht mit Zitaten und Anmerkungen zu überfrachten. EndNote hingegen ist ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm für Windows und MacOSX, dessen Name sicher nicht ohne Grund gewählt wurde, zumal der Hauptzweck dieser Software darin besteht, die Erstellung von Literaturverzeichnissen und Zitaten beim Abfassen von wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten zu unterstützen. Solche Programme zur Literaturverwaltung, auch Bibliographieprogramme genannt, gibt es heute in großer Zahl. Viele sind kommerzielle Softwareprodukte, andere kostenlose oder auch Open Source-Programme. EndNote, ein Produkt von Thomson ISI ResearchSoft,' zählt zur ersteren Gattung und wird in unseren Breiten von der Adept Scientific GmbH (Frankfurt am Main)' vertrieben. Mit einem Preis von ungefähr 200 Euro - genauere Angaben müssen aufgrund wechselnder Aktionen der Homepage entnommen werden - liegt das Programm eher im oberen Bereich der Produktgruppe; de facto wird dies aber durch günstigere Studentenversionen, vor allem aber auch durch Campuslizenzen für die Angehörigen der meisten österreichischen Universitäten durchaus nach unten relativiert. EndNote ist schon seit langem ein Begriff, das Produkt gilt bereits als "Klassiker" unter den Literaturverwaltungsprogrammen und ist derzeit in Version X (bzw. X.0.2 nach einem rezenten Patch-Update) auf dem Markt. Schon vor etlichen Jahren konnte man einer immer noch lesenswerten Broschüre entnehmen, dass ein Bibliographieprogramm - grob gesprochen - zumindest folgende Aufgaben unterstützen müsse: (a) Eingabe von Literaturzitaten ("references"), (b) Editieren von Literaturzitaten, (c) Suche bzw. Wiederauffinden von Literaturzitaten, (d) Erstellung von Literaturverzeichnissen und (e) Unterstützung von Qualität und Integrität der Datensammlung. Diese Anforderungen gelten immer noch, wobei heute die Punkte (a) und (b) vor allem durch das seitdem hinzugekommene World Wide Web beeinflusst werden, während für Punkt (d) inzwischen auch noch die Anforderung einer Verknüpfung mit Textverarbeitungsprogrammen entstanden ist (Eingabe von Platzhaltern fürvorläufige Zitate, die später durch die endgültige Form ersetzt werden). Im folgenden soll das von mir selbst nach vielen Jahren des Verwendens bzw. Ausprobierens anderer Programme vor knapp einem Jahr für die persönliche Literaturverwaltung ausgewählte Produkt EndNote (Windows-Version) im Hinblick auf diese Kriterien näher beschrieben und beurteilt werden.
  6. Delozier, E.P.: Bibliography management with Library Master version 2.0 (1994) 0.03 
    0.028021824 = product of:
  0.08406547 = sum of:
    0.06946954 = weight(_text_:wide in 6882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06946954 = score(doc=6882,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 6882, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6882)
    0.014595922 = product of:
      0.043787766 = sum of:
        0.043787766 = weight(_text_:29 in 6882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043787766 = score(doc=6882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14083174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 6882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6882)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Reviews Library Master, a bibliographic and textual database management software package: 1 of over 50 software packages intended to organize and track bibliographies and references. The software provides a wide range of data manipulation capabilities including: flexible inputting, editing, and deleting of references; sophisticated database querying capabilities; and flexible organization and output of bibliography lists
    Source
    Medical reference services quarterly. 13(1994) no.2, S.29-44
  7. Perez, E.: Industrial strength database publishing : Inmagic DB/Textworks WebPublisher (1997) 0.02 
    0.019764543 = product of:
  0.059293624 = sum of:
    0.04663708 = weight(_text_:web in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04663708 = score(doc=679,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
    0.012656543 = product of:
      0.03796963 = sum of:
        0.03796963 = weight(_text_:22 in 679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03796963 = score(doc=679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14019686 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=679)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    The availability of powerful indexing and database products with easy Web connections means that libraries able to gather and edit their own data are emancipated from the large vendors. The Oregon State Library staff used the Data Magician translation utility as part of a complex, but speedy, database converison project. The Oregon Index database of approximately 300.000 records was converted from a BRS database host over to the Inmagic WebPublisher system. Describes the planning and action stepts used in producing the Web accessible index database of considerable size. Participants have high ratings to effectiveness of both the translation utility and the database engine
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  8. Mahmood, K.: ¬The best library software for developing countries : more than 30 plus points of Micro CDS/ISIS (1997) 0.02 
    0.019467011 = product of:
  0.05840103 = sum of:
    0.045744486 = weight(_text_:world in 7890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.045744486 = score(doc=7890,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 7890, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7890)
    0.012656543 = product of:
      0.03796963 = sum of:
        0.03796963 = weight(_text_:22 in 7890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03796963 = score(doc=7890,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14019686 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7890, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7890)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Describes the features of a library automation application called Micro CDS/ISIS. The software produced by UNESCO is used by more than 15.000 instituions all over the world. It is cost free and readily available. Its technical features include minimum hardware requirements, large database capacity, variable length fields, repeatable fields, subfields, powerful indexing, and rapid searching. It follows international data exchange standards. Support features include extensive documentation and a worldwide user group. Training courses in CDS/ISIS are conducted worldwide. These features ensure that CDS/ISIS library software is ideal for developing countries
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  9. Jayakanth, F.; Aswath, L.: ¬A PFT-based approach to make CDS/ISIS data based OAI-compliant (2006) 0.02 
    0.016640468 = product of:
  0.0499214 = sum of:
    0.040798947 = weight(_text_:web in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.040798947 = score(doc=1495,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
    0.009122452 = product of:
      0.027367353 = sum of:
        0.027367353 = weight(_text_:29 in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027367353 = score(doc=1495,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14083174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    CDS/ISIS is a powerful and popular software package for managing computerized bibliographic data. It is developed and maintained by UNESCO since 1985. It is free software available in binary form for MS-DOS, MS-Windows, Unix, and Unix-based operating systems like Linux. It is used by many libraries and organizations in many countries to maintain their Online Public Access Catalogues (OPACs) and other bibliographic databases. With the advent of the Internet and Web technologies, publishing the content of databases on the Web provides a round the clock access to the content from any PC with Internet access. Some CDS-ISIS databases are published on the Web, but many are still on standalone systems or on local area networks. Interoperability is the key for the efficient dissemination of information to end-users. The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) provides a technical framework for interoperability of OAI-compliant digital libraries (UNESCO. 2004). However, CDS/ISIS databases are not OAI-compliant. In this paper, we describe a simple approach, to make CDS/ISIS OAI-compliant. It is based on printing CDS/ISIS records in an OAI static repository format.
    Date
    29. 2.2008 16:51:04
  10. Delozier, E.P.: Bibliography management with Pro-Cite version 2.0 (1993) 0.01 
    0.014472822 = product of:
  0.08683693 = sum of:
    0.08683693 = weight(_text_:wide in 6502) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08683693 = score(doc=6502,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 6502, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6502)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Reviews Pro-Cite, a database management system specifically designed to manage bibliographic references. Pro-Cite provides a wide range of data manipulation capabilities. These include: creating, editing and deleting database records; querying for specific records; organizing databases; and printing selected records to a variety of devices
  11. Hussain, K.H.; Rajeev, J.S.: ¬The changing language technology and CDS/ ISIS : UNICODE and the emergence of OTF (2006) 0.01 
    0.013932362 = product of:
  0.041797087 = sum of:
    0.032674633 = weight(_text_:world in 1496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.032674633 = score(doc=1496,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 1496, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1496)
    0.009122452 = product of:
      0.027367353 = sum of:
        0.027367353 = weight(_text_:29 in 1496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027367353 = score(doc=1496,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14083174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1496, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1496)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Language technology is undergoing a great change and within a few years languages of the world will embark on OTF (Open Type Font) Technology. Major operating systems have already started embedding Asian languages using OTF. Being a major bibliographic DBMS, CDS/ISIS cannot ignore these developments that have taken place in text processing. This paper looks at the ideas behind Unicode and OTF and examines future developments of multilingual information systems. The Unicode is a minimalist encoding which includes currently all major scripts in use and allows easy migration from an existing encoding scheme to it. Indic language computing will be tremendously benefited from the development of OTF in compliance with Unicode. CDS/ISIS should be made Unicode compliant by utilizing the shaping and encoding engine on various operating systems so that it can be effectively utilized to develop and distribute local information systems using vernacular scripts. The source code of CDS/ISIS may be made available under a free software license, allowing the evolution of the package in a free and socially useful manner.
    Date
    29. 2.2008 17:08:38
  12. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.01 
    0.01210856 = product of:
  0.07265136 = sum of:
    0.07265136 = product of:
      0.108977035 = sum of:
        0.054734707 = weight(_text_:29 in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054734707 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14083174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
        0.054242328 = weight(_text_:22 in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054242328 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14019686 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
    Source
    Library technology reports. 29(1993), no.2
  13. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.01 
    0.01210856 = product of:
  0.07265136 = sum of:
    0.07265136 = product of:
      0.108977035 = sum of:
        0.054734707 = weight(_text_:29 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054734707 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14083174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
        0.054242328 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054242328 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14019686 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
    Source
    Library technology reports. 29(1993), no.3
  14. Cox, R.W.: End Note Plus 2 and End Note Link 2 : database reference management packages (1996) 0.01 
    0.011578257 = product of:
  0.06946954 = sum of:
    0.06946954 = weight(_text_:wide in 4956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06946954 = score(doc=4956,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 4956, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4956)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    The arrival of personal computer based bibliographic database packages has revolutionized the acquisition of research references. End Note Plus 2 enables the user to input a wide range of reference types, globally edit, sort, search and output them in a large number of recognized formats. Reviews End Note Plus 2 and End Note Link 2
  15. Gates, R.: AskSam for your information needs (1996) 0.01 
    0.011578257 = product of:
  0.06946954 = sum of:
    0.06946954 = weight(_text_:wide in 6710) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06946954 = score(doc=6710,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 6710, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6710)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Reviews askSam 3.0 Professional, a free text indexing program. Its facilities include: word processing, HTML development, structured data entry, importing of a wide variety of data formats, report generation, field recognition, and searching tools. Tests importing a file from the Eudora Pro electronic mail client, and other Internet files. Details its indexing, searching, and output features
  16. dwi: Quellenarchiv (2002) 0.01 
    0.0108925775 = product of:
  0.032677732 = sum of:
    0.023555283 = weight(_text_:web in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.023555283 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
    0.009122452 = product of:
      0.027367353 = sum of:
        0.027367353 = weight(_text_:29 in 185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027367353 = score(doc=185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14083174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=185)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Content
    "Für bibliografische Angaben wie Autor, Titel und Erscheinungsjahr ist der obere Teil der Eingabemaske vorgesehen. Der Mittelteil hilft bei Beschaffung und Archi-vierung der Materialien: Ein Häkchen zeigt, ob eine Veröffentlichung noch fehlt oder schon abgelegt wurde. Angaben dazu, unter welcher Signatur und in welcher Bibliothek das Werk verfügbar ist, finden hier ebenso Platz wie Verweise auf das heimische Ablagesystem. Die Stichwort-Zuordnung erleichtert später das Suchen nach Material zu einem bestimmten Teilgebiet. In das Feld für die Zusammenfassung passen bis zu 4000 Zeichen; sinnvoll sind hier eine Inhaltsangabe oder einige kurze Zitate. Mit dem Literaturmanager kann man zwar beliebig viele Datenbanken aufbauen, allerdings immer nur eine zur selben Zeit öffnen. Der Export der Daten ist nur in eine Textdatei möglich, dabei kann man das Format mit einem kleinen Editor festlegen. Zum Import geeignet sind Datensätze aus Standard-Datenbanken, außerdem versteht Liman Excel- und Txt-Dateien. Hersteller infoball hofft vor allem auf Anwender, die das Web-Portal infoball.de zur Literaturrecherche benutzen. Der Import dieses Recherche-Ergebnisses in die Liman-Datenbank ist dabei für Inhaber eines kostenpflichtigen Accounts besonders einfach, möglich ist er aber bereits nach einer kostenlosen Registrierung. Insgesamt ist Liman 2.7 ein unkompliziertes Einsteigerprogramm, das auch für Studenten erschwinglich ist (? 50)."
    Date
    29. 1.2002 9:53:06
  17. Poynder, R.: Beyond Boolean (1994) 0.01 
    0.008713236 = product of:
  0.052279413 = sum of:
    0.052279413 = weight(_text_:world in 610) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.052279413 = score(doc=610,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.33973572 = fieldWeight in 610, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=610)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Information world review. 1994, no.94, S.14
  18. Endnote X2 für Mac OS X : bibliographies made easy ; search online bibliographic database, organize references, images, and PDFs easily, cite while you write (patent pending) in 3,000+styles, collaborate with others using EndNote Web (2008) 0.01 
    0.007851761 = product of:
  0.047110565 = sum of:
    0.047110565 = weight(_text_:web in 1809) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.047110565 = score(doc=1809,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1809, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1809)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
  19. Casale, M.: Full text retrieval for the Web (1996) 0.01 
    0.007772847 = product of:
  0.04663708 = sum of:
    0.04663708 = weight(_text_:web in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.04663708 = score(doc=6757,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Reviews developments and improvements in techniques for searching the WWW that have been made access to full text databases a practical proposition (full text retrieval (FTR)). Reports results of interviews with 8 full text database vendors offering FTR via the WWW: Dataware (http://www.dataware.com); Excalibur (http://www.excalib.com); Fulcrum (http://www.fulcrum.com); Muscat (http://www.muscat.co.uk); Open Text (http://www.opentext.com); Personal Library Software (PLS) (http://www.pls.com); Verity (http://www.verity.com); and ZyLab (ZyIndex and ZyImage) (http://www.zylab.com). Compares the prices of the systems and lists the questions that publishers should ask before making a choice of systems for handling FTR on the Web
  20. Hobohm, H.-C.: Persönliche Literaturverwaltung im Umbruch vom Bibliographie-Management zum Social Bookmarking : Anmerkungen zu EndNote, Reference Manager, RefWorks und Connotea (2005) 0.01 
    0.007624805 = product of:
  0.022874415 = sum of:
    0.0164887 = weight(_text_:web in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0164887 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04003532 = queryNorm
        0.12619963 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
    0.0063857157 = product of:
      0.019157147 = sum of:
        0.019157147 = weight(_text_:29 in 4368) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019157147 = score(doc=4368,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14083174 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 4368, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4368)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Im Sommer 2005 ist die neueste Version des weit verbreiteten persönlichen Literaturverwaltungssystems EndNote erschienen. Noch im Jahre 2000 musste diese Gattung von Software genauer beschrieben und für deutsche Wissenschaftler erklärt werden. Mittlerweile hat sich deren Gebrauch sogar institutionell verbreitet. So bietet der GBV EndNote und Reference Manager Connection Files, der edoc-Server der HU Berlin schreibt die Benutzung eigener Formate zur Ablieferung von Dissertationsliteraturlisten vor und die Max-Planck-Gesellschaft nutzt EndNote und Reference Manager offiziell für ihre Jahres-Berichte um nur einige Beispiele zu nennen. Obwohl viele (Natur-)Wissenschaftler eher von BiB-TeX oder "freien" Bibliographiemanagementsystemen kommen, scheinen sich diese beiden doch immer mehr durchzusetzen. Es erstaunt etwas, dass Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaftler sich dieser Systeme offenbar weniger bedienen, obwohl bekannt ist, dass deren Forschungsfront gerade eher auf bibliographische Vollständigkeit angewiesen ist als die der Naturwissenschaftler. Der Wettlauf zwischen EndNote und dem Konkurrenzprodukt aus dem Hause ISI ist jedoch nicht beendet wie ich noch vor Jahren spekulierte. ISI bzw. Thomson als dem Produzenten von Reference Manager hatte die beiden Konkurrenten EndNote und ProCite aufgekauft und man konnte erwarten, dass sich die Systeme angleichen und dem Nutzer der Übergang zu einem zentral gepflegten ISI Angebot erleichtert wird. In gewissen Teilen hat tatsächlich eine Angleichung stattgefunden. Die als herausragend empfundene Eigenschaft von Profite in höherem Maße inhaltliche Erschließung zu unterstützen ist mittlerweile auch bei den beiden anderen implementiert. Die einzigen verbleibenden Unterschiede (marketingtechnisch gesprochen: USPs - unique selling propositions) sind die Fähigkeit ProCites, Webseiten "on-the-fly" zu katalogisieren-sofern diese Metadaten aufweisen, die Web Publisher Funktion und erhöhte Netzwerkfähigkeit von Reference Manager sowie die Palm Version und die leicht größeren technischen Kapazitäten von Endnote und dessen Fähigkeit Abbildungen und Objekte direkt einzufügen. Zumindest ist zwischen EndNote und Reference Manager die Entscheidung nicht gefallen, da beide auf eigene Weise weiterentwickelt werden, während Profite seit sechs Jahren kein Update mehr erfahren hat. EndNote ist in den fünf Jahren seit der letzten Besprechung um 5 Versionsnummern auf Nummer 9 gewachsen. Reference Manager hat es auf elf (von 9.5) geschafft. In anderthalb Jahren wird EndNote also Reference Manager überholt haben. Man fragt sich, was die Unterschiede ausmacht, die solche Sprünge in den Versionsbezeichnungen rechtfertigen. Meist handelt es sich um die Einbindung neuer connection files und Importfilter, die Vorgabe neuer Medienformen und neuer bibliographischer Stile (Formatvorlagen): also neben der Anpassung an weiterentwickelte Betriebssysteme eher um quantitative Verbesserungen. Vielleicht ist der Vergleich gewagt, aber mir drängt sich die Parallele zu Virusprogrammen auf: Was wäre wenn diese bei jedem update des virus defintion files eine neue Versionsnummer erhielten? Andere Neuerungen wie die Unterstützung von XML, WSDL, openURL und teilweise auch Unicode werden von den Kunden sicher als selbstverständlich vorausgesetzt oder aber gar nicht bemerkt. Der Abstand der aktuellen Versionsnummer zur eigenen Version erhöht oft nur den psychologischen Druck, endlich auf die neue Fassung umzusteigen. Die meist um die 200 EUR (120 EUR für das update) dafür sind nicht immer gerechtfertigt.
    Date
    4.11.2005 13:29:37

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 37
  • d 9

Types

  • a 39
  • m 7
  • s 3
  • el 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects