Search (322 results, page 1 of 17)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.12
    0.11775547 = product of:
      0.23551095 = sum of:
        0.052988917 = product of:
          0.15896675 = sum of:
            0.15896675 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15896675 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33941987 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04003532 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15896675 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15896675 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33941987 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
        0.023555283 = weight(_text_:web in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023555283 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  2. Smith, A.: Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) (2022) 0.09
    0.0890465 = product of:
      0.178093 = sum of:
        0.05545069 = weight(_text_:world in 1094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05545069 = score(doc=1094,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.36034414 = fieldWeight in 1094, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1094)
        0.073683575 = weight(_text_:wide in 1094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073683575 = score(doc=1094,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.4153836 = fieldWeight in 1094, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1094)
        0.048958737 = weight(_text_:web in 1094) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048958737 = score(doc=1094,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 1094, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1094)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System) is a recommendation from the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) for representing controlled vocabularies, taxonomies, thesauri, classifications, and similar systems for organizing and indexing information as linked data elements in the Semantic Web, using the Resource Description Framework (RDF). The SKOS data model is centered on "concepts", which can have preferred and alternate labels in any language as well as other metadata, and which are identified by addresses on the World Wide Web (URIs). Concepts are grouped into hierarchies through "broader" and "narrower" relations, with "top concepts" at the broadest conceptual level. Concepts are also organized into "concept schemes", also identified by URIs. Other relations, mappings, and groupings are also supported. This article discusses the history of the development of SKOS and provides notes on adoption, uses, and limitations.
  3. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.08
    0.084782265 = product of:
      0.2543468 = sum of:
        0.0635867 = product of:
          0.19076009 = sum of:
            0.19076009 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19076009 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.33941987 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04003532 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.19076009 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19076009 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.33941987 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  4. Peters, I.: Folksonomies & Social Tagging (2023) 0.08
    0.08182444 = product of:
      0.16364887 = sum of:
        0.045744486 = weight(_text_:world in 796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045744486 = score(doc=796,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 796, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=796)
        0.06078585 = weight(_text_:wide in 796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06078585 = score(doc=796,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 796, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=796)
        0.057118528 = weight(_text_:web in 796) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057118528 = score(doc=796,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 796, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=796)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Die Erforschung und der Einsatz von Folksonomies und Social Tagging als nutzerzentrierte Formen der Inhaltserschließung und Wissensrepräsentation haben in den 10 Jahren ab ca. 2005 ihren Höhenpunkt erfahren. Motiviert wurde dies durch die Entwicklung und Verbreitung des Social Web und der wachsenden Nutzung von Social-Media-Plattformen (s. Kapitel E 8 Social Media und Social Web). Beides führte zu einem rasanten Anstieg der im oder über das World Wide Web auffindbaren Menge an potenzieller Information und generierte eine große Nachfrage nach skalierbaren Methoden der Inhaltserschließung.
  5. Lewandowski, D.: Suchmaschinen verstehen : 3. vollständig überarbeitete und erweiterte Aufl. (2021) 0.07
    0.07046205 = product of:
      0.1409241 = sum of:
        0.046208907 = weight(_text_:world in 4016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046208907 = score(doc=4016,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.30028677 = fieldWeight in 4016, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4016)
        0.061402984 = weight(_text_:wide in 4016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061402984 = score(doc=4016,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.34615302 = fieldWeight in 4016, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4016)
        0.0333122 = weight(_text_:web in 4016) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0333122 = score(doc=4016,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 4016, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4016)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    RSWK
    World Wide Web Recherche
    Subject
    World Wide Web Recherche
  6. Singh, A.; Sinha, U.; Sharma, D.k.: Semantic Web and data visualization (2020) 0.07
    0.070411876 = product of:
      0.14082375 = sum of:
        0.026139706 = weight(_text_:world in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026139706 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
        0.03473477 = weight(_text_:wide in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03473477 = score(doc=79,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
        0.07994928 = weight(_text_:web in 79) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07994928 = score(doc=79,freq=36.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.6119082 = fieldWeight in 79, product of:
              6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                36.0 = termFreq=36.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=79)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    With the terrific growth of data volume and data being produced every second on millions of devices across the globe, there is a desperate need to manage the unstructured data available on web pages efficiently. Semantic Web or also known as Web of Trust structures the scattered data on the Internet according to the needs of the user. It is an extension of the World Wide Web (WWW) which focuses on manipulating web data on behalf of Humans. Due to the ability of the Semantic Web to integrate data from disparate sources and hence makes it more user-friendly, it is an emerging trend. Tim Berners-Lee first introduced the term Semantic Web and since then it has come a long way to become a more intelligent and intuitive web. Data Visualization plays an essential role in explaining complex concepts in a universal manner through pictorial representation, and the Semantic Web helps in broadening the potential of Data Visualization and thus making it an appropriate combination. The objective of this chapter is to provide fundamental insights concerning the semantic web technologies and in addition to that it also elucidates the issues as well as the solutions regarding the semantic web. The purpose of this chapter is to highlight the semantic web architecture in detail while also comparing it with the traditional search system. It classifies the semantic web architecture into three major pillars i.e. RDF, Ontology, and XML. Moreover, it describes different semantic web tools used in the framework and technology. It attempts to illustrate different approaches of the semantic web search engines. Besides stating numerous challenges faced by the semantic web it also illustrates the solutions.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  7. Lewandowski, D.: Suchmaschinen (2023) 0.07
    0.06564318 = product of:
      0.13128635 = sum of:
        0.03920956 = weight(_text_:world in 793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03920956 = score(doc=793,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 793, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=793)
        0.052102152 = weight(_text_:wide in 793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052102152 = score(doc=793,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 793, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=793)
        0.03997464 = weight(_text_:web in 793) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03997464 = score(doc=793,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 793, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=793)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Eine Suchmaschine (auch: Web-Suchmaschine, Universalsuchmaschine) ist ein Computersystem, das Inhalte aus dem World Wide Web (WWW) mittels Crawling erfasst und über eine Benutzerschnittstelle durchsuchbar macht, wobei die Ergebnisse in einer nach systemseitig angenommener Relevanz geordneten Darstellung aufgeführt werden. Dies bedeutet, dass Suchmaschinen im Gegensatz zu anderen Informationssystemen nicht auf einem klar abgegrenzten Datenbestand aufbauen, sondern diesen aus den verstreut vorliegenden Dokumenten des WWW zusammenstellen. Dieser Datenbestand wird über eine Benutzerschnittstelle zugänglich gemacht, die so gestaltet ist, dass die Suchmaschine von Laien problemlos genutzt werden kann. Die zu einer Suchanfrage ausgegebenen Treffer werden so sortiert, dass den Nutzenden die aus Systemsicht relevantesten Dokumente zuerst angezeigt werden. Dabei handelt es sich um komplexe Bewertungsverfahren, denen zahlreiche Annahmen über die Relevanz von Dokumenten in Bezug auf Suchanfragen zugrunde liegen.
  8. Fernanda de Jesus, A.; Ferreira de Castro, F.: Proposal for the publication of linked open bibliographic data (2024) 0.06
    0.059789024 = product of:
      0.11957805 = sum of:
        0.03920956 = weight(_text_:world in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03920956 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
        0.052102152 = weight(_text_:wide in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052102152 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
        0.028266339 = weight(_text_:web in 1161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028266339 = score(doc=1161,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 1161, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1161)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    Linked Open Data (LOD) are a set of principles for publishing structured, connected data available for reuse under an open license. The objective of this paper is to analyze the publishing of bibliographic data such as LOD, having as a product the elaboration of theoretical-methodological recommendations for the publication of these data, in an approach based on the ten best practices for publishing LOD, from the World Wide Web Consortium. The starting point was the conduction of a Systematic Review of Literature, where initiatives to publish bibliographic data such as LOD were identified. An empirical study of these institutions was also conducted. As a result, theoretical-methodological recommendations were obtained for the process of publishing bibliographic data such as LOD.
  9. Lee, H.S.; Arnott Smith, C.: ¬A comparative mixed methods study on health information seeking among US-born/US-dwelling, Korean-born/US-dwelling, and Korean-born/Korean-dwelling mothers (2022) 0.05
    0.049824186 = product of:
      0.09964837 = sum of:
        0.032674633 = weight(_text_:world in 614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032674633 = score(doc=614,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 614, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=614)
        0.043418463 = weight(_text_:wide in 614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043418463 = score(doc=614,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 614, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=614)
        0.023555283 = weight(_text_:web in 614) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023555283 = score(doc=614,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 614, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=614)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    More knowledge and a better understanding of health information seeking are necessary, especially in these unprecedented times due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Using Sonnenwald's theoretical concept of information horizons, this study aimed to uncover patterns in mothers' source preferences related to their children's health. Online surveys were completed by 851 mothers (255 US-born/US-dwelling, 300 Korean-born/US-dwelling, and 296 Korean-born/Korean-dwelling), and supplementary in-depth interviews with 24 mothers were conducted and analyzed. Results indicate that there were remarkable differences between the mothers' information source preference and their actual source use. Moreover, there were many similarities between the two Korean-born groups concerning health information-seeking behavior. For instance, those two groups sought health information more frequently than US-born/US-dwelling mothers. Their sources frequently included blogs or online forums as well as friends with children, whereas US-born/US-dwelling mothers frequently used doctors or nurses as information sources. Mothers in the two Korean-born samples preferred the World Wide Web most as their health information source, while the US-born/US-dwelling mothers preferred doctors the most. Based on these findings, information professionals should guide mothers of specific ethnicities and nationalities to trustworthy sources considering both their usage and preferences.
  10. Huber, W.: Menschen, Götter und Maschinen : eine Ethik der Digitalisierung (2022) 0.04
    0.03985935 = product of:
      0.0797187 = sum of:
        0.026139706 = weight(_text_:world in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026139706 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
        0.03473477 = weight(_text_:wide in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03473477 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
        0.018844226 = weight(_text_:web in 752) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018844226 = score(doc=752,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 752, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=752)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Content
    Vorwort -- 1. Das digitale Zeitalter -- Zeitenwende -- Die Vorherrschaft des Buchdrucks geht zu Ende -- Wann beginnt das digitale Zeitalter? -- 2. Zwischen Euphorie und Apokalypse -- Digitalisierung. Einfach. Machen -- Euphorie -- Apokalypse -- Verantwortungsethik -- Der Mensch als Subjekt der Ethik -- Verantwortung als Prinzip -- 3. Digitalisierter Alltag in einer globalisierten Welt -- Vom World Wide Web zum Internet der Dinge -- Mobiles Internet und digitale Bildung -- Digitale Plattformen und ihre Strategien -- Big Data und informationelle Selbstbestimmung -- 4. Grenzüberschreitungen -- Die Erosion des Privaten -- Die Deformation des Öffentlichen -- Die Senkung von Hemmschwellen -- Das Verschwinden der Wirklichkeit -- Die Wahrheit in der Infosphäre -- 5. Die Zukunft der Arbeit -- Industrielle Revolutionen -- Arbeit 4.0 -- Ethik 4.0 -- 6. Digitale Intelligenz -- Können Computer dichten? -- Stärker als der Mensch? -- Maschinelles Lernen -- Ein bleibender Unterschied -- Ethische Prinzipien für den Umgang mit digitaler Intelligenz -- Medizin als Beispiel -- 7. Die Würde des Menschen im digitalen Zeitalter -- Kränkungen oder Revolutionen -- Transhumanismus und Posthumanismus -- Gibt es Empathie ohne Menschen? -- Wer ist autonom: Mensch oder Maschine? -- Humanismus der Verantwortung -- 8. Die Zukunft des Homo sapiens -- Vergöttlichung des Menschen -- Homo deus -- Gott und Mensch im digitalen Zeitalter -- Veränderung der Menschheit -- Literatur -- Personenregister.
  11. Adler, M.: ¬The strangeness of subject cataloging : afterword (2020) 0.04
    0.03949993 = product of:
      0.07899986 = sum of:
        0.03696713 = weight(_text_:world in 5887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03696713 = score(doc=5887,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.24022943 = fieldWeight in 5887, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5887)
        0.03473477 = weight(_text_:wide in 5887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03473477 = score(doc=5887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 5887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5887)
        0.007297961 = product of:
          0.021893883 = sum of:
            0.021893883 = weight(_text_:29 in 5887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021893883 = score(doc=5887,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14083174 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04003532 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 5887, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5887)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    "I can't presume to know how other catalogers view the systems, information resources, and institutions with which they engage on a daily basis. David Paton gives us a glimpse in this issue of the affective experiences of bibliographers and catalogers of artists' books in South Africa, and it is clear that the emotional range among them is wide. What I can say is that catalogers' feelings and worldviews, whatever they may be, give the library its shape. I think we can agree that the librarians who constructed the Library of Congress Classification around 1900, Melvil Dewey, and the many classifiers around the world past and present, have had particular sets of desires around control and access and order. We all are asked to submit to those desires in our library work, as well as our own pursuit of knowledge and pleasure reading. And every decision regarding the aboutness of a book, or about where to place it within a particular discipline, takes place in a cataloger's affective and experiential world. While the classification provides the outlines, the catalogers color in the spaces with the books, based on their own readings of the book descriptions and their interpretations of the classification scheme. The decisions they make and the structures to which they are bound affect the circulation of books and their readers across the library. Indeed, some of the encounters will be unexpected, strange, frustrating, frightening, shame-inducing, awe-inspiring, and/or delightful. The emotional experiences of students described in Mabee and Fancher's article, as well as those of any visitor to the library, are all affected by classificatory design. One concern is that a library's ordering principles may reinforce or heighten already existing feelings of precarity or marginality. Because the classifications are hidden from patrons' view, it is difficult to measure the way the order affects a person's mind and body. That a person does not consciously register the associations does not mean that they are not affected."
    Date
    5. 6.2020 17:23:29
  12. Ding, J.: Can data die? : why one of the Internet's oldest images lives on wirhout its subjects's consent (2021) 0.04
    0.035009112 = product of:
      0.070018224 = sum of:
        0.03653135 = weight(_text_:world in 423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03653135 = score(doc=423,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.23739755 = fieldWeight in 423, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=423)
        0.021709232 = weight(_text_:wide in 423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021709232 = score(doc=423,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.122383565 = fieldWeight in 423, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=423)
        0.011777641 = weight(_text_:web in 423) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011777641 = score(doc=423,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.09014259 = fieldWeight in 423, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=423)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    In 2021, sharing content is easier than ever. Our lingua franca is visual: memes, infographics, TikToks. Our references cross borders and platforms, shared and remixed a hundred different ways in minutes. Digital culture is collective by default and has us together all around the world. But as the internet reaches its "dirty 30s," what happens when pieces of digital culture that have been saved, screenshotted, and reposted for years need to retire? Let's dig into the story of one of these artifacts: The Lenna image. The Lenna image may be relatively unknown in pop culture today, but in the engineering world, it remains an icon. I first encountered the image in an undergrad class, then grad school, and then all over the sites and software I use every day as a tech worker like Github, OpenCV, Stack Overflow, and Quora. To understand where the image is today, you have to understand how it got here. So, I decided to scrape Google scholar, search, and reverse image search results to track down thousands of instances of the image across the internet (see more in the methods section).
    Lena Forsén, the real human behind the Lenna image, was first published in Playboy in 1972. Soon after, USC engineers searching for a suitable test image for their image processing research sought inspiration from the magazine. They deemed Lenna the right fit and scanned the image into digital, RGB existence. From here, the story of the image follows the story of the internet. Lenna was one of the first inhabitants of ARPANet, the internet's predecessor, and then the world wide web. While the image's reach was limited to a few research papers in the '70s and '80s, in 1991, Lenna was featured on the cover of an engineering journal alongside another popular test image, Peppers. This caught the attention of Playboy, which threatened a copyright infringement lawsuit. Engineers who had grown attached to Lenna fought back. Ultimately, they prevailed, and as a Playboy VP reflected on the drama: "We decided we should exploit this because it is a phenomenon." The Playboy controversy canonized Lenna in engineering folklore and prompted an explosion of conversation about the image. Image hits on the internet rose to a peak number in 1995.
    But despite this progress, almost 2 years later, the use of Lenna continues. The image appears on the internet in 30+ different languages in the last decade, including 10+ languages in 2021. The image's spread across digital geographies has mirrored this geographical growth, moving from mostly .org domains before 1990 to over 100 different domains today, notably .com and .edu, along with others. Within the .edu world, the Lenna image continues to appear in homework questions, class slides and to be hosted on educational and research sites, ensuring that it is passed down to new generations of engineers. Whether it's due to institutional negligence or defiance, it seems that for now, the image is here to stay.
    Content
    "Having known Lenna for almost a decade, I have struggled to understand what the story of the image means for what tech culture is and what it is becoming. To me, the crux of the Lenna story is how little power we have over our data and how it is used and abused. This threat seems disproportionately higher for women who are often overrepresented in internet content, but underrepresented in internet company leadership and decision making. Given this reality, engineering and product decisions will continue to consciously (and unconsciously) exclude our needs and concerns. While social norms are changing towards non-consensual data collection and data exploitation, digital norms seem to be moving in the opposite direction. Advancements in machine learning algorithms and data storage capabilities are only making data misuse easier. Whether the outcome is revenge porn or targeted ads, surveillance or discriminatory AI, if we want a world where our data can retire when it's outlived its time, or when it's directly harming our lives, we must create the tools and policies that empower data subjects to have a say in what happens to their data. including allowing their data to die."
  13. Hoeber, O.; Harvey, M.; Dewan Sagar, S.A.; Pointon, M.: ¬The effects of simulated interruptions on mobile search tasks (2022) 0.03
    0.032635152 = product of:
      0.065270305 = sum of:
        0.032674633 = weight(_text_:world in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032674633 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.023555283 = weight(_text_:web in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023555283 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
        0.009040388 = product of:
          0.027121164 = sum of:
            0.027121164 = weight(_text_:22 in 563) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027121164 = score(doc=563,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14019686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04003532 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 563, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=563)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(3/6)
    
    Abstract
    While it is clear that using a mobile device can interrupt real-world activities such as walking or driving, the effects of interruptions on mobile device use have been under-studied. We are particularly interested in how the ambient distraction of walking while using a mobile device, combined with the occurrence of simulated interruptions of different levels of cognitive complexity, affect web search activities. We have established an experimental design to study how the degree of cognitive complexity of simulated interruptions influences both objective and subjective search task performance. In a controlled laboratory study (n = 27), quantitative and qualitative data were collected on mobile search performance, perceptions of the interruptions, and how participants reacted to the interruptions, using a custom mobile eye-tracking app, a questionnaire, and observations. As expected, more cognitively complex interruptions resulted in increased overall task completion times and higher perceived impacts. Interestingly, the effect on the resumption lag or the actual search performance was not significant, showing the resiliency of people to resume their tasks after an interruption. Implications from this study enhance our understanding of how interruptions objectively and subjectively affect search task performance, motivating the need for providing explicit mobile search support to enable recovery from interruptions.
    Date
    3. 5.2022 13:22:33
  14. Information : a historical companion (2021) 0.03
    0.029004728 = product of:
      0.08701418 = sum of:
        0.052279413 = weight(_text_:world in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052279413 = score(doc=492,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.33973572 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
        0.03473477 = weight(_text_:wide in 492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03473477 = score(doc=492,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 492, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=492)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Written by an international team of experts (including Jeremy Adelman, Lorraine Daston, Devin Fitzgerald, John-Paul Ghobrial, Lisa Gitelman, Earle Havens, Randolph C. Head, Niv Horesh, Sarah Igo, Richard R. John, Lauren Kassell, Pamela Long, Erin McGuirl, David McKitterick, Elias Muhanna, Thomas S. Mullaney, Carla Nappi, Craig Robertson, Daniel Rosenberg, Neil Safier, Haun Saussy, Will Slauter, Jacob Soll, Heidi Tworek, Siva Vaidhyanathan, Alexandra Walsham), the book's inspired and original long- and short-form contributions reconstruct the rise of human approaches to creating, managing, and sharing facts and knowledge. Thirteen full-length chapters discuss the role of information in pivotal epochs and regions, with chief emphasis on Europe and North America, but also substantive treatment of other parts of the world as well as current global interconnections. More than 100 alphabetical entries follow, focusing on specific tools, methods, and concepts?from ancient coins to the office memo, and censorship to plagiarism. The result is a wide-ranging, deeply immersive collection that will appeal to anyone drawn to the story behind our modern mania for an informed existence.
    Content
    Cover -- Contents -- Introduction -- Alphabetical List of Entries -- Thematic List of Entries -- Contributors -- PART ONE -- 1. Premodern Regimes and Practices -- 2. Realms of Information in the Medieval Islamic World -- 3. Information in Early Modern East Asia -- 4. Information in Early Modern Europe -- 5. Networks and the Making of a Connected World in the Sixteenth Century -- 6. Records, Secretaries, and the European Information State, circa 1400-1700 -- 7. Periodicals and the Commercialization of Information in the Early Modern Era -- 8. Documents, Empire, and Capitalism in the Nineteenth Century -- 9. Nineteenth-Century Media Technologies -- 10. Networking: Information Circles the Modern World -- 11. Publicity, Propaganda, and Public Opinion: From the Titanic Disaster to the Hungarian Uprising -- 12. Communication, Computation, and Information -- 13. Search -- PART TWO -- Alphabetical Entries -- Glossary -- Index.
  15. Schreur, P.E.: ¬The use of Linked Data and artificial intelligence as key elements in the transformation of technical services (2020) 0.03
    0.026240628 = product of:
      0.07872188 = sum of:
        0.045744486 = weight(_text_:world in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045744486 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
        0.0329774 = weight(_text_:web in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0329774 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Library Technical Services have benefited from numerous stimuli. Although initially looked at with suspicion, transitions such as the move from catalog cards to the MARC formats have proven enormously helpful to libraries and their patrons. Linked data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) hold the same promise. Through the conversion of metadata surrogates (cataloging) to linked open data, libraries can represent their resources on the Semantic Web. But in order to provide some form of controlled access to unstructured data, libraries must reach beyond traditional cataloging to new tools such as AI to provide consistent access to a growing world of full-text resources.
  16. Zhu, L.; Xu, A.; Deng, S.; Heng, G.; Li, X.: Entity management using Wikidata for cultural heritage information (2024) 0.03
    0.026240628 = product of:
      0.07872188 = sum of:
        0.045744486 = weight(_text_:world in 975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045744486 = score(doc=975,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 975, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=975)
        0.0329774 = weight(_text_:web in 975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0329774 = score(doc=975,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 975, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=975)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Entity management in a Linked Open Data (LOD) environment is a process of associating a unique, persistent, and dereferenceable Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) with a single entity. It allows data from various sources to be reused and connected to the Web. It can help improve data quality and enable more efficient workflows. This article describes a semi-automated entity management project conducted by the "Wikidata: WikiProject Chinese Culture and Heritage Group," explores the challenges and opportunities in describing Chinese women poets and historical places in Wikidata, the largest crowdsourcing LOD platform in the world, and discusses lessons learned and future opportunities.
  17. Baines, D.; Elliott, R.J.: Defining misinformation, disinformation and malinformation : an urgent need for clarity during the COVID-19 infodemic (2020) 0.03
    0.025364365 = product of:
      0.07609309 = sum of:
        0.032674633 = weight(_text_:world in 5853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032674633 = score(doc=5853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 5853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5853)
        0.043418463 = weight(_text_:wide in 5853) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043418463 = score(doc=5853,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 5853, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5853)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    COVID-19 is an unprecedented global health crisis that will have immeasurable consequences for our economic and social well-being. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the director general of the World Health Organization, stated "We're not just fighting an epidemic; we're fighting an infodemic". Currently, there is no robust scientific basis to the existing definitions of false information used in the fight against the COVID-19infodemic. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how the use of a novel taxonomy and related model (based upon a conceptual framework that synthesizes insights from information science, philosophy, media studies and politics) can produce new scientific definitions of mis-, dis- and malinformation. We undertake our analysis from the viewpoint of information systems research. The conceptual approach to defining mis-,dis- and malinformation can be applied to a wide range of empirical examples and, if applied properly, may prove useful in fighting the COVID-19 infodemic. In sum, our research suggests that: (i) analyzing all types of information is important in the battle against the COVID-19 infodemic; (ii) a scientific approach is required so that different methods are not used by different studies; (iii) "misinformation", as an umbrella term, can be confusing and should be dropped from use; (iv) clear, scientific definitions of information types will be needed going forward; (v) malinformation is an overlooked phenomenon involving reconfigurations of the truth.
  18. González-Teruel, A.; Ávila Araújo, C.A.; Sabelli, M.: Diffusion of theories and theoretical models in the Ibero-American research on information behavior (2022) 0.03
    0.025364365 = product of:
      0.07609309 = sum of:
        0.032674633 = weight(_text_:world in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032674633 = score(doc=529,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
        0.043418463 = weight(_text_:wide in 529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043418463 = score(doc=529,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17738682 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 529, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=529)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Ibero-American research on information behavior (IB) lacks the visibility typical of other parts of the world, and little is known about it in countries outside the area. The objective of this paper has therefore been to analyze the way in which Ibero-American research incorporates various theoretical references to empirical research on IB. The results point to the existence of different focuses of research in the past 10 years, in the sense of a reduced empirical approach and a moderate to minimal use of theories in the design of such research. Furthermore, the most cited theories and models of IB at an international level are those most widely applied in this geographical area, and the use of a wide variety of theoretical frameworks has been demonstrated, which gives the research under review a cognitive, but also sociocultural, perspective. Future research should further elaborate on this issue, including other types of documents, such as conference papers, books, and theses, while taking into account the publication landscape of the geographical area in question.
  19. Breuer, T.; Tavakolpoursaleh, N.; Schaer, P.; Hienert, D.; Schaible, J.; Castro, L.J.: Online Information Retrieval Evaluation using the STELLA Framework (2022) 0.02
    0.022491967 = product of:
      0.0674759 = sum of:
        0.03920956 = weight(_text_:world in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03920956 = score(doc=640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1538826 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
        0.028266339 = weight(_text_:web in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028266339 = score(doc=640,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Involving users in early phases of software development has become a common strategy as it enables developers to consider user needs from the beginning. Once a system is in production, new opportunities to observe, evaluate and learn from users emerge as more information becomes available. Gathering information from users to continuously evaluate their behavior is a common practice for commercial software, while the Cranfield paradigm remains the preferred option for Information Retrieval (IR) and recommendation systems in the academic world. Here we introduce the Infrastructures for Living Labs STELLA project which aims to create an evaluation infrastructure allowing experimental systems to run along production web-based academic search systems with real users. STELLA combines user interactions and log files analyses to enable large-scale A/B experiments for academic search.
  20. Asubiaro, T.V.; Onaolapo, S.: ¬A comparative study of the coverage of African journals in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef (2023) 0.02
    0.02224627 = product of:
      0.06673881 = sum of:
        0.05769842 = weight(_text_:web in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05769842 = score(doc=992,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.13065568 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04003532 = queryNorm
            0.4416067 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
        0.009040388 = product of:
          0.027121164 = sum of:
            0.027121164 = weight(_text_:22 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027121164 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14019686 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04003532 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    This is the first study that evaluated the coverage of journals from Africa in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef. A list of active journals published in each of the 55 African countries was compiled from Ulrich's periodicals directory and African Journals Online (AJOL) website. Journal master lists for Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef were searched for the African journals. A total of 2,229 unique active African journals were identified from Ulrich (N = 2,117, 95.0%) and AJOL (N = 243, 10.9%) after removing duplicates. The volume of African journals in Web of Science and Scopus databases is 7.4% (N = 166) and 7.8% (N = 174), respectively, compared to the 45.6% (N = 1,017) covered in CrossRef. While making up only 17.% of all the African journals, South African journals had the best coverage in the two most authoritative databases, accounting for 73.5% and 62.1% of all the African journals in Web of Science and Scopus, respectively. In contrast, Nigeria published 44.5% of all the African journals. The distribution of the African journals is biased in favor of Medical, Life and Health Sciences and Humanities and the Arts in the three databases. The low representation of African journals in CrossRef, a free indexing infrastructure that could be harnessed for building an African-centric research indexing database, is concerning.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 14:09:06
    Object
    Web of Science

Languages

  • e 239
  • d 81
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 282
  • el 62
  • m 17
  • p 8
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • A 1
  • EL 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects