Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Niemann, C.: Intelligenz im Chaos : erste Schritte zur Analyse des Kreativen Potenzials eines Tagging-Systems (2010) 0.01
    0.011845919 = product of:
      0.047383677 = sum of:
        0.047383677 = product of:
          0.094767354 = sum of:
            0.094767354 = weight(_text_:intelligenz in 4375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.094767354 = score(doc=4375,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.21362439 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.44361675 = fieldWeight in 4375, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.678294 = idf(docFreq=410, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4375)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die Auszeichnung digitaler Medien durch Tagging ist zur festen Größe für das Wissensmanagement im Internet avanciert. Im Kontext des zunehmenden information overload' stehen wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken vor der Aufgabe, die große Flut digital publizierter Artikel und Werke möglichst inhaltlich erschlossen verfügbar zu machen. Die Frage ist, ob durch den Einsatz von Tagging-Systemen die kollaborative Intelligenz der NutzerInnen für die Sacherschließung eingesetzt werden kann, während diese von einer intuitiven und individuellen Wissensorganisation profitieren. Die große Freiheit bei der Vergabe von Deskriptoren durch die NutzerInnen eines Tagging-Systems ist nämlich ein ambivalentes Phänomen: Kundennähe und kreatives Potenzial stehen der großen Menge völlig unkontrollierter Meta-Informationen gegenüber, deren inhaltliche Qualität und Aussagekraft noch unklar ist. Bisherige Forschungsbemühungen konzentrieren sich hauptsächlich auf die automatische Hierarchisierung bzw. Relationierung der Tag-Daten (etwa mittels Ähnlichkeitsalgorithmen) oder auf die Analyse des (Miss-)Erfolgs, den die NutzerInnen bei einer Suchanfrage subjektiv erfahren. Aus der Sicht stark strukturierter Wissensorganisation, wie sie Experten z. B. durch die Anwendung von Klassifikationen realisieren, handelt es sich bei den zunächst unvermittelt nebeneinander stehenden Tags allerdings kurz gesagt um Chaos. Dass in diesem Chaos aber auch Struktur und wertvolles Wissen als Gemeinschaftsprodukt erzeugt werden kann, ist eine der zentralen Thesen dieses Artikels.
  2. Yi, K.: Harnessing collective intelligence in social tagging using Delicious (2012) 0.01
    0.010785515 = product of:
      0.02157103 = sum of:
        0.008828139 = product of:
          0.026484415 = sum of:
            0.026484415 = weight(_text_:k in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026484415 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.012742892 = product of:
          0.025485784 = sum of:
            0.025485784 = weight(_text_:22 in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025485784 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    25.12.2012 15:22:37
  3. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.00
    0.0038228673 = product of:
      0.015291469 = sum of:
        0.015291469 = product of:
          0.030582938 = sum of:
            0.030582938 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030582938 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  4. Choi, Y.; Syn, S.Y.: Characteristics of tagging behavior in digitized humanities online collections (2016) 0.00
    0.003185723 = product of:
      0.012742892 = sum of:
        0.012742892 = product of:
          0.025485784 = sum of:
            0.025485784 = weight(_text_:22 in 2891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025485784 = score(doc=2891,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2891, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    21. 4.2016 11:23:22
  5. Qin, C.; Liu, Y.; Mou, J.; Chen, J.: User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community (2019) 0.00
    0.003185723 = product of:
      0.012742892 = sum of:
        0.012742892 = product of:
          0.025485784 = sum of:
            0.025485784 = weight(_text_:22 in 5492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025485784 = score(doc=5492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13174312 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5492)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  6. Golub, K.; Lykke, M.; Tudhope, D.: Enhancing social tagging with automated keywords from the Dewey Decimal Classification (2014) 0.00
    0.0022070347 = product of:
      0.008828139 = sum of:
        0.008828139 = product of:
          0.026484415 = sum of:
            0.026484415 = weight(_text_:k in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026484415 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  7. Yi, K.: ¬A semantic similarity approach to predicting Library of Congress subject headings for social tags (2010) 0.00
    0.0022070347 = product of:
      0.008828139 = sum of:
        0.008828139 = product of:
          0.026484415 = sum of:
            0.026484415 = weight(_text_:k in 3707) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026484415 = score(doc=3707,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3707, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3707)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  8. Matthews, B.; Jones, C.; Puzon, B.; Moon, J.; Tudhope, D.; Golub, K.; Nielsen, M.L.: ¬An evaluation of enhancing social tagging with a knowledge organization system (2010) 0.00
    0.0022070347 = product of:
      0.008828139 = sum of:
        0.008828139 = product of:
          0.026484415 = sum of:
            0.026484415 = weight(_text_:k in 4171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026484415 = score(doc=4171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4171)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  9. Sun, A.; Bhowmick, S.S.; Nguyen, K.T.N.; Bai, G.: Tag-based social image retrieval : an empirical evaluation (2011) 0.00
    0.0022070347 = product of:
      0.008828139 = sum of:
        0.008828139 = product of:
          0.026484415 = sum of:
            0.026484415 = weight(_text_:k in 4938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026484415 = score(doc=4938,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4938, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4938)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Tags associated with social images are valuable information source for superior image search and retrieval experiences. Although various heuristics are valuable to boost tag-based search for images, there is a lack of general framework to study the impact of these heuristics. Specifically, the task of ranking images matching a given tag query based on their associated tags in descending order of relevance has not been well studied. In this article, we take the first step to propose a generic, flexible, and extensible framework for this task and exploit it for a systematic and comprehensive empirical evaluation of various methods for ranking images. To this end, we identified five orthogonal dimensions to quantify the matching score between a tagged image and a tag query. These five dimensions are: (i) tag relatedness to measure the degree of effectiveness of a tag describing the tagged image; (ii) tag discrimination to quantify the degree of discrimination of a tag with respect to the entire tagged image collection; (iii) tag length normalization analogous to document length normalization in web search; (iv) tag-query matching model for the matching score computation between an image tag and a query tag; and (v) query model for tag query rewriting. For each dimension, we identify a few implementations and evaluate their impact on NUS-WIDE dataset, the largest human-annotated dataset consisting of more than 269K tagged images from Flickr. We evaluated 81 single-tag queries and 443 multi-tag queries over 288 search methods and systematically compare their performances using standard metrics including Precision at top-K, Mean Average Precision (MAP), Recall, and Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG).
  10. Yoon, K.: Conceptual syntagmatic associations in user tagging (2012) 0.00
    0.0022070347 = product of:
      0.008828139 = sum of:
        0.008828139 = product of:
          0.026484415 = sum of:
            0.026484415 = weight(_text_:k in 240) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026484415 = score(doc=240,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 240, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=240)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  11. Knautz, K.; Stock, W.G.: Collective indexing of emotions in videos (2011) 0.00
    0.0022070347 = product of:
      0.008828139 = sum of:
        0.008828139 = product of:
          0.026484415 = sum of:
            0.026484415 = weight(_text_:k in 295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026484415 = score(doc=295,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 295, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=295)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  12. Weiand, K.; Hartl, A.; Hausmann, S.; Furche, T.; Bry, F.: Keyword-based search over semantic data (2012) 0.00
    0.0022070347 = product of:
      0.008828139 = sum of:
        0.008828139 = product of:
          0.026484415 = sum of:
            0.026484415 = weight(_text_:k in 432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026484415 = score(doc=432,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13429943 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037621226 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 432, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=432)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)