Search (3074 results, page 1 of 154)

  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.30
    0.3022664 = product of:
      0.37783298 = sum of:
        0.053007193 = product of:
          0.15902157 = sum of:
            0.15902157 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15902157 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033374272 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15902157 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15902157 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.15902157 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15902157 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.0067826295 = product of:
          0.027130518 = sum of:
            0.027130518 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027130518 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116871014 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033374272 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.8 = coord(4/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  2. Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents 0.30
    0.30167288 = product of:
      0.5027881 = sum of:
        0.053007193 = product of:
          0.15902157 = sum of:
            0.15902157 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15902157 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033374272 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22489046 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22489046 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
        0.22489046 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22489046 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
  3. Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019) 0.30
    0.30167288 = product of:
      0.5027881 = sum of:
        0.053007193 = product of:
          0.15902157 = sum of:
            0.15902157 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15902157 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033374272 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22489046 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22489046 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
        0.22489046 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22489046 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Footnote
    https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
  4. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.30
    0.2968403 = product of:
      0.4947338 = sum of:
        0.07067626 = product of:
          0.21202877 = sum of:
            0.21202877 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21202877 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033374272 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21202877 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21202877 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
        0.21202877 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21202877 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  5. Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978) 0.30
    0.2968403 = product of:
      0.4947338 = sum of:
        0.07067626 = product of:
          0.21202877 = sum of:
            0.21202877 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21202877 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033374272 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.21202877 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21202877 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
        0.21202877 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21202877 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
  6. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.26
    0.25973526 = product of:
      0.43289208 = sum of:
        0.061841726 = product of:
          0.18552518 = sum of:
            0.18552518 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18552518 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033374272 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.18552518 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18552518 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.18552518 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18552518 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  7. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.22
    0.22263022 = product of:
      0.37105036 = sum of:
        0.053007193 = product of:
          0.15902157 = sum of:
            0.15902157 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15902157 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033374272 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15902157 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15902157 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.15902157 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15902157 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  8. Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019) 0.22
    0.22263022 = product of:
      0.37105036 = sum of:
        0.053007193 = product of:
          0.15902157 = sum of:
            0.15902157 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15902157 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033374272 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15902157 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15902157 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
        0.15902157 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15902157 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
  9. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.22
    0.22263022 = product of:
      0.37105036 = sum of:
        0.053007193 = product of:
          0.15902157 = sum of:
            0.15902157 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.15902157 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033374272 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.15902157 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15902157 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
        0.15902157 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15902157 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  10. Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007) 0.21
    0.20989776 = product of:
      0.5247444 = sum of:
        0.2623722 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2623722 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
        0.2623722 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2623722 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Footnote
    DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
  11. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.19
    0.18552518 = product of:
      0.30920863 = sum of:
        0.04417266 = product of:
          0.13251798 = sum of:
            0.13251798 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13251798 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033374272 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.13251798 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13251798 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.13251798 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13251798 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  12. Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981) 0.19
    0.18552518 = product of:
      0.30920863 = sum of:
        0.04417266 = product of:
          0.13251798 = sum of:
            0.13251798 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13251798 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033374272 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.13251798 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13251798 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
        0.13251798 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13251798 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
    
    Source
    http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
  13. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.17
    0.16962302 = product of:
      0.42405754 = sum of:
        0.21202877 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21202877 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.21202877 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.21202877 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28294745 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  14. Jovanovic, M.: ¬Eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie (2012) 0.11
    0.113530256 = product of:
      0.28382564 = sum of:
        0.277043 = weight(_text_:bibliometrie in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.277043 = score(doc=326,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.26408052 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            1.0490854 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
        0.0067826295 = product of:
          0.027130518 = sum of:
            0.027130518 = weight(_text_:22 in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027130518 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.116871014 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.033374272 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
          0.25 = coord(1/4)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    In der Bibliometrie werden meist zwei Größen vermessen: die Anzahl von Publikationen und Zitationen. Publiziert und zitiert haben Menschen bereits sehr früh in der Geschichte. Schon in der Antike sind bei überlieferten Werken Zitationen zu finden. Der englische Begriff "Bibliometrics" selbst wurde aber erst 1969 definiert. In dem folgenden Artikel wird eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie, einer Unterdisziplin der Informationswissenschaft, bis zu diesem wichtigen Jahr anhand von beispielhaften Studien und Arbeiten dargestellt. Es wird auf die Anfänge von Publikationen und Zitationen und den fachlichen Rahmen der Bibliometrie eingegangen. Der Ursprung der Bibliometriegeschichte selbst wird von unterschiedlichen Autoren unterschiedlich früh angesetzt. Die verschiedenen Ansätze werden vorgestellt und diskutiert. Der Artikel schließt mit einer Beschreibung der wachsenden Bedeutung dieses Fachs im heutigen Informationszeitalter.
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:23:32
  15. Glänzel, W.; Debackere, K.: Messen von Wissenschaftlicher Kommunikation und Forschungsleistung : Möglichkeiten und Beschränkungen bibliometrischer Methoden (2005) 0.07
    0.06659286 = product of:
      0.33296427 = sum of:
        0.33296427 = weight(_text_:bibliometrie in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.33296427 = score(doc=3770,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.26408052 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            1.2608438 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In den letzten drei Jahrzehnten hat sich die Bibliometrie (auch Szientometrie genannt) zu einem komplexen Forschungs- und Dienstleistungsgebiet entwickelt. Ergebnisse bibliometrischer Studien haben längst Eingang gefunden in Wissenschaftspolitik und Forschungsmanagement. Allerdings haben sich betreffend der Aufgabe und Funktion der Bibliometrie auch hartnäckig Vorurteile und Mißverständnisse gehalten. Zu diesen gehören Meinungen wie z. B., daß methodische Forschung auf diesem Gebiet unnötig sei und daß Bibliometriker ihre Aktivitäten besser auf den praxisorientierte Einsatz und auf die Erarbeitung leicht verständlicher Guidelines für den Umgang mit ihren Indikatoren konzentrieren sollten. Trotz derverbreiteten Auffassung, daß Bibliometrie lediglich ein Hilfsmittel im Dienste der Wissenschaftspolitik sei, haben Bibliometriker durch ihre Forschung gezeigt, daß sich ihre Disziplin zu einem vielseitigem interdisziplinären Fachgebiet mit eigenen Teilbereichen entwickelt hat: Die strukturelle Szientometrie beschäftigt sich mit der epistemologischen Struktur der Wissenschaft, die dynamische Szientometrie brachte z. B. Modelle des Wachstums der Wissenschaft, der Alterung von Information und der Zitationsprozesse hervor; die evaluative Szientometrie entwickelte schließlich Indikatoren zum Messen und zur Evaluation von Forschungsleistung. Obwohl sich im letztgenannten Bereich ein Anwendungsschwerpunkt herauskristallisiert hat, sollte hierbei noch ein letztes Mißverständins ausgeräumt werden: Bibliometrie kann zwar zur Entwicklung von Methoden für die Forschungsevaluation genutzt werden; es kann aber nicht Aufgabe der Bibliometrie sein, Forschungsergebnisse zu beurteilen. Darüber hinaus hat Bibliometrie auch nicht zum Ziel, qualitative Methoden durch quantitative Verfahren, also im besonderen peer reviews oder Gutachten von Experten durch indikatorbasierte Evaluationen zu ersetzen; qualitative Methoden und Bibliometrie sollten einander stets ergänzen. Im folgenden wollen wir zunächst kurz die Struktur der gegenwärtigen bibliometrischen Forschung abreißen und dann die Möglichkeiten und Beschränkungen bibliometrischer Methoden diskutieren.
    Content
    "Struktur der Bibliometrie: Bibliometrie hat drei große Zielgruppen, die direkt oder indirekt das Profil der gegenwärtigen bibliometrischen Forschung mitbestimmen. 1. Bibliometrie für Bibliometriker (Methodik) Das ist die Domäne der bibliometrischen "Grundlagenforschung". Die methodische Forschung erfolgt zumeist in diesem Bereich. 2. Bibliometrie für Wissenschaftsgebiete (Wissenschaftsinformation) Dieser Bereich wird durch eine große aber sehr heterogene Interessengruppe repräsentiert. Infolge der primären Orientierung der Fachwissenschaftler sind deren Interessen stark auf ihr eigenes Gebiet ausgerichtet. Dieser Bereich läßt sich vielleicht am ehesten als Erweiterung der Wissenschaftsinformation mit metrischen Mitteln beschreiben. Hier finden wir auch das Grenzgebiet zu quantitativen Aspekten des Information Retrievals. 3. Bibliometrie für Wissenschaftspolitik (Wissenschaftspolitik) Dieser Bereich ist gegenwärtig der wichtigste in der Bibliometrie. Hier stehen nationale, regionale und institutionelle Strukturen in der Wissenschaft und die vergleichende Untersuchung und die Evaluation der Forschungsleistung auf diesen Aggregationsebenen im Vordergrund."
  16. Tunger, D.: Bibliometrie als Teil eines Trenderkennugns-Systems in der Naturwissenschaft (2009) 0.06
    0.064643376 = product of:
      0.32321686 = sum of:
        0.32321686 = weight(_text_:bibliometrie in 2770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.32321686 = score(doc=2770,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.26408052 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            1.223933 = fieldWeight in 2770, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2770)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Die Anzahl wissenschaftlicher Publikationen in Zeitschriften, die Anzahl von Zitaten in diesen Zeitschriftenartikeln und die Anzahl angemeldeter Patente steigen ständig und scheinbar unaufhaltsam. Der Einsatz von Bibliometrie eröffnet die Möglichkeit, diese Kommunikation in der Wissenschaft transparenter zu machen: So können mit Hilfe von Bibliometrie die Entwicklung von Themen nachvollzogen, die Wahrnehmung von Einrichtungen bestimmt und mögliche Kooperationspartner identifiziert werden. Der Beitrag illustriert, wie es mit Hilfe von quantitativen bibliometrischen Methoden möglich ist, einen objektiven Eindruck wissenschaftlicher Entwicklung zu gewinnen. Er befasst sich dabei mit der Frage, wie Bibliometrie im Kontext von Trendbeobachtung und Trenderkennung in der Naturwissenschaft eingesetzt werden kann und welcher Nutzen sich hieraus ergibt.
  17. Gerdel, W.: Datentechnische Methoden in der Referenzanalyse (1980) 0.06
    0.055408604 = product of:
      0.277043 = sum of:
        0.277043 = weight(_text_:bibliometrie in 7571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.277043 = score(doc=7571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26408052 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            1.0490854 = fieldWeight in 7571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=7571)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  18. Nacke, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne (1980) 0.06
    0.055408604 = product of:
      0.277043 = sum of:
        0.277043 = weight(_text_:bibliometrie in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.277043 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26408052 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            1.0490854 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  19. Nacke, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse (1980) 0.06
    0.055408604 = product of:
      0.277043 = sum of:
        0.277043 = weight(_text_:bibliometrie in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.277043 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26408052 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            1.0490854 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  20. Eisenhardt, O.H.: Ergebnisse der Referenzanalyse (1980) 0.06
    0.055408604 = product of:
      0.277043 = sum of:
        0.277043 = weight(_text_:bibliometrie in 401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.277043 = score(doc=401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.26408052 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
              0.033374272 = queryNorm
            1.0490854 = fieldWeight in 401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.912698 = idf(docFreq=43, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=401)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel

Languages

Types

  • el 72
  • b 34
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes